Restoring Trust for People With Psychosis Through Psychotherapy.

ABSTRACT: Mistrust is a significant problem for people with psychosis and can interfere with their capacity to engage in psychosocial treatment. In this article, the developmental trajectory of mistrust is outlined, including the impact that attachment disruption, childhood trauma, attributional biases, internalized stigma, and discrimination can have on the person's capacity to form trusting bonds with others. After this review, three elements are described that may allow for the restoration of trust: the therapist's openness to understanding the patient's experience and agenda for therapy, the therapist's effort to honestly disclose their thoughts to encourage dialogue and mutual reflection, and therapist's attempt to promote metacognition through helping the patient develop more complex representations of the minds of others. These elements are framed in the context of metacognitive reflection and insight therapy, an integrative therapy that is well suited to address mistrust through its explicit focus on metacognition and intersubjectivity.

Trust in Conventional Healthcare and Utilization of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in South Tyrol, Italy: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Survey.

Background: This study explored the link between trust in conventional healthcare and consultations with complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) providers in South Tyrol, Italy's linguistically diverse region. Methods: A representative cross-sectional survey of 1,388 South Tyrolean adults assessed trust in conventional healthcare, general practitioners, and complementary and alternative medicine consultation frequencies and their determinants using chi-square tests and Kendall-Tau-b correlations. Results: Seventy percent trusted the traditional healthcare system, with general practitioners as the primary trusted professionals. Trust is correlated with higher education and linguistic compatibility. A 5% subgroup, mostly women and multilinguals with lower education levels, showed uncertain trust. Over 80% had seen a general practitioner in the last year, while distrust was correlated with complementary and alternative medicine consultations. German and Ladin speakers, with higher education levels, were notably inclined towards complementary and alternative medicine consultations. Conclusions: Trust in South Tyrolean healthcare varied according to education level and language. While general practitioners remain central, there is a marked shift towards complementary and alternative medicine among specific groups.

"Trust in God, but tie your donkey": Holy water priest healers' views on collaboration with biomedical mental health services in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

This exploratory qualitative study examines holy water priest healers' explanatory models and general treatment approaches toward mental illness, and their views and reflections on a collaborative project between them and biomedical practitioners. The study took place at two holy water treatment sites in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Twelve semi-structured interviews with holy water priest healers found eight notable themes: they held multiple explanatory models of illness, dominated by religious and spiritual understanding; they emphasized spiritual healing and empathic understanding in treatment, and also embraced biomedicine as part of an eclectic healing model; they perceived biomedical practitioners' humility and respect as key to their positive views on the collaboration; they valued recognition of their current role and contribution in providing mental healthcare; they recognized and appreciated the biomedical clinic's effectiveness in treating violent and aggressive patients; they endorsed the collaboration and helped to overcome patient and family reluctance to the use of biomedicine; they lamented the lack of spiritual healing in biomedical treatment; and they had a number of dissatisfactions and concerns, particularly the one-way referral from religious healers to the biomedical clinic. The study results show diversity in the religious healers' etiological understanding, treatment approaches and generally positive attitude and views on the collaboration. We present insights and explorations of factors affecting this rare, but much needed collaboration between traditional healers and biomedical services, and potential ways to improve it are discussed.

Bridge the gap caused by public health crises: medical humanization and communication skills build a psychological bond that satisfies patients.

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction is an important outcome domain of patient-centered care. Medical humanization follows the patient-centered principle and provides a more holistic view to treat patients. The COVID-19 pandemic posed significant barriers to maintaining medical humanization. However, empirical study on the relationship between medical humanization and patient satisfaction is clearly absent. OBJECTIVES: We examined the mediation effects of communication on the relationship between medical humanization and patient satisfaction when faced with a huge public health crisis like the COVID-19 pandemic, and the moderation effect of medical institutional trust on the mediation models. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study was performed. A final sample size of 1445 patients was surveyed on medical humanization, communication, patient satisfaction and medical institutional trust. RESULTS: All correlations were significantly positive across the main variables (r = 0.35-0.67, p < 0.001 for all) except for medical institutional trust, which was negatively correlated with the medical humanization (r=-0.14, p < 0.001). Moderated mediation analysis showed that the indirect effect of medical humanization on patient satisfaction through communication was significant (b = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.18 ~ 0.25). Medical institutional trust significantly moderated the effect of medical humanization on patient satisfaction (b=-0.09, p < 0.001) and the effect of medical humanization on communication (b= -0.14, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Medical humanization positively influence patient satisfaction, communication mediated the association between medical humanization and patient satisfaction, and medical institutional trust negatively moderated the effects of medical humanization on patient satisfaction and communication. These findings suggest that humanistic communication contributes to patient satisfaction in the face of a huge public health crisis, and patients' evaluation of satisfaction is also regulated by rational cognition.

Assessing the Influence of Patient Empowerment Gained Through Mental Health Apps on Patient Trust in the Health Care Provider and Patient Compliance With the Recommended Treatment: Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: In chronic mental illness, noncompliance with treatment significantly worsens the illness course and outcomes for patients. Considering that nearly 1 billion people worldwide experience mental health issues, including 1 of 5 Canadians in any given year, finding tools to lower noncompliance in these populations is critical for health care systems. A promising avenue is apps that make mental health services more accessible to patients. However, little is known regarding the impact of the empowerment gained from mental health apps on patient compliance with recommended treatment. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the impact of patient empowerment gained through mental health apps on patient trust in the health care provider and patient compliance with the recommended treatment. METHODS: A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted in Canada. Eligible participants were Canadian adults diagnosed with chronic mental health disorders who were using at least one of the following apps: Dialogue, MindBeacon, Deprexis, Ginger, Talkspace, BetterHelp, MindStrong, Mindshift, Bloom, Headspace, and Calm. A total of 347 valid questionnaires were collected and analyzed using partial least-squares structural equation modeling. Trust in the health care provider and patient compliance were measured with multiple-item scales adapted from existing scales. Patient empowerment was conceived and measured as a higher-order construct encompassing the following 2 dimensions: patient process and patient outcome. All the items contributing to the constructs in the model were measured with 7-point Likert scales. The reliability and validity of the measurement model were assessed, and the path coefficients of the structural model were estimated. RESULTS: The results clearly show that patient empowerment gained through mental health apps positively influenced patient trust in the health care provider (ß=.306; P<.001). Patient trust in the health care provider had a positive effect on patient compliance (ß=.725; P<.001). The direct relationship between patient empowerment and patient compliance was not significant (ß=.061, P=.23). Interestingly, the data highlight that the effect of patient empowerment on patient compliance was fully mediated by trust in the health care provider (ß=.222; P<.001). The results show that patient empowerment gained through the mental health app involves 2 dimensions: a process and an outcome. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that for individuals living with mental health disorders, empowerment gained through mental health apps enhances trust in the health care provider. It reveals that patient empowerment impacts patient compliance but only through the full mediating effect of patient trust in the health care provider, indicating that patient trust is a critical variable to enhance patient compliance. Hence, our results confirm that health care systems could encourage the use of mental health apps to favor a climate that facilitates patients' trust in health care provider recommendations, possibly leading to better compliance with the recommended treatment.

Whakawhanaungatanga-Building trust and connections: A qualitative study indigenous Maori patients and whanau (extended family network) hospital experiences.

AIMS: Investigated the experiences of Maori (the Indigenous peoples of Aotearoa, New Zealand) patients and whanau (extended family network) engaging with acute hospital inpatient services and their priorities for a Maori-centred model of relational care. DESIGN: A qualitative Maori-centred research design using a Thought Space Wananga (learning through in-depth group discussion, deliberation and consideration) approach. METHODS: Two wananga were conducted between May 2022 and June 2022, with 13 Maori patients who had been acutely hospitalized within the past 12 months and their whanau members. The first wananga utilized storytelling and journey mapping to collect data. The second wananga refined the initial themes. Wananga were audio-recorded and then inductively coded and developed into themes. RESULTS: Thirteen patients and whanau attended the first wananga, while 10 patients and whanau participated in the second wananga). Four themes were developed: (1) Whakawhanaungatanga (establishing connections and relationships), (2) Whakamana (uplifting the status and esteem of Maori), (3) Whakawhitiwhiti korero (the importance of communicating, discussing and deliberating) and (4) Kotahitanga (working together with purpose) all provide insights into the importance of effectively engaging and connecting with Maori patients and whanau when acutely hospitalized. CONCLUSIONS: The experiences and priorities of Maori patients and whanau affirm the international literature, suggesting that Indigenous relational concepts are critical to building relationships, connections and trust. Despite existing healthcare models for working with Indigenous peoples, their poor application contributes to sub-optimal healthcare experiences at all points of their healthcare journey. A relational mode of practice focused on engagement and forming connections better meets the needs of Indigenous peoples engaging with inpatient health services. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Despite the existence of Indigenous models of care, Indigenous peoples consistently report a lack of engagement and connection when accessing inpatient health services. Without establishing relationships, applying models of care is challenging. IMPACT (ADDRESSING): What problem did the study address? Internationally, healthcare systems are consistently ill-equipped to deliver culturally safe care for Indigenous and marginalized peoples, evident in ongoing health inequities. Like other reports of Indigenous experiences of health services, Maori express dissatisfaction with care delivery in an acute inpatient setting. This study investigated Maori patients and whanau experiences engaging with acute hospital inpatient services and their priorities for a Maori-centred model of relational care. What were the main findings? Maori patients and whanau recounted negative experiences with healthcare professionals lacking effective relationships and trust. Satisfaction occurred when engagement with health care professionals resembled Indigenous cultural rituals of encounter that considered their holistic, collective and dynamic worldviews. Previous models of relational care, while helpful, are not Indigenous and so do not address their needs, such as engagement as a mode of practice (how) to achieve this. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? This research impacts Indigenous peoples' health outcomes, particularly Maori, and nurses and clinicians working and interacting within acute inpatient and other hospital settings. Indigenous research methods support co-constructing knowledge for translation into practical outcomes through transformational practices, policies and theory development. REPORTING METHOD: We used the Consolidated Criteria for Strengthening the Reporting of Health Research Involving Indigenous Peoples (CONSIDER) statement (see File S2-CONSIDER Checklist) and the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines (see File S3-COREQ Checklist). PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Maori patients and their whanau interviewed about their experiences were involved in data interpretation.

Betraying, Earning, or Justifying Trust in Health Organizations.

Health care and public health programs increasingly rely on, and often even require, organizational action, which is facilitated, if not dependent on, trust. Case examples in this essay highlight trust, trustworthiness, and distrust in public and private organizations, providing insights into how trust in health-related organizations can be betrayed, earned, and justified and into the consequences of organizational trust and trustworthiness for the health of individuals and communities. These examples demonstrate the need for holistic assessments of trust in clinicians and trust in organizations and for organizations, public health, and the medical profession to address questions concerning their own trustworthiness. Normative and empirical assessments of trust and trustworthiness that capture the experiences of those treated within the walls of a health care organization, as well as the care of those outside, will contribute to more trustworthy systems of care.

Theory of trust and acceptance of artificial intelligence technology (TrAAIT): An instrument to assess clinician trust and acceptance of artificial intelligence.

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) technologies like generative and ambient AI solutions are proliferating in real-world healthcare settings. Clinician trust affects adoption and impact of these systems. Organizations need a validated method to assess factors underlying trust and acceptance of AI for clinical workflows in order to improve adoption and the impact of AI. OBJECTIVE: Our study set out to develop and assess a novel clinician-centered model to measure and explain trust and adoption of AI technology. We hypothesized that clinicians' system-specific Trust in AI is the primary predictor of both Acceptance (i.e., willingness to adopt), and post-adoption Trusting Stance (i.e., general stance towards any AI system). We validated the new model at an urban comprehensive cancer center. We produced an easily implemented survey tool for measuring clinician trust and adoption of AI. METHODS: This survey-based, cross-sectional, psychometric study included a model development phase and validation phase. Measurement was done with five-point ascending unidirectional Likert scales. The development sample included N = 93 clinicians (physicians, advanced practice providers, nurses) that used an AI-based communication application. The validation sample included N = 73 clinicians that used a commercially available AI-powered speech-to-text application for note-writing in an electronic health record (EHR). Analytical procedures included exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The Johnson-Neyman (JN) methodology was used to determine moderator effects. RESULTS: In the fully moderated causal model, clinician trust explained a large amount of variance in their acceptance of a specific AI application (56%) and their post-adoption general trusting stance towards AI in general (36%). Moderators included organizational assurances, length of time using the application, and clinician age. The final validated instrument has 20 items and takes 5 min to complete on average. CONCLUSIONS: We found that clinician acceptance of AI is determined by their degree of trust formed via information credibility, perceived application value, and reliability. The novel model, TrAAIT, explains factors underlying AI trustworthiness and acceptance for clinicians. With its easy-to-use instrument and Summative Score Dashboard, TrAAIT can help organizations implementing AI to identify and intercept barriers to clinician adoption in real-world settings.

Multi-Institutional Analysis of Cancer Patient Exposure, Perceptions, and Trust in Information Sources Regarding Complementary and Alternative Medicine.

PURPOSE: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use during cancer treatment is controversial. We aim to evaluate contemporary CAM use, patient perceptions and attitudes, and trust in various sources of information regarding CAM. METHODS: A multi-institutional questionnaire was distributed to patients receiving cancer treatment. Collected information included respondents' clinical and demographic characteristics, rates of CAM exposure/use, information sources regarding CAM, and trust in each information source. Comparisons between CAM users and nonusers were performed with chi-squared tests and one-way analysis of variance. Multivariable logistic regression models for trust in physician and nonphysician sources of information regarding CAM were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 749 respondents, the most common goals of CAM use were management of symptoms (42.2%) and treatment of cancer (30.4%). Most CAM users learned of CAM from nonphysician sources. Of CAM users, 27% reported not discussing CAM with their treating oncologists. Overall trust in physicians was high in both CAM users and nonusers. The only predictor of trust in physician sources of information was income >$100,000 in US dollars per year. Likelihood of trust in nonphysician sources of information was higher in females and lower in those with graduate degrees. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of patients with cancer are using CAM, some with the goal of treating their cancer. Although patients are primarily exposed to CAM through nonphysician sources of information, trust in physicians remains high. More research is needed to improve patient-clinician communication regarding CAM use.

Keeping medical science trustworthy: The threat by predatory journals.

Since most scientific journals tend to ask article processes costs from authors, a new category of journals has developed of which the business model is commonly exclusively based on financial contributions by authors. Such journals have become known as predatory journals. The financial contributions that they ask are not always lower than those asked by high-quality journals although they offer less: there is commonly no real review, texts are not edited, and there are commonly no printed editions. The lack of serious reviews makes predatory journals attractive, however, particularly for authors of low-quality (or even fraudulent) manuscripts. It is shown here that numerous - commonly fairly recent - journals, some of which may predatory, attract manuscripts by approaching authors of articles in high-quality journals like Complementary Therapies in Medicine. Publication of articles in such journals contaminates thorough literature and undermines the trustworthiness of the medical society. Any involvement in such journals (as an author, reviewer or editor) of such journals should therefore be discouraged.

Project AquiLá: Community-engaged Planning to Explore the Relationship between Culture and Health.

BACKGROUND: Elements of charrette planning were employed to develop and examine the relationship between transnationalism, culture and health. OBJECTIVE: This paper describes the partnership, the first two stages of the planning charrette and lessons learned. METHODS: During charrette planning phase 1 we collected data through social network interviews (n = 58), cultural conversations (n = 88), and photovoice (n = 9). In the second phase we performed five charrette planning meetings. Data were synthesized by the planning team. LESSONS LEARNED: The issue centered focus facilitated trust among partners. The holistic, iterative process to planning and interpreting preliminary data provided a deeper understanding of the issues under investigation. Community partners at the table held us accountable to the communities we were studying and infused an undercurrent of social justice in our work. CONCLUSIONS: There are advantages in employing a community engaged transdisciplinary team-based approach to the study of transnationalism, culture and health.

Achieving trust in health-behavior-change artificial intelligence apps (HBC-AIApp) development: A multi-perspective guide.

OBJECTIVE: Trust determines the success of Health-Behavior-Change Artificial Intelligence Apps (HBC-AIApp). Developers of such apps need theory-based practical methods that can guide them in achieving such trust. Our study aimed to develop a comprehensive conceptual model and development process that can guide developers how to build HBC-AIApp in order to support trust creation among the app's users. METHODS: We apply a multi-disciplinary approach where medical informatics, human-centered design, and holistic health methods are integrated to address the trust challenge in HBC-AIApps. The integration extends a conceptual model of trust in AI developed by Jermutus et al., whose properties guide the extension of the IDEAS (integrate, design, assess, and share) HBC-App development process. RESULTS: The HBC-AIApp framework consists of three main blocks: (1) system development methods that study the users' complex reality, hence, their perceptions, needs, goals and environment; (2) mediators and other stakeholders who are important for developing and operating the HBC-AIApp, boundary objects that examine users' activities via the HBC-AIApp; and (3) the HBC-AIApp's structural components, AI logic, and physical implementation. These blocks come together to provide the extended conceptual model of trust in HBC-AIApps and the extended IDEAS process. DISCUSSION: The developed HBC-AIApp framework drew from our own experience in developing trust in HBC-AIApp. Further research will focus on studying the application of the proposed comprehensive HBC-AIApp development framework and whether applying it supports trust creation in such apps.

African American Males Have More Distress During Cancer Treatment Than White Males.

African American (AA) males have a higher incidence and mortality rate for some cancers than other races and sexes, which could be associated with distress during treatment, medical mistrust, and health disparities. We hypothesize distress in AA males during treatment is higher than in other races and sexes. We assessed effect modification of moderate to severe (≥ 4) distress scores during cancer treatment by race and sex, age, and socioeconomic status (SES). National Comprehensive Cancer Network's distress thermometer (scale 0-10) and characteristics for 770 cancer patients were collected from a Philadelphia hospital. Variables included age, sex, race, smoking status, marital status, SES, comorbidities, mental health, period before and during COVID-19, cancer diagnosis, and stage. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and t-tests were used to compare AA and White patients. Effect modification of ≥ 4 distress by race and sex, age, and SES were analyzed by logistic regression. A p value of ≤ .05 was significant, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. On average, AA patients had a non-significant, higher distress score (4.53, SD = 3.0) than White patients (4.22, SD = 2.9) (p = .196). The adjusted odds ratio of ≥4 distress was 2.8 (95% CI [1.4, 5.7]) for AA males compared with White males. There was no significant difference between White and AA females, race and age, or race and SES. There was an effect modification of ≥4 distress by race and sex. AA males in cancer treatment had higher odds of ≥4 distress compared with White males.

The association between the risk perceptions of COVID-19, trust in the government, political ideologies, and socio-demographic factors: A year-long cross-sectional study in South Korea.

Risk perception research, targeting the general public, necessitates the study of the multi-faceted aspects of perceived risk through a holistic approach. This study aimed to investigate the association between the two dimensions of risk perception of COVID-19, i.e., risk as a feeling and analysis, trust in the current government, political ideologies, and socio-demographic factors in South Korea. This study used a year-long repeated cross-sectional design, in which a national sample (n = 23,018) participated in 23 consecutive telephone surveys from February 2020 to February 2021. Most factors differed in the magnitude and direction of their relationships with the two dimensions of risk perception. However, trust in the current government, alone, delineated an association in the same direction for both dimensions, i.e., those with a lower level of trust exhibited higher levels of cognitive and affective risk perception. Although these results did not change significantly during the one-year observation period, they are related to the political interpretation of risk. This study revealed that affective and cognitive risk perceptions addressed different dimensions of risk perception. These findings could help governments and health authorities better understand the nature and mechanisms of public risk perception when implementing countermeasures and policies in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and other public health emergencies.

'It's about developing a trustful relationship': A Realist Evaluation of midwives' relational competencies and confidence in a Danish antenatal psychosocial assessment programme.

OBJECTIVE: to explore how contextual conditions influence midwives' relational competencies, ability and confidence to undertake psychosocial assessment of pregnant women and their partners during the first antenatal consultation that identifies expectant parents in vulnerable positions. DESIGN: a realist evaluation carried out through three phases: 1) development 2) testing and 3) refinement of programme theories. Data was generated through realist interviews and observations. SETTING: nine community-based and hospital-based midwife clinics in the North Region of Denmark. INTERVENTION: a dialogue-based psychosocial assessment programme in the the North Region of Denmark was evaluated. PARTICIPANTS AND DATA: 15 midwives were interviewed and 16 observations of midwives undertaking psychosocial assessment during the first antenatal consultation were conducted. FINDINGS: contextual conditions at multiple levels which supported midwives' relational competencies, autonomy and the power of peer reflection-and thus facilitation of a woman-centred approach and trust-were identified, i.e., being experienced, having interest, organisational prioritisation of peer reflection and flexibility. Where midwives lacked experience, competency development regarding psychosocial assessment, opportunities for peer reflection and autonomy to individualise care for expectant parents in vulnerable positions, the approach to assessment tended to become institution-centred which caused a distant dialogue and instrumental assessment which potentially harmed the midwife-woman/couple relationship. CONCLUSION: midwives' ability and confidence to undertake psychosocial assessment were affected by whether individual and organisational contextual conditions empowered them to assess and care for expectant parents within a philosophy of woman-centred care. Accordingly, development of trustful midwife-woman/couple relationships - which is essential for disclosure - was achievable. These conditions become fundamental for securing quality of antenatal care for expectant parents in vulnerable positions.

The contribution of primary care practitioners to interventions reducing loneliness and social isolation in older people-An integrative review.

BACKGROUND: Social connection is a fundamental human need. Its absence can lead to loneliness and social isolation, adversely impacting health and well-being. Given their regular contact and trusted relationships with older people, practitioners delivering community-based primary care are well-positioned to address this issue. However, their contribution to addressing loneliness and social isolation is unclear. AIM: This integrative review explores the contribution of the primary care workforce to interventions aimed at reducing loneliness and social isolation in community-dwelling older people. METHOD: Using an integrative review method, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and PubMed were searched for original research published between 2000 and 2022. Fourteen papers reporting 13 primary studies were appraised for methodological quality and included in the review. Data were extracted into a summary table and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Included studies came from over six countries. Internationally, primary care services have diverse structures, funding and workforces influencing their response to loneliness and social isolation. All but one intervention was multi-component, with ten studies including a group-based activity and three providing primarily individual-level activities. Only six studies reported reductions in loneliness following the intervention. Three themes were identified: characteristics of interventions; implementation context, barriers and facilitators; and differing contributions of primary care practitioners in addressing loneliness and social isolation of older people. CONCLUSION: There is increasing demand and scope for primary care practitioners to assist lonely and socially isolated older people. It is important to understand how to equip and incentivise these practitioners to routinely identify, assess and respond to lonely and socially isolated older people despite varying implementation contexts. There is a need for further research that explores how the primary care team can be better utilised to deliver effective interventions that reduce the health impacts of loneliness and social isolation.

The role of social support and interpersonal trust to improve compliance of iron supplementation amongst adolescent girls: A qualitative approach.

Context: Adolescence is a crucial phase in preventing and controlling anaemia. One of the efforts made by the Indonesian government to overcome adolescent girl's anaemia is the iron and folic acid (IFA) supplementation programme. This programme is one of the most effective interventions that various countries have used to overcome anaemia. The key to the success of the supplementation of IFA is the compliance of adolescent girls. Aims: This study investigates the compliance and its contributing factors of IFA supplementation and the role of social support and interpersonal trust as a source of information and reminder amongst adolescent girls in Sidoarjo, Indonesia. Methods: This research was a qualitative study using the in-depth interview to collect data. Thirteen adolescent girls from three high schools in Sidoarjo, Indonesia, were recruited using a snowball sampling technique. Results: Most of the girls did not comply with IFA supplementation. Contributing factors were the influence of peers, influence of teachers, parental influence, risk and benefit of taking IFA tablet and also failure to remember to take IFA tablet. The social environment that provided information and reminder came from teacher, parent, peer and also health worker. Interpersonal trust was needed to have positive perceived social support. Conclusions: Compliance with the consumption of IFA supplements requires the cooperation of various parties (teachers, parents, peers and health workers) and also interpersonal trust between adolescent girls to their social environment so the programme could be run optimally.

Medical experts and trusted confidants: parent perceptions of the clinician-parent relationship in childhood cancer.

PURPOSE: A childhood cancer diagnosis threatens the health, safety, and security of the child and whole family unit. A strong relationship between the healthcare team and family is integral to provision of holistic support during this time of crisis. Family-centered care necessitates a fluid, therapeutic relationship between parents and the child's healthcare team. This study investigated bereaved parents' perspectives on their relationship with their child's care team and the impact of these relationships on their coping across the cancer trajectory and into bereavement. METHODS: Thirty-one parents whose child died from cancer between 1 and 6 years prior to study enrollment participated in semi-structured interviews about their relationships and interactions with their child's healthcare team across the illness course and into bereavement. We audio-recorded interviews, transcribed them verbatim, and utilized a codebook thematic analysis approach to analyze interview transcripts. RESULTS: Four themes emerged across interviews with parents describing their perceptions of the parent-clinician relationship: (1) a collaborative approach improves perceptions of care, (2) professional trust is core to the relationship, (3) parental personal preference and bias can limit relationship-building, and (4) meaningful connections form on an emotional, individualized level. These themes highlight relational patterns between parents and clinicians that can promote or erode alliance and collaboration. CONCLUSION: Bereaved parents recognize key attributes that influence the parent-clinician relationship. Educating clinicians about parent-identified positive modifiable behaviors (e.g., communication deficits) and awareness of non-modifiable care factors (e.g., individual personality preferences) may enable clinicians to strengthen relationships with parents and ultimately improve quality of care.

"I didn't feel like I could trust her and that felt really risky": a phenomenographic exploration of how Australian Midwives describe intrapartum risk.

OBJECTIVE: Concepts of intrapartum risk are not well explored in the Australian context. In response to an increasing focus on risk in maternity care, we sought to obtain insight into what Australian midwives conceptualised as intrapartum risk. DESIGN: The research was conducted using a phenomenographic approach. Following ethical approval, in-depth semi-structured interviews were used to determine the qualitatively different ways midwives conceptualise intrapartum risk. SETTING: This project was undertaken across different midwifery practice settings in Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Australian midwives (n=14) with expertise in caring for women in the intrapartum period volunteered to participate in the study. FINDINGS: When discussing their experience of intrapartum risk, midwives focused on the external horizon of the woman as the risk, that included the internal horizons of being labelled as clinically high risk, working relationships within transdisciplinary risk and institutional risk. Risks were orientated toward the woman as well as to the midwives. KEY CONCLUSIONS: The midwives in this study conceptualised that intrapartum risk was associated with the woman including being labelled as high risk in addition to certain challenges within the midwife-woman relationship, particularly if there was a lack of reciprocal trust. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study supports current evidence that improved collaborative professional relationships are integral to safety in maternity care. It reinforces continuity of midwifery care as important, and particularly as a way of mitigating intrapartum risk. Further research is required to inform what challenges experienced in the midwife-woman relationship contribute to concepts of risk.

Implementing midwifery units in a European country: Situational analysis of an Italian case study.

INTRODUCTION: Strong evidence recommends midwifery-led care for women with uncomplicated pregnancies. International research is now focusing on how to implement midwifery models of care in countries where they are not well established. In Europe, many countries like Italy are promoting midwifery-led care in national guidelines but often struggle to apply this change in practice. METHODS: This study collected data on professional, organisational and service users' levels to conduct a situational analysis of an Italian service which is approaching the implementation of a midwifery unit. Participatory Action Research was used together with the support of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to conduct data collection and analysis. RESULTS: Forty-eight participants amongst professionals (midwives, obstetricians and neonatologists) and at organisational level (midwifery leaders and medical directors) were recruited; secondary data on service users' views was analysed via regional online surveys. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation were identified to assess the readiness of the local context. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to include professionals, managers and service users in a European context such as Italy. Facilitators to the implementation of the alongside midwifery unit were found in national guidelines, allocated funding, collaborative engagement and medical support. Hierarchical structures, a prevalent medical model and lack of trust and awareness of the evidence of safety of midwifery-led models were main barriers.