Patient satisfaction with treatments for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Treatment satisfaction among patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis has not been studied and compared across treatments using a validated instrument. OBJECTIVES: To assess patient-reported satisfaction with systemic and phototherapy treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis in clinical practice and to correlate satisfaction with disease severity and quality-of-life measures. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 1182 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the Dermatology Clinical Effectiveness Research Network in the U.S.A. Patients receiving either topical therapies only; monotherapy with oral systemic therapies, biologics or narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy; or combination therapy with biologics and methotrexate completed the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication version II. RESULTS: Median unadjusted overall satisfaction scores were highest for patients receiving biologic monotherapies, biologic-methotrexate combinations, or phototherapy (83.3); scores were lowest for those receiving topical therapies only or acitretin (66.7). In fully adjusted models, compared with patients receiving methotrexate monotherapy, those receiving adalimumab, etanercept, ustekinumab, phototherapy or adalimumab with methotrexate had significantly higher median overall satisfaction scores by 7.2-8.3 points, while those receiving topical therapies only had significantly lower overall satisfaction by 8.9 points. Adjusted convenience scores were lowest for patients receiving topical therapies only or infliximab. Modest but significant correlations were found between the overall satisfaction subscale and both the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (ρ = -0.36, P < 0.001) and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (ρ = -0.47, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Discernible differences were found in treatment satisfaction among therapies, particularly regarding treatment effectiveness and convenience. Further application of treatment satisfaction measures may inform treatment decisions and guideline development.

Self-administration of hospital-based narrowband ultraviolet B (TL-01) phototherapy: a feasibility study in an outpatient setting.

BACKGROUND: Self-administration of narrowband (TL-01) ultraviolet (UV)B phototherapy by patients at home is a safe and effective mode of treatment. Could selected patients self-administer phototherapy in hospital? OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of outpatient self-administration of UVB phototherapy as a potential service development. METHODS: A total of 20 patients with psoriasis (n = 15) and eczema (n = 5) (13 female, mean age 32 years, range 17-56 years) were included in this pilot project. Patients underwent a training programme over 2 days, which included a minimal erythemal dose test and supervised treatment, prior to commencing self-administration of phototherapy. Questionnaires were used to gather feedback from patients and staff. RESULTS: Treatment data were collected for 18 of the 20 patients. The mean number of exposures was 25 (range 3-45), and the mean cumulative dose was 16 J cm(-2) (range 0·23-41·27 J cm(-2) ). No unexpected adverse effects were noted. These results were similar to those of a sample group of outpatients who had nurse-administered UVB phototherapy, for whom the mean number of exposures was 24 (range 4-49) and the mean cumulative dose was 17 J cm(-2) (range 0·53-71·16 J cm(-2) ). Thirteen patients completed the questionnaires. All concluded that the training programme sufficiently prepared them for self-administering phototherapy, and 12 reported that they would be happy to self-administer treatment in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Self-administration of UVB phototherapy is practicable, safe and effective for most selected patients. This mode of treatment provides training and support for patients to gain more control over management of their skin disease, empowering them to take an active role in their treatment. Self-administration of UVB phototherapy by outpatients provides an intermediate level of care between nurse-administered hospital phototherapy and self-administered home phototherapy.

The medicalization of sunlight in the early twentieth century.

This paper traces the emergence of the therapeutic use of sunlight in medicine during the first half of the twentieth century. This was a period of considerable flux in medicine with various strands of practice and theory competing. Drawing on two case studies of sunlight therapy, both artificial (actinotherapy) and natural (heliotherapy), in the treatment of rickets and tuberculosis this paper will explore how medicine was constituted within these regimes. The paper will argue that therapeutic and clinical applications of sunlight helped establish an association between sunlight and health but also defined a particular and specific performance of medicine.

Phototherapy with ultraviolet radiation: a study of hormone parameters and psychological effects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients report well-being as they are treated with phototherapy. We investigated hormone parameters and psychological well-being after phototherapy in a placebo-controlled study. METHODS: A total of 77 patients with dermatological conditions and 22 healthy volunteers were divided into four groups. The patients received phototherapy either on the whole body or only on hands and/or feet. The volunteers were given either whole-body phototherapy or placebo light. Serum or plasma samples were analysed for cortisol, calcium, magnesium, phosphate, TSH, T(4), T(3) and 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and urine samples for cortisol. Patients and volunteers answered a questionnaire before and 6 weeks after phototherapy/placebo light. Psychiatric ratings were performed according to the Comprehensive Psychopathological Self-rating Scale for Affective Syndromes, a self-report version of which has been transformed to correspond to the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). RESULTS: In the patients who received whole-body irradiation, we observed a significant improvement in both MADRS score and cognitive-symptom score after the completion of phototherapy. We also observed a significantly higher level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D after phototherapy, but no difference in the other hormone parameters. CONCLUSION: Whole-body phototherapy of patients with dermatological conditions results in improved well-being and significantly higher levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in serum.