ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of home and centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation for adults with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: Prospective economic analyses were undertaken from a health system perspective alongside a randomized controlled equivalence trial in which participants referred to pulmonary rehabilitation undertook a standard 8-week outpatient centre-based or a new home-based programme. Participants underwent clinical assessment prior to programme commencement, immediately following completion and 12 months following programme completion. They provided data for utility (quality-adjusted life years (QALY) determined using SF6D (utility scores for health states) calculated from 36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2) and effectiveness (change in distance walked on 6-min walk test (Δ6MWD) following pulmonary rehabilitation ). Individual-level cost data for the 12 months following programme completion was sourced from healthcare administration and government databases. RESULTS: Between-group mean difference point estimates for cost (-$4497 (95% CI: -$12 250 to $3257), utility (0.025 (-0.038 to 0.086) QALY) and effectiveness (14 m (-11 to 39) Δ6MWD) favoured the home-based group. Cost-utility analyses demonstrated 63% of estimates falling in the dominant southeast quadrant and the probability that the new home-based model was cost-effective at a $0 threshold for willingness to pay was 78%. Results were robust to a range of sensitivity analyses. Programme completion was associated with significantly lower healthcare costs in the following 12 months. CONCLUSION: Home-based pulmonary rehabilitation provides a cost-effective alternative model for people with COPD who cannot access traditional centre-based programmes.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/economics , Health Care Costs , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/rehabilitation , Self Care/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Exercise Therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Self Care/methods , Treatment Outcome , Walk TestABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and reduces hospitalizations in patients with heart failure, but international uptake of cardiac rehabilitation for heart failure remains low. DESIGN AND METHODS: The aim of this multicentre randomized trial was to compare the REACH-HF (Rehabilitation EnAblement in CHronicHeart Failure) intervention, a facilitated self-care and home-based cardiac rehabilitation programme to usual care for adults with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The study primary hypothesis was that the addition of the REACH-HF intervention to usual care would improve disease-specific HRQoL (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (MLHFQ)) at 12 months compared with usual care alone. RESULTS: The study recruited 216 participants, predominantly men (78%), with an average age of 70 years and mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 34%. Overall, 185 (86%) participants provided data for the primary outcome. At 12 months, there was a significant and clinically meaningful between-group difference in the MLHFQ score of -5.7 points (95% confidence interval -10.6 to -0.7) in favour of the REACH-HF intervention group ( p = 0.025). With the exception of patient self-care ( p < 0.001) there was no significant difference in other secondary outcomes, including clinical events ( p > 0.05) at follow-up compared with usual care. The mean cost of the REACH-HF intervention was £418 per participant. CONCLUSIONS: The novel REACH-HF home-based facilitated intervention for HFrEF was clinically superior in disease-specific HRQoL at 12 months and offers an affordable alternative to traditional centre-based programmes to address current low cardiac rehabilitation uptake rates for heart failure.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Rehabilitation , Heart Failure/rehabilitation , Home Care Services , Self Care , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Function, Left , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiac Rehabilitation/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Health Care Costs , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/economics , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Home Care Services/economics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Recovery of Function , Self Care/economics , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United KingdomABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Office-based biofeedback therapy is effective for constipation with dyssynergic defecation, but must be performed by skilled staff, is only available in selected centres, and requires multiple visits. The efficacy of home-based biofeedback therapy is unknown. We compared clinical and subjective outcomes with home-based and office-based approaches. METHODS: In this randomised controlled trial, eligible patients were adult outpatients (age 18-80 years) who met the Rome III criteria for functional constipation and who had been referred to a tertiary-care centre after non-response to routine management, and who had dyssynergic defecation. Patients were randomly assigned according to a schedule generated in advance by the study biostatistician, in permuted blocks of four, to receive office-based or home-based biofeedback therapy. Office-based biofeedback comprised therapist-guided pelvic floor training for six sessions over 3 months (visits every 2 weeks). Home-based biofeedback comprised 20 min self-training sessions twice per day, in which a self-inserted probe was used to provide visual feedback via a handheld monitoring device of anal sphincter pressure and push effort. Patients recorded in diaries the time of each defecation attempt, stool consistency, straining effort, feeling of incomplete evacuation, need for digital assistance with stooling, and satisfaction with bowel function, from 1 week before enrolment to the end of follow-up. Treatment responders were defined post hoc as those with normalisation of dyssynergic defecation and an increase in the number of complete spontaneous bowel movements per week by 3 months. Cost outcomes calculated from health-care costs and loss of salary were assessed from hospital billing and medical records and questionnaires. Primary outcome measures were the presence of a dyssynergic pattern during attempted defecation, balloon expulsion time, the number of complete spontaneous bowel movements per week, and satisfaction with bowel function, assessed by intention to treat (non-inferiority) and per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03202771. FINDINGS: Of 300 patients screened we enrolled 100, from Jan 7, 2005, to Jan 31, 2010. 83 patients completed training (38 [76%] of 50 in the home-based biofeedback group and 45 [90%] of 50 in the office-based biofeedback group). 34 (68%) patients in the home-based group and 35 (70%) in the office-based group were classified as responders. All primary outcomes improved significantly from baseline in the two treatment groups (all p<0·0001). Home-based biofeedback therapy was non-inferior to office-based therapy for number of complete spontaneous bowel movements per week, satisfaction with bowel function, and balloon expulsion time in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, and for dyssynergia in the per-protocol analysis. No adverse events were reported. The median cost of home-based biofeedback therapy was significantly lower than that for office-based treatment (US$1081·70, IQR 794·90-1399·30 vs $1942·50, 1621·70-2369·00, p=0·009). INTERPRETATION: Home-based and office-based biofeedback therapy for dyssynergic defecation improved bowel symptoms and physiology with similar efficacy. A home-based programme could substantially broaden the availability and use of this treatment. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health.
Subject(s)
Biofeedback, Psychology/methods , Constipation/physiopathology , Constipation/therapy , Defecation/physiology , Adult , Anal Canal/physiology , Biofeedback, Psychology/instrumentation , Constipation/diagnosis , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Exercise Therapy , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Intention to Treat Analysis , Male , Manometry , Pelvic Floor/physiology , Pressure , Self Care/economics , Self Care/methods , Sensory Thresholds/physiologyABSTRACT
Background: To identify practices that do not add value, cause harm, or subject patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to a level of risk that outweighs possible benefits (overuse). Methods: A qualitative approach was applied. First, a multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals used the Metaplan technique to draft and rank a list of overused procedures as well as self-care practices in patients with stable and exacerbated COPD. Second, in successive consensus-building rounds, description files were created for each "do not do" (DND) recommendation, consisting of a definition, description, quality of supporting evidence for the recommendation, and the indicator used to measure the degree of overuse. The consensus group comprised 6 pulmonologists, 2 general practitioners, 1 nurse, and 1 physiotherapist. Results: In total, 16 DND recommendations were made for patients with COPD: 6 for stable COPD, 6 for exacerbated COPD, and 4 concerning self-care. Conclusion: Overuse poses a risk for patients and jeopardizes care quality. These 16 DND recommendations for COPD will lower care risks and improve disease management, facilitate communication between physicians and patients, and bolster patient ability to provide self-care.
Subject(s)
Medical Overuse , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Self Care/adverse effects , Clinical Decision-Making , Consensus , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Disease Progression , Health Care Costs , Humans , Medical Overuse/economics , Patient Safety , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/economics , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Self Care/economics , Unnecessary Procedures/adverse effectsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To describe use of complementary health approaches (CHAs) among patients with type 2 diabetes, and independent associations between CHA use and Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) and lower-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. METHODS: Participants were enrolled onto the SMARTSteps Program, a diabetes self-management support program conducted between 2009 and 2013 in San Francisco. At the 6-month interview, CHA use in the prior 30 days was estimated using a 12-item validated instrument. Demographic and diabetes-related measures A1C were assessed at baseline and 6-month followup. AIC and LDL values were ascertained from chart review over the study period. Medication adherence was measured using pharmacy claims data at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: Patients (n = 278) completed 6-month interviews: 74% were women and 71.9% were non-English speaking. Any CHA use was reported by 51.4% overall. CHA modalities included vitamins/nutritional supplements (25.9%), spirituality/prayer (21.2%), natural remedies/herbs (24.5%), massage/acupressure (11.5%), and meditation/yoga/tai chi (10.4%). CHA costs per month were $43.86 (SD = 118.08). Nearly one third reported CHA (30.0%) specifically for their type 2 diabetes. In regression models, elevated A1C (>8.0%) was not significantly associated with overall CHA use (odds ratio [OR] = 1.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7 to 4.52) whereas elevated LDL was (OR = 3.93; 95% CI, 1.57 to 9.81). With medication adherence added in exploratory analysis, these findings were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: CHA use is common among patients with type 2 diabetes and may be associated with poor cardiometabolic control and medication adherence.
Subject(s)
Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Self Care/statistics & numerical data , Complementary Therapies/economics , Complementary Therapies/methods , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Female , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/economics , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care/methods , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , San Francisco , Self Care/economics , Self Care/methodsSubject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Self Care , Ultraviolet Therapy , Vitiligo/radiotherapy , Ambulatory Care/economics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Erythema/etiology , Humans , Office Visits/economics , Self Care/economics , Severity of Illness Index , Skin Pigmentation/radiation effects , Ultraviolet Therapy/adverse effects , Ultraviolet Therapy/economicsABSTRACT
There are few studies evaluating the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions for patients with psoriasis. Motivational interviewing (MI) as a telephone follow-up after climate-heliotherapy was effective on several clinical parameters, but its cost-effectiveness is unknown. A cost-utility analysis was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing MI with usual care. A total of 169 Norwegian patients were included. A within-trial analysis compared the costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Utilities were measured with the 15D instrument, supplemented with Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI). A time-integrated summary score defined the clinical effects. QALYs were adjusted for baseline differences. MI provided equivalent quality of life and utility (15D: -0.0022 QALYs (95% Cl -0.02, 0.01), p = 0.77, and DLQI: -0.62 QALYs (95%CI -0.65, 0.41), p = 0.24, at lower costs -1103 (-2293, 87), p = 0.058, compared with treatment-as-usual. The MI intervention was thus cost-effective. This result was more evident when using the DLQI as outcome measure compared with 15D.
Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Heliotherapy/economics , Motivational Interviewing/economics , Psoriasis/therapy , Self Care/economics , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Norway , Quality of Life , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The health-seeking behaviour of elderly individuals can help in ascertaining the determinants and in developing appropriate policies for their healthcare. METHODS: In this community-based cross-sectional study, we included 250 elderly persons above 60 years of age living in the urban field practice area of Shri Vasantrao Naik Government Medical College, Yavatmal, Maharashtra. We used a structured proforma to collect information about their health-seeking behaviour. RESULTS: Overall, 48% of the study subjects chose an allopathic practitioner. The difference in the health-seeking behaviour for self-treatment, treatment from traditional healers and paraprofessionals as one group and allopathic treatment as another group was significant for the determinants of age (p<0.001), educational level (p<0.0001) and poverty status (p=0.0007) and registration under any government scheme (p=0.0446). The average expenditure on health was significantly more among those who were above 75 years of age, employed, educated and above the poverty line, irrespective of gender. CONCLUSION: Elderly persons who prefer allopathic treatment are likely to be above 75 years of age, those having some education and those above poverty line.
Subject(s)
Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Behavior , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Status Disparities , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Medicine, Traditional/methods , Middle Aged , Needs Assessment , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Self Care/economics , Self Care/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate adherence to medication and study factors associated with non-adherence in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional, questionnaire based study was conducted in Nephrology department of a super specialty hospital. Patients above 18 years of age, suffering from CKD from six months or more were interviewed using self-designed, semi-structured questionnaire to get information about adherence to medication, diet restriction and lifestyle modification (n = 150). Morisky medication adherence questionnaire was used to calculate overall adherence. In this higher score indicates poor adherence. Main outcome measures included prevalence of non-adherence and factors associated with the same. RESULTS: Average number of medicines taken by each patient was 8.0+1.612 (mean+SD) per day. Non-adherence to medication schedule was reported in 34% patients. Common causes of non-adherence were high cost (21.3%), complex dosing schedule (20%), fear of adverse effects (16%). Sixty-eight% patients were not aware about importance of taking each medicine. Sixteen% stopped taking medicines due to high cost. Forty-two% suggested that government should adopt measures to provide free medicines to poor patients. In Morisky medication adherence questionnaire high, medium and low adherence was reported in 7.3%, 55.3% and 37.3% of patients, respectively. Moderately positive correlation was observed between poor adherence and number of concurrent illnesses and number of medicines taken. CONCLUSION: Since majority of patients were not aware about importance of taking each medicine, creating awareness about the same is essential for improving adherence to therapy. Measures to provide free medicines to non-affording patients need to be implemented since high cost was other major cause of non-adherence.
Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Life Style , Patient Compliance , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Self Care , Combined Modality Therapy/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy/economics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dietary Supplements/adverse effects , Dietary Supplements/economics , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Costs , Exercise , Female , Hospitals, Special , Humans , India , Male , Meditation , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic , Polypharmacy , Prospective Studies , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/drug therapy , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/economics , Self Care/economics , Self Report , Water-Electrolyte BalanceABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of medical yoga as an early intervention compared with evidence-based exercise therapy and self-care advice for non-specific low back pain. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with a cost-effectiveness analysis. SUBJECTS: A total of 159 participants randomized into the medical yoga group (n = 52), the exercise therapy group (n = 52) and the self-care advice group (n = 55). METHODS: The health outcome measure EQ-5D was applied to measure quality of life data combined with cost data collected from treatment groups from baseline to 12 months follow-up. Outcome measure was health-related quality of life (HRQL). Incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) was also calculated. Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted primarily from the societal and employer perspectives. RESULTS: Medical yoga is cost-effective compared with self-care advice if an employer considers the significant improvement in the HRQL of an employee with low back pain justifies the additional cost of treatment (i.e. in this study EUR 150). From a societal perspective, medical yoga is a cost-effective treatment compared with exercise therapy and self-care advice if an additional QALY is worth EUR 11,500. Sensitivity analysis suggests that medical yoga is more cost-effective than its alternatives. CONCLUSION: Six weeks of uninterrupted medical yoga thera-py is a cost-effective early intervention for non-specific low back pain, when treatment recommendations are adhered to.
Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy/economics , Low Back Pain/economics , Low Back Pain/therapy , Self Care/economics , Yoga , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance , Quality of Life , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Effective self-management is viewed as the cornerstone of diabetes care. Many interventions and policies are available to support self-management, but challenges remain regarding reaching specific subgroups and effectively changing lifestyles. Here, our aim was to identify emerging policies and practices regarding diabetes care in The Netherlands. METHODS: Study with a purposeful sample of key informants, covering a range of stakeholders. They were individually interviewed, using a flexible and semi-structured approach. A thematic analysis was done, guided by an international framework, which resulted in 28 themes. RESULTS: After a decade of investing in diabetes care in The Netherlands, stakeholders seem to have shifted their focus towards a view that effective self-management is expected in most people. The expectation is that individuals' personal networks, community organizations and emerging information technologies will facilitate this. If support of self-management is required, this has to be provided by local coalitions of health and social care organizations, with involvement of municipalities. Poor reach in specific subgroups of the population, such as economically deprived people, is recognized but has not led to targeted policies. CONCLUSIONS: The role of healthcare providers in supporting patients' self-management in diabetes care seems to be changing in The Netherlands.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/trends , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/trends , Policy Making , Self Care/trends , Attitude of Health Personnel , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/economics , Health Care Costs/trends , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Netherlands , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/economics , Patient Care Team/trends , Patient Education as Topic/trends , Qualitative Research , Risk Reduction Behavior , Self Care/economics , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Conflicting data exists on the effectiveness of integrated programs in reducing recurrent exacerbations and hospitalizations in patients with Asthma and chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD). We developed a Pulmonologist-led Chronic Lung Disease Program (CLDP) for patients with severe asthma and COPD and analyzed its impact on healthcare utilization and predictors of its effectiveness. METHODS: CLDP elements included clinical evaluation, onsite pulmonary function testing, health education, and self-management action plan along with close scheduled and on-demand follow-up. Patients with ≥2 asthma or COPD exacerbations requiring emergency room visit or hospitalization within the prior year were enrolled, and followed for respiratory related ER visits (RER) and hospitalizations (RHA) over the year (357 ± 43 days) after CLDP interventions. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were enrolled, and 104 patients were subject to analyses. During the year of follow-up after CLDP enrollment, there was a significant decrease in mean RER (0.56 ± 1.48 versus 2.62 ± 2.81, p < 0.0001), mean RHA (0.39 ± 0.08 versus 1.1 ± 1.62, p < 0.0001), and 30 day rehospitalizations (0.05 ± 0.02 versus 0.28 ± 0.07, p < 0.0001). Reduction of healthcare utilization was strongly associated with GERD and sinusitis therapy, and was independent of pulmonary rehabilitation. Direct variable cost analyses estimated annual savings at $1.17 million. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed lack of spirometry utilization as an independent risk factor for severe exacerbations. CONCLUSIONS: A Pulmonologist-led disease management program integrating key elements of care is cost effective and significantly decreases severe exacerbations. Integrated programs should be encouraged for care of frequent exacerbators of asthma and COPD.
Subject(s)
Asthma/therapy , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/methods , Disease Management , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Adult , Aged , Asthma/economics , Asthma/physiopathology , California , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Forced Expiratory Volume/physiology , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Program Evaluation , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/economics , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Self Care/economics , Self Care/methods , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Endometriosis/nursing , Menstruation Disturbances/nursing , Cost Savings , Cross-Sectional Studies , Endometriosis/diagnosis , Endometriosis/economics , Endometriosis/epidemiology , Female , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Menstruation Disturbances/diagnosis , Menstruation Disturbances/economics , Menstruation Disturbances/epidemiology , Models, Nursing , National Health Programs/economics , Nursing Diagnosis/economics , Patient Education as Topic/economics , Recurrence , Self Care/economics , SwitzerlandABSTRACT
Oral mucositis (OM) is one of the side effects of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), resulting in major morbidity. The aim of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of the introduction of a specialized oral care program including laser therapy in the care of patients receiving HSCT with regard to morbidity associated with OM. Clinical information was gathered on 167 patients undergoing HSCT and divided according to the presence (n = 91) or absence (n = 76) of laser therapy and oral care. Cost analysis included daily hospital fees, parenteral nutrition (PN) and prescription of opioids. It was observed that the group without laser therapy (group II) showed a higher frequency of severe degrees of OM (relative risk = 16.8, 95% confidence interval -5.8 to 48.9, p < 0.001), with a significant association between this severity and the use of PN (p = 0.001), prescription of opioids (p < 0.001), pain in the oral cavity (p = 0.003) and fever > 37.8°C (p = 0.005). Hospitalization costs in this group were up to 30% higher. The introduction of oral care by a multidisciplinary staff including laser therapy helps reduce morbidity resulting from OM and, consequently, helps minimize hospitalization costs associated with HSCT, even considering therapy costs.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Low-Level Light Therapy , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Oral Hygiene/methods , Stomatitis/therapy , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Allografts/economics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/economics , Antifungal Agents/administration & dosage , Antifungal Agents/economics , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/economics , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Brazil , Case-Control Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Dentists/economics , Drug Costs , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/economics , Hospital Costs , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/economics , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Low-Level Light Therapy/economics , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Myeloablative Agonists/economics , Myeloablative Agonists/therapeutic use , Narcotics/economics , Narcotics/therapeutic use , Opportunistic Infections/economics , Opportunistic Infections/etiology , Oral Hygiene/economics , Parenteral Nutrition/economics , Patient Care Team , Retrospective Studies , Self Care/economics , Stomatitis/economics , Stomatitis/etiology , Stomatitis/prevention & control , Transplantation Conditioning/economics , Transplantation, Autologous/economicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a common inflammatory skin condition for which office-based and home phototherapy are safe and effective treatments. However, patients who are prescribed home phototherapy devices often choose other treatment options. OBJECTIVE: To determine the reasons why patients do not purchase a home phototherapy device after it has been recommended and prescribed by their physician. METHODS: Patients who were written a prescription for a home phototherapy device but did not fill the prescription were identified and contacted by the National Biological Corporation to participate in a telephone survey consisting of 4 questions regarding why they did not pursue a prescribed home ultraviolet device and how they were currently treating their psoriasis. RESULTS: The most common reason for not obtaining the prescribed home phototherapy device was using a biologic agent (31%). The second and third most frequently reported reasons were "cost share too high" and "insurance will not cover" (18% and 17%, respectively), together accounting for 35%. LIMITATIONS: The reason why patients were prescribed biologics while having an unfilled home phototherapy device prescription was not obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Out of pocket cost is a significant barrier to home phototherapy, even to patients who are well insured.
Subject(s)
Patient Compliance , Psoriasis/therapy , Self Care/instrumentation , Ultraviolet Therapy/instrumentation , Biological Factors/therapeutic use , Health Expenditures , Humans , Insurance Coverage , Insurance, Health , Self Care/economics , Ultraviolet Therapy/economicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Improving the quality of care for people with vascular disease is a key priority. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has recently been included as a target condition for general practices to add to registers of chronic conditions as part of the Quality and Outcome Framework. This paper outlines the implementation and evaluation of a self-management intervention involving an information guidebook, tailored access to local resources and telephone support for people with stage 3 chronic kidney disease. METHODS/DESIGN: The study involves a multi-site, longitudinal patient-level randomized controlled trial. The study will evaluate the clinical use and cost-effectiveness of a complex self-management intervention for people with stage 3 chronic kidney disease in terms of self-management capacity, health-related quality of life and blood pressure control compared to care as usual. We describe the methods of the patient-level randomized controlled trial. DISCUSSION: The management of chronic kidney disease is a developing area of research. The BRinging Information and Guided Help Together (BRIGHT) trial aims to provide evidence that a complementary package of support for people with vascular disease that targets both clinical and social need broadens the opportunities of self-management support by addressing problems related to social disadvantage. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration reference: ISRCTN45433299.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics , Health Care Costs , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Patient Education as Topic/economics , Primary Health Care/economics , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Research Design , Self Care/economics , Vascular Diseases/therapy , Blood Pressure , Clinical Protocols , Cost-Benefit Analysis , England , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Humans , Pamphlets , Quality of Life , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/economics , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/physiopathology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/psychology , Risk Reduction Behavior , Severity of Illness Index , Social Support , Telephone/economics , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Diseases/diagnosis , Vascular Diseases/economics , Vascular Diseases/physiopathology , Vascular Diseases/psychologySubject(s)
Chronic Pain/therapy , Cooperative Behavior , Interdisciplinary Communication , Chronic Pain/economics , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Chronic Pain/psychology , Combined Modality Therapy/economics , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/psychology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Germany , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Surveys , Humans , Motivation , National Health Programs/economics , Patient Care Team/economics , Patient Compliance/psychology , Self Care/economics , Self Care/methods , Self Care/psychologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To introduce supported self-management (SSM) for depression, examine it through the use of a quality assessment framework, and show its potential for enhancing the Canadian health care system. METHOD: SSM is examined in terms of quality criteria: relevance, effectiveness, appropriateness, efficiency, safety, acceptability, and sustainability. Critical research is highlighted, and a case study is presented to illustrate the use of SSM with depressed patients. RESULTS: SSM is defined by access to a self-management guide (workbook or website) plus encouragement and coaching by health care provider, family member, or other supporter. It has high relevance to depression care in Canada, high cost-effectiveness, high appropriateness for most people with depression, and high safety. Acceptability of this intervention is more problematic: many providers remain doubtful of its acceptability to their poorly motivated patients. Sustainability of SSM as a component of mental health care will require ongoing knowledge exchange among policy-makers, health care providers, and researchers. CONCLUSION: The introduction of SSM represents a unique opportunity to enhance the delivery of depression care in Canada. Actively engaging the distressed individual in changing depressive patterns can improve outcomes without mobilizing substantial new resources. Over time, we will learn more about making SSM compatible with constraints on provider time, increasing access to self-management tools, and evaluating the benefit to everyday clinical work.
Subject(s)
Caregivers , Depressive Disorder , Health Promotion , Primary Health Care/methods , Self Care , Social Support , Canada , Caregivers/classification , Caregivers/education , Caregivers/psychology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Depressive Disorder/economics , Depressive Disorder/therapy , Female , Health Education/methods , Health Education/organization & administration , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Humans , Male , Quality Improvement , Self Care/economics , Self Care/methods , Self Care/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The choices for self-medication in Hong Kong are much diversified, including western and Chinese medicines and food supplements. This study was to examine Hong Kong public knowledge, attitudes and behaviours regarding self-medication, self-care and the role of pharmacists in self-care. METHODS: A cross-sectional phone survey was conducted, inviting people aged 18 or older to complete a 37-item questionnaire that was developed based on the Thematic Household surveys in Hong Kong, findings of the health prorfessional focus group discussions on pharmacist-led patient self management and literature. Telephone numbers were randomly selected from residential phone directories. Trained interviewers invited eligible persons to participate using the "last birthday method". Associations of demographic characteristics with knowledge, attitudes and beliefs on self-medication, self-care and role of pharmacists, and spending on over-the-counter (OTC) products were analysed statistically. RESULTS: A total of 1, 560 phone calls were successfully made and 1, 104 respondents completed the survey which indicated a response rate of 70.8%. 63.1% had adequate knowledge on using OTC products. Those who had no formal education/had attended primary education (OR = 3.19, 95%CI 1.78-5.72; p < 0.001), had attended secondary education (OR = 1.50, 95%CI 1.03-2.19; p = 0.035), and aged ≥ 60 years (OR = 1.82, 95% CI 1.02-3.26; p = 0.042) were more likely to have inadequate knowledge on self-medication. People with chronic disease also tended to spend more than HKD100 on western (OR = 3.58, 95%CI 1.58-8.09; p = 0.002) and Chinese OTC products (OR = 2.94, 95%CI 1.08-7.95; p = 0.034). 94.6% believed that patients with chronic illnesses should self-manage their diseases. 68% agreed that they would consult a pharmacist before using OTC product but only 45% agreed that pharmacists could play a leading role in self-care. Most common reasons against pharmacist consultation on self-medication and self-care were uncertainty over the role of pharmacists and low acceptance level of pharmacists. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of respondents supported patients with chronic illness to self-manage their diseases but less than half agreed to use a pharmacist-led approach in self-care. The government should consider developing doctors-pharmacists partnership programs in the community, enhancing the role of pharmacists in primary care and providing education to patients to improve their awareness on the role of pharmacists in self-medication and self-care.