ABSTRACT
To address literature gaps on treatment with real-world evidence, this study compared effectiveness, safety, and cost outcomes in NVAF patients with coronary or peripheral artery disease (CAD, PAD) prescribed apixaban versus other oral anticoagulants. NVAF patients aged ≥65 years co-diagnosed with CAD/PAD initiating warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban were selected from the US Medicare population (January 1, 2013 to September 30, 2015). Propensity score matching was used to match apixaban versus warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban cohorts. Cox models were used to evaluate the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding (MB), all-cause mortality, and a composite of stroke/myocardial infarction/all-cause mortality. Generalized linear and two-part models were used to compare stroke/SE, MB, and all-cause costs between cohorts. A total of 33,269 warfarin-apixaban, 9,335 dabigatran-apixaban, and 33,633 rivaroxaban-apixaban pairs were identified after matching. Compared with apixaban, stroke/SE risk was higher in warfarin (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.61 to 2.31), dabigatran (HR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.18 to 2.43), and rivaroxaban (HR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.51) patients. MB risk was higher in warfarin (HR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.52 to 1.83), dabigatran (HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.13 to 1.68), and rivaroxaban (HR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.71 to 2.05) patients vs apixaban. Stroke/SE- and MB-related medical costs per-patient per-month were higher in warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban patients versus apixaban. Total all-cause health care costs were higher in warfarin and rivaroxaban patients compared with apixaban patients. In conclusion, compared with apixaban, patients on dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin had a higher risk of stroke/SE, MB, and event-related costs.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Embolism/prevention & control , Health Care Costs , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Peripheral Arterial Disease/complications , Stroke/prevention & control , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Cause of Death , Coronary Artery Disease/economics , Dabigatran/therapeutic use , Embolism/economics , Embolism/etiology , Female , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/economics , Humans , Male , Mortality , Myocardial Infarction/economics , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Peripheral Arterial Disease/economics , Propensity Score , Proportional Hazards Models , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Pyridones/therapeutic use , Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use , Stroke/economics , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/etiology , United States/epidemiology , Warfarin/therapeutic useABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the real-world cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban, versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) from a French national health insurance perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was developed with a lifetime horizon and cycle length of 3 months. All inputs were drawn from real-world evidence (RWE) studies: data on baseline patient characteristics at model entry were obtained from a French RWE study, clinical event rates as well as persistence rates for the VKA treatment arm were estimated from a variety of RWE studies, and a meta-analysis provided comparative effectiveness for rivaroxaban compared to VKA. Model outcomes included costs (drug costs, clinical event costs, and VKA monitoring costs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and life-years (LY) gained, incremental cost per QALY, and incremental cost per LY. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model and to better understand the results drivers. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, the incremental total cost was 714 and the total incremental QALYs and LYs were 0.12 and 0.16, respectively. The resulting incremental cost/QALY and incremental cost/LY were 6,006 and 4,586, respectively. The results were more sensitive to the inclusion of treatment-specific utility decrements and clinical event rates. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is no official willingness-to-pay threshold in France, these results suggest that rivaroxaban is likely to be cost-effective compared to VKA in French patients with AF from a national insurance perspective.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use , Stroke/drug therapy , Vitamin K/antagonists & inhibitors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Atrial Fibrillation/pathology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Markov Chains , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/economics , Myocardial Infarction/pathology , Myocardial Infarction/prevention & control , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Rivaroxaban/economics , Stroke/economics , Stroke/pathology , Stroke/prevention & control , Warfarin/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Stroke is a major leading cause of death and disability worldwide. N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) including eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid have potent anti-inflammatory effects, reduce platelet aggregation, and regress atherosclerotic plaques. Since the discovery that the Greenland Eskimo population, whose diet is high in marine n-3 PUFAs, have a lower incidence of coronary heart disease than Western populations, numerous epidemiological studies to explore the associations of dietary intakes of fish and n-3 PUFAs with cardiovascular diseases, and large-scale clinical trials to identify the benefits of treatment with n-3 PUFAs have been conducted. In most of these studies the incidence and mortality of stroke were also evaluated mainly as secondary endpoints. Thus, a systematic literature review regarding the association of dietary intake of n-3 PUFAs with stroke in the epidemiological studies and the treatment effects of n-3 PUFAs in the clinical trials was conducted. Moreover, recent experimental studies were also reviewed to explore the molecular mechanisms of the neuroprotective effects of n-3 PUFAs after stroke.
Subject(s)
Fatty Acids, Omega-3/therapeutic use , Stroke/drug therapy , Stroke/mortality , Cost of Illness , Fatty Acids, Omega-3/economics , Humans , Incidence , Stroke/economics , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Aims: Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) prevalence increases with age. Hence, evaluating the economic burden among older-aged patients is vital. This study aimed to compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs among newly-diagnosed older-aged NVAF patients treated with warfarin, rivaroxaban, or apixaban vs. dabigatran.Materials and Methods: Newly-diagnosed older-aged (aged ≥65 years) NVAF patients initiating dabigatran, warfarin, rivaroxaban, or apixaban (first prescription date = index date) from 01JAN2010-31DEC2015 and with continuous enrollment for ≥12 months pre-index date were included from 100% Medicare database. Patient data were assessed until drug discontinuation/switch/dose change/death/disenrollment/study end (up to 12 months). Dabigatran initiators were 1:1 propensity score-matched (PSM) with warfarin, rivaroxaban, or apixaban initiators. Generalized linear models were used to compare all-cause HRU and costs per-patient-per-month (PPPM) between the matched cohorts.Results: After PSM with dabigatran, 70,531 warfarin, 51,673 rivaroxaban, and 25,209 apixaban patients were identified. Dabigatran patients had significantly fewer generalized-linear-model-adjusted PPPM hospitalizations (0.114 vs. 0.123; 0.111 vs. 0.121), and outpatient visits (2.864 vs. 4.201; 2.839 vs. 2.949) than warfarin and rivaroxaban patients, respectively, but had significantly more PPPM hospitalizations (0.103 vs. 0.090) and outpatient visits (2.780 vs. 2.673) than apixaban patients (all p < .0001). Dabigatran patients incurred significantly lower adjusted total PPPM costs ($3,309 vs. $3,362; $3,285 vs. $3,474) than warfarin and rivaroxaban patients, respectively (all p < .01) but higher total PPPM costs ($3,192 vs. $2,986) than apixaban patients (all p < .0001).Limitations: This study is subject to the inherent limitations of any claims dataset, including potential bias from coding errors and identification of medical conditions using diagnosis codes as opposed to clinical evidence. Medications filled over-the-counter or provided as samples by the physician are never captured in claims data.Conclusions: Newly-diagnosed older-aged NVAF patients initiating dabigatran incurred significantly lower adjusted all-cause HRU and costs than warfarin and rivaroxaban patients but higher adjusted HRU and costs than apixaban patients.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Comorbidity , Dabigatran/therapeutic use , Female , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Humans , Male , Medicare , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Propensity Score , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Pyridones/therapeutic use , Racial Groups , Residence Characteristics , Retrospective Studies , Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use , Sex Factors , Stroke/economics , Stroke/prevention & control , United States , Warfarin/therapeutic useABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: After surviving from an acute phase of stroke, it is essential for stroke survivors to continue therapies to improve their function and quality of life. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of rehabilitation treatment on the society in economic aspect with evidence from a traditional hospital. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was carried out with patients who were being treated at Traditional Medicine Hospital in Ho Chi Minh City after experiencing a stroke. Patients' relevant medical information was extracted from the hospital's database and placed on a structured questionnaire. RESULTS: Among 103 eligible patients aged 60.3 } 11.4 years, 93.2% had experienced a stroke for the first time. Eighty-four patients were diagnosed with ischaemic stroke, while the number of haemorrhagic stroke patients was approximately 4.5 times lower (n = 19). The mean total cost was $3,310.40 USD, which included $1,653.60 USD, $539.90 USD and $1,117.00 USD for direct medical, direct non-medical and indirect cost, respectively. Hospital bed costs accounted for a considerable percentage of direct medical costs (41.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Stroke was determined to be a significant social burden, although patients in this study had already suffered from the acute phase. This study gives decision makers a comparative view about the economic view on the economic burden of the stroke rehabilitation treatment between using traditional national Western and Eastern therapy.
Subject(s)
Health Care Costs , Hospitalization/economics , Stroke Rehabilitation/economics , Stroke/economics , Aged , Female , Hospitals, Public , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Stroke/therapy , VietnamABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Palm oil's high yields, consequent low cost and highly versatile properties as a cooking oil and food ingredient have resulted in its thorough infiltration of the food sector in some countries. Longitudinal studies have associated palm oil's high saturated fatty acid content with non-communicable disease, but neither the economic or disease burdens have been assessed previously. METHODS: This novel palm oil-focussed disease burden assessment employs a fully integrated health, macroeconomic and demographic Computable General Equilibrium Model for Thailand with nine regional (urban/rural) households. Nutritional changes from food consumption are endogenously translated into health (myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke) and population outcomes and are fed back into the macroeconomic model as health and caregiver-related productive labour supply effects and healthcare costs to generate holistic 2016-2035 burden estimates. Model scenarios mirror the replacement of palm cooking oil with other dietary oils and are compared with simulated total Thai health and macroeconomic burdens for MI and stroke. RESULTS: Replacing consumption of palm cooking oil with other dietary oils could reduce MI/stroke incident cases by 8280/2639 and cumulative deaths by 4683/894 over 20 years, removing approximately 0.5% of the total Thai burden of MI/stroke. This palm cooking oil replacement would reduce consumption shares of saturated/monounsaturated fatty acids in Thai household consumption by 6.5%/3% and increase polyunsaturated fatty acid consumption shares by 14%, yielding a 1.74% decrease in the population-wide total-to-HDL cholesterol ratio after 20 years. The macroeconomic burden that would be removed is US$308mn, approximately 0.44% of the total burden of MI/stroke on Thailand's economy or 0.003% of cumulative 20-year GDP. Bangkok and Central region households benefit most from removal of disease burdens. CONCLUSIONS: Simulations indicate that consumption of palm cooking oil, rather than other dietary oils, imposes a negative health burden (MI and stroke) and associated economic burden on a high consuming country, such as Thailand. Integrated sectoral model frameworks to assess these burdens are possible, and burden estimates from our simulated direct replacement of palm cooking oil indicate that using these frameworks both for broader analyses of dietary palm oil use and total burden analyses of other diseases may also be beneficial.
Subject(s)
Dietary Fats , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Palm Oil , Stroke/epidemiology , Cholesterol, HDL , Dietary Fats, Unsaturated , Fatty Acids , Humans , Models, Economic , Myocardial Infarction/economics , Plant Oils , Stroke/economics , Thailand/epidemiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: People often experience distress following stroke due to fundamental challenges to their identity. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate (1) the acceptability of 'HeART of Stroke' (HoS), a community-based arts and health group intervention, to increase psychological well-being; and (2) the feasibility of a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT). DESIGN: Two-centre, 24-month, parallel-arm RCT with qualitative and economic components. Randomisation was stratified by centre and stroke severity. Participant blinding was not possible. Outcome assessment blinding was attempted. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling adults ≤2 years poststroke recruited via hospital clinical teams/databases or community stroke/rehabilitation teams. INTERVENTIONS: Artist-facilitated arts and health group intervention (HoS) (ten 2-hour sessions over 14 weeks) plus usual care (UC) versus UC. OUTCOMES: The outcomes were self-reported measures of well-being, mood, capability, health-related quality of life, self-esteem and self-concept (baseline and 5 months postrandomisation). Key feasibility parameters were gathered, data collection methods were piloted, and participant interviews (n=24) explored the acceptability of the intervention and study processes. RESULTS: Despite a low recruitment rate (14%; 95% CI 11% to 18%), 88% of the recruitment target was met, with 29 participants randomised to HoS and 27 to UC (57% male; mean (SD) age=70 (12.1) years; time since stroke=9 (6.1) months). Follow-up data were available for 47 of 56 (84%; 95% CI 72% to 91%). Completion rates for a study-specific resource use questionnaire were 79% and 68% (National Health Service and societal perspectives). Five people declined HoS postrandomisation; of the remaining 24 who attended, 83% attended ≥6 sessions. Preliminary effect sizes for candidate primary outcomes were in the direction of benefit for the HoS arm. Participants found study processes acceptable. The intervention cost an estimated £456 per person and was well-received (no intervention-related serious adverse events were reported). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this first community-based study of an arts and health intervention for people poststroke suggest a definitive RCT is feasible. Recruitment methods will be revised. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN99728983.
Subject(s)
Art Therapy/methods , Quality of Life , Self Concept , Stroke Rehabilitation , Stroke/psychology , Activities of Daily Living , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Delivery of Health Care , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Independent Living/psychology , Male , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Psychosocial Support Systems , Stroke/economics , Stroke Rehabilitation/methods , Stroke Rehabilitation/psychologySubject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Quality Indicators, Health Care/organization & administration , Stroke/therapy , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Continuity of Patient Care/economics , Cost Savings , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics , Efficiency, Organizational , Health Care Costs , Humans , Organizational Innovation , Quality Improvement/economics , Quality Indicators, Health Care/economics , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/economics , Telemedicine/economics , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of direct-acting oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in Thai patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and a HAS-BLED score of 3. METHODS: Total costs (US$) in 2017 and quality-adjusted life-years were estimated over 20 years using a Markov model. A base-case analysis was conducted under a societal perspective, which included direct healthcare, non-healthcare and indirect costs in Thailand. Clinical events for warfarin and utilities were obtained from Thai patients whenever possible. The efficacy of direct-acting oral anticoagulants was derived from trial-based East Asian subgroups and adjusted for time in the target international normalized ratio range of warfarin. RESULTS: In the base case, use of apixaban instead of warfarin incurred an additional cost of US$20,763 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Substituting apixaban with rivaroxaban and rivaroxaban with high-dose edoxaban would incur an additional cost per quality-adjusted life-year by US$507 and US$434, respectively. Compared with warfarin, high-dose edoxaban had the lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$9704/quality-adjusted life-year, followed by high-dose dabigatran (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio US$11,155/quality-adjusted life-year). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios based on a payer perspective were similar. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was below Thailand's cost-effectiveness threshold when high-dose dabigatran and edoxaban prices were reduced by 50%. Changes in key parameters had a minimal impact on incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. CONCLUSIONS: For both societal and payer perspectives, high-dose edoxaban with a price below the country cost-effectiveness threshold should be the first anticoagulant option for Thai patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and a high risk of bleeding.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Factor Xa Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Stroke/prevention & control , Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Costs , Factor Xa Inhibitors/adverse effects , Factor Xa Inhibitors/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Markov Chains , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Risk , Stroke/economics , Stroke/etiology , Thailand , Warfarin/administration & dosage , Warfarin/economicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This is one of the first head-to-head real-world evidence studies comparing stroke-related and bleed-related healthcare and resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients initiating oral anticoagulants. METHODS: Adult NVAF patients newly diagnosed and treated with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin between 10/01/2010 and 12/31/2014 were identified using MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases. Per-patient-per-month stroke and bleed-related HCRU and costs were reported. RESULTS: Dabigatran patients were matched 1:1 to 26,592 rivaroxaban and 33,024 warfarin patients (mean age=68 years). Compared to rivaroxaban, dabigatran patients had lower bleed-related inpatient and outpatient HCRU (0.004 vs. 0.005; 0.099 vs. 0.145) and significantly lower adjusted bleed-related costs ($116 vs. $172), all p <0.05. Compared to warfarin, dabigatran patients had significantly lower stroke-related outpatient visits (0.034 vs. 0.048, p<0.001) and higher bleed-related outpatient visits (0.101 vs. 0.091, p=0.045). Multivariate adjusted bleed-related costs were significantly lower for dabigatran patients than warfarin patients ($94 vs. $138, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that dabigatran patients had lower bleed-related HCRU and costs than rivaroxaban patients, and lower outpatient stroke-related HCRU, higher bleed-related outpatient HCRU, and lower bleed-related costs than warfarin patients. It provides valuable stroke-related and bleed-related HCRU and costs information among commercially insured and Medicare patients.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Stroke/prevention & control , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/economics , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Dabigatran/administration & dosage , Dabigatran/adverse effects , Dabigatran/economics , Female , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hemorrhage/economics , Humans , Male , Medicare , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Rivaroxaban/administration & dosage , Rivaroxaban/adverse effects , Rivaroxaban/economics , Stroke/economics , Stroke/etiology , United States , Warfarin/administration & dosage , Warfarin/adverse effects , Warfarin/economicsABSTRACT
Background and Purpose- Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are safer, at least equally efficacious, and cost-effective compared to warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) but they remain underused, particularly in demented patients. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of DOACs compared with warfarin in patients with AF and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods- We constructed a microsimulation model to estimate the lifetime costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and cost-effectiveness of anticoagulation therapy (adjusted-dose warfarin and various DOACs) in 70-year-old patients with AF and AD from a US societal perspective. We stratified patient cohorts based on stage of AD and care setting. Model parameters were estimated from secondary sources. Health benefits were measured in the number of acute health events, life-years, and QALYs gained. We classified alternatives as cost-effective using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY gained. Results- For patients with AF and AD, compared with warfarin, DOACs increase costs but also increase QALYs by reducing the risk of stroke. For mild-AD patients living in the community, edoxaban increased lifetime costs by $6603 and increased QALYs by 0.076 compared to warfarin, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $86 882/QALY gained. Even though DOACs increased QALYs compared with warfarin for all patient groups (ranging from 0.019 to 0.085 additional QALYs), no DOAC treatment alternative had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio <$150 000/QALY gained for patients with moderate to severe AD. For patients living in a long-term care facility with mild AD, the DOAC with the lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (rivaroxaban) costs $150 169 per QALY gained; for patients with more severe AD, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were higher. Conclusions- For patients with AF and mild AD living in the community, edoxaban is cost-effective compared with warfarin. Even though patients with moderate and severe AD living in the community and patients with any stage of AD living in a long-term care setting may obtain positive clinical benefits from anticoagulation treatment, DOACs are not cost-effective compared with warfarin for these populations. Compared to aspirin, no oral anticoagulation (warfarin or any DOAC) is cost effective in patients with AF and AD.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/economics , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Health Care Costs , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Stroke/prevention & control , Aged , Alzheimer Disease/complications , Anticoagulants/economics , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Dabigatran/economics , Dabigatran/therapeutic use , Disease Progression , Humans , Pyrazoles/economics , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Pyridines/economics , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Pyridones/economics , Pyridones/therapeutic use , Rivaroxaban/economics , Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use , Stroke/economics , Stroke/etiology , Thiazoles/economics , Thiazoles/therapeutic use , Warfarin/economics , Warfarin/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Warfarin use for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with chronic kidney disease is debated. Apixaban was shown to be safer than warfarin, with superior reduction in the risk of stroke, systemic embolism, mortality, and major bleeding irrespective of kidney function. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-utility of apixaban compared with warfarin in AF patients at different levels of kidney function. METHODS: A Markov model was used to estimate the cost effectiveness of apixaban compared with warfarin in AF patients at three levels of kidney function: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of more than 80 ml/min, 50 to 80 ml/min, and 50 ml/min or less. Event rates and associated utilities were obtained from previous literature. The model adopted the US health care system perspective, with hospitalization costs extracted from the Healthcare and Utilization Project. Treatment costs were obtained from official price lists. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of results. RESULTS: Apixaban was a dominant treatment strategy compared with warfarin in AF patients with eGFR levels of 50 ml/min or less and 50 to 80 ml/min. In patients with an eGFR of more than 80 ml/min, apixaban was cost-effective compared with warfarin, costing $6307 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Results were consistent assuming anticoagulant discontinuation after major bleeding events. Compared with dabigatran and rivaroxaban, apixaban was the only cost-effective anticoagulant strategy relative to warfarin in both mild and moderate renal impairment settings. CONCLUSIONS: Apixaban is a favorably cost-effective alternative to warfarin in AF patients with normal kidney function and potentially cost-saving in those with renal impairment.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/economics , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Pyrazoles/economics , Pyridones/economics , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Stroke/economics , Warfarin/economics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Blood Coagulation , Factor Xa Inhibitors/economics , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Fibrinolytic Agents/economics , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Health Care Costs , Heart , Hospitalization , Humans , Kidney , Middle Aged , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Pyridones/therapeutic use , Quality of Life , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/physiopathology , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome , Warfarin/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to determine the scale and the nature of the economic burden caused by strokes and to use the results as an evidential source for determining the allocation of South Korea stroke cases in 2015. METHODS: For research subjects, the study analyzed demographic characteristics and economic burden based on data from national health insurance (NHI) claims for inpatient and outpatient cases of ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke in 2015 through the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) and statistical data regarding cause of death from the Korea National Statistical Office (KNSO). This study, in order to estimate economic burden due to stroke, deduced the direct and indirect costs of illness caused by stroke, using cost-of-illness (COI) methods. The economic burden is divided into direct and indirect costs, and indirect cost is estimated by summing lost productivity measured in opportunity cost lost by medical disposition due to a specific disease and lost productivity due to premature death. RESULTS: The total economic burden in Korea due to stroke was US$6.855 billion, that due to ischemic stroke was US$3.658 billion, and that due to hemorrhagic stroke was US$3.197 billion. The average economic burden per stroke case was about US$7247. CONCLUSION: The results of estimating the annual economic burden in all of Korea due to stroke will be used as an evidential source for preparing medical insurance policies, priorities, and plans for arranging medical resources for stroke as well as for determining effective prevention of the disease and related priorities in national health care policies.
Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs , Stroke/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Insurance, Health , Male , Middle Aged , National Health Programs , Republic of Korea , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to analyse hospital charges for patients with haemorrhagic stroke in China and investigate potential factors associated with inpatient charges. METHODS: The study participants were in-hospital patients with a primary diagnosis of haemorrhagic stroke from all the secondary and tertiary hospitals in Beijing during the period from 1 March 2012 to 28 February 2015. Distribution characteristics of detailed hospital charges were analysed. The influence of potential factors on hospital charges was researched using a stepwise multiple regression model. RESULTS: A total of 34 890 patients with haemorrhagic stroke of mean age 61.19±14.37 years were included in the study, of which 37.2% were female. Median length of hospital stay (LOHS) was 15 days (IQR 9-23) and median hospital cost was 18 577 Chinese yuan (CNY) (IQR 10 442-39 784). The hospital costs for patients in Western medicine hospitals (median 19 651 CNY) were significantly higher (P<0.01) than those in traditional Chinese medicine hospitals (median 14 560 CNY), and were significantly higher (P<0.01) for Level 3 hospitals (median 20 029 CNY) than for Level 2 hospitals (median 16 095 CNY). The proportion of medicine fees and bed fees within total hospital charges showed a decreasing trend during the study period. With stepwise multiple regression, the major factors associated with hospital charges were LOHS, surgery, pulmonary infection, ventilator usage, hospital level, occupation, hyperlipidaemia, hospital type, in-hospital death, sex and age. CONCLUSION: We conclude that medicines form the largest part of hospital charges but are showing a decreasing trend, and LOHS is strongly associated with patient charges for haemorrhagic stroke in China. This implies that the cost structure is very unreasonable in China and medical technology costs fail to be fully manifested. A reasonable decrease in medicine charges and shortening LOHS may be effective ways to reduce hospital charges.
Subject(s)
Cerebral Hemorrhage , Hospital Charges , Stroke , Aged , Cerebral Hemorrhage/complications , Cerebral Hemorrhage/economics , China , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Stroke/complications , Stroke/economicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The South Korean government introduced a policy in 2 phases, in September 2005 and in January 2010, for reducing copayments for patients with critical diseases, including stroke, to prevent excessive medical expenditures and to ease economic barriers. Previous studies of the effect of this policy were focused primarily on cancer. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between this policy and 1-year mortality after surgery among patients with stroke. METHODS: We used data from the Korean National Health Insurance sampling cohort (n = 2173 in 2003-2012) and performed an interrupted time series analysis. RESULTS: Approximately 26% of the patients died within 1 year after surgery. The time trends after reducing copayments from 10% to 5% (phase 2) were inversely associated with risk of 1-year mortality (relative risk = .855, 95% confidence interval: .749-.975; P = .0196). In addition, this inverse association was greater in patients with low incomes, of older ages, and with higher Charlson comorbidity indices. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a policy for reducing copayments to ease excessive cost burdens for patients with stroke was positively associated with a reduced risk of 1-year mortality after surgical treatment due to stroke. On the basis of our results, health policy makers should make an effort to identify vulnerable populations and to overcome economic barriers for providing effective alternatives to ensure patients receive optimal health care.
Subject(s)
Health Expenditures , Stroke/economics , Stroke/mortality , Age Factors , Aged , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Interrupted Time Series Analysis , Male , Middle Aged , National Health Programs/economics , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Stroke/surgeryABSTRACT
Objectives The aim of the present study was to determine the direct medical costs of hospitalisations for ischaemic stroke (IS) in-patients with different types of health insurance in China and to analyse the demographic characteristics of hospitalised patients, based on data supplied by the China Health Insurance Research Association (CHIRA). Methods A nationwide and cross-sectional sample of IS in-patients with International Classifications of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) Code I63 who were ensured under either the Basic Medical Insurance Scheme for Employees (BMISE) or the Basic Medical Insurance Scheme for Urban Residents (BMISUR) was extracted from the CHIRA claims database. A retrospective analysis was used with regard to patient demographics, total hospital charges and costs. Results Of the 49588 hospitalised patients who had been diagnosed with IS in the CHIRA claims database, 28850 (58.2%) were men (mean age 67.34 years) and 20738 (41.8%) were women (mean age 69.75 years). Of all patients, 40347 (81.4%) were insured by the BMISE, whereas 8724 (17.6%) were insured by the BMISUR; the mean age of these groups was 68.55 and 67.62 years respectively. For BMISE-insured in-patients, the cost per hospitalisation was RMB10131 (95% confidence interval (CI) 10014-10258), the cost per hospital day was RMB787 (95% CI 766-808), the out-of-pocket costs per patient were RMB2346 (95% CI 2303-2388) and the reimbursement rate was 74.61% (95% CI 74.48-74.73%). For BMISUR-insured in-patients the cost per hospitalisation was RMB7662 (95% CI 7473-7852), the cost per hospital day was RMB744 (95% CI 706-781), the out-of-pocket costs per patient were RMB3356 (95% CI 3258-3454) and the reimbursement rate was 56.46% (95% CI 56.08-56.84%). Conclusions Costs per hospitalisation, costs per hospital day and the reimbursement rate were higher for BMISE- than BMISUR-insured in-patients, but BMISE-insured patients had lower out-of-pocket costs. The financial burden was higher for BMISUR- than BMISE-insured in-patients. For BMISUR-insured in-patients, the out-of-pocket payment was 43.54% of total expenses, which means the government should increase the financial investment, raise reimbursement rates and set up differential reimbursements to meet the health needs of in-patients with different income levels. What is known about the topic? Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases are major non-communicable diseases affecting the health of the Chinese population. The China Health Statistics Yearbook (2013) reported that across all in-patients, 195million (5.82%) had been discharged with a diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease. Of these, 118million had IS, accounting for 60.51% of all in-patients with cerebrovascular disease and 54.97% of hospitalisation costs for all cerebrovascular disease in-patients. After the two basic insurance systems, namely the BMISE and BMISUR, had been established, the out-of-pocket expenses for patients were reduced. However, to date there have been no studies investigating how the different types of health insurance (i.e. the BMISE and the BMISUR) affected the costs of treatment of IS in-patients in China. What does this paper add? This paper reports the direct costs for patients diagnosed with IS based on data supplied by the CHIRA. Direct hospitalisation costs depending on the type of insurance cover, age and gender were also evaluated. What are the implications for practitioners? The present study found that the personal financial burden of disease treatment was higher for in-patients insured under the BMISUR than BMISE. For in-patients insured under the BMISUR, the out-of-pocket payment was 43.54% of total expenses, which means the government should increase the financial investment, raise reimbursement rates and set up differential reimbursement rates to meet the health needs of patients with different incomes.
Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/economics , Stroke/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Brain Ischemia/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Insurance, Health , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , National Health Programs , Sex Distribution , Stroke/epidemiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine the cost-effectiveness of CYP2C19 loss-of-function and gain-of-function allele guided (LOF/GOF-guided) antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: A life-long decision-analytic model was designed to simulate outcomes of three strategies: universal clopidogrel (75 mg daily), universal alternative P2Y12 inhibitor (prasugrel 10 mg daily or ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily), and LOF/GOF-guided therapy (LOF/GOF allele carriers receiving alternative P2Y12 inhibitor, wild-type patients receiving clopidogrel). Model outcomes included clinical event rates, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained and direct medical costs from perspective of US healthcare provider. RESULTS: Base-case analysis found nonfatal myocardial infarction (5.62%) and stent thrombosis (1.2%) to be the lowest in universal alternative P2Y12 inhibitor arm, whereas nonfatal stroke (0.72%), cardiovascular death (2.42%), and major bleeding (2.73%) were lowest in LOF/GOF-guided group. LOF/GOF-guided arm gained the highest QALYs (7.5301 QALYs) at lowest life-long cost (USD 76,450). One-way sensitivity analysis showed base-case results were subject to the hazard ratio of cardiovascular death in carriers versus non-carriers of LOF allele and hazard ratio of cardiovascular death in non-carriers of LOF allele versus general patients. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis of 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations, LOF/GOF-guided therapy, universal alternative P2Y12 inhibitor, and universal clopidogrel were the preferred strategy (willingness-to-pay threshold = 50,000 USD/QALY) in 99.07%, 0.04%, and 0.89% of time, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Using both CYP2C19 GOF and LOF alleles to select antiplatelet therapy appears to be the preferred antiplatelet strategy over universal clopidogrel and universal alternative P2Y12 inhibitor therapy for ACS patients with PCI.
Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/economics , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19/genetics , Drug Costs , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/economics , Pharmacogenomic Testing/economics , Pharmacogenomic Variants , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/economics , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/economics , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Acute Coronary Syndrome/enzymology , Acute Coronary Syndrome/genetics , Adenosine/analogs & derivatives , Adenosine/economics , Adenosine/therapeutic use , Clopidogrel , Computer Simulation , Coronary Thrombosis/economics , Coronary Thrombosis/etiology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19/metabolism , Decision Support Techniques , Genotype , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/economics , Humans , Models, Economic , Monte Carlo Method , Myocardial Infarction/economics , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Patient Selection , Phenotype , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/metabolism , Prasugrel Hydrochloride/economics , Prasugrel Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Predictive Value of Tests , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/metabolism , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Risk Factors , Stroke/economics , Stroke/etiology , Ticagrelor , Ticlopidine/analogs & derivatives , Ticlopidine/economics , Ticlopidine/therapeutic use , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the impact of co-occurring chronic conditions on healthcare expenditures among noninstitutionalized older adults (age ≥50 years) with stroke in comparison to non-stroke-matched controls. METHODS: This study used a retrospective, cross-sectional, matched case-control design using pooled 2002-2012 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data. Stroke survivors (N = 2913) were compared with matched controls (N = 8739) based on propensity scores. Healthcare expenditures for co-occurring chronic conditions were compared between stroke survivors and matched controls using ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions. All analyses were conducted in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) using survey procedures adjusting for the complex survey design of the MEPS. RESULTS: The annual mean total healthcare expenditures (expressed in 2012 United States dollars) were significantly higher among stroke survivors compared with matched non-stroke controls ($18,796 versus $14,391, P < .001). OLS regressions revealed that co-occurring chronic conditions partially explained the excess healthcare expenditures among stroke survivors. The annual mean total healthcare expenditures among stroke survivors were significantly higher for most of the co-occurring chronic conditions compared with matched controls (e.g., in presence of hyperlipidemia, stroke survivor expenditures were $18,807 compared to $15,807 among matched controls). Stroke survivors with co-occurring arthritis, diabetes, or hypertension had significantly greater inpatient, emergency room, and prescription expenditures compared with matched controls. CONCLUSIONS: Stroke survivors experience a high economic burden. Interdisciplinary team-based treatment approaches to provide holistic care may help reduce the burden due to co-occurring chronic medical conditions among stroke survivors.
Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Stroke/complications , Stroke/economics , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Survivors , United StatesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The comparative cost-effectiveness of all oral anticoagulants approved up to date has not been evaluated from the US perspective. The objective of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of edoxaban 60mg, apixaban 5mg, dabigatran 150mg, dabigatran 110mg, rivaroxaban 20mg and warfarin in stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients at high-risk of bleeding (defined as HAS-BLED score≥3). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We constructed a Markov state-transition model to evaluate lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) with each of the six treatments from the perspective of US third-party payers. Probabilities of clinical events were obtained from the RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, ARISTOTLE and ENGAGE AF-TIMI trials; costs were derived from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, and other studies. Because edoxaban is only indicated in patients with creatinine clearance ≤95ml/min, we re-ran our analyses after excluding edoxaban from the analysis. RESULTS: Treatment with edoxaban 60mg cost $77,565/QALY gained compared to warfarin, and apixaban 5mg cost $108,631/QALY gained compared to edoxaban 60mg. When edoxaban was not included in the analysis, treatment with apixaban 5mg cost $84,128/QALY gained, compared to warfarin. Dabigatran 150mg, dabigatran 110mg and rivaroxaban 20mg were dominated strategies. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with creatinine clearance between 50 and 95ml/min, apixaban 5mg was the most cost-effective treatment for willingness-to-pay thresholds (WTP) above $115,000/QALY gained, and edoxaban 60mg was cost-effective when the WTP was between $75,000 and $115,000/QALY gained. For patients with creatinine clearance >95ml/min, apixaban 5mg was the most cost-effective treatment for WTP thresholds above $80,000/QALY gained.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/economics , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Stroke/prevention & control , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Dabigatran/adverse effects , Dabigatran/economics , Dabigatran/therapeutic use , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Humans , Markov Chains , Pyrazoles/adverse effects , Pyrazoles/economics , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Pyridines/adverse effects , Pyridines/economics , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Pyridones/adverse effects , Pyridones/economics , Pyridones/therapeutic use , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Rivaroxaban/adverse effects , Rivaroxaban/economics , Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use , Stroke/economics , Thiazoles/adverse effects , Thiazoles/economics , Thiazoles/therapeutic use , Warfarin/adverse effects , Warfarin/economics , Warfarin/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for stroke prevention among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients by incorporating Taiwanese demographic information derived from a population-based database, the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), into cost-effectiveness analysis. METHODS: From 1 January to 31 December 2012, 98,213 AF patients were selected from the NHIRD database. A Markov model was constructed that combined published secondary data with the Taiwan NHIRD to compare the cost and incremental cost effectiveness of apixaban 5 mg twice daily, dabigatran 110 or 150 mg twice daily, rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily, and warfarin. RESULTS: The lifetime costs of warfarin, dabigatran 110 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, rivaroxaban 20 mg, and apixaban 5 mg were US$10,660, US$13,693, US$13,426, US$13,455, US$15,965, respectively. Apixaban resulted in an incremental cost effectiveness of US$39,351, US$27,039, US$41,298, and US$48,896 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) compared with warfarin, dabigatran 110 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, and rivaroxaban 20 mg, respectively. In Monte-Carlo analyses, apixaban 5 mg, rivaroxaban 20 mg, warfarin, and dabigatran 110 mg were cost effective in 83, 10.4, 7, and 0.8%, respectively, of the simulations using a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of US$50,000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Apixaban was more cost effective than warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in patients with AF. Among the anticoagulant therapies, the WTP threshold of apixaban was about US$50,000 per QALY gained. These cost-effectiveness estimations provide useful information to aid clinical decision making in stroke prevention for AF patients.