Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Health Econ ; 20(6): 829-840, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30900047

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The objectives of this study were to estimate the economic burden of HPV in Italy, accounting for total direct medical costs associated with nine major HPV-related diseases, and to provide a measure of the burden attributable to HPV 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, 58 infections. METHODS: A cost-of-illness incidence-based model was developed to estimate the incidences and costs of invasive cervical cancer, cervical dysplasia, cancer of the vulva, vagina, anus, penis, oropharyngeal, anogenital warts, and recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) in the context of the Italian National Health System (NHS). We used data from hospital discharge records (HDRs) of an Italian region and conducted a systematic literature review to estimate the lifetime cost per case, the number of incident cases, the prevalence of HPV9 types. Costs of therapeutic options not included in the diagnosis-related group (DRG) tariffs were estimated through a scenario analysis. RESULTS: In 2018, the total annual direct costs were €542.7 million, with a range of €346.7-€782.0 million. These costs could increase considering innovative therapies for cancer treatment (range €16.2-€37.5 million). The fraction attributable to the HPV9 genotypes without innovative cancers treatment was €329.5 million, accounting for 61% of the total annual burden of HPV-related diseases in Italy. Of this amount, €135.9 million (41%) was related to men, accounting for 64% of the costs associated with non-cervical conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The infections by HPV9 strains and the economic burden of non-cervical HPV-related diseases in men were found to be the main drivers of direct costs.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Papillomavirus Infections/economics , Uterine Cervical Diseases/economics , Alphapapillomavirus/genetics , Alphapapillomavirus/isolation & purification , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/economics , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , National Health Programs , Papillomavirus Infections/drug therapy , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Diseases/drug therapy , Uterine Cervical Diseases/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Diseases/virology
2.
Sex Transm Dis ; 34(9): 631-7, 2007 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17308503

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: According to the national guidelines developed in 2001, a woman at high risk of gonorrhea and chlamydia in Madagascar is treated presumptively at her first sexually transmitted infection clinic visit; risk-based treatment (RB) is subsequently used at 3-month visits. OBJECTIVES: To compare health and economic outcomes for a 2-stage Markov process with the following 3 cervical infection treatment policies at baseline and at 3-month follow-up visit: presumptive treatment (PT), RB, and an interim laboratory/risk-based policy. STUDY DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis was used to compare the 9 treatment strategies. RESULTS: When 3-month incidence of cervical infection is <20%, the national guidelines are less costly and less effective than both RB followed by PT, and PT at both visits. CONCLUSIONS: The national guidelines are a reasonable strategy, especially in the context of resource constraints, relatively low reinfection rates, and local preferences.


Subject(s)
Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/economics , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Trees , Female , Guidelines as Topic/standards , Humans , Madagascar/epidemiology , National Health Programs/standards , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sex Work , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/etiology , Uterine Cervical Diseases/economics , Uterine Cervical Diseases/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Diseases/etiology , Uterine Cervical Diseases/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL