Comparison of functional-oil blend and anticoccidial antibiotics effects on performance and microbiota of broiler chickens challenged by coccidiosis.

This study aimed to compare the effects of different levels of cashew nutshell liquid (CNSL) and castor oil (CNSL-castor oil) with growth-promoting antibiotics associated with anticoccidials in broiler chickens challenged with coccidiosis. In this work, 2520 one-day-old male broiler chicks (Cobb) were randomly assigned to 84 pens, containing 30 birds each. The experimental design was completely randomized, with seven treatments: enramycin (8 ppm), virginiamycin (16.5 ppm), and tylosin (55 ppm); different doses of CNSL-castor oil (0.5, 0.75, and 1.00 kg/t); and a control diet (without additives). All treatments received semduramicin + nicarbazin (500 g/t; Aviax® Plus) from 0 to 28 d and monensin sodium (100 ppm; Elanco) from 29 to 35 days of age, when the feed was without antibiotics. The challenge was introduced at 14 days of age by inoculating broiler chickens with sporulated Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina, and Eimeria maxima oocysts via oral gavage. In addition to performance parameters, intestinal contents were collected at 28 and 42 days of age for microbiota analysis by sequencing the 16s rRNA in V3 and V4 regions using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Taxonomy was assigned using the SILVA database (v. 138) with QIIME2 software (v. 2020.11). After one week of challenge, the broilers that received tylosin had a higher body weight gain (BWG) than those in the control group (p < 0.05), while the other treatments presented intermediate values. At 28 d, the BWG was lower for the control, CNSL-Castor oil 0.5 kg/t, enramycin, and virginiamycin treatments than that in the tylosin treatment. The inclusion of CNSL-Castor oil at concentrations of 0.75 and 1 kg/t acted as an intermediate treatment (p < 0.05). For alpha diversity, using the Shannon index, it was possible to observe the effect of age, with substantial diversity at 42 d. The Firmicutes phylum had the highest abundance, with values between 84.33% and 95.16% at 42 d. Tylosin showed better performance indices than other treatments. CNSL-castor oil treatments with concentrations of 0.75 and 1 kg/t showed similar results to those of enramycin and virginiamycin. Furthermore, CNSL-castor oil acted as a modulator of intestinal microbiota, reducing the abundance of pathogenic bacteria.

In vitro synergistic effect of retapamulin with erythromycin and quinupristin against Enterococcus faecalis.

To find a therapeutic alternative for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections, we evaluated the effects of combinations of retapamulin with macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin (MLS) antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Enterococcus faecium, and Enterococcus faecalis. Using both the disk diffusion test and checkerboard assay, we initially examined the effects of combinations of retapamulin with MLS antibiotics against standard strains of these species. Combinations of retapamulin with erythromycin, quinupristin/dalfopristin and quinupristin showed synergistic activity against E. faecalis only. Synergy of retapamulin with clindamycin and dalfopristin was not observed. Then, a checkerboard assay was performed to evaluate the effects of the combinations against 15 clinical strains of E. faecalis. Retapamulin and quinupristin, the most synergistic combination, showed activity against all erythromycin-susceptible, -intermediate, and -resistant strains tested. Among the eight strains with high-level erythromycin resistance, five strains were synergistically inhibited in the presence of only 1 µg of retapamulin per ml. Time-kill assay revealed that combinations of retapamulin with erythromycin and quinupristin were bacteriostatic. These results suggest that combinations of retapamulin with erythromycin and quinupristin have in vitro synergistic activity against E. faecalis, including strains with high-level erythromycin resistance.

Synergy of streptogramin antibiotics occurs independently of their effects on translation.

Streptogramin antibiotics are divided into types A and B, which in combination can act synergistically. We compared the molecular interactions of the streptogramin combinations Synercid (type A, dalfopristin; type B, quinupristin) and NXL 103 (type A, flopristin; type B, linopristin) with the Escherichia coli 70S ribosome by X-ray crystallography. We further analyzed the activity of the streptogramin components individually and in combination. The streptogramin A and B components in Synercid and NXL 103 exhibit synergistic antimicrobial activity against certain pathogenic bacteria. However, in transcription-coupled translation assays, only combinations that include dalfopristin, the streptogramin A component of Synercid, show synergy. Notably, the diethylaminoethylsulfonyl group in dalfopristin reduces its activity but is the basis for synergy in transcription-coupled translation assays before its rapid hydrolysis from the depsipeptide core. Replacement of the diethylaminoethylsulfonyl group in dalfopristin by a nonhydrolyzable group may therefore be beneficial for synergy. The absence of general streptogramin synergy in transcription-coupled translation assays suggests that the synergistic antimicrobial activity of streptogramins can occur independently of the effects of streptogramin on translation.

Antibiotic resistance in faecal bacteria isolated from horses receiving virginiamycin for the prevention of pasture-associated laminitis.

Enterococcus faecium, a major cause of potentially life-threatening hospital-acquired human infections, can be resistant to several antimicrobials, such that streptogramin quinupristin-dalfopristin (Q/D) is one of the few antibiotics still effective. Consequently use of the streptogramin virginiamycin as an animal growth promoter was banned in the EU in 1999 as some believed this contributed to the emergence of Q/D resistant E. faecium. Virginiamycin is advocated for preventing equine pasture-associated laminitis, but its effect on equine faecal bacterial Q/D resistance has not been determined. Faecal samples were obtained from horses receiving virginiamycin, horses co-grazing and horses not exposed to virginiamycin. Streptogramin resistant E. faecium were cultured from 70% (21/30) of animals treated with virginiamycin, 75% (18/24) of co-grazing animals and 69% (11/16) of animals not exposed. ermB and vatD genes were detected using real time PCR in 63% and 66% of animals treated with virginiamycin, 75% and 71% of co-grazing animals and 63% and 69% of animals not exposed. Antimicrobial resistance genes were present only in samples which had cultured Q/D resistant E. faecium. There was no significant difference between groups with respect to antimicrobial resistance. The gene load of vatD was significantly (p=0.04) greater in unexposed animals compared to those treated with virginiamycin. The use of virginiamycin to prevent pasture-associated laminitis does not appear to be related to an increased Q/D resistance frequency. However, in view of the high frequency of resistance within all groups, the horse is a reservoir of Q/D resistant genes and clones that potentially could be transferred transiently to humans.

Characterisation of a Staphylococcus aureus strain with progressive loss of susceptibility to vancomycin and daptomycin during therapy.

Following an initial response to vancomycin therapy, a patient with meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia developed endocarditis, failed a second course of vancomycin and then failed daptomycin therapy. An increase in the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations of four consecutive MRSA blood isolates from 2 microg/mL to 8 microg/mL was shown by Etest. Population analysis of four successive blood culture isolates recovered over the 10-week period showed that the MRSA strain became progressively less susceptible to both vancomycin and daptomycin. Retrospectively, the macro Etest method using teicoplanin indicated a decrease in vancomycin susceptibility in the second blood isolate. The patient improved after treatment with various courses of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, quinupristin/dalfopristin and linezolid. Early detection of vancomycin-heteroresistant S. aureus isolates, which appeared to have clinical significance in this case, continues to be a challenge for the clinical laboratory. Development of suitable practical methods for this should be given priority. Concurrent development of resistance to vancomycin and daptomycin, whilst rare, must be considered in a patient who is unresponsive to daptomycin following vancomycin therapy.

[Pharmacological rationale for choice of antibiotics for intraabdominal infections]. / Infezioni intraddominali: aspetti farmacologici degli antibiotici.

The pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characteristics of antimicrobial agents are the two fundamental pharmacological components which provide a rationale for the choice of therapy for intraabdominal infections, and especially serious infections. The most important PK-PD parameters are well known which can potentiate therapeutic efficacy. Antimicrobial agents can be subdivided into categories based on whether their activity is dependent on concentration or exposure time. Therefore, a correct dosing regimen for the time-dependent molecules (i.e. beta-lactams, linezolid, tigecycline) should prolong the maximum exposure time to maintain serum levels over the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The concentration-dependent molecules, on the other hand, which include aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones, should be given in order to reach maximum concentrations, since they are bactericidal in direct proportion to their concentrations and possess a prolonged post-antibiotic effect.

[Therapeutic perspectives of linezolid in the management of infections due to multiresistant Gram-positive pathogens]. / Le prospettive terapeutiche di linezolid nelle infezioni da patogeni Gram-positivi multiresistenti.

Multi-antibiotic resistant Gram-positive cocci represent emerging pathogens especially in the setting of the immunocompromised, hospitalized patients, in particular when surgery, invasive procedures, or prosthetic implants are of concern, patients are admitted in intensive care units, or underlying chronic disorders and immunodeficiency are of concern, and broad-spectrum antibiotics and/or immunosuppressive drugs are widely administered. The spectrum of available antimicrobial compounds for an effective management of these relevant infections is significantly impaired in selection and clinical efficacy by the emerging and spread of methicillin-resistant and more recently glycopeptide-resistant Gram-positive microbial strains linezolid, together with the recently licensed quinupristin-dalfopristin, daptomycin and tigecycline, followed by a number of glycopeptides, fluoroquinolones, and other experimental compounds represent an effective response to these concerns, due to their innovative mechanisms of action, their maintained or enhanced activity against multiresistant pathogens, their effective pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties, their frequent possibility of synergistic activity with other compounds effective against Gram-positive pathogens, and a diffuse potential for a safe and easy administration, also when compromised patients are of concern. The main problems related to the epidemiological and clinical features of multiresistant Gram-positive infection, the potential clinical indications of all recently available compounds compared with the standard of treatment of resistant Gram-positive infections, and updated data on efficacy and tolerability of linezolid have to be clarified.

[Comparative study of treatment with quinupristin-dalfopristin alone or in combination with gentamicin, teicoplanin, imipenem or levofloxacin in experimental endocarditis due to a multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium]. / Comparacion de la eficacia de quinupristina-dalfopristina en monoterapia y combinada con gentamicina, teicoplanina, imipenem o levofloxacino en un modelo experimental de endocarditis por Enterococcus faecium multirresistente.

The incidence of multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium is increasing despite advances in antibacterial therapy. Thus, new antibiotics are required to treat hospital- or community-acquired infections caused by these multidrug-resistant organisms. The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of quinupristin-dalfopristin (QD) alone, or in combination with gentamicin (G), teicoplanin (T), imipenem (I) or levofloxacin (L) against a strain of multidrug-resistant E. faecium in an experimental model of aortic valve endocarditis in rabbits. The study group consisted of 28 control animals. Eighty-two animals were treated with one of the following antibiotic regimens: G1: 18 animals QD (30 mg/kg/8 h); G2: 18 animals QD+G (6 mg/kg/12 h); G3: 16 animals QD+T (20 mg/kg/12 h); G4: 14 animals QD+I (60 mg/kg/8 h); and G5: 16 animals QD+L (20 mg/kg/12 h). The response to therapy was determined by the comparison of the number of CFU/g of E. faecium in each vegetation. In vitro, time-kill studies looking for synergy for the combinations that showed better efficacy in vivo were done. The sensitivity of the strain was intermediate to QD, resistant to T and I, and sensitive to L. There was no high-level resistance to G. QD alone revealed a significant decrease (p <0.001) in the CFU/g in the control group (9.49 vs. 7.31). There were no differences in the average of CFU/g between the QD alone (G1), QD+G (G2) and QD+T (G3) groups. These three groups revealed a significant difference in decrease of CFU/g respect of the group control (p <0.001). There were no differences in the average of CFU/g between QD+I (G4) and QD+T (G5). These two groups revealed the greatest decrease in average CFU/g (G4: 4.38 and G5: 4.04) with differences respect of the group control (p <0.0001) and respect of the groups G1, G2 and G3 (p <0.001). We did not detect any alteration of MIC from QD in the course of the treatment for either of the final isolations. Only the time kill corresponding to concentrations of I 32 mg/l (0.25 x MIC) and QD 1 mg/l (0.25 x MIC presents a descending slope in the curve at 4 and 8 h, suggesting an early synergy phenomenon, which was lost after 8 h. In light of these results, the combination QD with I and L may be considered suitable alternatives for the treatment of multiresistant E. faecium.

Comparación de la eficacia de quinupristina-dalfopristina en monoterapia y combinada con gentamicina, teicoplanina, imipenem o levofloxacino en un modelo experimental de endocarditis por Enterococcus faecium multirresistente / Comparative study of treatment with quinupristin-dalfopristin alone or in combination with gentamicin, teicoplanin, imipenem or levofloxacin in experimental endocarditis due to a multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium

La incidencia de infecciones por Enterococcus faecium multirresistentes va aumentando a pesar de los avances que se han producido en antibioticoterapia.Por ello, se necesitan nuevos antibióticos para tratar las infecciones nosocomiales o comunitarias causadas por este microorganismo.El objetivo principal del presente estudio fue comparar la eficacia de quinupristina-dalfopristina (QD), sola o combinada con gentamicina(G), teicoplanina (T), imipenem (I) o levofloxacino (L), en un modelo de endocarditis experimental en conejos por E. faecium multirresistente.Se utilizaron 110 animales, 28 como grupo control y 82 como grupos terapéuticos, que fueron G1: 18 animales con QD (30mg/kg/8 h); G2: 18 con QD+G (6 mg/kg/12 h); G3: 16 con QD+T (20 mg/kg/12 h); G4: 14 con QD+I (60 mg/kg/8 h); y G5: 16 con QD+L(20 mg/kg/12 h). Se valoró la respuesta terapéutica comparando la concentración de E. faecium en las vegetaciones cardiacas expresada comolog10 de las unidades formadoras de colonias por gramo de tejido (UFC/g). Se realizaron pruebas de cinética de letalidad bacteriana paralas asociaciones que mostraron mejor comportamiento in vivo: QD + I y QD + L. El patrón de sensibilidad de la cepa utilizada fue: sensiblepara L, intermedia para QD, resistente para T e I, y sin resistencia de alto grado para G. El tratamiento con QD logró una reducción significativa(p <0.001) en las UFC/g respecto al grupo control (9,49 frente a 7,31). No hubo diferencias significativas entre los grupos G1 (QDsola), G2 (QD + G) y G3 (QD + T), consiguiendo estos tres grupos una redución significativa respecto del grupo control (p <0.001). No hubodiferencias entre G4 (QD + I) y G5 (QD + L). Estos dos grupos se mostraron como los más eficaces en reducir la media de UFC/g en lasvegetaciones cardiacas (G4: 4,38 y G5: 4,04), con p <0.0001 respecto al grupo control y p <0.001 respecto a G1, G2 y G3. No se detectóningún cambio en la CMI de QD durante el tratamiento. Sólo la curva de letalidad correspondiente a la concentración de I de 32 mg/l (0,25x CMI) con QD 1 mg/l (0,25 x CMI) presentó una curva descendente a las 4 y 8 horas, sugiriendo una sinergia precoz que se perdió a las 8 horas.A la vista de estos resultados, la combinación de QD con I o L podría considerarse como alternativa terapéutica en la endocarditis porE. faecium multirresistente

The incidence of multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium is increasing despite advances in antibacterial therapy. Thus, new antibiotics arerequired to treat hospital- or community-acquired infections caused by these multidrug-resistant organisms. The aim of this study was tocompare the therapeutic efficacy of quinupristin-dalfopristin (QD) alone, or in combination with gentamicin (G), teicoplanin (T), imipenem(I) or levofloxacin (L) against a strain of multidrug-resistant E. faecium in an experimental model of aortic valve endocarditis in rabbits. Thestudy group consisted of 28 control animals. Eighty-two animals were treated with one of the following antibiotic regimens: G1: 18 animalsQD (30 mg/kg/8 h); G2: 18 animals QD+G (6 mg/kg/12 h); G3: 16 animals QD+T (20 mg/kg/12 h); G4: 14 animals QD+I (60 mg/kg/8 h);and G5: 16 animals QD+L (20 mg/kg/12 h). The response to therapy was determined by the comparison of the number of CFU/g of E. faeciumin each vegetation. In vitro, time-kill studies looking for synergy for the combinations that showed better efficacy in vivo were done.The sensitivity of the strain was intermediate to QD, resistant to T and I, and sensitive to L. There was no high-level resistance to G. QD alonerevealed a significant decrease (p <0.001) in the CFU/g in the control group (9.49 vs. 7.31). There were no differences in the average of CFU/gbetween the QD alone (G1), QD+G (G2) and QD+T (G3) groups. These three groups revealed a significant difference in decrease of CFU/grespect of the group control (p <0.001). There were no differences in the average of CFU/g between QD+I (G4) and QD+T (G5). These twogroups revealed the greatest decrease in average CFU/g (G4: 4.38 and G5: 4.04) with differences respect of the group control (p <0.0001)and respect of the groups G1, G2 and G3 (p <0.001). We did not detect any alteration of MIC from QD in the course of the treatment for eitherof the final isolations. Only the time kill corresponding to concentrations of I 32 mg/l (0.25 x MIC) and QD 1 mg/l (0.25 x MIC presents adescending slope in the curve at 4 and 8 h, suggesting an early synergy phenomenon, which was lost after 8 h. In light of these results, thecombination QD with I and L may be considered suitable alternatives for the treatment of multiresistant E. faecium

Establishing the change in antibiotic resistance of Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from Dutch broilers by logistic regression and survival analysis.

In this study, we investigated the change in the resistance of Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from Dutch broilers against erythromycin and virginiamycin in 1998, 1999 and 2001 by logistic regression analysis and survival analysis. The E. faecium strains were isolated from caecal samples that had been randomly collected from six slaughterhouses. Moreover, between the sample collection in 1998 and the sample collection in 1999, virginiamycin and the macrolide antibiotics (of which erythromycin is a member) have been banned in The Netherlands from use in broiler feeds as growth promoter. In the logistic regression analysis we used the internationally accepted cut-off values to determine whether bacteria were resistant or not. In the survival analysis, inhibition of bacterial growth was the event and time to event was replaced by concentration of antibiotic to event. As a consequence, changes in the growth of bacteria can be tested over an entire range of concentrations and no cut-off value for resistance has to be determined. We performed the survival analysis by use of a Cox logistic model with an odds ratio (OR) for the increase of the odds of the basic hazard rate as outcome. Both the logistic regression and the survival analyses showed that resistance to erythromycin and virginiamycin decreased during the study period. In the logistic regression model the ORs associated with the fraction of bacteria inhibited by the antibiotics in 2001 as compared to 1998 were 3.76 (2.57-5.49) for erythromycin and 11.65 (7.68-17.66) for virginiamycin. The corresponding ORs from the survival analysis were lower; 2.88 (2.21-3.76) and 2.11 (1.80-2.49), respectively. The reason for the differences between the ORs of the survival analysis and the logistic regression analysis is probably because most changes in resistance included the cut-off value and logistic regression specifically examines those changes.

Efficacy of quinupristin-dalfopristin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-insensitive S. aureus in a model of hematogenous pulmonary infection.

BACKGROUND: Quinupristin-dalfopristin (Q-D) is a mixture of quinupristin and dalfopristin, which are semisynthetic antibiotics of streptogramin groups B and A, respectively. METHODS: We compared the effect of Q-D to that of vancomycin (VCM) in murine models of hematogenous pulmonary infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and VCM-insensitive S. aureus (VISA). RESULTS: Treatment with Q-D resulted in a significant decrease in the number of viable bacteria in the lungs of mice in an MRSA infection model [Q-D 100 mg/kg, Q-D 10 mg/kg, VCM and control (mean +/- SEM): 2.99 +/- 0.44, 6.38 +/- 0.32, 5.75 +/- 0.43 and 8.40 +/- 0.14 log10 CFU/lung, respectively]. Compared with VCM, high-dose Q-D significantly reduced the number of bacteria detected in the VISA hematogenous infection model [Q-D 100 mg/kg, Q-D 10 mg/kg, VCM and control (mean +/- SEM): 5.17 +/- 0.52, 7.03 +/- 0.11, 7.10 +/- 0.49 and 7.18 +/- 0.36 log10 CFU/lung, respectively]. Histopathological examination confirmed the effect of Q-D. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that Q-D is potent and effective in the treatment of MRSA and VISA hematogenous pulmonary infections.

Linezolid and quinupristin/dalfopristin resistance in vancomycin-resistant enterococci and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prior to clinical use in Turkey.

The aim of this study was to determine the in vitro antimicrobial activity of recently licensed quinupristin/dalfopristin and linezolid which have not yet been in clinical use in Turkey against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) strains isolated from various clinical specimens by using the Etest. The results showed that all MRSA strains were fully susceptible to both the new compounds. All strains were inhibited by 1 mg/l quinupristin/dalfopristin (mode MIC 0.38 mg/l) and by 3 mg/l linezolid (mode MIC 1.5 mg/l). Four strains of Enterococcus faecium showed an increase of resistance of 2-3 mg/l to quinupristin/dalfopristin (susceptible mode MIC 0.38 mg/l). With linezolid, all strains except two fell within the range 0.75-2.0 mg/l.

Prospective, randomized study comparing quinupristin-dalfopristin with linezolid in the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium infections.

OBJECTIVES: Quinupristin-dalfopristin and linezolid have been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) infections. However, the two antibiotics have not been compared in terms of safety and efficacy in a prospective randomized study. The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the two drugs in the treatment of VREF infections in cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty cancer patients with VREF infection were randomized to receive linezolid 600 mg every 12 h or quinupristin-dalfopristin 7.5 mg/kg every 8 h. All patients were followed up for 30 days after discontinuation of study drugs. RESULTS: Linezolid and quinupristin-dalfopristin had comparable clinical responses (58% and 43%, respectively, P = 0.6). Myalgias and/or arthralgias occurred at a frequency of 33% in patients who received quinupristin-dalfopristin, but were not observed in the linezolid group (P = 0.03). In contrast, drug-related thrombocytopenia occurred in 11% of patients who received linezolid, but was not observed in the quinupristin-dalfopristin group (P = 0.2). CONCLUSION: In cancer patients, quinupristin-dalfopristin treatment is associated with a relatively high frequency of myalgias/arthralgias; however, profound thrombocytopenia might limit the choice of linezolid in a subpopulation of cancer patients.

In vitro activity of linezolid & quinupristin/dalfopristin against Gram-positive cocci.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Since the incidence of vancomycin- and methicillin-resistant Gram-positive infections continue to increase, novel antimicrobials such as linezolid and streptogramin may provide new options to treat patients. The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro susceptibility of Enterococcus faecium resistant to glycopeptides, coagulase negative staphylococci and S. aureus resistant to methicillin isolated mainly from blood and also rectal swab cultures of patients against quinupristin/dalfopristin and linezolid. METHODS: The in vitro susceptibility to linezolid and quinupristin/dalfopristin for a total of 332 isolates of Gram-positive cocci [127 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 109 methicillin-resistant coagulase negative staphylococci (71 S. epidermidis, 38 S. haemolyticus) and 96 vanA genotype vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium] was investigated by E test. RESULTS: All MRSA and MRCoNS isolates were susceptible to linezolid (MICs < 4.0 mg/l). Ninety per cent of VRE isolates were inhibited by linezolid at concentration of 2.0 mg/l and presented similar activities to quinupristin/dalfopristin. MICs for quinupristin/dalfopristin against staphylococci were also low (MIC(90) = 1.0 mg/l for both MRSA and MRCoNS isolates). INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: The results of the present study demonstrated that quinupristin/ dalfopristin and linezolid, have good in vitro activity against MRSA, MRCoNS and vancomycin resistant E. faecium in Turkey. These drugs could be promising therapeutic options in an era of rapidly growing antibiotic resistance in all parts of world.

Endocarditis due to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in an immunocompromised patient: cure by administering combination therapy with quinupristin/dalfopristin and high-dose ampicillin.

A 56-year-old man with diabetes mellitus and cadaveric renal transplantation had vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium tricuspid valve endocarditis. Relapse followed 6 weeks of treatment with intravenous gentamicin and high-dose ampicillin. On the basis of previous data suggesting the potential for synergistic activity of quinupristin/dalfopristin plus high-dose ampicillin, therapy with this combination was administered for 63 days. Cure was achieved and later confirmed at 2-year follow-up.

Telithromycin and quinupristin-dalfopristin resistance in clinical isolates of Streptococcus pyogenes: SMART Program 2001 Data.

This study evaluated the current status of antimicrobial resistance in clinical isolates of Streptococcus pyogenes in Taiwan as part of the SMART (Surveillance from Multicenter Antimicrobial Resistance in Taiwan) program. In 2001, 419 different isolates of S. pyogenes, including 275 from respiratory secretions, 87 from wound pus, and 31 from blood, were collected from nine hospitals in different parts of Taiwan. MICs of 23 antimicrobial agents were determined at a central location by the agar dilution method. All of the isolates were susceptible to penicillin (MIC at which 90% of the isolates were inhibited [MIC(90)], moxifloxacin > ciprofloxacin = levofloxacin = gatifloxacin > gemifloxacin) demonstrated potent activity against nearly all of the isolates of S. pyogenes tested. Thirty-two isolates (8%) were not susceptible to quinupristin-dalfopristin. Seventeen percent of isolates had telithromycin MICs of >or=1 microg/ml, and all of these isolates exhibited erythromycin MICs of >or=32 microg/ml. The high prevalence of resistance to telithromycin (which is not available in Taiwan) limits its potential use in the treatment of S. pyogenes infections, particularly in areas with high rates of macrolide resistance.

Quinupristin-dalfopristin and linezolid: evidence and opinion.

Quinupristin-dalfopristin and linezolid demonstrate in vitro activity against a wide range of gram-positive bacteria, including many isolates resistant to earlier antimicrobials. Quinupristin-dalfopristin is inactive against Enterococcus faecalis but has been effective for treatment of infections due to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium associated with bacteremia. In comparative trials, linezolid proved to be equivalent to comparator agents, resulting in its approval for several clinical indications. The almost-complete bioavailability of linezolid permits oral administration. Each agent can cause adverse effects that may limit use in individual patients. Resistance to these drugs has been encountered infrequently among vancomycin-resistant E. faecium. Resistance to quinupristin-dalfopristin is rare among staphylococci in the United States, and resistance to linezolid is very rare. Whether there is any benefit to use of these agents in combination regimens, and whether there are circumstances in which they might be alternatives to cell-wall active antibiotics for treatment of bone or endovascular infections, are questions that deserve further study.

Efficacy of quinupristin-dalfopristin in preventing vascular graft infection due to Staphylococcus epidermidis with intermediate resistance to glycopeptides.

A rat model was used to investigate the efficacy of quinupristin-dalfopristin (Q-D) in the prevention of vascular prosthetic graft infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis with intermediate resistance to glycopeptides. The in vitro activity of the compound was compared to that of vancomycin by MIC determination and time-kill study. Moreover, the efficacy of collagen-sealed Q-D-soaked Dacron was evaluated in a rat model of graft infection. Graft infections were established in the subcutaneous tissue of the backs of 120 adult male Wistar rats. The in vivo study included a control group, one contaminated group that did not receive any antibiotic prophylaxis, two contaminated groups that received grafts soaked with 10 and 100 micro g of Q-D per ml, respectively, and two contaminated groups that received grafts soaked with 10 and 100 micro g of vancomycin per ml, respectively. Rats that received Dacron grafts soaked with 100 micro g of Q-D per ml showed no evidence of infection (<10 CFU/ml). In contrast, for rats that received Dacron grafts soaked with 10 micro g of Q-D per ml and Dacron grafts soaked with 10 or 100 micro g of vancomycin per ml, the quantitative graft cultures demonstrated 2.2 x 10(2) +/- 1.3 x 10(2), 2.2 x 10(6) +/- 1.9 x 10(5), and 5.6 x 10(2) +/- 0.3 x 10(2) CFU/ml, respectively. Taken together the results of the study demonstrate that the use of Dacron grafts soaked with Q-D can result in significant bacterial growth inhibition and show that this compound is potentially valuable for prevention of vascular prosthetic graft infection.

Efficacies of quinupristin-dalfopristin combined with vancomycin in vitro and in experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in relation to cross-resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramin B- type antibiotics.

A beneficial effect of the combination of quinupristin-dalfopristin and vancomycin was observed against two methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus harboring or not harboring the ermC gene, which codes for constitutive macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin B resistance. The beneficial effect was observed in time-kill studies, in which the drugs were used at inhibitory concentrations, and in a rabbit model of endocarditis, in which the combination was highly bactericidal and more active than monotherapies.

Synercid plus vancomycin for the treatment of severe methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci infections: evaluation of 5 cases.

Synercid (quinupristin/dalfopristin), the first semi-synthetic injectable streptogramin, is a promising alternative to glycopeptides against many Gram-positive multiresistant bacteria. Vancomycin is still considered an effective agent for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections but therapeutic failures with glycopeptides have been observed, even for the treatment of infections caused by S. aureus strains sensitive to vancomycin. Synercid, in combination with a glycopeptide, may address this problem without causing significant side effects due to the different toxicity patterns of the 2 antimicrobials. This study reports our experience with the combination of Synercid and vancomycin in 5 patients with severe infection caused by MRSA or methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus.