Treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome: a survey of physical therapists in Saudi Arabia.

OBJECTIVE: Shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS) is one of the most frequent causes of shoulder pain. Evidence supported the use of conservative treatment for SIS. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) indicated that physical therapy interventions, including therapeutic exercises, manual therapy, patient education, and advice, were recommended for the treatment of SIS. This study's purpose was to investigate physical therapists' adherence to the CPGs for treating SIS. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Physical therapists in Saudi Arabia were invited to participate in an online survey via the Saudi Physical Therapy Association between May and December 2022. The developed online survey consisted of 36 questions, divided into five sections: eligibility, demographics, clinical practice regarding the treatment of SIS, barriers, and facilitators for the use of CPGs. Descriptive and logistic regression analysis were employed to analyze study data. RESULTS: A total of 313 physical therapists completed the entire survey. In general, physical therapists were aligned with CPGs. Physical therapists advised their patients, utilized therapeutic exercises and manual therapy techniques, and used electrotherapy modalities despite being not recommended. Key challenges indicated by physical therapists for the use of CPGs include low patient adherence to therapists' instructions, lack of adequate knowledge, and limited clinical time. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, physical therapists in Saudi Arabia followed the CPGs for treating SIS. Therapeutic exercises combined with manual therapy were the most common treatment options. However, further research should consider exploring adherence to such guidelines over time.

Efficacy of low-level laser therapy combined with exercise for subacromial impingement syndrome: A randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) combined with exercise on shoulder pain and disability in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS). DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Pontifical Catholic University. SUBJECTS: We enrolled 120 subacromial impingement syndrome patients. INTERVENTION: Groups I (n = 42), II (n = 42) and III (n = 36) were treated with Low-level laser therapy and exercise, exercise only and Low-level laser therapy only, respectively. Interventions were conducted three times a week for 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the change in shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI). Secondary outcomes included changes in the numeric pain rating scale and medication intake. RESULTS: Average ages of patients in groups I, II and III were 51.9 ± 8.7 years, 56.0 ± 10.4 years and 54.2 ± 7.1 years, respectively. Pain scores at baseline (P = 0.829), 2 months (P = 0.057) and 3 months follow-ups (p = 0.004) were 6.8 (4.7-7.7), 0.2 (0.0-0.5) and 0.3 (0.0-1.0) for group I; 6.6 (5.7-8.0), 0.5 (0.2-2.0) and 0.2 (0.0-3.3) for group II; and 6.5 (5.1-7.4), 2.4 (0.1-6.7) and 4.0 (2.0-5.0) for group III, respectively. SPADI scores at baseline (P = 0.029), 2 months (P < 0.001) and 3 months follow-ups (P = 0.001) were 60.8 (37.7-70.8), 3.8 (0.0-10.8) and 2.3 (0.8-10.8) for group I; 61.5 (41.5-71.5), 9.2 (3.8-29.2) and 14.2 (1.5-38.0) for the group II; and 73.3 (59.2-80.8), 34.2 (16.9-54.6) and 33.1 (22.3-49.2) for the group III, respectively. CONCLUSION: Low-level laser therapy combined with exercises reduce pain intensity, improve shoulder function and reduces pain intensity and medication intake over 3 months. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02725749.

Effects of eight-week "gyroscopic device" mediated resistance training exercise on participants with impingement syndrome or tennis elbow.

BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation of injuries in the upper extremity and reestablishment of muscle strength throughout the range of motion in overhead movements, are the major concerns of athletes and coaches in the sports field. PURPOSE: To determine the effect of eight-week "gyroscopic device" mediated resistance training exercise on grip strength, wrist and shoulder strength and proprioception, and upper extremity performance, in participants with impingement syndrome or tennis elbow. DESIGN AND METHODS: For this study, in a university rehabilitation clinic 45 volleyball players (aged 22-28) purposefully were selected and divided into 3 groups: shoulder impingement (group I), tennis elbow (group II), and control (group III). The experimental groups performed the "gyroscopic device" mediated resistance training, three sessions a week over 8 wks. Grip strength, wrist and shoulder strength and proprioception, and upper extremity performance were measured before and after implementation of the intervention (eight-week resistance training using a "gyroscopic device") using a hand hold dynamometer, isokinetic dynamometer, and Y balance test respectively. RESULTS: After 8 weeks of "gyroscopic device" exercise, improvement in the shoulder, wrist and grip strength, shoulder and wrist proprioception and performance scores of both experimental groups was significant. There were no significant differences between study groups I and II, both groups, however, demonstrated significant differences when compared to the control group, but between group I and the control group, and between group II and the control group, the difference was significant. However, no significant change was seen in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the significant effects of the "gyroscopic device" mediated exercise on grip strength, wrist and shoulder strength and proprioception, and performance of the upper extremity, use of the exercise can be recommended for subjects with impingement syndrome or tennis elbow impairment in measured variables. More research is needed to confirm the result of this study.

Immediate effect of scapula-focused exercises performed with kinematic biofeedback on scapular kinematics in individuals with subacromial pain syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Given the changes in the patterns of muscular activation and scapular movement in individuals with subacromial pain syndrome, the use of neuromuscular training has been considered in rehabilitation protocols. There is currently no evidence of the effects of the use of three-dimensional (3D) kinematic biofeedback on individuals with subacromial pain syndrome. This study aimed to determine the immediate effect of scapular motor control exercises using 3D kinematic biofeedback on the scapular kinematics, inter-segment coordination and pain of individuals with subacromial pain syndrome. METHOD: The kinematics of the scapulothoracic joint of 26 subjects with subacromial pain syndrome were assessed in the movement arm elevation and lowering in the sagittal plane before and after performance of three scapula-focused exercises using kinematic biofeedback. The individuals were familiarized with the selected exercises to acquire a greater scapular posterior tilt, while kinematic biofeedback, with visual and auditory stimuli, was used in real time. Scapular kinematics, pain, and subjective perception of exertion were the pre- and post-test measures. FINDINGS: In the movement of arm elevation and lowering, no differences were found in scapular tilt and on coordination between the segments pre- and post-test and the effect size was considered small. INTERPRETATION: Our results demonstrate that the performance of scapula-focused exercises using kinematic biofeedback does not cause immediate changes in the magnitude of scapular movement. However, inter-segmental coordination showed evidence of changes for scapular tilt in the lowering of the arm and internal rotation in the elevation and the lowering of the arm in individuals with subacromial pain syndrome.

The effect of interferential current therapy on patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Although interferential current (IFC) is a common electrotherapeutic modality used to treat musculoskeletal pain, there is not any randomized controlled trial investigating its clinical efficacy in subacromial impingement syndrome (SAIS). AIM: Investigation of effectiveness of IFC treatment in patients with SAIS. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. SETTING: Physical medicine and rehabilitation outpatient clinic. POPULATION: Patients (N.=65) between 25 and 65 years of age, with a diagnosis of SAIS according to clinical evaluation and subacromial injection test. METHODS: Patients were randomly distributed into two groups: 1) active IFC group (N.=33); 2) sham IFC group (N.=32). Exercise, cryotherapy, and a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) were given to both groups. Ten sessions of IFC with bipolar method were applied to the active IFC group daily 20 minutes per session, 5 days per week, for 2 weeks while sham IFC was applied to the sham IFC group with the same protocol. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Constant scores, and Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ) were used for evaluation at baseline, immediately post-treatment, and 1 month post-treatment. Both the patients and the researcher who assessed the outcomes were blinded to the treatment protocol throughout the study period. RESULTS: Sixty of the 65 patients (active IFC group N.=30, sham IFC group N.=30) completed the study, 3 patients from active IFC, 2 from sham IFC group dropped during the follow up period. Statistically significant improvement was observed in all parameters of both groups immediately and 1 month post-treatment (P<0.01). There were no statistical differences between the active IFC group and sham IFC group in all outcome parameters (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that IFC therapy does not provide additional benefit to NSAID, cryotherapy, and exercise program in treatment of SAIS. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Our study responds to the needs of the lack of evidence in the field of rehabilitation. IFC therapy does not provide additional benefit for the treatment of SAIS.

Physiotherapy for patients with shoulder pain in primary care: a descriptive study of diagnostic- and therapeutic management.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain is one of the three main musculoskeletal complaints and more than 50% of the patients have symptoms longer than 6 months. Until now, limited data exist about the content of physiotherapy for patients with shoulder pain in primary care. OBJECTIVE: Describe current physiotherapeutic diagnostic- and therapeutic management, including the use of diagnostic ultrasound, in patients with shoulder pain in primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective cohort study in primary care physiotherapy with a 12 week follow-up. METHODS: Descriptive data from physiotherapists was collected, such as: the diagnostic hypotheses after patient history and physical examination, the use of specific tests and diagnostic ultrasound, the interventions used and possible changes in treatment plan. RESULTS: Subacromial impingement syndrome was the most common hypothesis after patient history (48%) as well as physical examination (39%). Diagnostic ultrasound was used in 31% and of these patients the clinical diagnosis changed in 29%. Various interventions were used in all clinical diagnoses. After 12 weeks 41% of patients still received physiotherapy treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with shoulder pain in physiotherapy practice frequently show signs of subacromial impingement syndrome. The interventions used by the physiotherapists were generally in line with the guideline for subacromial impingement syndrome however a small proportion of physiotherapists used massage and tape/bracing techniques. A large proportion of patients were still receiving treatment after 12 weeks when no improvement was observed. If treatment for patients with subacromial impingement shows no benefit patients should be referred back to the general practitioner or orthopedic surgeon. Conclusions from this study might be slightly biased because of the selection of physiotherapists.

The Use of Osteopathic Manual Therapy and Rehabilitation for Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: A Case Report.

Rotator cuff dysfunction is common in athletes involved with overhead sports. Secondary subacromial impingement is a common cause of pain for patients with rotator cuff dysfunction. Exercise rehabilitation and manual therapy can be used in the treatment of subacromial impingement to decrease pain, increase functionality and support a return to activity. The current case report describes a 24-year-old patient with supraspinatus tendinosis and secondary subacromial impingement who was experiencing pain when playing tennis, and during daily activities involving overhead movements. Osteopathic manual therapy and rehabilitation was undertaken leading to significant improvements in pain and function over a six-week period. The current case report describes an evidence-informed approach to the management of subacromial impingement syndrome whilst incorporating a manual therapy technique, balanced ligamentous tension, that has received little attention in the literature.

Effects of Low-Load Exercise on Postneedling-Induced Pain After Dry Needling of Active Trigger Point in Individuals With Subacromial Pain Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The application of dry needling usually is associated with postneedling-induced pain. A postneedling intervention to reduce this adverse event is needed. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of low-load exercise on reducing postneedling-induced pain after dry needling of active trigger points (TrPs) in the infraspinatus muscle in subacromial pain syndrome. DESIGN: A 72-hour follow-up, single-blind randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Urban hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with subacromial pain syndrome (n = 90, 52% female, mean age: 35 ± 13 years) with active TrPs in the infraspinatus muscle. INTERVENTIONS: All individuals received dry needling into the infraspinatus active TrP. Then, they were divided randomly into an experimental group, which received a single bout of low-load exercise of shoulder muscles; a placebo group, which received inactive ultrasound for 10 minutes; and a control group, which did not receive any intervention. OUTCOME MEASURES: Numerical Pain Rating Scale (0-10 point) was administered postneedling, immediately postintervention (2 minutes), and 24, 48, and 72 hours after needling. Shoulder pain (Numerical Pain Rating Scale, 0-10) and disability (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand; Shoulder Pain and Disability Index) were assessed before and 72 hour after needling. RESULTS: The 5 × 3 analysis of covariance showed that the exercise group demonstrated a larger decrease in postneedling-induced pain immediately after (P = .001), 24 hours (P = .001), and 48 hours after (P = .006) than placebo or control groups. No differences were found at 72 hours (P = .03). Similar improvements in shoulder pain (P < .001) and related disability (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand: P < .001; Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: P < .001) were observed 72 hours after needling, irrespective of the treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Low-load exercise was effective for reducing postneedling-induced pain on active TrPs in the infraspinatus muscle 24 and 48 hours after needling. The application of a postneedling intervention did not influence short-term pain and disability changes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Short-Term Effects of Thoracic Spine Manipulation on Shoulder Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the short-term effects of thoracic spine manipulation (TSM) on pain, function, scapular kinematics, and scapular muscle activity in individuals with shoulder impingement syndrome. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with blinded assessor and patient. SETTING: Laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with shoulder impingement syndrome (N=61). INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly allocated to TSM group (n=30) or sham-TSM group (n=31) and attended 2 intervention sessions over a 1-week period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Scapular kinematics and muscle activity were measured at day 1 (baseline, before the first intervention), day 2 preintervention (before second intervention), day 2 postintervention (after the second intervention), and day 3 (follow-up). Shoulder pain and function were assessed by the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index at baseline, day 2 preintervention, and follow-up. An assessor blinded to group assignment measured all outcomes. RESULTS: Pain decreased by 0.7 points (95% confidence interval, 1.3-0.1 points) at day 2 preintervention and 0.9 points (95% confidence interval, 1.5-0.3 points) at day 2 postintervention in the TSM group. The Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (P=.01) and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (P=.02) scores improved in both groups. Scapular upward rotation increased during arm lowering (P<.01) at day 2 postintervention (5.3°) and follow-up (3.5°) in the TSM group. Upper trapezius activity increased (P<.05) in the sham-TSM group. Middle trapezius, lower trapezius, and serratus anterior decreased activities in both groups during elevation and lowering of the arm. CONCLUSIONS: TSM may increase scapular upward rotation during arm lowering. TSM does not seem to influence activity of the scapular muscles. The results concerning shoulder pain, function, scapular tilt, and internal rotation are not conclusive.

Kinesiology taping does not alter shoulder strength, shoulder proprioception, or scapular kinematics in healthy, physically active subjects and subjects with Subacromial Impingement Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of kinesiology tape (KT) on shoulder strength, proprioception, and scapular kinematics in healthy and Subacromial Impingement Syndrome (SAIS) subjects. DESIGN: Placebo-controlled quasi-experimental study. SETTING: Research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 30 physically active subjects participated. Ten healthy subjects with no previous history of shoulder pathology received KT on the dominant shoulder. Twenty subjects with shoulder pain for a minimum of two weeks and presenting with clinical signs of impingement were allotted to receive KT (n = 10) or placebo taping (PT, n = 10) on the involved shoulder. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All participants were tested pre- and post-application. Shoulder internal/external rotation (IR/ER) strength was assessed with isokinetic dynamometry (average peak torque/body weight). Shoulder IR/ER proprioception was assessed through threshold to detect passive motion (mean absolute error in degrees). Scapular position at 90° and 120° of shoulder abduction during arm raising/lowering were assessed using a 3D motion analysis system. RESULTS: No significant within group or between group differences were demonstrated for any measure. CONCLUSIONS: Taping does not appear to aid/impair shoulder strength, shoulder proprioception, or scapular kinematics. Future research should explore if the effects of KT are time-dependent and similar in other pathologies.

[Effectiveness of physiotherapy on painful shoulder impingement syndrome]. / Efectividad de los medios físicos en el síndrome de abducción dolorosa de hombro.

BACKGROUND: Painful shoulder impingement syndrome is one of the first reasons for care in rehabilitation centres. As the evidence regarding the effectiveness of physical measures as adjuvant treatment is limited, the aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of physiotherapy on shoulder pain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective and analytical study was conducted using the medical records of patients with shoulder pain who attended in a rehabilitation centre from October 2010 to September 2011. The demographic and clinical data were collected, and the clinical improvement was determined as: complete, incomplete, or no improvement. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Chi squared was used to determine whether there were differences between the different modalities of physiotherapy, as well as the level of improvement. RESULTS: The study included a total of 181 patients, with a mean age of 54.3 years, and a mean of 4.6 months of onset of pain. The physiotherapy treatments included: warm compresses plus interferential current (60.2%), and warm compresses plus ultrasound (17.1%). Just over half (53.6%) obtained a moderate recovery, 36.4% slight improvement, and 9.9% no improvement. No significant differences were found between the different forms of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The supervised rehabilitation program consists of 9 sessions of physiotherapy. A functional improvement of 90% was obtained, without finding any statistical differences between the therapies used.

Effects of a movement training oriented rehabilitation program on symptoms, functional limitations and acromiohumeral distance in individuals with subacromial pain syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Multiple factors have been associated with the presence of a subacromial pain syndrome (SPS), including deficits in performance of scapular and glenohumeral muscles. Such deficits can lead to inadequate kinematics and decreased acromiohumeral distance (AHD). Exercises that aim at correcting these deficits, such as movement training, were suggested to improve symptoms and functional limitations. To date, few studies have assessed outcomes following an intervention focused on movement training. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the effects of a rehabilitation program based on movement training on symptoms, functional limitations and AHD in individuals with SPS. DESIGN: Prospective single group pre-post design. METHODS: Twenty-five participants with SPS (SPS group) participated in a 6-week program. Twenty asymptomatic volunteers were recruited for normative AHD values (control group). Outcomes of both groups were evaluated at baseline and 6 weeks, i.e. immediately following intervention for the SPS group. Changes in symptoms and functional limitations for SPS group were assessed using the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) index and Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Changes in AHD for both groups were assessed using ultrasonographic measures. RESULTS: Following the rehabilitation program, the scores on WORC and DASH were significantly improved (p < 0.001). AHD increased significantly in the SPS group (p = 0.019), especially in a subgroup with initial deficits (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The rehabilitation program yielded improvements in symptoms and functional limitations in participants with SPS. Moreover, it led to an increase of the AHD--thus potentially decreasing subacromial compression, particularly in participants with an initially smaller AHD. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: identifier--NCT02395770.

Efficacy of dynamic humeral centering according to Neer test results: a stratified analysis of a randomized-controlled trial.

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of dynamic humeral centering (DHC) according to Neer test results. The study was a stratified analysis of a previously reported randomized trial. The patients included had shoulder pain with impingement syndrome. Interventions were DHC or nonspecific mobilization for control. The primary outcome was the Constant score including subscores for pain, activity, mobility, and strength at 3 months. All patients improved at follow-up, with better results after DHC. There was no interaction between Neer test results, treatments, and time. However, a trend toward higher effect sizes was observed after DHC in patients with a positive Neer test in comparison with negative patients. Patients with a positive Neer test showed improvement after DHC for rotator cuff disease compared with nonspecific mobilization.

Intervención grupal del síndrome subacromial en atención primaria / A group intervention for shoulder impingement syndrome in primary care

Introducción. El aumento de consultas por dolor de hombro en los servicios de rehabilitación impone buscar alternativas eficientes para mejorar su manejo. Objetivos. Evaluar la efectividad de un programa de rehabilitación grupal para mejorar la funcionalidad y el dolor en pacientes afectos de síndrome subacromial y ver qué variables se asocian a un mejor resultado funcional final. Métodos. Estudio longitudinal prospectivo de intervención antes/después. Muestra: 211 pacientes. La intervención consistió en 10 sesiones de electroterapia analgésica individual, 5 sesiones de cinesiterapia grupal y una sesión informativa: «escuela de hombro». El seguimiento fue de un año. Medimos la funcionalidad con el test de Constant y el dolor con la escala visual analógica. Pruebas estadísticas: chi cuadrado, T-test, ANOVA y regresión lineal múltiple (p < 0,05). Resultados. La funcionalidad mejoró significativamente en los 4 períodos estudiados respecto al valor inicial y se estabilizó a los 6 meses. El perfil de paciente que obtuvo mayor funcionalidad fue: mujer, mayor de 60 años, sin dolor en reposo inicial y laboralmente no activa. La mejora del dolor observada a largo plazo no fue significativa. El consumo de analgésicos se redujo significativamente a los 3 meses. La adherencia al tratamiento domiciliario de ejercicios fue del 81% a los 3 y 6 meses y del 70,6% al año. Conclusiones. La aplicación de un programa de rehabilitación grupal en pacientes afectos de síndrome subacromial se ha mostrado efectivo para mejorar la funcionalidad a largo plazo. Sin embargo, el dolor no ha mostrado mejoría significativa a lo largo del estudio (AU)

Introduction. Due to the increase in consultations for shoulder pain in rehabilitation services, there is a need for efficient alternatives to improve the management of this disorder. Objectives. To evaluate the effectiveness of a supervised group exercise program to improve functionality and pain in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome and to identify the variables that are associated with a better functional outcome. Methods. A prospective longitudinal, pre and post intervention study was carried out in a sample of 211 patients. The treatment consisted of 10 individual sessions of analgesic electrotherapy, 5 sessions of group exercise therapy and an educational session: «shoulder school». One year follow-up was performed. Shoulder function and pain were assessed using Constant's test and the visual analogue scale. The statistical analysis was carried out with the chi-square test, T-test, ANOVA and multiple linear regression (P < .05). Results. Functionality improved significantly in all periods studied compared with baseline and stabilized at 6 months. The profile of patients who achieved greater functionality was female, older than 60 years, with no initial rest pain and occupationally inactive. Long-term pain improvement was not significant. Analgesic use was significantly reduced at 3 months. Adherence to home exercise treatment was 81% at 3 and 6 months and 70.6% at one year. Conclusions. The application of a group rehabilitation program in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome was effective in improving long-term functionality. However, there was no significant pain improvement during the study (AU)

The therapeutic role of motor imagery on the functional rehabilitation of a stage II shoulder impingement syndrome.

PURPOSE: Motor imagery (MI) has been used as a complementary therapeutic tool for motor recovery after central nervous system disease and peripheral injuries. However, it has never been used as a preventive tool. We investigated the use of MI in the rehabilitation of stage II shoulder impingement syndrome. For the first time, MI is used before surgery. METHOD: Sixteen participants were randomly assigned to either a MI or control group. Shoulder functional assessment (Constant score), range of motion and pain were measured before and after intervention. RESULTS: Higher Constant score was observed in the MI than in the control group (p=0.04). Participants in the MI group further displayed greater movement amplitude (extension (p<0.001); flexion (p=0.025); lateral rotation (p<0.001). Finally, the MI group showed greater pain decrease (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: MI intervention seems to alleviate pain and enhance mobility, this is probably due to changes in muscle control and consequently in joint amplitude. MI might contribute to postpone or even protect from passing to stage III that may require surgery. Implications for Rehabilitation Adding motor imagery training to classical physical therapy in a stage II impingement syndrome: Helps in alleviating pain Enhances shoulder mobility Motor imagery is a valuable technique that can be used as a preventive tool before the stage III of the impingement syndrome.

The addition of cervical unilateral posterior-anterior mobilisation in the treatment of patients with shoulder impingement syndrome: a randomised clinical trial.

Shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS) is a complex, multi-factorial problem that is treated with a variety of different conservative options. One conservative option that has shown effectiveness is manual therapy to the thoracic spine. Another option, manual therapy to the cervical spine, has been studied only once with good results, evaluating short-term outcomes, in a small sample size. The purpose of this study was to investigate the benefit of neck manual therapy for patients with SIS. The study was a randomised, single blinded, clinical trial where both groups received pragmatic, evidence-based treatment to the shoulder and one group received neck manual therapy. Subjects with neck pain were excluded from the study. Comparative pain, disability, rate of recovery and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) measures were analyzed on the 68 subjects seen over an average of 56.1 days (standard deviation (SD)=55.4). Eighty-six percent of the sample reported an acceptable change on the PASS at discharge. There were no between-groups differences in those who did or did not receive neck manual therapy; however, both groups demonstrated significant within-groups improvements. On average both groups improved 59.7% (SD=25.1) for pain and 53.5% (SD=40.2) for the Quick Disabilities of the Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) from baseline. This study found no value when neck manual therapy was added to the treatment of SIS. Reasons may include the lack of therapeutic dosage provided for the manual therapy approach or the lack of benefit to treating the neck in subjects with SIS who do not have concomitant neck problems.

Técnica de Thrust para la disfunción de la cabeza humeral en superioridad / Thrust technique for the dysfunction of the humeral head in superiority

Las disfunciones en el hombro tienen una alta incidencia en lapoblación, entendiendo por hombro, el complejo articular compuesto de cinco articulaciones, entre la que cabría destacar, la articulación glenohumeral. Una de las lesiones más invalidantes de la articulación glenohumeral es la lesión de superioridad, debido a la estenosis del espacio subacromial que ésta provoca. El objetivo de la técnica de thrust para superioridad de la cabeza humeral será provocar el descenso de la cabeza humeral para recuperar la funcionalidad de la articulación gleno-humeral. Para realizar correctamente la técnica, previamente habría que aplicar un diagnóstico adecuado, basado en la inspección, palpación, pruebas de movilidad, pruebas musculares, pruebas ortopédicas y radilógicas. Este procedimiento tiene riesgos conocidos que deberán evitarse para obtener los beneficios terapéuticos deseados, en los pacientes que presenten indicaciones para su aplicación (AU)

Shoulder dysfunctions are very common in the population. By shoulder, one understands joint complex composed of five joints, among which one could highlight the gleno-humeral joint. One of the more incapacitating injuries of the gleno-humeral joints is the injury in superiority due to the stenosis of the subacromial space that this would cause. The aim of the thrust technique for superiority of the humeral head will be to cause the decline of the humeral head to regain functionality of the gleno-humeral joint. To successfully carry out the technique, it would be necessary to previously perform an appropriate diagnostic, based on inspection, palpation, mobility tests, muscle testing, orthopedic and x ray tests. This procedure has known risks that must be avoided to obtain desired therapeutic benefits in patients presenting indications for application (AU)

Shoulder muscle function in frozen shoulder syndrome patients following manipulation under anesthesia: a 6-month follow-up study.

INTRODUCTION: The present study evaluates changes in shoulder muscle function in patients with frozen shoulder syndrome (FSS) following manipulation under general anesthesia (MUA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen FSS patients with mean (±SD) age of 53.6±9.7 years were included in this study. Isometric endurance of the shoulder muscles was characterized by time and net impulse (NI), which were assessed with the patient holding a weight in the hand until exhaustion. Fatigability of the deltoid and trapezius muscles during isometric endurance test was assessed by electromyogram power spectrum median frequency (MF) slope per minute. Patients were also screened for daytime pain. Data were collected before MUA, and at 1 and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Six months postoperatively, the MF slope for the trapezius and deltoid muscles of the involved and uninvolved shoulders did not differ (P>0.05), whereas NI remained lower and endurance time was longer (P<0.05). Shoulder pain was reduced as compared to preoperative levels (on visual analog scale) 1 and 6 months postoperatively (P<0.05). DISCUSSION: In patients with FSS, the fastest improvements in shoulder muscle NI, fatigability and pain take place in the first month after MUA; 6 months after MUA, however, NI and endurance time remained impaired for the involved shoulder. Physiotherapy should pay more attention to muscle function recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prospective follow-up study.