The Importance of Cystoscopy in Diagnosis and Treatment of Urethral Stricture Following Transurethral Prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Transurethral prostatectomy is the gold standard surgical treatment of bladder outlet obstruction due to benign enlargement of the prostate, with more than 30,000 procedures performed annually in the United States alone. The success rate of this minimally invasive procedure is high and the results are durable. The development of urethral stricture is a long-term complication of the procedure and is noted in about 2% of patients. The stricture narrows the urethral lumen, leading to re-appearance of obstructive urinary symptoms. Traditionally, the evaluation of the stricture was performed by retrograde urethrography. Advancements in the fields of flexible endoscopy allowed rapid inspection of the urethra and immediate dilatation of the stricture in selected cases. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of urethrography versus cystoscopy in the evaluation of urethral strictures following transurethral prostatectomy. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of a series of 32 consecutive patients treated due to post-transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) urethral stricture. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent both tests. In 16 there was concordance between the two tests. Four patients had no pathological findings in urethrography but had strictures in cystoscopy. All strictures were short (up to 10 mm) and were easily treated during cystoscopy, with no complaints or re-surgery needed in 24 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Cystoscopy was superior to urethrography in the evaluation of post-TURP strictures. Strictures where often short and treated during the same procedure. We recommend that cystoscopy be the procedure of choice in evaluating obstructive urinary symptoms after TURP, and retrograde urethrography be preserved for selected cases.

Comparison of Multipulse Laser Vaporesection versus Plasmakinetic Resection for Treatment of Benign Prostate Obstruction.

We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Multipulse laser vaporesection of the prostate (MPVP) versus plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) for treatment of patients with benign prostate obstruction (BPO) in a prospective trial. From January 2016 to April 2017, a total of 144 patients were included in the cohort study, of whom 73 patients underwent MPVP and 71 underwent PKRP. All patients received pre-operative evaluation and followed up at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Baseline characteristics, perioperative data and postoperative outcomes were compared. Early (within 30 days postoperatively) and late complications were also recorded. Preoperative data, including age, prostate volume, international prostate symptom score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function Questionnaires (IIEF-5), the rate of anticoagulants use, Charlson comorbidity index were similar in two groups. Peri-operative parameters, including the rate of transfusion, and decrease in hemoglobin level were comparable. The operative time, the duration of catheterization and length of hospital stay were significantly shorter in the MPVP group. The voiding parameters and the quality-of-life scores (QoL) improved significantly in both groups postoperatively. There was a significantly difference in QoL at 1-year in the MPVP group (p < 0.001), under mixed model analysis with random effect and Bonferroni correction. There were no significant differences in improvement of IPSS, Qmax, IIEF-5, residual prostate volume ratio and PSA level reduction at the 1-year follow-up. MPVP was significantly superior to PKRP in terms of a reduction in overall complication rate (21.9% vs 45.0%, p = 0.004). Both treatments led to comparable symptomatic improvements. MPVP demonstrates satisfactory efficiency, shorter catheterization time and shorter hospital stay. Our data revealed that MPVP may be a promising technique which is safe and favorable alternative for patients with BPO.

Instrumentación transuretral en portadores de esfínter urinario artificial. Presentación y discusión de tres casos clínicos / Transurethral instrumentation in patients with artificial urinary sphincter. Presentation and discussion of three clinical cases

El tratamiento para la incontinencia urinaria masculina de esfuerzo severa es la colocación de un esfínter urinario artificial (EUA). La etiología de la incontinencia con frecuencia es la cirugía prostática previa. Los resultados funcionales son buenos con una tasa aceptable de complicaciones. Las complicaciones son más frecuentes si existe radioterapia previa o se realizan procedimientos transuretrales sin tener en cuenta la presencia del manguito del EUA. Cuando es necesaria la cirugía transuretral, por ejemplo por tumor vesical, es necesario realizar el desabrochado del manguito esfinteriano. Los sondajes uretrales precisan también desactivar el manguito y manipular la uretra con sumo cuidado, evitando su manipulación siempre que sea posible. Se presentan tres casos muy complejos de pacientes portadores de EUA que han precisado diversas soluciones ante manipulación uretral y presencia de complicaciones como estenosis de uretra (AU)

Artificial urinary sphincter (AS) is the gold standard treatment for severe male urinary stress incontinence. The etiology of incontinence is often previous prostate surgery as a radical prostatectomy. Functional results are good with an acceptable rate of complications. If there is prior radiotherapy complications are more frequent. When transurethral surgery, for example for bladder tumor is needed, it is necessary unbuttoned the sleeve. Urethral soundings need also turn off the sleeve and manipulate the urethra carefully, avoiding handling whenever possible. We present three very complex cases of patients with US showing several solutions to urethral manipulation and to resolve complications such as urethral perforation and stricture (AU)

Open urethroplasty versus endoscopic urethrotomy--clarifying the management of men with recurrent urethral stricture (the OPEN trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Urethral stricture is a common cause of difficulty passing urine in men with prevalence of 0.5 %; about 62,000 men in the UK. The stricture is usually sited in the bulbar part of the urethra causing symptoms such as reduced urine flow. Initial treatment is typically by endoscopic urethrotomy but recurrence occurs in about 60% of men within 2 years. The best treatment for men with recurrent bulbar stricture is uncertain. Repeat endoscopic urethrotomy opens the narrowing but it usually scars up again within 2 years requiring repeated procedures. The alternative of open urethroplasty involves surgically reconstructing the urethra, which may need an oral mucosal graft. It is a specialist procedure with a longer recovery period but may give lower risk of recurrence. In the absence of firm evidence as to which is best, individual men have to trade off the invasiveness and possible benefit of each option. Their preference will be influenced by individual social circumstances, availability of local expertise and clinician guidance. The open urethroplasty versus endoscopic urethrotomy (OPEN) trial aims to better guide the choice of treatment for men with recurrent urethral strictures by comparing benefit over 2 years in terms of symptom control and need for further treatment. METHODS/DESIGN: OPEN is a pragmatic, UK multicentre, randomised trial. Men with recurrent bulbar urethral strictures (at least one previous treatment) will be randomised to undergo endoscopic urethrotomy or open urethroplasty. Participants will be followed for 24 months after randomisation, measuring symptoms, flow rate, the need for re-intervention, health-related quality of life, and costs. The primary clinical outcome is the difference in symptom control over 24 months measured by the area under the curve (AUC) of a validated score. The trial has been powered at 90% with a type I error rate of 5% to detect a 0.1 difference in AUC measured on a 0-1 scale. The analysis will be based on all participants as randomised (intention-to-treat). The primary economic outcome is the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year. A qualitative study will assess willingness to be randomised and hence ability to recruit to the trial. DISCUSSION: The OPEN Trial seeks to clarify relative benefit of the current options for surgical treatment of recurrent bulbar urethral stricture which differ in their invasiveness and resources required. Our feasibility study identified that participation would be limited by patient preference and differing recruitment styles of general and specialist urologists. We formulated and implemented effective strategies to address these issues in particular by inviting participation as close as possible to diagnosis. In addition re-calculation of sample size as recruitment progressed allowed more efficient design given the limited target population and funding constraints. Recruitment is now to target. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN98009168 Date of registration: 29 November 2012.

[Treatment of the urethral sphincter insufficiency]. / Prise en charge de l'insuffisance sphinctérienne urétrale.

The intrinsic sphincter insufficiency is a cause of stress urinary incontinence. Its definition is clinical and based on urodynamics. It is mostly met with women, in context of the post-obstetrical period or older women in a multifactorial context. For men, it occurs mainly as complication of the surgery of the cancer of prostate or bladder. An initial, clinical and paraclinical assessment allows to confirm the diagnosis of intrinsic sphincter insufficiency, to estimate its severity, and to identify associated mechanisms of incontinence (urethral hypermobility, bladder overactivity) to choose the most adapted treatment. The perineal reeducation is the treatment of first intention in both sexes. At the menopausal woman, the local hormonotherapy is a useful additive. In case of failure or of incomplete efficiency, the treatment of the intrinsic sphincter insufficiency is surgical. Bulking agents, urethral slings, peri-urethral balloons and artificial sphincter are 4 therapeutic options to discuss according to history, the severity of the incontinence, the expectations of the patient.

Optical urethrotomy under local anaesthesia is a feasible option in urethral stricture disease.

The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility of performing optical urethrotomy for urethral stricture disease under local anaesthesia. A total of 33 patients with radiologically proven urethral stricture underwent optical urethrotomy by a single operator under local anaesthesia. Of these patients, 23 (70%) had stricture involving the corpora spongiosum and 18 (55%) of the patients were dependent on supra-pubic catheters. The procedure was successful in 30 cases (91%). The procedure was very well tolerated (average visual analogue pain score of 2/10) with an extremely low complication rate. The large number of patients with urethral stricture disease and the premium on operating time on formal theatre slates encouraged us to perform these procedures under local anaesthetic. Although most patients had severe stricture disease, the majority of cases were successful and very well tolerated. Optical urethrotomy under local anesthesia could be a viable option in the absence of formal theatre time and the facilities to perform general anaesthesia.

The safety and efficacy of optical urethrotomy using a spongiosum block with sedation: a comparative nonrandomized study.

PURPOSE: Optical urethrotomy is generally performed with the patient under general or major regional anesthesia. We determined the safety and efficacy of optical urethrotomy using a spongiosum block with sedation for anterior urethral stricture in a comparative, nonrandomized study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 32 patients with anterior urethral stricture optical urethrotomy was performed under general/major regional anesthesia in 16 patients (group 1) or a spongiosum block and sedation in 16 (group 2). In group 2 a total of 2 to 3 ml 1% lidocaine were slowly injected into the glans penis. Standard optical urethrotomy was performed immediately with a cold cut knife. RESULTS: The 2 groups were matching in terms of patient age, and stricture cause and length. Optical urethrotomy was successfully completed in all patients in group 1 and in 15 of 16 in group 2. In group 2, 15 patients (94%) had no pain or discomfort. One patient reported moderate discomfort and the procedure was abandoned. In group 2 none of the patients required parental analgesia post procedure. The first year recurrence was not significantly different in the 2 groups (p = 0.192). The anesthetic effect lasted for about an hour and was satisfactory without any complications. Pain score on the visual analogue scale was not different in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Optical urethrotomy using a spongiosum block with sedation is as safe and effective as using regional or general anesthesia, particularly in patients who are more ill. The shorter operative time in the local anesthesia group could also make it cost-effective.

Prolapso de uretra / Urethral prolapse

El prolapso uretral en la mujer es infrecuente. Se define como la completa eversión de la mucosa uretral a través del meato. Ocurre frecuentemente en mujeres negras prepúperes y en mujeres blancas posmenopáusicas. El tratamiento recomendado incluye desde la terapia conservadora hasta múltiples intervenciones quirúrgicas (AU)

Prolapse of the urethra in female patients is a rare events. It is defined as the complete eversion of the urethral mucosa through the external meatus. It occurs most often in pre-puberal black girls and in postmenopausal white women. Recommended treatment ranges from conservative therapy to a diversity of operative techniques (AU)

Prostatic urethral strictures after transurethral microwave thermal therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Prostatic urethral strictures are rare. We present 3 cases in a study group of 27 who underwent high energy transurethral microwave therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. In all 3 cases, midprostatic strictures with ectopic area proximal to the stricture were seen by cystoscopy. Two of the strictures were urodynamically significant. The most likely explanation for their occurrence is direct damage of the prostatic urethra due to ischemia or heat damage of the prostatic urethra.