Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 73
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
JAMA ; 329(16): 1343-1344, 2023 04 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36951876

ABSTRACT

This Viewpoint discusses the limitations of medical school ranking in attracting a diverse student population and urges administrators to holistically communicate their mission, goals, and learning environment as an alternative strategy.


Subject(s)
Schools, Medical , Humans , Schools, Medical/classification , Schools, Medical/standards , Schools, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Medicine/standards , Medicine/statistics & numerical data
2.
Mo Med ; 118(1): 7-12, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33551470

ABSTRACT

Medical students, residents, and practicing physicians experience high burnout, depression, and suicide rates, and the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated stress for many.1-6 While laudable, current well-being efforts appear insufficient to meet the challenges that so many are facing. This essay explores approaches that individuals and organizations can take to promote mental health and well-being from medical school to practice.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Mental Health/standards , Physicians/psychology , Students, Medical/psychology , Adaptation, Psychological/physiology , Burnout, Professional/epidemiology , Burnout, Professional/therapy , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/therapy , Humans , Limbic System/physiopathology , Mental Health/statistics & numerical data , Mindfulness/methods , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Schools, Medical/organization & administration , Schools, Medical/standards , Stress, Psychological/complications , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Suicide/psychology , Suicide/statistics & numerical data , Suicide Prevention
3.
J Osteopath Med ; 121(1): 43-47, 2021 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33512395

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had an overwhelming impact on both clinical practices and learning environments. On March 17th, 2020, the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine and Commission on Osteopathic College Accreditation issued a statement recommending a "pause" in medical student participation in-person at clinical sites. In response, the Family Medicine Department at the Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine recognized the need to evolve the traditional curriculum and quickly transitioned to an online format, incorporating telemedicine into the clerkship. This new model enabled 44 third-year medical students to obtain high-quality, offsite, virtual education and learn new skills.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Clinical Clerkship/methods , Curriculum/standards , Osteopathic Medicine/education , Schools, Medical/standards , Students, Medical , Telemedicine/methods , Clinical Competence , Humans , Learning , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Acad Med ; 96(4): 529-533, 2021 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33060401

ABSTRACT

PROBLEM: The Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) require that many clinical trials register and report results on ClinicalTrials.gov. Noncompliance with these policies denies research participants and scientists access to potentially relevant findings and could lead to monetary penalties or loss of funding. After discovering hundreds of potentially noncompliant trials affiliated with the institution, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (JHUSOM) sought to develop a program to support research teams with registration and reporting requirements. APPROACH: JHUSOM conducted a baseline assessment of institutional compliance in 2015, launched the ClinicalTrials.gov Program in June 2016, and expanded the program to the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center in April 2018. The program is innovative in its comprehensive approach, and it was among the first to bring a large number of trials into compliance. OUTCOMES: From September 2015 to September 2020, JHUSOM brought completed and ongoing trials into compliance with FDAAA and NIH policies and maintained almost perfect compliance for new trials. During this period, the proportion of trials potentially noncompliant with the FDAAA decreased from 44% (339/774) to 2% (32/1,304). NEXT STEPS: JHUSOM continues to develop and evaluate tools and procedures that facilitate trial registration and results reporting. In collaboration with other academic medical centers, JHUSOM plans to share resources and to identify and disseminate best practices. This report identifies practical lessons for institutions that might develop similar programs.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/standards , Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , Guideline Adherence/standards , Guidelines as Topic , Registries/standards , Research Report/standards , Schools, Medical/standards , Academic Medical Centers/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Clinical Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Female , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Maryland , Middle Aged , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Schools, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Acad Med ; 96(4): 501-506, 2021 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33298697

ABSTRACT

Medical schools implemented holistic review more than a decade ago, which led to more deliberate consideration and inclusion of applicants historically underrepresented in medicine. This article presents a theory of holistic enrollment management that unites holistic review with enrollment management principles. This theory contextualizes medical school admissions as a complex marketplace with multifaceted, competing forces. Applying an enrollment management framework of mission, market, means, and metrics can improve the capacity of a medical school to efficiently advance its mission over time. Medical schools employing a clear, compelling, and focused mission to direct all aspects of the medical education enterprise can more effectively attract applicants who are better prepared to enact that mission throughout their careers. Medical schools share a marketplace and collectively compete to identify, attract, admit, and matriculate the most mission-aligned student body within the pool of applicants they share. Institutions that deliberately mobilize resources within this dynamic marketplace will engage, admit, and matriculate the most suiting applicants and attract even more mission-aligned matriculants over time. Widespread adoption of this holistic framework of enrollment management may enhance the capacity of the medical education system to better capitalize on the existing diversity in the national pool of applicants, encourage more underrepresented applicants to apply in the future, admit and matriculate a more diverse national student body, and ultimately better prepare new physicians to meet the increasingly diverse health care needs of the nation.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Education, Medical/standards , Minority Groups/education , Minority Groups/statistics & numerical data , School Admission Criteria/statistics & numerical data , Schools, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Schools, Medical/standards , Adult , Female , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Male , United States , Young Adult
8.
Salud Publica Mex ; 61(5): 648-656, 2019.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31661742

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To know the characteristics of medical education and identify its strengths and weaknesses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A transversal and quantitative study of the characteristics of medical education in 29 medical schools in Mexico was carried out, between April and September 2017. Questionnaire with Likert scale was applied to explore context, regulation, structure, process, results and impact of medical education. Bivariate analysis was performed with a Chi square test and the significance level was equal to or less than 0.05. RESULTS: The political context obtained 64%, economical context 10% and mechanisms of regulation 31%. The educational structure was 61% and the social impact was 93%. CONCLUSIONS: Public policies, regulatory mechanisms and public investment must be strengthened to improve the quality of medical education.


OBJETIVO: Conocer las características de la educación médica e identificar sus fortalezas y debilidades. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio transversal y cuantitativo para conocer las características de la educación médica en 29 escuelas de medicina en México, entre abril y septiembre de 2017. Se utilizó un cuestionario con escala tipo Likert para explorar el contexto, la regulación, la estructura, el proceso, los resultados y el impacto de la educación médica. Se realizó un análisis bivariado con ji cuadrada y una significancia estadística de p igual o menor a 0.05. RESULTADOS: El contexto político obtuvo 64%, el contexto económico 10%, los mecanismos de regulación 31%, la estructura educativa 61% y el impacto social 93%. CONCLUSIONES: Se requiere fortalecer las políticas públicas, la regulación y la inversión pública, para mejorar la calidad de la educación médica.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical/standards , Private Sector/standards , Public Sector/standards , Schools, Medical/standards , Chi-Square Distribution , Cross-Sectional Studies , Curriculum , Education, Medical/economics , Education, Medical/legislation & jurisprudence , Education, Medical/organization & administration , Mexico , National Health Programs , Physicians/supply & distribution , Private Sector/economics , Private Sector/organization & administration , Probability , Public Policy , Public Sector/economics , Public Sector/organization & administration , Surveys and Questionnaires
9.
Salud pública Méx ; 61(5): 648-656, sep.-oct. 2019. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1127328

ABSTRACT

Resumen: Objetivo: Conocer las características de la educación médica e identificar sus fortalezas y debilidades. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio transversal y cuantitativo para conocer las características de la educación médica en 29 escuelas de medicina en México, entre abril y septiembre de 2017. Se utilizó un cuestionario con escala tipo Likert para explorar el contexto, la regulación, la estructura, el proceso, los resultados y el impacto de la educación médica. Se realizó un análisis bivariado con ji cuadrada y una significancia estadística depigual o menor a 0.05. Resultados: El contexto político obtuvo 64%, el contexto económico 10%, los mecanismos de regulación 31%, la estructura educativa 61% y el impacto social 93%. Conclusiones: Se requiere fortalecer las políticas públicas, la regulación y la inversión pública, para mejorar la calidad de la educación médica.


Abstract: Objective: To know the characteristics of medical education and identify its strengths and weaknesses. Materials and methods: A transversal and quantitative study of the characteristics of medical education in 29 medical schools in Mexico was carried out, between April and September 2017. Questionnaire with Likert scale was applied to explore context, regulation, structure, process, results and impact of medical education. Bivariate analysis was performed with a Chi square test and the significance level was equal to or less than 0.05. Results: The political context obtained 64%, economical context 10% and mechanisms of regulation 31%. The educational structure was 61% and the social impact was 93%. Conclusions: Public policies, regulatory mechanisms and public investment must be strengthened to improve the quality of medical education.


Subject(s)
Schools, Medical/standards , Public Sector/standards , Private Sector/standards , Education, Medical/standards , Chi-Square Distribution , Cross-Sectional Studies , Curriculum , Education, Medical/economics , Education, Medical/legislation & jurisprudence , Education, Medical/organization & administration , Mexico , National Health Programs
10.
Med Educ Online ; 24(1): 1583968, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30810513

ABSTRACT

Medical educators are continually looking for ways to enhance integrated learning and help students see how the material taught in their various courses is inter-related. . At Stony Brook School of Medicine, we embarked on a school-wide new curriculum called the Learning focused, Experiential, Adaptive, Rigorous and Novel (LEARN) curriculum and developed several integrated courses that were not based in specific departments. As part of this process, the pre-clinical (Phase-1) curriculum was shortened to 17 months to accommodate an expanded set of clinical offerings. The new structure called for teachers from different departments to lead and conduct the integrated blocks of pre-clinical courses. In this paper, we describe our discouraging experience with the first iteration of an integrated course in Cardiology, Pulmonology and Renal organ systems (CPR), and its transformation into a highly successful second iteration. This involved a systematic course quality improvement (QI) process within the context of a larger school wide curricular reform. As a result, student overall satisfaction with the course increased from 22% (28 of 127 responders) to 83% (111 of 134 responders); the mean score on a standardized NBME content exam increased by 6.7%. We report the systematic process we used to collect data from students and faculty that helped facilitate quality improvement in a key course in Phase-1 of our LEARN curriculum.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Undergraduate/organization & administration , Feedback , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Schools, Medical/organization & administration , Students, Medical/psychology , Community-Based Participatory Research , Curriculum/standards , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/standards , Humans , Problem-Based Learning , Schools, Medical/standards , United States
11.
BMC Med Educ ; 18(1): 319, 2018 Dec 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30577828

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study investigated perceived preparedness to practice, one year after graduation across osteopathic education institutions (OEIs) and explored possible differences between countries where osteopathy is regulated (Reg) and countries where it is not (Unreg). METHODS: Two hundred forty-five graduates from 7 OEIs in 4 European countries, already assessed in a previous study, were contacted one year after their graduation to complete the survey. Survey tools included a questionnaire to assess perceived preparedness to practice: Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) questionnaire, and a questionnaire to collect socio-demographic information and practice characteristics. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-eight graduates (68.6%) completed the survey. The AAMC mean score one year after the graduation (23.19; confidence interval 22.81-23.58) was significantly higher than in the previous study (17.58; 16.90-18.26) (p < 0.001). A difference was also found between Reg (23.49; 23.03-23.95) and Unreg (22.34; 21.74-22.94) (p = 0.004). Osteopaths with a previous healthcare degree scored significantly higher on AAMC score (25.53; 24.88-26.19) than osteopaths without a previous healthcare degree (22.33; 21.97-22.69) (p < 0.001). Regulation and a previous degree were the only significant independent variables in the most predictive multivariate linear model. The model had an r2 = 0.33. CONCLUSIONS: Graduates from OEIs where osteopathy is regulated felt significantly better prepared to practice than Unreg. Systematic information searches about graduates' perception of preparedness to practice, may enable OEIs to strengthen their existing curricula to ensure their graduates are effectively prepared to practice.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Competence , Osteopathic Medicine , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Europe , Female , Government Regulation , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Osteopathic Medicine/education , Osteopathic Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , Professional Competence , Schools, Medical/legislation & jurisprudence , Schools, Medical/standards , Self-Assessment , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
12.
Tex Med ; 114(11): 34-39, 2018 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30485391

ABSTRACT

Incarnate Word's osteopathic medical school is changing how medicine is taught while helping San Antonio's poorest communities.


Subject(s)
Medical Missions/organization & administration , Osteopathic Medicine/education , Physicians/supply & distribution , Schools, Medical/standards , Humans , Poverty , Texas
13.
Med Educ Online ; 23(1): 1522225, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30286694

ABSTRACT

While medical educators appear to believe that admission to the medical school should be governed, at least in part, by human judgement, there has been no systematic presentation of evidence suggesting it improves selection. From a fair testing perspective, legal, ethical, and psychometric considerations, all dictate that the scientific evidence regarding human judgement in selection should be given consideration. To investigate the validity of using human judgements in admissions, multi-disciplinary meta-analytic research evidence from the wider literature is combined with studies from within medical education to provide evidence regarding the fairness and validity of using interviews and holistic review in medical school admissions. Fourteen studies, 6 of which are meta-analytic studies that summarized 292 individual studies, were included in the final review. Within these studies, a total of 33 studies evaluated the reliability of the traditional interview. These studies reveal that the interview has low to moderate reliability (~.42) which significantly limits its validity. This is confirmed by over 100 studies examining interview validity which collectively show interview scores to be moderately correlated with important outcome variables (corrected value ~.29). Meta-analyses of over 150 studies demonstrate that mechanical/formula-based selection decisions produce better results than decisions made with holistic/clinical methods (human judgement). Three conclusions regarding the use of interviews and holistic review are provided by these meta-analyses. First, it is clear that the traditional interview has low reliability and that this significantly limits its validity. Second, the reliable variance from interview scores appears moderately predictive of outcomes that are relevant to consider in medical school admission. And third, the use of holistic review as a method of incorporating human judgement is not a valid alternative to mechanical/statistical approaches as the evidence clearly indicates that mechanistic methods are more predictive, reliable, cost efficient, and transparent.


Subject(s)
Interviews as Topic/standards , Judgment , School Admission Criteria , Schools, Medical/organization & administration , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Schools, Medical/standards
14.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract ; 23(3): 601-610, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29445976

ABSTRACT

Web-based interviewing may be an effective element of a medical school's larger approach to promotion of holistic review, as recommended by the Association of American Medical Colleges, by facilitating the feasibility of including rural and community physicians in the interview process. Only 10% of medical schools offer videoconference interviews to applicants and little is known about the impact of this interview modality on the admissions process. This study investigated the impact of overall acceptance rates using videoconference interviews and face-to-face interviews in the medical school selection process using an equivalence trial design. The University of New Mexico School of Medicine integrated a videoconferencing interview option for community and rural physician interviewers in a pseudo-random fashion during the 2014-2016 admissions cycles. Logistic regression was conducted to examine whether videoconference interviews impacted acceptance rates or the characteristics of accepted students. Demographic, admissions and diversity factors were analyzed that included applicant age, MCAT score, cumulative GPA, gender, underrepresented in medicine, socioeconomic status and geographic residency. Data from 752 interviews were analyzed. Adjusted rates of acceptance for face-to-face (37.0%; 95% CI 28.2, 46.7%) and videoconference (36.1%; 95% CI 17.8, 59.5%) interviews were within an a priori ± 5% margin of equivalence. Both interview conditions yielded highly diverse groups of admitted students. Having a higher medical college admission test score, grade point average, and self-identifying as disadvantaged increased odds of admission in both interview modalities. Integration of the videoconference interview did not impact the overall acceptance of a highly diverse and qualified group of applicants, and allowed rural and community physicians to participate in the medical school interview process as well as allowed campus faculty and medical student committee members to interview remotely.


Subject(s)
Interviews as Topic/methods , Interviews as Topic/statistics & numerical data , School Admission Criteria/statistics & numerical data , Schools, Medical/organization & administration , Videoconferencing , Academic Success , Adult , Composite Resins , Cultural Diversity , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Methacrylates , Pilot Projects , Residence Characteristics , Schools, Medical/standards , Social Class , Young Adult
15.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract ; 23(1): 151-158, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28501933

ABSTRACT

Medical school admissions interviews are used to assess applicants' nonacademic characteristics as advocated by the Association of American Medical Colleges' Advancing Holistic Review Initiative. The objective of this study is to determine whether academic metrics continue to significantly influence interviewers' scores in holistic processes by blinding interviewers to applicants' undergraduate grade point averages (uGPA) and Medical College Admission Test (MCAT). This study examines academic and demographic predictors of interview scores for two applicant cohorts at the University of Michigan Medical School. In 2012, interviewers were provided applicants' uGPA and MCAT scores; in 2013, these academic metrics were withheld from interviewers' files. Hierarchical regression analysis was conducted to examine the influence of academic and demographic variables on overall cohort interview scores. When interviewers were provided uGPA and MCAT scores, academic metrics explained more variation in interview scores (7.9%) than when interviewers were blinded to these metrics (4.1%). Further analysis showed a statistically significant interaction between cohort and uGPA, indicating that the association between uGPA and interview scores was significantly stronger for the 2012 unblinded cohort compared to the 2013 blinded cohort (ß = .573, P < .05). By contrast, MCAT scores had no interactive effects on interviewer scores. While MCAT scores accounted for some variation in interview scores for both cohorts, only access to uGPA significantly influenced interviewers' scores when looking at interaction effects. Withholding academic metrics from interviewers' files may promote assessment of nonacademic characteristics independently from academic metrics.


Subject(s)
College Admission Test/statistics & numerical data , Educational Measurement/standards , Interviews as Topic/standards , School Admission Criteria/statistics & numerical data , Schools, Medical/standards , Students, Medical/psychology , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Regression Analysis , United States , Young Adult
18.
Med Teach ; 39(sup1): S1-S7, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28103722

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: The accreditation of undergraduate medical education is a universal undertaking. Despite the widespread adoption of accreditation processes and an increasing focus on accreditation as a mechanism to ensure minimum standards are met in various fields, there is little evidence to support the effectiveness of accreditation. Traditionally, accreditation has worked toward achieving two ends: assuring and improving quality. Many recent articles emphasize the need for continuous quality improvement mechanisms to work, as well as the quality assurance role of accreditation. METHODS: The aim of the study was to examine the purposes and outcomes of accreditation, and stakeholders' experience of accreditation in Saudi Arabia. Triangulation of data was achieved through literature review, analysis of accreditation documents, examined the outcome of accreditation process (pre and post) through stakeholders' experience of accreditation (learner, teacher, and academic leader perspectives). Data were interrogated using thematic analysis approach involving identifying, analyzing, and reporting repeated patterns (themes) of meaning within data. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the three phase study: "Passing the exam" versus long-term benefit, generic versus specialized accreditation standards, and internal quality assurance and self-evaluation. The data revealed a number of strategies that stakeholders can employ to achieve a balance between an "accreditation threat" and a quality improvement approach that is likely to have a lasting effect on educational outcomes. DISCUSSION: This empirical study revealed strong parallels between assessment and accreditation purpose, engagement, and outcomes. Like an increasing number of commentaries in the literature, this study suggests that accreditation bodies would do well to shift toward a holistic approach to quality management in medical education; implementation of quality improvement by an external "other"-described by some participants as the "policeman approach"-is not ideal for promoting sustainable quality education. Sustainable accreditation for long-term education improvement is not presented as a method, but as a way of thinking about important, and often overlooked, aspects of accreditation practice. Sustainable accreditation means that there is a need to meet both the immediate accreditation standards ("the exam") as well as establishing a basis for continuing quality improvement.


Subject(s)
Accreditation , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Schools, Medical/standards , Humans , Qualitative Research , Saudi Arabia
19.
Mo Med ; 114(5): 363-366, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30228634

ABSTRACT

Providing health care to patients and families living in rural America presents significant challenges, but comes with unique rewards. The physician who chooses a rural life typically cares for an underserved and aging population, which is often less healthy and affluent than its urban and suburban counterparts. At the same time, rural clinicians feel deeply connected to their patients and their communities. Physicians cite strong doctor-patient relationships as a primary motivator to practice in a rural setting, in addition to lower cost of living and slower pace of life1. Those who choose primary care specialties also enjoy the challenge of caring for multiple, interrelated aspects of health for their patients and community. During Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences' (KCU) century-long history, we have offered our osteopathic medical students the opportunity to learn in rural areas during the third and fourth years. As our new, state-of-the-art medical school campus opens in Joplin, Missouri, we will build on our commitment to rural health by offering first- and second-year KCU-Joplin students training opportunities in rural settings, and expanding third- and fourth-year rural clinical rotations. The rich experience to learn rural medicine offers the potential to connect medical students, patients and community in new and exciting ways, building on the firm foundation of osteopathic medical training grounded in strong patient-centered primary care.


Subject(s)
Physicians/psychology , Rural Health/standards , Students, Medical/psychology , Economics/trends , Health Workforce/trends , Humans , Kansas/epidemiology , Medically Underserved Area , Missouri/epidemiology , Osteopathic Medicine/education , Osteopathic Medicine/standards , Physician-Patient Relations , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/standards , Rural Health/trends , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Schools, Medical/standards , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data
20.
Med Educ Online ; 21: 30000, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26847852

ABSTRACT

The Albert Einstein College of Medicine (Einstein) was founded in 1955 during an era of limited access to medical school for women, racial minorities, and many religious and ethnic groups. Located in the Bronx, NY, Einstein seeks to educate physicians in an environment of state-of-the-art scientific inquiry while simultaneously fulfilling a deep commitment to serve its community by providing the highest quality clinical care. A founding principle of Einstein, the basis upon which Professor Einstein agreed to allow the use of his name, was that admission to the student body would be based entirely on merit. To accomplish this, Einstein has long used a 'holistic' approach to the evaluation of its applicants, actively seeking a diverse student body. More recently, in order to improve its ability to identify students with the potential to be outstanding physicians, who will both advance medical knowledge and serve the pressing health needs of a diverse community, the Committee on Admissions reexamined and restructured the requirements for admission. These have now been categorized as four 'Admissions Competencies' that an applicant must demonstrate. They include: 1) cocurricular activities and relevant experiences; 2) communication skills; 3) personal and professional development; and 4) knowledge. The purpose of this article is to describe the process that resulted in the introduction and implementation of this competency based approach to the admission process.


Subject(s)
Cultural Diversity , School Admission Criteria , Schools, Medical/organization & administration , College Admission Test , Communication , Humans , Knowledge , Schools, Medical/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL