Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 508
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Clin Oral Investig ; 28(5): 271, 2024 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38658431

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study evaluated the effect of different colouring solutions and primer systems used in the bonding of brackets on enamel colour change and bond strength. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 120 premolar teeth were divided into four main groups; brackets were bonded with 37% orthophosphoric acid + Transbond XT Primer in Group 1, 3 M Single Bond Universal in Group 2, Transbond Plus SEP in Group 3, and G-Premio Bond in Group 4. Each group was divided into three subgroups, and the teeth were placed in a cup containing coffee and tea mixture, in a cup containing cola and in distilled water. A bond strength test was applied to all teeth. Colour measurements of all teeth were performed at 2 different times: before bonding and after the bond strength test. RESULTS: The average bond strength of the 37% orthophosphoric acid group was higher than that of the other groups. The effect of primer and solution groups on colour change was statistically significant (p = 0.001 and p = 0.023, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the bond strength was clinically sufficient in all primer groups. The highest colour change was observed when the tea-coffee solution and Transbond Plus SEP primer were used. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study has identified enamel discoloration and bond strength from different colouring solutions and primer systems used for bonding braces, which can be used to inform clinicians and patients to achieve better treatment results.


Subject(s)
Bicuspid , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate , Dental Bonding , Orthodontic Brackets , Resin Cements , Shear Strength , Humans , Dental Bonding/methods , In Vitro Techniques , Resin Cements/chemistry , Color , Coloring Agents , Materials Testing , Dental Enamel/chemistry , Dental Stress Analysis , Phosphoric Acids/chemistry , Surface Properties , Tea/chemistry , Acid Etching, Dental
2.
J Esthet Restor Dent ; 36(5): 770-777, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38014602

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the effect of bromelain and propolis extract on the bond strength (BS) of a universal adhesive system to eroded dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty human molars with exposed dentin were halved, with one half protected by composite resin and the other subjected to erosive treatment followed by remineralization. After the erosive treatment, the composite resin was removed, and the teeth were randomly assigned to three groups (n = 20): Adhesive-Control System; Br-10%; Pr-16%. Following the treatments, composite resin blocks were built on the dentin surfaces and sticks of 0.9 mm2 were obtained and stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 h and 6 months. After these periods, the sticks underwent bond strength testing and the data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA, Bonferroni test, p < 0.05. Fracture patterns were observed using light microscope and scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: Irrespective of the substrate and aging duration, propolis demonstrated higher BS (p < 0.05) compared to the other treatments. Eroded dentin exhibited greater removal of the smear layer and dentinal tubules with a larger diameter than sound dentin, especially when treated with bromelain, resulting in the formation of resin tags. CONCLUSIONS: Propolis consistently promoted the highest bond strength, irrespective of aging or substrate. Eroded dentin treated with propolis, or bromelain exhibited a higher prevalence of non-adhesive fractures and resin tag formation. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Propolis shows promise for enhancing the longevity of adhesive restorations in eroded dentin due to its ability to promote high bond strength.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Propolis , Humans , Bromelains , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Propolis/pharmacology , Dentin , Composite Resins/chemistry , Tensile Strength , Materials Testing
3.
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg ; 42(2): 125-139, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38011333

ABSTRACT

Objective: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the adhesive bond strength of restorative materials to caries-affected dentin (CAD) treated with antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) in comparison with conventional chemical disinfectants. Methods: Three databases, including the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed, were searched to address the focused question: "What is the effect of aPDT compared to conventional chemical disinfection techniques on the adhesive bond strength of restorative materials to CAD?." Search keywords included "dentin*" "adhes bond*" "caries-affected dentin" "photodynamic "photochemotherapy" "photosensitizing agent" "phototherapy" "photoradiation" "laser" "light activated" "photoactivated." A fixed-effects model was used in each meta-analysis and the inverse variance was used to calculate the standard mean difference (SMD). For evaluating the statistical heterogeneity, the Cochrane's Q test and the I2 statistics were used. The risk of bias was evaluated based on the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. Results: Fourteen studies were included in the qualitative as well as quantitative analysis. The results of the meta-analyses exhibited an SMD of 2.38% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.03-2.73; p < 0.00001], indicating a statistically significant difference in the shear bond strength scores between the tested group (samples treated with aPDT) and the control group (i.e., favoring the sound dentin and/or conventional chemical disinfectants). Contrarily, an SMD of -1.46% (95% CI: -2.04 to -0.88; p < 0.00001) and -0.37% (95% CI: -0.70 to -0.03; p = 0.03) was observed, indicating a statistically significant difference in the microtensile bond strength (µTBS), as well as microleakage scores between the tested group (favoring the samples treated with aPDT) and the control group (i.e., sound dentin and/or conventional chemical disinfectants). Conclusions: Adhesive bond strength of restorative materials to CAD treated with conventional chemical disinfectants showed superior outcomes compared to photodynamic therapy (aPDT).


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Disinfectants , Photochemotherapy , Dental Caries Susceptibility , Dentin , Resin Cements/chemistry , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology
4.
Int Orthod ; 22(1): 100822, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37992472

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to translucent dental zirconia samples which are anatomically accurate and treated with various surface treatments. METHODS: This in vitro study included 156 samples from 3 brands of high-translucent zirconia split into a control group and 4 surface treatment groups: 9.6% hydrofluoric acid etching, 50-micron aluminium oxide particle air abrasion, and 30-micron tribochemical silica coating (TBS) particle air abrasion with and without silane application. After surface treatment, all groups were primed with a 10-MDP primer and bonded to metal orthodontic brackets. Shear bond strength (SBS) was tested and results were compared between all groups. Data analysis consisted of a balanced two-factor factorial ANOVA, a Shapiro-Wilks test, and a non-parametric permutation test. The significance level was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Among all surface treatments, aluminium oxide particle abrasion produced significantly higher SBS (P≤0.002). Lava™ Plus zirconia samples had significantly higher SBS than Cercon® samples (P<0.0001). TBS surface treatment produced significantly higher SBS on Lava™ Plus samples than it did on the other zirconia brands (P=0.032). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that mechanical abrasion using aluminium oxide in combination with a 10-MDP primer creates a higher SBS to high-translucent zirconia than the bond created by tribochemical silica coating. Also, there was no significant difference in ARI regardless of zirconia brand or surface preparation.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Methacrylates , Orthodontic Brackets , Zirconium , Humans , Resin Cements/chemistry , Air Abrasion, Dental , Surface Properties , Shear Strength , Silicon Dioxide/chemistry , Aluminum Oxide/chemistry , Materials Testing , Dental Stress Analysis
5.
J Esthet Restor Dent ; 36(5): 746-760, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38130045

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to assess the influence of air abrasion with aluminum oxide and bioactive glass on dentin bond strength. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic search was conducted in three databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase), on March 3rd, 2023, with previously identified MeSH Terms. A total of 1023 records were screened. Exclusion criteria include primary teeth, air abrasion of a substrate other than sound dentin, use of particles apart from aluminum oxide or bioactive glass, and studies in which bond strength was not assessed. RESULTS: Out of the 1023 records, title and abstract screening resulted in the exclusion of 895 and 67 studies, respectively, while full-text analysis excluded another 25 articles. In addition, 5 records were not included, as full texts could not be obtained after requesting the authors. Two cross-references were added. Thus, 33 studies were included in this review. It is important to emphasize the absence of standardization of air abrasion parameters. According to 63.6% of the studies, air abrasion does not influence dentin bond strength. Moreover, 30.3% suggest improving bonding performance, and 6.1% advocate a decrease. CONCLUSIONS: Air abrasion with aluminum oxide does not enhance or impair dentin bond strength. The available data on bioactive glass are limited, which hinders conclusive insights. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Dentin air abrasion is a widely applied technique nowadays, with numerous clinical applications. Despite the widespread adoption of this procedure, its potential impact on bonding performance requires a thorough analysis of the existing literature.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins , Dental Bonding , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Bonding/methods , Air Abrasion, Dental/methods , Materials Testing , Surface Properties , Aluminum Oxide/chemistry , Dentin , Resin Cements/chemistry
6.
Clin Oral Investig ; 27(12): 7833-7840, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37989965

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of glass-ceramic coated zirconia versus alumina air-abraded zirconia on the shear bond strength (SBS) of resin cement and investigate the residual stresses present on both mechanically pre-treated surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 180 zirconia disks, with diameters of 10 mm and 5 mm, were divided into two groups: DCMhotbond glass-ceramic coated, followed by hydrofluoric acid etching (DCM), and alumina air-abraded (AB). All mechanically pre-treated disks were conditioned with G-Multi Primer and bonded using G-Cem Linkforce Cement. Ninety specimens were immersed in distilled water for 24 h and subsequently allocated into three groups based on aging conditions (n = 15/subgroups): immediate testing, 5000 thermal cycles, and 10,000 thermal cycles. Then, the shear bond strength was assessed, and the obtained data were subjected to analysis using a two-way ANOVA, followed by a one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD post hoc test (α = 0.05). The residual stresses present on both mechanically pre-treated surfaces were examined using X-ray diffraction analysis. RESULTS: The mean SBS values of the DCM and AB groups showed no significant difference under each aging condition. The SBS of DCM groups was not affected by thermal cycles, whereas the SBS of AB groups exhibited a significant decrease following thermal cycles. Glass-ceramic coated surfaces exhibited higher compressive stresses than alumina air-abrasion. CONCLUSIONS: The DCMhotbond glass-ceramic coated zirconia showed comparable bond strength to the alumina air-abrasion technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The DCMhotbond glass-ceramic coating technique is a promising alternative for zirconia surface pre-treatment. However, further investigations are needed before suggesting its clinical use.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Aluminum Oxide/chemistry , Surface Properties , Ceramics/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Zirconium/chemistry , Shear Strength , Materials Testing , Dental Stress Analysis
7.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater ; 148: 106169, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37837872

ABSTRACT

When partial and/or non-retentive preparation, such as those for occlusal veneers, is indicated, a proper and stable adhesion is essential. Therefore, the aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of loss of adhesion in different regions of the bonding interface on the fatigue behavior of simplified lithium disilicate restorations. For this, lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD) discs (1 mm thick and Ø = 10 mm) were fabricated, polished with #400-, #600-, #1200-grit silicon carbide (SiC) papers, and crystallized. As substrate, fiber-reinforced resin epoxy discs (2.5 mm thick and Ø = 10 mm) were fabricated and polished with #600-grit SiC paper. The ceramic bonding surface was treated with 5% hydrofluoric acid and a silane-containing primer (Monobond N), while the substrate was etched with 10% hydrofluoric acid followed by the application of the bonding system primers (Primer A + B). A lacquer (nail polish) was used to simulate the loss of adhesion in specific areas according to the study design to compose the testing groups: bonded (control; did not received nail polish application); - non-bonded (loss of adhesion in the whole specimen area); - margin (loss of adhesion in the ceramic margin); - center (loss of adhesion in the ceramic central area). The adhesive area of partially bonded groups was 50% of the adhesive surface. Then, the discs (n = 12) were bonded to the respective substrate using a resin cement (Multilink N), light-cured, water-stored for 90 days, and subjected to thermocycling (25,000 cycles, 5° to 55 °C) before testing. A cyclic fatigue test was run (20 Hz, initial load of 200 N for 5000 cycles, 50 N step size for 10,000 cycles each until specimen failure), and the fatigue failure load and number of cycles for failure were recorded. As complementary analysis, finite element analysis (FEA) and scanning electron microscopy analysis were performed. Kaplan-Meier log-rank (Mantel-Cox) was conducted for survival analysis. The results showed that as the loss of adhesion reaches the central area, the worse is the fatigue behavior and the higher is the stress peak concentration in the ceramic bonding surface. The bonded specimens presented better fatigue behavior and stress distribution compared to the others. In conclusion in a non-retentive preparation situation, proper adhesion is a must for the restoration fatigue behavior even after aging; while the loss of adhesion reaches central areas the mechanical functioning is compromised.


Subject(s)
Ceramics , Resin Cements , Ceramics/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Hydrofluoric Acid/chemistry , Surface Properties , Materials Testing , Dental Stress Analysis , Dental Porcelain
8.
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg ; 41(10): 576-582, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37870415

ABSTRACT

Objective: Assessment of post surface conditioners [sulfuric acid (SA), Rose Bengal (RB), and sandblasting (SB)] and different luting cements [methyl methacrylate (MMA)-based cement and composite-based cement] on pushout bond strength (PBS) of poly-ether ether-ketone (PEEK) post bonded to canal dentin. Materials and methods: Endodontic treatment was performed on 120 single-rooted human premolar teeth. The preparation of the post space was performed and 4 mm of gutta-percha was retained in the apical region of the root. One hundred and twenty PEEK posts were fabricated from a PEEK blank utilizing a Computer aided design-Computer aided manufacture (CAD-CAM) system. The PEEK posts were allocated randomly into four groups based on post surface conditioning (n = 30). Group A: SA, Group B: RB, Group C: SB, and Group D: No conditioning (NC). Each group was further divided into two subgroups based on the luting cement used for bonding (n = 15). Group A1, B1, C1, and D1 specimens were cemented using composite-based resin cement. However, Group A2, B2, C2, and D2 posts were luted with MMA-based resin cement. PBS assessment using a universal testing machine was performed. Failure modes were analyzed under a stereomicroscope. The data relating to the effects of surface treatment and luting types of cement were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post hoc test (p = 0.05). Results: Coronal section of Group B2: RB+Super-Bond C&B [9.61 ± 0.75 megapascals (MPa)] displayed the highest bond scores of PEEK after root dentin. Whereas it was also discovered that Group D1: NC+Panavia®V5 (2.05 ± 0.72 MPa) presented the lowest PBS scores. Intergroup comparison analysis revealed that Group A2: SA+Super-Bond C&B and Group B2: RB+Super-Bond C&B displayed no significant difference in their bond scores. Conclusions: RB and SA possess the potential to be used as a PEEK post conditioner. MMA-based cement displayed better performance than composite-based cement.


Subject(s)
Photochemotherapy , Resin Cements , Humans , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dentin , Ether , Ketones , Methacrylates/chemistry , Methylmethacrylate , Resin Cements/chemistry , Rose Bengal
9.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent ; (7): s65-s77, 2023 10 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37879051

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of airborne-particle abrasion and nanosilica (nano-Si) infiltration treatment on the surface characteristics of dental zirconia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 15 unsintered zirconia ceramic green bodies (10 × 10 × 3 mm) were divided into three groups (n = 5): Group C, no treatment after sintering; Group S, airborne-particle abrasion with 50-µm aluminum oxide particles after sintering; and Group N, infiltration of nano-Si followed by sintering and hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching. The zirconia disks' surface roughness was analyzed by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The surface morphology of the specimens was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the chemical composition was analyzed by energy-dispersive x-ray (EDX). Data were statistically analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test (P < .05). RESULTS: Zirconia surface treatments by infiltration of nano-Si, sintering, and HF etching showed multiple changes in the surface features. The surface roughness of Groups C, S, and N were 0.88 ± 0.07 µm, 1.26 ± 0.10 µm, and 1.69 ± 0.15 µm, respectively. The surface roughness of Group N was significantly higher than that of Groups C and S (P < .05). EDX analysis showed peaks that corresponded to silica (Si) after infiltration with colloidal Si that disappeared following acid etching. CONCLUSIONS: Infiltrating nano-Si increases the surface roughness of zirconia. The formation of retentive nanopores on the surface potentially improves the zirconia-resin cement bonding strengths.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Humans , Surface Properties , Ceramics/chemistry , Zirconium/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Aluminum Oxide/chemistry , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Dental Etching
10.
Int J Mol Sci ; 24(14)2023 Jul 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37511327

ABSTRACT

The dental prophylactic cleaning of a damaged resin-based composite (RBC) restoration with sodium bicarbonate can change the surface characteristics and influence the repair bond strength. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of sodium bicarbonate (SB) and aluminum oxide (AO) surface treatments on the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of repaired, aged RBC. Bar specimens were prepared from microhybrid RBC and aged in deionized water for 8 weeks. Different surface treatments (AO air-abrasion; SB air-polishing), as well as cleaning (phosphoric acid, PA; ethylene-diamine-tetraacetic-acid, EDTA) and adhesive applications (single bottle etch-and-rinse, ER; universal adhesive, UA), were used prior to the application of the repair RBC. Not aged and aged but not surface treated RBCs were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. The repaired blocks were cut into sticks using a precision grinding machine. The specimens were tested for tensile fracture and the µTBS values were calculated. Surface characteristics were assessed using scanning electron microscopy. AO-PA-UA (62.6 MPa) showed a 20% increase in µTBS compared to the NC (50.2 MPa), which proved to be the most significant. This was followed by SB-EDTA-UA (58.9 MPa) with an increase of 15%. In addition to AO-PA-UA, SB-EDTA-UA could also be a viable alternative in the RBC repair protocol.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins , Dental Bonding , Composite Resins/chemistry , Aluminum Oxide/chemistry , Sodium Bicarbonate , Edetic Acid , Surface Properties , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Dental Materials , Tensile Strength , Materials Testing , Resin Cements/chemistry
11.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther ; 43: 103670, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37356697

ABSTRACT

AIM: The effect of novel final disinfection protocols Malachite green (MG), Fotoenticine® (FTC), Green tea extract (GTE), and Ozonated water (OW) on the bond strength of prefabricated glass fiber posts (PGFP) adhered to canal dentin. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The canals of fifty premolars with closed apices were cleansed and obturated. The specimens were randomly assigned to one of five groups based on the final irrigant used, with the control group receiving NaOCl+EDTA and the experimental groups receiving MG, FTC, OW, and GTE. The GFP was cemented with a self-etching, dual-cure paste; the bond strength was estimated with a universal testing machine; and failure analysis was conducted with a stereomicroscope. RESULTS: The highest PBS was observed in the coronal third of Group 4 (using ozonated water as the final irrigant), whereas the lowest bond integrity was observed in the apical section of Group 2 (1.02-0.54 MPa) using Malachite green as the final irrigant. Group 1, Group 4, and Group 5 exhibited no significant difference in the bond integrity of GFP to dentin when compared to Group 2 (p>0.05). In addition, comparable bond score values were obtained for Groups 2 and 3 (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that OW and GTE may be effective final disinfectants for root canals, as they increase the bond strength of resin-luting cement.


Subject(s)
Ozone , Photochemotherapy , Post and Core Technique , Ozone/pharmacology , Tea , Dentin , Materials Testing , Photochemotherapy/methods , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacology , Rosaniline Dyes/pharmacology , Resin Cements/chemistry , Water , Dental Pulp Cavity
12.
J Orofac Orthop ; 84(Suppl 3): 259-265, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36867217

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This in vitro study was conducted to compare the discoloration of a flowable self-adhesive composite, a highly filled composite adhesive, and a liquid polish applied highly filled composite adhesive for bonded lingual retainers. METHODS: Thirty composite discs were fabricated and divided into three groups: group 1, flowable self-adhesive (GC Ortho Connect™ Flow [GCO], GC Orthodontics, Tokyo, Japan); group 2, highly filled composite adhesive (Transbond™ LR [TLR], 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA); and group 3, highly filled composite adhesive with liquid polish (TLR and BisCover LV™ [TLRB], BISCO Inc, Schaumburg, IL, USA). L*a*b* values were measured by spectrophotometer prior to (T0) and following (T1) immersion in coffee. T1 - T0 differences were calculated as ∆L*, ∆a*, ∆b*, and ∆E*ab values. The Shapiro-Wilk test was performed to determine whether the data were normally distributed. The values that did not fit the normal distribution were evaluated with the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Dunn's test was used for multiple comparisons. The level of significance was p < 0.05. RESULTS: The difference between the TLR and TLRB groups was statistically significant for ∆E*ab (P = 0.007). ∆E*ab value of TLR group was greater than ∆E*ab value of TLRB group. The differences between the GCO and TLR groups (p = 0.001) and the TLR and TLRB groups (p = 0.010) were statistically significant for ∆a*. ∆a* values of GCO and TLRB groups were greater than ∆a* value of TLR group. The difference between the TLR and TLRB groups was statistically significant (p = 0.003) for ∆b*. ∆b* value of TLR group was greater than ∆b* value of TLRB group. CONCLUSIONS: Using a Transbond LR polished with BisCover LV or only GC Ortho Connect Flow for lingual retainer bonding reduces coffee-induced discoloration.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Resin Cements , Resin Cements/chemistry , Dental Cements/chemistry , Coffee , Composite Resins/chemistry , Materials Testing
13.
J Adhes Dent ; 25(1): 79-86, 2023 Mar 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36939647

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the bonding receptiveness of zirconia treated with nano-silica surface infiltration and the bond strength of composite cement after aging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Zirconia ceramic green bodies (Ceramill zolid, Amann Girbach) with dimensions of 10 x 10 x 4 mm were divided into three groups (n = 4): group C (control: no treatment after sintering), group S (sandblasted: 50-µm alumina airborne particle abrasion after sintering) and group N (nanosintered: infiltrated with nano-silica colloid, sintered, and then etched with hydrofluoric acid). Phase transformations were examined through X-ray diffraction (XRD). Composite resin (Filtek Z250, 3M Oral Care) was bonded to zirconia using the 10-MDP-containing composite cement Panavia F (Kuraray Noritake). The composite-cement/zirconia bond strength was immediately measured using the microtensile bond strength test (µTBS) as well as after three months of artificial aging in water (n = 20 microstick specimens/group). Failure mode patterns were examined using SEM. RESULTS: The specimens of groups C and S, as tested by XRD, exhibited almost full tetragonal phases, while a small extent of tetragonal-monoclinic phase transformation (t→m) was observed for group N. Group N achieved the highest bond strengths (41.5 ± 8.6 MPa), which was significantly higher than that measured for groups C and S (p < 0.05). There was a significant drop in µTBS after 90 days of water storage for groups C and S. SEM revealed a decrease in the percentage of cohesive failure in groups N and S after water storage. CONCLUSIONS: Infiltrating zirconia with nano-silica is a reliable method to establish a strong and stable bond to zirconia. The combination of surface infiltration with nano-silica and application of a phosphate monomer-containing composite cement can significantly improve the composite-cement/zirconia bond strength.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Dental Bonding/methods , Silicon Dioxide/chemistry , Phosphates , Surface Properties , Materials Testing , Dental Cements/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Zirconium/chemistry , Glass Ionomer Cements , Aluminum Oxide/chemistry , Water/chemistry , Dental Stress Analysis
14.
Oper Dent ; 48(1): 59-67, 2023 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36445958

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of particle abrasion medium and pressure on shear bond strength and biaxial flexural strength of three generations of zirconia (Lava Frame, Lava Plus, and Lava Esthetic) with the goal of optimizing the bond to zirconia. METHODS: 280 discs (14 mm diameter; 1 mm thickness) of each zirconia were milled and sintered. Specimens of each material were randomly distributed into 14 groups (n=20); half were tested for shear bond strength and half were tested for biaxial flexural strength. The specimens were particle abraded on one surface by 2 different media (50 µm alumina particles or 50 µm glass beads) for 10 seconds at three different pressures (15, 30, and 45 psi or 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 MPa). Untreated specimens served as positive control. A tube (1.50 mm diameter) filled with dual cured resin cement (Panavia SA) was placed onto the surface and light cured. Specimens were stored in water (37°C for 24 hours) and shear bond strength was measured in a universal testing machine (Instron). Biaxial flexural strength of each specimen was measured according to ISO 6872. Shear bond strength and biaxial flexural strength were compared individually with a 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for factors surface treatment and zirconia composition. RESULTS: Significant differences were seen between surface treatments (p<0.01), zirconia composition (p<0.01) and their interaction (p<0.01) for both bond strength and flexural strength. With alumina particle abrasion, higher pressure produced higher bonds for Lava Frame and Lava Plus zirconia while the bond of Lava Esthetic declined with increased pressure. Higher pressure (>0.2 MPa or 30 psi) with alumina decreased biaxial flexural strength with Lava Esthetic zirconia. CONCLUSIONS: Particle abrasion with alumina produced a significantly better combination of bond strength while maintaining biaxial strength of three zirconia materials than particle abrasion with glass beads. The bond strength also depended upon the pressure of particle abrasion and the generation of zirconia used.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Flexural Strength , Surface Properties , Materials Testing , Zirconium/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Shear Strength , Aluminum Oxide , Dental Stress Analysis
15.
J Prosthet Dent ; 129(5): 725-731, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34420804

ABSTRACT

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The debonding of zirconia cantilevered resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses remains a technical complication because zirconia's chemical inertness impedes adequate surface preparation for bonding. Limited clinical evidence on the performance of various pretreatment methods for the bonding surface of zirconia resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses is available. PURPOSE: The present prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial aimed at evaluating the performance of zirconia resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses prepared with nanostructured alumina coating. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study adopted a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind (patients, operator) design to compare the performance of nanostructured alumina coating with that of conventional airborne-particle abrasion. Twenty-seven healthy patients needing a replacement of a missing maxillary or mandibular central or lateral incisor were screened and rated to be eligible, and 31 zirconia cantilevered resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses were randomly allocated into 1 of 2 groups. The first group (n=15), where the restoration bonding surface was airborne-particle abraded with 50-µm alumina, served as a control group. In the second group (n=16), the restorations were pretreated with nanostructured alumina coating. Treatment and data collection were standardized. The primary outcome evaluated was the survival of the RBFDPs as defined by the restoration not debonding. The Kaplan-Meier analysis of cumulative survival was performed, and nonparametric tests were used to determine patient-specific differences between both study groups (age, sex, restored arch, tooth replaced, bonding surface area) (α=.05). Retainer wing surfaces of debonded resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses were inspected under a scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: Within a mean ±standard deviation observation period of 22.4 ±7.7 months (minimum, 8.3; maximum, 37.9 months), 3 debondings occurred, and the survival rate was 90.3%. The survival rate was 93.8% for the nanostructured alumina coating and 86.7% for the control group, with no statistically significant differences (log-rank, P=.54). No patient-specific differences were found between study groups (P>.05). As per the scanning electron micrographs, the majority of the nanostructured alumina-coated surfaces had large areas of nanostructured alumina residue, whereas the airborne-particle abraded surfaces exhibited predominantly adhesive failure with less cement residue. CONCLUSIONS: Over a mean observation period of 2 years, both zirconia pretreatments showed promising and comparable clinical results; therefore, nanostructured alumina coating could be regarded as a viable alternative pretreatment method to airborne-particle abrasion.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Dental Prosthesis , Humans , Dental Bonding/methods , Aluminum Oxide/chemistry , Prospective Studies , Resin Cements/chemistry , Zirconium/chemistry , Surface Properties
16.
J Esthet Restor Dent ; 35(1): 64-73, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36579757

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To present an update on the concept of cantilevered single-retainer all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) first presented 25 years ago in the Journal of Esthetic Dentistry. OVERVIEW: The initially presented case of the concept was followed clinically over 26 years and is presented along with two additional clinical long-term cases using varying methods to obtain an esthetic and hygienic ovate pontic design. Veneered alumina and zirconia ceramic (3 mol% yttria-tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline ceramic; 3Y-TZP) was used and bonded with a phosphate monomer containing luting resin after 50 µm alumina particle air-abrasion at 0.25 MPa pressure. The restorations replacing incisors did not debond and soft tissues in the pontic area were maintained over 26 years. CONCLUSIONS: Cantilevered single-retainer all-ceramic RBFDPs today made from veneered 3Y-TZP zirconia ceramic can be considered a standard of care for the replacement of single incisors and provide an excellent esthetic outcome with a long-term preservation of soft tissues in the pontic area. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Bonding nonretentive oxides ceramics such as alumina and zirconia ceramic with phosphate monomer containing luting resins after alumina particle air-abrasion is durable over decades. This proves that bonding to zirconia ceramic is not of any problem when adequate methods are used. Single-retainer zirconia ceramic RBFDPs maintain soft tissues in the edentulous area of single missing incisors and often deem implants unessential for this indication.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Resin Cements , Aluminum Oxide/chemistry , Ceramics/chemistry , Denture, Partial, Fixed , Esthetics, Dental , Phosphates/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Zirconium/chemistry
17.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater ; 138: 105551, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36459707

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of using natural cross-linkers as sumac and curcumin on the durability of the resin-dentin bond and stiffness of demineralized dentin matrix. METHODS: Thirty sound molars were divided into 5 groups: Control (CO), Grape Seed extract (GSE), Cacao seed extract (CSE), Sumac extract (SE) and Curcumin extract (CE). The teeth had their coronal dentin exposed, etched, and pre-treated for 1 min with the extracts. Teeth were then bonded using Single-Bond II adhesive and 4 mm composite was built up on dentin surface. Teeth were sectioned into 1 × 1 × 8mm beams and their micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) was tested after 24 h and 6 months of water storage. For stiffness testing, 15 teeth were sectioned to obtain dentin beams (1 × 1 × 6.5 mm), the beams were demineralized in 10% phosphoric acid then rinsed and divided into 5 groups. Beams were then immersed in their respective extract solution for 1 min after which they were subjected to a 3- point loading test using a universal testing machine to calculate their modulus of elasticity. RESULTS: After 24 h, no significant difference in µTBS was shown between all groups. After 6 Months, GSE, CE, and SE showed significantly higher µTBS compared to CO (p ≥ 0.05). For the modulus of elasticity; only GSE showed a significantly higher modulus compared to other groups. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The application of grape seed extract, curcumin and sumac extract as dentin pre-treatments appear to be a promising approach to enhance the durability of the resin-dentin bond in a clinically relevant application time.


Subject(s)
Curcumin , Dental Bonding , Grape Seed Extract , Grape Seed Extract/pharmacology , Curcumin/pharmacology , Curcumin/analysis , Dentin/chemistry , Elasticity , Collagen/analysis , Tensile Strength , Materials Testing , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Composite Resins/chemistry
18.
J Prosthet Dent ; 130(6): 866-876, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35153064

ABSTRACT

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: A novel zirconia-alumina composite (ZAC) particle has yet to be studied for airborne-particle abrasion in a bonding protocol for the zirconia surface. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the shear bond force of resin cement to yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) when using spherical ZAC particles to conduct airborne-particle abrasion and modify the topography of Y-TZP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Spherical 30- to 70-µm ZAC particles were fabricated by using a hybrid gel technique. A total of 160 Ø6.6×4.0-mm zirconia disks were fabricated from 4 commercially available zirconia blanks, e.max ZirCAD zirconia (EM), NexxZr T zirconia (NE), Lava Plus High Translucency zirconia (LP), and Imagine High Translucency Zirconia (IM), by using computer-aided manufacturing technology. As-sintered specimens without further surface treatment were used as controls (ZR0). Surface treatment groups included sharp-edged alumina airborne-particle abrasion (ABC), 50 µm, 0.2 MPa; airborne-particle abrasion with ZAC particle at 0.2 MPa (2ZA); and airborne-particle abrasion with spherical ZAC particle at 0.4 MPa (4ZA). All surface treatment groups were airborne-particle abraded at the specified pressures for 10 seconds at a standardized distance of 10 mm. The surface roughness (Ra) and area roughness (Sa) of specimens from each group were measured. Following the application of an adhesive (Scotchbond Universal), Ø6.6×4.0-mm resin cement (RelyX Ultimate) buttons were fabricated for shear bond testing by using a universal testing machine at a 5-mm/min crosshead speed (n=10). The data were analyzed by using a 2-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD test, and regression analysis (α=0.05). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to observe changes of the zirconia surface and the failure modes of each group before and after shear bond testing. RESULTS: The mean ±standard deviation shear bond force values ranged from 272.6 ±41.4 N to 686.7 ±152.8 N. Statistically significant higher force values than those of the controls (P<.05) were obtained by using airborne-particle abrasion. No significant differences were found among any of the airborne-particle abrasion treatment groups (P>.05). The mean of Ra values ranged from 0.27 µm to 0.74 µm, and the mean of Sa values, from 0.48 µm to 1.48 µm. SEM observation revealed that the zirconia surface was made jagged by abrasion with sharp-edged alumina particles. The spherical ZAC particles create microcraters on the zirconia surface. Fractographic observation disclosed that failures were adhesive-cohesive failure modes with residual resin cement attached on the zirconia surface. CONCLUSIONS: The surface treatment of zirconia with sharp-edged alumina or the spherical ZAC abrasives improved the bonding force between the zirconia and resin cement. No statistically significant differences in shear bond force values were found between airborne-particle abrasion surface treatment groups.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Dental Materials , Dental Materials/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Surface Properties , Ceramics/chemistry , Zirconium/chemistry , Aluminum Oxide/chemistry , Materials Testing , Shear Strength , Dental Stress Analysis
19.
J Prosthet Dent ; 130(1): 124-130, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34863577

ABSTRACT

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) is a high-performance polymer gaining popularity in dentistry for the fabrication of crowns, fixed partial dentures, removable partial denture frameworks, and frameworks for implant-supported fixed complete dentures. Despite a lack of performance data, lithium disilicate crowns have been bonded to retentive elements in PEKK frameworks. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the bond strengths and flexibility of lithium disilicate to PEKK or zirconia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-five PEKK, 15 zirconia, and 60 lithium disilicate beam-shaped specimens (12.5×2×2 mm) were fabricated. The ends of the PEKK beams were subjected to 3 different surface treatments before the application and light polymerization of a primer: 50-µm aluminum oxide airborne-particle abrasion, nonthermal air plasma, and argon-oxygen plasma. The zirconia specimen bonding surfaces were prepared with 50-µm aluminum oxide airborne-particle abrasion and the application of primer. Lithium disilicate specimens were etched with 4.5% hydrofluoric acid, and primer was applied. The lithium disilicate specimens were luted with an adhesive resin cement to the PEKK and zirconia specimens by using light-activated and chemically activated polymerization. Fifteen monolithic specimens of PEKK, lithium disilicate, and zirconia (25×2×2 mm) were also fabricated. All specimens were incubated overnight in 100% humidity before testing. Bonded and monolithic specimens were loaded in a universal testing machine, and 4-point bend tests were conducted until failure (n=15). The flexural modulus and strength were calculated and statistically analyzed with 1-way analysis of variance and Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc tests (α=.05). RESULTS: All bonded specimens failed at the adhesive interface. The zirconia-lithium disilicate bond strength was approximately twice that of the strongest group of PEKK (airborne-particle abrasion group) bonded to lithium disilicate (42 ±12 MPa and 24 ±13 MPa, respectively) and was approximately 9 times more rigid (71 ±19 GPa and 8 ±2 GPa, respectively). Monolithic PEKK fractured at 238 ±22 MPa, monolithic zirconia at 771 ±128 MPa, and monolithic lithium disilicate at 173 ±26 MPa. Monolithic PEKK was approximately 30 times more flexible than monolithic zirconia (6 ±1 GPa and 178 ±16 GPa, respectively). All values were statistically significantly different (P<.05), except for the bond strength between lithium disilicate and PEKK treated with airborne-particle abrasion and nonthermal air plasma and the flexural moduli of PEKK to lithium disilicate. CONCLUSIONS: Bond strength between PEKK and lithium disilicate was significantly weaker than that between zirconia and lithium disilicate. Monolithic PEKK was significantly more flexible than monolithic zirconia.


Subject(s)
Ceramics , Dental Bonding , Humans , Ceramics/chemistry , Materials Testing , Dental Porcelain/chemistry , Zirconium/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Aluminum Oxide/chemistry , Surface Properties , Dental Stress Analysis
20.
J Prosthodont Res ; 67(1): 150-156, 2023 Jan 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35569998

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To clarify the effect of a multi-purpose primer combining several functional monomers on two prosthodontic materials (cast titanium and a gold alloy) after airborne-particle abrasion. METHODS: Disk-shaped adherends were prepared from cast titanium (CP Titanium JIS2) and a gold alloy (Casting Gold M.C. Type IV). A silane-containing two-liquid primer (M&C primer (MC)) and two silane-free single-liquid primers (Alloy Primer (AP) and V-Primer (VP)) were used as surface-treatment agents. The shear bond strengths were determined before and after thermocycling to evaluate the adhesive durability, and the results were compared using a non-parametric statistical analysis. The effect of airborne-particle abrasion with alumina on the titanium surface was analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in bond strength between the MC and AP before and after thermocycling, whereas VP showed significantly lower values. XPS revealed that the titanium acquired hydrophilic properties after the airborne-particle abrasion. CONCLUSIONS: The novelty of this study is that it shows that the presence/absence of the silane had no effect on the bonding of cast titanium with an acrylic resin. The study also showed that the multi-purpose primer can be used without any problems with both cast titanium and gold alloy, in combination with airborne-particle abrasion with alumina.


Subject(s)
Acrylic Resins , Dental Bonding , Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Gold Alloys/chemistry , Titanium/chemistry , Methacrylates/chemistry , Shear Strength , Aluminum Oxide/chemistry , Materials Testing , Resin Cements/chemistry , Surface Properties
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL