Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 42
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Urology ; 142: 237-242, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32320790

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate an alternative to clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) for individuals with neurogenic bladder for its effects on independence, privacy, and convenience. This prospective cohort study provides an initial assessment of quality of life, safety, and efficacy of closed diurnal indwelling catheterization (CDIC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Individuals with spinal cord disorders using CIC were prospectively screened at multidisciplinary clinic appointments. During the 24-week intervention, a foley was placed each morning and capped between scheduled bladder drainage each 3-4 hours. After a maximum of 8 hours of CDIC use, CIC was resumed. Quality of life outcome measures (the Short Form Health Survey, King's Health Questionnaire, and Pediatric Quality of Life InventoryTM (PedsQL) questionnaires), clinic evaluations, labs, imaging, and urodynamics were obtained at specified interval visits planned after 4-, 12-, and 24 weeks of study participation and compared to baseline. RESULTS: A total of 11 subjects enrolled; 8 completed the 24-week intervention. No significant difference with CDIC was observed in the Short Form Health Survey or PedsQL summary scores as compared to baseline. For the King's Health Questionnaire, physical limitations secondary to bladder function decreased significantly from baseline to the 4-week and 12-week (P = .02) but not 24-week visits. All 8 subjects who completed the 24-week intervention requested continued use. Early discontinuation occurred in 3 male participants due to urethral trauma (1) and incontinence (2). No increase in bacteriuria, urinary tract infections, or renal anatomic changes was observed. CONCLUSION: This prospective study demonstrates that CDIC may be safe and effective for short-term use. This alternative to CIC for scheduled daytime bladder drainage for neurogenic bladder warrants further consideration.


Subject(s)
Catheters, Indwelling , Spinal Cord Diseases/complications , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/etiology , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/therapy , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation , Adolescent , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Child , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Young Adult
2.
Investig Clin Urol ; 60(1): 35-39, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30637359

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate patients' tolerance to indwelling urinary catheters (IUCs) before and after reducing their balloon volumes. IUCs are a source of discomfort or pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients hospitalized in our department with IUCs were included during the study period with some exclusion. Each patient was his/her own control before and two hours after reduction of the balloon volume (RBV) by half using two types of assessments, a visual analog scale for pain and a catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) symptom questionnaire. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included in our study that completed the assessments. The mean scores for pain before and after RBVs were 2.80 and 2.02, respectively. The difference was significant (p<0.05). The mean grades of the CRBD before and after RBVs were 1.02 and 0.75, respectively. The difference was significant (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A 50% RBV has shown a significant amelioration in tolerating the catheter.


Subject(s)
Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Urinary Bladder Diseases/etiology , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement/methods , Postoperative Complications , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Transurethral Resection of Prostate/methods , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation , Urinary Incontinence, Urge/etiology , Young Adult
3.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 16(2): 127-132, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28836932

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to apply the principles of enhanced recovery in renal transplant recipients and to assess the changes in the quality of patient care and patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study included 286 consecutive renal transplant patients. Of these, 135 patients went through the enhanced recovery program and 151 patients had traditional recovery. Patient education and discharge planning were commenced on admission. For enhanced recovery, prolonged preoperative fasting was avoided by carbohydrate loading. Goal-directed fluid management was aided by transesophageal Doppler to avoid central line insertion. Intrathecal diamorphine and ultrasonography-guided transversus abdominis plane blocks were used to achieve adequate analgesia. Patients started oral intake a few hours postoperatively. The urinary catheter was removed 2 to 4 days after transplant. RESULTS: The postoperative patient-controlled analgesia requirement for morphine was significantly reduced in the enhanced recovery versus traditional recovery group (median of 9.5 vs 47 mg; P < 0.001). The length of stay was significantly reduced for living-donor (median 5 vs 7 days; P < .001) and for deceased-donor transplant recipients (median 5 vs 8.5 days; P < 0.001) with enhanced recovery versus recipients who had traditional recovery. Implementing enhanced recovery saves £2160 per living-donor transplant and £3078 per deceased-donor transplant. In the enhanced recovery group, readmission within 10 days after transplant was 5%. CONCLUSIONS: Our service evaluation demonstrated that enhanced recovery benefits both types of renal transplant (living and deceased grafts) procedures, with excellent patient satisfaction and reduction of hospital length of stay.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Early Ambulation , Kidney Transplantation , Length of Stay , Patient Discharge , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , State Medicine/organization & administration , Analgesia, Patient-Controlled , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Device Removal , Female , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Living Donors , Male , Middle Aged , Morphine/administration & dosage , Patient Satisfaction , Program Evaluation , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Quality Indicators, Health Care/organization & administration , Recovery of Function , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation , Urinary Catheters
4.
Eur Urol ; 72(5): 677-685, 2017 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28483330

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Retzius-sparing (posterior) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) may expedite postoperative urinary continence recovery. OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term (≤3 mo) urinary continence (UC), urinary function (UF), and UF-related bother outcomes of posterior RARP compared with standard anterior approach RARP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 120 patients aged 40-75 yr with low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer (per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines) underwent primary RARP at a tertiary care institution. INTERVENTION: Eligible men were randomized to receive either posterior (n=60) or anterior (n=60) RARP. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Primary outcome was UC (defined as 0 pads/one security liner per day) 1 week after catheter removal. Secondary outcomes were short-term (≤3 mo) UC recovery, and UF and UF-related bother scores (measured by the International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS] and IPSS quality-of-life scores, respectively) assessed at 1 and 2 wk, and 1 and 3 mo following catheter removal. Continence outcomes were objectively verified using 24-hr pad weights. UC recovery was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression; UF and UF-related bother outcomes were compared using linear generalized estimating equations (GEEs). Perioperative complications, positive surgical margin, and biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) represent secondary outcomes reported in the study. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Compared with 48% in the anterior arm, 71% men undergoing posterior RARP were continent 1 wk after catheter removal (p=0.01); corresponding median 24-h pad weights were 25 and 5g (p=0.001). Median time to continence in posterior versus anterior RARP was 2 and 8 d postcatheter removal, respectively (log-rank p=0.02); results were confirmed on multivariable regression analyses. GEE analyses showed that UF-related bother (but not UF) scores were significantly lower in the posterior versus anterior RARP group at 1 wk, 2 wk, and 1 mo on GEE analyses. Incidence of postoperative complications (12% anterior vs 18% posterior) and probability of BCRFS (0.91 vs 0.91) were comparable in the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center randomized study, the Retzius-sparing approach of RARP resulted in earlier recovery of UC and lower UF-related bother compared with standard RARP. These results require long-term validation and reproduction by other centers, as well as studies on men with high-risk localized disease. PATIENT SUMMARY: In our hands, men with low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer undergoing Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) had earlier recovery of urinary continence and lower urinary function-related bother than those undergoing standard RARP.


Subject(s)
Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Urinary Incontinence/etiology , Adult , Aged , Chi-Square Distribution , Device Removal , Humans , Incontinence Pads , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Linear Models , Male , Margins of Excision , Michigan , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Proportional Hazards Models , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Quality of Life , Recovery of Function , Risk Factors , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Tertiary Care Centers , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation , Urinary Catheters , Urinary Incontinence/diagnosis , Urinary Incontinence/physiopathology , Urinary Incontinence/therapy
5.
World J Urol ; 34(3): 407-11, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26337521

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate urethral catheter (UC) versus suprapubic tube (SPT) without stenting the anastomosis at robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) regarding surgical outcome and catheter-associated discomfort. One year after surgery, continence and patient satisfaction were evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients undergoing RALP were prospectively randomized to urinary drainage with UC or with SPT. Functional results were assessed with standardized questionnaires (IPSS, IPSS Bother Score, IIEF and Visual Analogue Scale) preoperatively, after catheter removal and 1 year after surgery. Moreover, bother by the catheter as well as pain due to the catheter was assessed. RESULTS: At personal hygiene, SPT was significantly less bothersome on the day of surgery as well as POD 1-6. Pain caused by the catheter did not differ significantly between the two groups except for POD 5 and 6, when the SPT performed significantly better. Differences regarding voiding parameters after catheter removal did not reach statistical significance. One year after surgery, no significant difference between the two groups was found regarding urinary function and IPSS. Though not statistically significant either, the need for the incision of bladder neck contracture (BNC) in two patients in the UC group is of note, as in the SPT group, no BNC occurred. CONCLUSION: Draining the bladder with SPT only is a feasible option in patients undergoing RALP. Patients with SPT are significantly less bothered by the catheter at personal and genital hygiene compared to UC. The risk of BNC seems to be reduced in the SPT group.


Subject(s)
Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Robotics/methods , Urinary Bladder/surgery , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Transurethral Resection of Prostate/methods , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Bladder/physiopathology , Urination/physiology
6.
Pak J Biol Sci ; 18(2): 67-73, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26364356

ABSTRACT

In this study, we investigated the feasibility of using Psidium guajava, Mangifera indica and Ocimum gratissimum leaf extracts in preventing Escherichia coli biofilm formation. The plants extractions were done with methanol under cold extraction. The various concentrations 5.0, 10.0 and 20.0 mg mL(-1) were used to coat 63 catheters under mild heat from water bath. Biofilm formation on the catheter was induced using cultures of E. coli. Biofilm formation was evaluated using aerobic plate count and turbidity at 600 nm. From the obtained results, Psidium guajava, Mangifera indica and Ocimum gratissimum delayed the onset of biofilm formation for a week. Ocimum gratissimum coated catheter had the highest inhibitory effect at 5.0, 10.0 and 20.0 mg mL(-1) with bacterial count ranging from 2.2 x 10(5)-7.0 x 10(4) and 5.7 x 10(5)-3.7 x10(5) for 120 and 128 h, respectively. The Psidium guajava coated catheter had the lowest inhibitory effect at 5.0, 10.0 and 20.0 mg mL(-1), with bacterial count ranging between 4.3 x 10(5)-1.9 x 10(3) and 7.7 x 10(5)-3.8 x 10(5) for 120 and 128 h, respectively. Despite the antimicrobial activities, the differences in the activity of these plant extracts were statistically not significant (p < 0.05).


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Biofilms/drug effects , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Coated Materials, Biocompatible , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation , Urinary Catheters/microbiology , Biofilms/growth & development , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Equipment Design , Escherichia coli/growth & development , Feasibility Studies , Mangifera , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Ocimum , Phytotherapy , Plant Leaves , Plants, Medicinal , Psidium , Time Factors , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects
7.
Urol Int ; 85(4): 415-20, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21099192

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of short-term antibiotic therapy (ABT) in preventing urinary tract infection (UTI) after catheter removal following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). METHODS: 729 consecutive patients underwent LRP by one of two surgeons. One surgeon systematically prescribed a 3-day course of ABT (ciprofloxacin) starting the day before catheter removal; the other surgeon did not. The groups were compared for the incidence of symptomatic UTI occurring within 6 weeks after catheter removal. RESULTS: ABT was given to 261 of 713 patients (37%), while the remaining 452 patients (63%) did not receive ABT. After catheter removal, UTI was observed less frequently among patients receiving ABT: 3.1 vs. 7.3% in those not receiving ABT (p = 0.019). A number needed to treat to prevent 1 UTI is 24. Hospital readmission for febrile UTI was observed only in patients who did not receive ABT (n = 5, 1.1 vs. 0%, p = 0.16). One would need to prescribe ABT for 91 LRP patients to prevent 1 case of febrile UTI. CONCLUSIONS: ABT at the time of catheter removal reduced the risk of postoperative UTI after LRP. One would need to prescribe ABT to 24 patients to prevent 1 case of UTI.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheters, Indwelling , Ciprofloxacin/administration & dosage , Device Removal , Laparoscopy , Prostatectomy/methods , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Aged , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/etiology , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Humans , Incidence , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , New York City , Patient Readmission , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Urinary Tract Infections/etiology
8.
Br J Nurs ; 19(15): 954-8, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20966861

ABSTRACT

The aim of this article is to promote understanding of the benefits, assessment process and suitability of catheter valves, as a form of urinary drainage for patients. A literature review on the benefits of catheter valves provides the opportunity for an in-depth discussion that compares and contrasts different urinary drainage systems. On the evidence of the literature review, all patients require a holistic assessment which considers a number of factors, and provides the nurse with the essential objective data to ascertain the suitability of the catheter valve. These data can be transferred into an easy step-by-step algorithm to help guide the nurse in making the decision, with the patient, on the most appropriate urinary catheter drainage system.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Drainage/instrumentation , Nursing Assessment/methods , Patient Preference , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation , Drainage/methods , Drainage/nursing , Humans , Urinary Catheterization/nursing
13.
Eur Urol ; 48(4): 628-33, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15964124

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety, effectiveness and patient satisfaction of an intraurethral valve-pump catheter (In-Flow) versus the current standard of care, clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), for females with hypocontractile or acontractile bladder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a multi-centre, prospective, single-arm crossover study. Eligible patients underwent a 1-week In-Flow tolerability trial. Successful patients then continued through an 8-week baseline phase using CIC, followed by a 16-week In-Flow treatment phase, and a final 4-week treatment withdrawal phase. Outcome measures included post-void residual (PVR), Wagner incontinence-specific quality of life (I-QOL), rate of urinary tract infection and adverse events. At study completion, open enrollment was offered. RESULTS: A total of 273 women with a mean age of 48.9 years using CIC entered the study in 18 centres under either the original (n=88) or revised protocols (n=185). The revised protocol included the addition of a 1-week tolerability trial. The reasons for the large early withdrawal of subjects (169/273) were mainly related to initial discomfort and leakage. A total of 77 patients completed the In-Flow treatment phase. PVR was comparable during baseline CIC phase and In-Flow treatment phase (20.3 ml vs. 16.1 ml), with significantly improved quality of life (QOL; mean improvement of I-QOL score +25.9; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The In-Flow catheter appears to be a viable alternative to CIC. A subgroup of patients, mainly those unsatisfied with the currently available treatments, was more likely to tolerate In-Flow catheters, and they may achieve enhanced independence and QOL.


Subject(s)
Urinary Bladder Diseases/physiopathology , Urinary Bladder Diseases/therapy , Urinary Catheterization , Adult , Aged , Cross-Over Studies , Equipment Design , Equipment Safety , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , North America/epidemiology , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation , Urinary Incontinence/physiopathology , Urinary Incontinence/therapy , Urinary Tract Infections/etiology , Urination , Withholding Treatment
14.
Int J Hyperthermia ; 21(1): 45-55, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15764350

ABSTRACT

Since December 2001, the Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway has been conducting whole body hyperthermia (WBH) studies, treating patients with either ovarian carcinoma or non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Accurate and reliable thermometry instrumentation is important in all types of hyperthermia procedures, particularly in WBH, where the target patient body temperature is 41.8 degrees C. Reliable documentation of side-effects in clinical studies is also dependent on precise temperature monitoring, since in this temperature range even small, but systematic, inaccuracies (0.1-0.2 degrees C) in the temperature monitoring is expected to affect the amount of side effects. Readily available heating and temperature data from previous treatment sessions of the same patient is also valuable for precise temperature control in future treatment sessions. The WBH thermometry system implemented at Haukeland University Hospital is described. It is based on commercially available components, including standard medical thermistor probes, and includes a temperature calibration and verification facility. The thermometry system is accurate, reliable, easy to use, comfortable for the patient and relatively inexpensive. By implementing the Steinhart-Hart polynomial fit to standard medical thermistor probe data, it is shown that the WBH treatment thermometers used can measure the patient body temperatures with a short- and long-term accuracy of +/- 0.01 degrees C.


Subject(s)
Hyperthermia, Induced/instrumentation , Hyperthermia, Induced/standards , Neoplasms/therapy , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Thermometers , Body Temperature , Documentation , Equipment Design , Humans , Hyperthermia, Induced/methods , Models, Theoretical , Monitoring, Physiologic/instrumentation , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Monitoring, Physiologic/standards , Urinary Bladder , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation
15.
J Endourol ; 19(1): 72-8, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15735388

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the ProstaLund Compact Device in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 38 consecutive patients with a mean age of 72.6+/-8.2 years, 19 with an indwelling catheter, underwent transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) with the ProstaLund Compact Device. Pretreatment evaluation included transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), urodynamics, and cystoscopy for all patients and flow rate (Qmax), postvoiding residual urine volume (PVR), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and quality-of-life (QoL) assessment for those without a catheter. The mean prostate volume was 63.5+/-30 cc. The Qmax, IPSS, and QoL studies were repeated at 3, 6, and 12 months, while urodynamics, cystoscopy, and TRUS were repeated at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: The treatment lasted a mean of 43.1+/-17.1 minutes, achieved a maximal intraprostatic temperature of 58.7+/-7.2 degrees C, and destroyed 18.4+/-14.3 g of prostatic tissue. Twelve months post-treatment, for the patients without a catheter preoperatively, the IPSS was improved from 21.5+/-6.3 to 6.5+/-3.1 (P<0.001), Qmax from 7.2+/-3.1 mL/sec to 18.1+/-7.4 mL/sec (P<0.001), detrusor pressure at Qmax from 87.5+/-15 cm H2O to 48.4+/-16.4 cm H2O (P<0.001), and PVR from 113.2+/-78.2 mL to 34.6+/-36.7 mL (P<0.01). The good-response rates for IPSS (or=50% improvement), Qmax (>or=15 mL/sec or >or=50% improvement), PVR (<50 mL or >or=50% decrease), and QoL (

Subject(s)
Postoperative Complications , Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Transurethral Resection of Prostate/instrumentation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Catheters, Indwelling , Cystoscopy , Endosonography , Equipment Design , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Prostatic Hyperplasia/complications , Prostatic Hyperplasia/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation , Urinary Retention/diagnosis , Urinary Retention/etiology , Urinary Retention/physiopathology , Urinary Retention/therapy , Urodynamics/physiology
16.
Curr Microbiol ; 41(2): 120-5, 2000 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10856378

ABSTRACT

Sections of sterile all-silicone-, hydrogel/silver-all-silicone-, and hydrogel/silver-latex-Foley urinary catheters were exposed to suspensions of bacteria and Candida albicans associated with urinary tract infections. The adhesion of these microorganisms to the catheters was determined with a radiolabel-cell procedure and scanning electron microscopy. Anomalous data with the radiolabel procedure were produced with the hydrogel/silver-latex catheters for certain species. These aberrant data were related to adhesion on the untreated cut ends of the latex catheter. Radiolabel-cell-adhesion procedures that involve sections of coated materials may need to be supplemented with additional procedures such as scanning electron microscopy for valid interpretations of the data. Adhesion to the hydrogel/silver catheters by both Gram-positive- and Gram-negative bacteria most commonly associated with nosocomial urinary tract infections, including a strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa noted for its superior adhesion capacity, was significantly lower than the adhesion to the control all-silicone catheter.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Adhesion , Hydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate , Silver , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology , Candida albicans/pathogenicity , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Negative Bacteria/pathogenicity , Gram-Positive Bacteria/pathogenicity , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Latex , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Silicones , Time Factors , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control
17.
J Urol ; 161(1): 144-51, 1999 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10037387

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel intraurethral prostatic bridge catheter in preventing temporary prostatic obstruction following targeted high energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 54 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia underwent high energy transurethral microwave therapy under topical urethral anesthesia followed by placement of a prostatic bridge catheter, which remained indwelling as long as 1 month (prostatic bridge catheter group). Patient evaluation included determination of peak urinary flow rate, International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) and quality of life score at baseline, immediately following transurethral microwave therapy and prostatic bridge catheter placement, and periodically thereafter for 1 month. Results were retrospectively compared with those of 51 patients who underwent transurethral microwave therapy followed by standard temporary urinary catheterization, typically for 24 hours (standard catheterization group). RESULTS: Immediately following transurethral microwave therapy and prostatic bridge catheter placement significant improvements (p <0.0005) were observed in mean peak flow rate, I-PSS and quality of life score of 59.3, 33.5 and 23.6%, respectively, compared with baseline values. Further improvements were noted up to 1 month, at which time mean peak flow rate, I-PSS and quality of life score had improved 79.0, 54.9 and 56.5%, respectively, versus baseline (p <0.0005). In a retrospective comparison at baseline and 14 days between the prostatic bridge catheter group and standard catheterization group mean baseline peak flow rate, I-PSS and quality of life score were similar. However, at the 14-day followup evaluation in the prostatic bridge catheter group mean peak flow rate was 101.8% higher, and I-PSS and quality of life score were 47.9 and 51.1% lower, respectively, than the corresponding values in the standard catheterization group (p <0.0005). The prostatic bridge catheter was well tolerated and remained indwelling throughout the entire 1-month followup in 48 of 54 patients (88.9%). Early prostatic bridge catheter removal was required in 3 patients (5.6%) due to urinary retention and in 3 (5.6%) due to catheter migration. CONCLUSIONS: Prostatic bridge catheter placement provides an effective and well tolerated option for preventing prostatic obstruction in the acute period after transurethral microwave therapy. This approach avoids the inconvenience and infection risk of standard indwelling catheters or intermittent self-catheterization. Prostatic bridge catheter insertion and removal are rapid, facile, nontraumatic procedures. Prostatic bridge catheter may potentially be used in an array of minimally invasive procedures involving thermal treatment of the prostate gland.


Subject(s)
Diathermy/adverse effects , Microwaves/adverse effects , Microwaves/therapeutic use , Prostatic Hyperplasia/therapy , Urinary Catheterization , Equipment Design , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Urethra , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation , Urodynamics
18.
Arch Esp Urol ; 48(9): 973-5, 1995 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8554408

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe a new technique to deflate impacted Foley balloon. METHOD: A total endourologic method using urethrotome sheath, ureteric catheter, stylet, sedoanalgesia needle and cold cup biopsy forceps is described. The technique involves minimal maneuverability of urethra. RESULTS: The technique is non traumatic, simple, and successful in almost all cases. This technique requires urology instruments which are easily available at any centre. CONCLUSION: The described technique is safe, effective non traumatic and can easily be used in cases of impacted Foley balloon. There is no damage to the posterior urethra.


Subject(s)
Catheterization/methods , Urinary Catheterization/methods , Anesthesia, Local , Biopsy/instrumentation , Catheterization/instrumentation , Humans , Ureter , Urethra , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation
19.
Prog Urol ; 5(4): 548-50, 1995 Sep.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7581506

ABSTRACT

We report our experience on performing ureteroscopic procedures using local anaesthesia with or without intravenous analgesia. During a two year period 334 ureteroscopic procedures were performed in our hospital. 159 of them were begun but only 138 completed without the use of general or regional anaesthesia. In 9 patients ureteroscopy was performed with lindocaine jelly in the urethra only, and in 129 with additional intravenous analgesia Fentanyl, a synthetic morphine derivative, was used for intravenous analgesia. Ureteroscopy was performed for stone fragmentation or extraction in 119 patients for taking away a double J catheter which showed migration into ureter in 8 and for diagnostic purposes in 11. Ureteric lesions were observed in 7 patients (5%). The findings suggest that ureteroscopy when performed without general or regional anaesthesia does not increase the risk of complications or compromise the results of treatment.


Subject(s)
Analgesia , Anesthesia, Local , Ureteroscopy , Analgesia/methods , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Anti-Anxiety Agents/administration & dosage , Diazepam/administration & dosage , Fentanyl/administration & dosage , Foreign-Body Migration/therapy , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Ureteral Calculi/therapy , Ureteral Diseases/diagnosis , Ureteroscopy/methods , Urethra , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL