Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 42
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
2.
BMC Public Health ; 20(1): 993, 2020 Jun 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32580720

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Universal child health services (UCHS) provide an important pragmatic platform for the delivery of universal and targeted interventions to support families and optimize child health outcomes. We aimed to identify brief, evidence-based interventions for common health and developmental problems that could be potentially implemented in UCHS. METHODS: A restricted evidence assessment (REA) of electronic databases and grey literature was undertaken covering January 2006 to August 2019. Studies were eligible if (i) outcomes related to one or more of four areas: child social and emotional wellbeing (SEWB), infant sleep, home learning environment or parent mental health, (ii) a comparison group was used, (iii) universal or targeted intervention were delivered in non-tertiary settings, (iv) interventions did not last more than 4 sessions, and (v) children were aged between 2 weeks postpartum and 5 years at baseline. RESULTS: Seventeen studies met the eligibility criteria. Of these, three interventions could possibly be implemented at scale within UCHS platforms: (1) a universal child behavioural intervention which did not affect its primary outcome of infant sleep but improved parental mental health, (2) a universal screening programme which improved maternal mental health, and (3) a targeted child behavioural intervention which improved parent-reported infant sleep problems and parental mental health. Key lessons learnt include: (1) Interventions should impart the maximal amount of information within an initial session with future sessions reinforcing key messages, (2) Interventions should see the family as a holistic unit by considering the needs of parents with an emphasis on identification, triage and referral, and (3) Brief interventions may be more acceptable for stigmatized topics, but still entail considerable barriers that deter the most vulnerable. CONCLUSIONS: Delivery and evaluation of brief evidence-based interventions from a UCHS could lead to improved maternal and child health outcomes through a more responsive and equitable service. We recommend three interventions that meet our criteria of "best bet" interventions.


Subject(s)
Child Health Services/organization & administration , Child Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Evidence-Based Medicine/organization & administration , Evidence-Based Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Universal Health Insurance/organization & administration , Universal Health Insurance/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Prohibitins
3.
Int J Health Policy Manag ; 9(5): 185-197, 2020 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32563219

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chile and Colombia are examples of Latin American countries with health systems shaped by similar values. Recently, both countries have crafted policies to regulate the participation of private for-profit insurance companies in their health systems, but through very different mechanisms. This study asks: what values are important in the decision-making processes that crafted these policies? And how and why are they used? METHODS: An embedded multiple-case study design was carried out for 2 specific decisions in each country: (1) in Chile, the development of the Universal Plan of Explicit Entitlements -AUGE/GES - and mandating universal coverage of treatments for high-cost diseases; and (2) in Colombia, the declaration of health as a fundamental right and a mechanism to explicitly exclude technologies that cannot be publicly funded. We interviewed key informants involved in one or more of the decisions and/or in the policy analysis and development process that contributed to the eventual decision. The data analysis involved a constant comparative approach and thematic analysis for each case study. RESULTS: From the 40 individuals who were invited, 28 key informants participated. A tension between 2 important values was identified for each decision (eg, solidarity vs. individualism for the AUGE/GES plan in Chile; human dignity vs. sustainability for the declaration of the right to health in Colombia). Policy-makers used values in the decisionmaking process to frame problems in meaningful ways, to guide policy development, as a pragmatic instrument to make decisions, and as a way to legitimize decisions. In Chile, values such as individualism and free choice were incorporated in decision-making because attaining private health insurance was seen as an indicator of improved personal economic status. In Colombia, human dignity was incorporated as the core value because the Constitutional Court asserted its importance in its use of judicial activism as a check on the power of the executive and legislative branches. CONCLUSION: There is an opportunity to open further exploration of the role of values in different health decisions, political sectors besides health, and even other jurisdictions.


Subject(s)
Administrative Personnel/organization & administration , Health Care Reform/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Universal Health Insurance/organization & administration , Chile , Colombia , Health Care Rationing/organization & administration , Humans , Insurance, Health/organization & administration , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Private Sector/organization & administration , Public Sector/organization & administration
4.
Value Health ; 23(1): 39-42, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31952672

ABSTRACT

India is a diverse land with different cultures, social norms, castes, religions, faiths, languages, politics, and a complex healthcare system. As a step to enhance healthcare, the government of India announced a move toward universal health coverage to increase accessibility and affordability of health-related services. Recently, there has been an introduction of health technology assessment (HTA) in India to help inform evidence-based decision making in cases of limited resources and budgets. Nevertheless, there are challenges related to biased decision making, an unregulated healthcare framework, and the lack of data and capacity that will (directly or indirectly) affect the use of HTA in India. For HTA to be successful in India and in similar low- and middle-income countries, it is important that the decision makers acknowledge these challenges and embrace differences in ideologies, cultures, and politics instead of ignoring them. Drawing lessons from countries with well-developed HTA bodies may help, but these need to be modified for the country-specific context. Ensuring quality and transparency is key to building trust in medical decision making. Improved coordination at all levels of healthcare is vital to ensure the long-term success of HTA in India. This is challenging but achievable by spreading awareness among stakeholders and achieving moderate health-sector regulation that can combat corruption. HTA will prosper in India if it incorporates cultural and institutional diversity, alongside tackling socioeconomic inequalities.


Subject(s)
Choice Behavior , Health Care Rationing , Health Policy , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Universal Health Care , Universal Health Insurance , Clinical Decision-Making , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Culturally Appropriate Technology , Culturally Competent Care , Health Care Costs , Health Care Rationing/economics , Health Care Rationing/organization & administration , Health Policy/economics , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Healthcare Disparities/organization & administration , Humans , India , Policy Making , Quality of Life , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Social Values , Stakeholder Participation , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/economics , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration , Universal Health Insurance/economics , Universal Health Insurance/organization & administration
5.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 19(1): 670, 2019 Sep 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31533710

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health systems reform is inevitable due to the never-ending changing nature of societal health needs and policy dynamism. Today, the Health Transformation Plan (HTP) remains the major tool to facilitate the achievements of universal health coverage (UHC) in Iran. It was initially implemented in hospital-based setting and later expanded to primary health care (PHC). This study aimed to analyze the HTP at the PHC level in Iran. METHODS: Qualitative data were collected through document analysis, round-table discussion, and semi-structured interviews with stakeholders at the micro, meso and macro levels of the health system. A tailored version of Walt & Gilson's policy triangle model incorporating the stages heuristic model was used to guide data analysis. RESULTS: The HTP emerged through a political process. Although the initiative aimed to facilitate the achievements of UHC by improving the entire health system of Iran, little attention was given to PHC especially during the first phases of policy development - a gap that occurred because politicians were in a great haste to fulfil a campaign promise. CONCLUSIONS: Health reforms targeting UHC and the health-related Sustainable Development Goals require the political will to improve PHC through engagements of all stakeholders of the health system, plus improved fiscal capacity of the country and financial commitments to implement evidence-informed initiatives.


Subject(s)
Health Care Reform/organization & administration , Health Planning/organization & administration , Health Policy , Policy Making , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Government Programs , Humans , Iran , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Politics , Universal Health Insurance/organization & administration
7.
Lancet ; 394(10196): 432-442, 2019 Aug 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31379334

ABSTRACT

New Zealand was one of the first countries to establish a universal, tax-funded national health service. Unique features include innovative Maori services, the no-fault accident compensation scheme, and the Pharmaceutical Management Agency, which negotiates with pharmaceutical companies to get the best value for medicines purchased by public money. The so-called universal orientation of the health system, along with a strong commitment to social service provision, have contributed to New Zealand's favourable health statistics. However, despite a long-standing commitment to reducing health inequities, problems with access to care persist and the system is not delivering the promise of equitable health outcomes for all population groups. Primary health services and hospital-based services have developed largely independently, and major restructuring during the 1990s did not produce the expected efficiency gains. A focus on individual-level secondary services and performance targets has been prioritised over tackling issues such as suicide, obesity, and poverty-related diseases through community-based health promotion, preventive activities, and primary care. Future changes need to focus on strengthening the culture and capacity of the system to improve equity of outcomes, including expanding Maori health service provision, integrating existing services and structures with new ones, aligning resources with need to achieve pro-equity outcomes, and strengthening population-based approaches to tackling contemporary drivers of health status.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Universal Health Insurance/economics , Financing, Government , Government Programs , Humans , National Health Programs , New Zealand , Universal Health Insurance/organization & administration
9.
Nutrients ; 11(12)2019 Dec 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31888177

ABSTRACT

Despite some progress, stunting prevalence in many African countries including Ethiopia remains unacceptably high. This study aimed to identify key interventions that, if implemented at scale through the health sector in Ethiopia, can avert the highest number of stunting cases. Using the Lives Saved Tool (LiST), the number of stunting cases that would have been averted, if proven interventions were scaled-up to the highest wealth quintile or to an aspirational 90% coverage was considered. Stunting prevalence was highest among rural residents and households in the poorest wealth quintile. Coverage of breastfeeding promotion and vitamin A supplementation were relatively high (>50%), whereas interventions targeting women were limited in number and had particularly low coverage. Universal coverage (90%) of optimal complementary feeding, preventive zinc supplementation, and water connection in homes could have each averted 380,000-500,000 cases of stunting. Increasing coverage of water connection to homes to the level of the wealthiest quintile could have averted an estimated 168,000 cases of stunting. Increasing coverage of optimal complementary feeding, preventive zinc supplementation, and Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) services is critical. Innovations in program delivery and health systems governance are required to effectively reach women, remote areas, rural communities, and the poorest proportion of the population to accelerate stunting reduction.


Subject(s)
Growth Disorders/prevention & control , Health Priorities/organization & administration , Health Promotion/methods , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Child, Preschool , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Female , Growth Disorders/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Male , Poverty , Prevalence , Program Evaluation , Rural Population , Sanitation/methods , Universal Health Insurance/organization & administration
10.
Bull World Health Organ ; 96(11): 734-735, 2018 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30455527

ABSTRACT

Despite efforts to boost its health workforce, Bangladesh is struggling to make progress towards universal coverage of health services. Sophie Cousins reports.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Health Workforce/statistics & numerical data , Universal Health Insurance/organization & administration , Universal Health Insurance/statistics & numerical data , Bangladesh , Clinical Competence , Humans , Midwifery/statistics & numerical data , Personnel Selection
11.
Int J Equity Health ; 17(1): 130, 2018 10 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30286757

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A case study was prepared examining government resource contributions (GRCs) to private-not-for-profit (PNFP) providers in Uganda. It focuses on Primary Health Care (PHC) grants to the largest non-profit provider network, the Uganda Catholic Medical Bureau (UCMB), from 1997 to 2015. The framework of complex adaptive systems was used to explain changes in resource contributions and the relationship between the Government and UCMB. METHODS: Documents and key informant interviews with the important actors provided the main sources of qualitative data. Trends for GRCs and service outputs for the study period were constructed from existing databases used to monitor service inputs and outputs. The case study's findings were validated during two meetings with a broad set of stakeholders. RESULTS: Three major phases were identified in the evolution of GRCs and the relationship between the Government and UCMB: 1) Initiation, 2) Rapid increase in GRCs, and 3) Declining GRCs. The main factors affecting the relationship's evolution were: 1) Financial deficits at PNFP facilities, 2) advocacy by PNFP network leaders, 3) changes in the government financial resource envelope, 4) variations in the "good will" of government actors, and 5) changes in donor funding modalities. Responses to the above dynamics included changes in user fees, operational costs of PNFPs, and government expectations of UCMB. Quantitative findings showed a progressive increase in service outputs despite the declining value of GRCs during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: GRCs in Uganda have evolved influenced by various factors and the complex interactions between government and PNFPs. The Universal Health Coverage (UHC) agenda should pay attention to these factors and their interactions when shaping how governments work with PNFPs to advance UHC. GRCs could be leveraged to mitigate the financial burden on communities served by PNFPs. Governments seeking to advance UHC goals should explore policies to expand GRCs and other modalities to subsidize the operational costs of PNFPs.


Subject(s)
Financing, Government , Organizations, Nonprofit/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Universal Health Insurance/organization & administration , Financing, Organized , Humans , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Private Sector/organization & administration , Uganda
12.
Int J Equity Health ; 17(1): 97, 2018 10 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30286758

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Faith-based non-profit (FBNP) providers have had a long-standing role as non-state, non-profit providers in the Ghanaian health system. They have historically been considered to be important in addressing the inequitable geographical distribution of health services and towards the achievement of universal health coverage (UHC), but in changing contexts, this contribution is being questioned. However, any assessment of contribution is hampered by the lack of basic information about their comparative presence and coverage in the Ghanaian health system. In response, since the 1950s, there have been repeated calls for the 'mapping' of faith-based health assets. METHODS: A historically-focused mixed-methods study was conducted, collecting qualitative and quantitative data and combining geospatial mapping with varied documentary resources (secondary and primary, current and archival). Geospatial maps were developed, providing a visual representation of changes in the spatial footprint of the Ghanaian FBNP health sector. RESULTS: The geospatial maps show that FBNPs were originally located in rural remote areas of the country but that this service footprint has evolved over time, in line with changing social, political and economic contexts. CONCLUSION: FBNPs have had a long-standing role in the provision of health services and remain a valuable asset within national health systems in Ghana and sub-Saharan Africa more broadly. Collaboration between the public sector and such non-state providers, drawing on the comparative strengths and resources of FBNPs and focusing on whole system strengthening, is essential for the achievement of UHC.


Subject(s)
Organizations, Nonprofit/organization & administration , Public Sector/organization & administration , Universal Health Insurance/organization & administration , Ghana , Government Programs , Health Services , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Humans , Medical Assistance/organization & administration , National Health Programs , Qualitative Research
13.
Indian J Public Health ; 62(3): 167-170, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30232963

ABSTRACT

The realization of Universal Health Coverage requires adequate healthcare financing and human resources to provide financial protection to the economically disadvantaged population by covering their medicine, diagnostics, and service costs. Conventionally, inadequate public healthcare financing and the lack of skilled human resources are considered as the major barriers towards achieving UHC in India. To strengthen the Indian healthcare system, there has been significant increase budgetary allocation towards healthcare, a national health protection scheme targeting low-income households, upgrading of primary health-care and expansion of the health work-force. Nevertheless, an evolving paradigm for improving holistic health, sanitation, nutrition, gender equity, drug accessibility and affordability, innovative initiatives in national health programs for reduction of maternal deaths, tuberculosis and HIV burden and the utilization of information technology in healthcare provision of the underserved and the marginalized is gaining rapid acceleration. These represent a genuine innovation towards fulfillment of UHC goals for India.


Subject(s)
Health Workforce/organization & administration , Medical Assistance/organization & administration , Universal Health Insurance/organization & administration , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Health Workforce/economics , Health Workforce/standards , Holistic Health , Humans , India , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Public Health , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Sanitation/methods , Universal Health Insurance/economics , Universal Health Insurance/standards
15.
Int J Health Serv ; 48(3): 568-585, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29925286

ABSTRACT

Described as "universal prepayment," the national health insurance (or single-payer) model of universal health coverage is increasingly promoted by international actors as a means of raising revenue for health care and improving social risk protection in low- and middle-income countries. Likewise, in the United States, the recent failed efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act have renewed debate about where to go next with health reform and arguably opened the door for a single-payer, Medicare-for-All plan, an alternative once considered politically infeasible. Policy debates about single-payer or national health insurance in the United States and abroad have relied heavily on Canada's system as an ideal-typical single-payer system but have not systematically examined health system performance indicators across different universal coverage models. Using available cross-national data, we categorize countries with universal coverage into those best exemplifying national health insurance (single-payer), national health service, and social health insurance models and compare them to the United States in terms of cost, access, and quality. Through this comparison, we find that many critiques of single-payer are based on misconceptions or are factually incorrect, but also that single-payer is not the only option for achieving universal coverage in the United States and internationally.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Single-Payer System/organization & administration , Universal Health Insurance/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Humans , Models, Organizational , National Health Programs/economics , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Health Care/economics , Single-Payer System/economics , United States , Universal Health Insurance/economics
16.
Health Policy ; 122(12): 1278-1282, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29843901

ABSTRACT

In May 2017, an Irish cross-party parliamentary committee published the 'Houses of the Oireachtas Committee on the Future of Healthcare "Sláintecare" report'. The report, known as 'Sláintecare', is unique and historic as it is the first time there has been a cross-party political consensus on major health reform in Ireland. Sláintecare sets out a high level policy roadmap to deliver whole system reform and universal healthcare, phased over a ten year period and costed. Sláintecare details reform proposals which, if delivered, will establish; a universal, single-tier health service where patients are treated solely on the basis of health need; the reorientation of the health system 'towards integrated primary and community care, consistent with the highest quality of patient safety in as short a time-frame as possible'. Sláintecare has five interrelated components: population health; entitlements and access to healthcare; integrated care; funding; and implementation. In this article, the authors use documents in the public domain (parliamentary reports, public hearings, submissions to the Committee, media coverage, the final report of the Committee, speeches by Committee members) to describe the policy process and the main contents of the proposed Sláintecare reforms. It is too soon tell if the political consensus in the policy formation can hold for its implementation.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/methods , Health Care Reform/methods , Health Policy , Universal Health Insurance/organization & administration , Health Care Reform/economics , Humans , Ireland , Policy Making , Politics
17.
Health Econ Policy Law ; 13(3-4): 299-322, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29388519

ABSTRACT

Canada is the only country with a broad public health system that does not include universal, nationwide coverage for pharmaceuticals. This omission causes real hardship to those Canadians who are not well-served by the existing patchwork of limited provincial plans and private insurance. It also represents significant forgone benefits in terms of governments' ability to negotiate drug prices, make expensive new drugs available to patients on an equitable basis, and provide integrated health services regardless of therapy type or location. This paper examines Canada's historical failure to adopt universal pharmaceutical insurance on a national basis, with particular emphasis on the role of public and elite ideas about its supposed lack of affordability. This legacy provides novel lessons about the barriers to reform and potential methods for overcoming them. The paper argues that reform is most likely to be successful if it explicitly addresses entrenched ideas about pharmacare's affordability and its place in the health system. Reform is also more likely to achieve universal coverage if it is radical, addressing various components of an effective pharmaceutical program simultaneously. In this case, an incremental approach is likely to fail because it will not allow governments to contain costs and realize the social benefits that come along with a universal program, and because it means forgoing the current promising conditions for achieving real change.


Subject(s)
Health Care Reform/organization & administration , Health Policy/history , Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services/economics , Universal Health Insurance/organization & administration , Canada , Costs and Cost Analysis/economics , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans
18.
MEDICC Rev ; 20(4): 40-45, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31242171

ABSTRACT

A major challenge to achieve health coverage in Nigeria is expansion of health access to the poor, vulnerable and informal sectors, which constitute over 70% of the population of more than 186 million. Evidence from other countries suggests that it is difficult for contributory insurance schemes to achieve universal health coverage in such conditions, especially with such a large informal sector. In fact, Nigeria's national social health insurance program has provided coverage to less than 5% of the population since its implementation in 2005, private voluntary health insurance has shown poor potential to extend coverage, and community-based health insurance has failed to expand access to poor, vulnerable and informal sector populations as well. Decentralization of health insurance to the states has limited potential to expand health insurance coverage for the poor, vulnerable and those in the informal sector. Furthermore, social health insurance in many developed countries has taken many years to achieve universal health coverage. This paper suggests that policy makers should consider adopting a tax-based, noncontributory, universal health-financing system as the primary funding mechanism to accelerate progress toward universal health coverage. Social health insurance and its decentralization to states for formal sector workers should serve as a supplement, while private voluntary health insurance should cover better-off groups. Simultaneously, it is critical to tackle issues of poor governance structures, mismanagement of funds, corruption, and lack of transparency and accountability within regulatory and implementing agencies, to ensure that monies allocated for expanded health insurance coverage are well managed. Although the proposed universal health coverage reform may take some years to achieve, it is more feasible to collect taxes, improve tax administration and expand the tax base than to enforce payment of contributions from nonsalaried workers and those who cannot afford to pay for health insurance or for services out of pocket.


Subject(s)
Healthcare Financing , Taxes , Universal Health Insurance/organization & administration , Humans , National Health Programs/economics , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Nigeria , Taxes/economics , Universal Health Insurance/economics
19.
Soc Sci Med ; 198: 7-13, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29272763

ABSTRACT

Universal Health Coverage (UHC) calls for universal effective coverage, which emphasizes that people must have reasonably equal access to covered services. A critical question then arises: what policies can a nation adopt to assure an adequate supply of services and distribute them reasonably to each community and socioeconomic strata? Taiwan relied on incentives, public and private partnership and effective regulations to produce the adequate supply for UHC and distributed them. Taiwan's experience holds a valuable lesson for other nations. Taiwan was the last state in the 20th century to achieve UHC when it implemented the National Health Insurance (NHI) program in 1995. Political timing was crucial in the government's decision to achieve UHC, but the key to its success in providing effective coverage to its 23 million population was the readiness of the health service sector, the result of two decades of planning and development in the pre-NHI period. This paper analyzes how Taiwan historically built up the supply of health services that made achieving UHC possible. We identified four key strategies adopted in the health service sector development, namely: 1) enhancing public-private partnerships in developing medical resources with tax incentives and subsidies; 2) ameliorating regional disparities in medical resource distribution through incentives and effective regulation; 3) safeguarding quality of care by regulating providers through licensing and accreditation programs; and 4) promoting an evidence-based policy-making process.


Subject(s)
Health Services/supply & distribution , Universal Health Insurance/organization & administration , Evidence-Based Practice , Health Care Rationing , Humans , National Health Programs , Policy Making , Public-Private Sector Partnerships , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Taiwan
20.
Lancet ; 389(10088): 2503-2513, 2017 Jun 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28495109

ABSTRACT

Starting well before Independence in 1948, and over the ensuing six decades, Israel has built a robust, relatively efficient public system of health care, resulting in good health statistics throughout the life course. Because of the initiative of people living under the British Mandate for Palestine (1922-48), the development of many of today's health services predated the state's establishment by several decades. An extensive array of high-quality services and technologies is available to all residents, largely free at point of service, via the promulgation of the 1994 National Health Insurance Law. In addition to a strong medical academic culture, well equipped (albeit crowded) hospitals, and a robust primary-care infrastructure, the country has also developed some model national projects such as a programme for community quality indicators, an annual update of the national basket of services, and a strong system of research and education. Challenges include increasing privatisation of what was once largely a public system, and the underfunding in various sectors resulting in, among other challenges, relatively few acute hospital beds. Despite substantial organisational and financial investment, disparities persist based on ethnic origin or religion, other socioeconomic factors, and, regardless of the country's small size, a geographic maldistribution of resources. The Ministry of Health continues to be involved in the ownership and administration of many general hospitals and the direct payment for some health services (eg, geriatric institutional care), activities that distract it from its main task of planning for and supervising the whole health structure. Although the health-care system itself is very well integrated in relation to the country's two main ethnic groups (Israeli Arabs and Israeli Jews), we think that health in its widest sense might help provide a bridge to peace and reconciliation between the country and its neighbours.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Health Services/standards , Accreditation/statistics & numerical data , Clinical Governance/statistics & numerical data , Delivery of Health Care/history , Demography/statistics & numerical data , Emigration and Immigration/statistics & numerical data , Health Expenditures , Health Services/history , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Health Status , Health Status Indicators , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Israel , Life Expectancy , National Health Programs/history , National Health Programs/organization & administration , National Health Programs/standards , Primary Health Care/history , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/standards , Private Sector/organization & administration , Private Sector/statistics & numerical data , Universal Health Insurance/organization & administration , Universal Health Insurance/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL