Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 48
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Emerg Radiol ; 29(5): 895-901, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35829928

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: There are limited data comparing the severity of traumatic adrenal injury (TAI) and the need for interventions, such as transfusions, hospitalization, or incidence of adrenal insufficiency (AI) and other clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between the grade of TAI and the need for subsequent intervention and clinical outcomes following the injury. METHODS: After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval, our trauma registry was queried for patients with TAI between 2009 and 2017. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) examinations of the abdomen and pelvis were evaluated by a board-certified radiologist with subspecialty expertise in abdominal and trauma imaging, and adrenal injuries were classified as either low grade (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grade I-III) or high grade (AAST grade IV-V). Patients without initial contrast-enhanced CT imaging and those with indeterminate imaging findings on initial CT were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients with 149 TAI were included. Eight-six patients demonstrated low-grade injuries and 43 high grade. Age, gender, and Injury Severity Score (ISS) were not statistically different between the groups. There was an increased number of major vascular injuries in the low-grade vs. high-grade group (23% vs. 5%, p < 0.01). No patient required transfusions or laparotomy for control of adrenal hemorrhage. There was no statistical difference in hospital length of stay (LOS), ventilator days, or mortality. Low-grade adrenal injuries were, however, associated with shorter ICU LOS (10 days vs. 16 days, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The need for interventions and clinical outcomes between the low-grade and high-grade groups was similar. These results suggest that, regardless of the TAI grade, treatment should be based on a holistic clinical assessment and less focused on specific interventions directed at addressing the adrenal injury.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating , Abdominal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Abdominal Injuries/therapy , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Length of Stay , Retrospective Studies , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35670748

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Blunt chest trauma is often associated with severe pain, reduced lung function and decreased sleep quality. This study aims to investigate the immediate and long-term effect of acupuncture on these factors using a randomized control double-blind design. METHODS: A total of 72 patients were randomized into 2 groups: treatment group (press tack acupuncture) and control group (press tack placebo). The face rating scale, numerical rating scale (NRS), portable incentive spirometer and Verran Snyder-Halpern sleep scale were measured at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at the 4th day, with 2-weeks and 3-months follow-ups. RESULTS: There were no significant changes between the groups at the baseline measurements, with the exception of hypertension comorbidity. Immediately after the intervention and on the 4th day follow-up, the patients in the treatment group showed a significantly lower face rating scale when compared to the control (P < 0.05). There were no significant changes in any of the other measurements between the groups (P > 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed that the NRS for turn over on the 4th day was reduced significantly in the treatment group of patients without lung contusion (P < 0.05). For patients without pleural drainage, cough NRS in the treatment group was significantly reduced in the 2-week follow-up (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that press tack acupuncture effects on pain reduction were inconclusive. However, future studies on the effect of acupuncture on blunt chest trauma patients are needed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltirl.gov: NCT04318496.


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy , Thoracic Injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating , Acupuncture Therapy/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Pain , Thoracic Injuries/diagnosis , Thoracic Injuries/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnosis , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy
3.
Rev. cir. (Impr.) ; 73(5): 581-586, oct. 2021. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1388882

ABSTRACT

Resumen Introducción: La terapia endovascular ha demostrado ser una buena alternativa de tratamiento en las enfermedades arteriales y venosas. Asimismo, en trauma vascular periférico constituye una excelente opción, especialmente en sitios anatómicos difíciles de acceder y con lesiones complejas como seudoaneurismas, fístulas arteriovenosas (FAV) o la combinación de ambos, con numerosas ventajas. Objetivo: Evaluar los resultados del tratamiento endovascular en trauma vascular penetrante por agresiones y iatrogenias. Materiales y Método: Revisión retrospectiva de todos los pacientes con trauma vascular periférico sometidos a terapia endovascular. Resultados: Entre abril de 2011 y mayo de 2020 se trataron 30 pacientes, 28 hombres y 2 mujeres. Con edades fluctuantes entre 17 y 84 años. La causa del trauma fue 20 penetrantes y 10 iatrogenias. Los vasos afectados fueron arteria femoral superficial 6, femoral profunda 2, subclavia 9, axilar 1, poplítea 4, ilíacas 1, peronea 1, tibial anterior 5, tronco venoso braquiocefálico 1. Diecisiete pacientes fueron tratados con endoprótesis, 9 con embolización y 4 con cierre percutáneo en relación con catéteres arteriales en subclavia. No hubo mortalidad, pero dos pacientes requirieron reparación abierta: un seudoaneurisma poplíteo gigante y un seudoaneurisma de tibial anterior, en ambos se constató sección completa de ambas arterias. El seguimiento clínico ha sido entre 30 días y 3 años. Conclusiones: En esta serie de casos, la terapia endovascular en lesiones de trauma vascular periférico ofrece excelentes resultados con baja morbimortalidad y permeabilidad aceptable a corto y mediano plazo.


Introduction: Endovascular therapy has proven to be a good treatment alternative in arterial and venous diseases. Likewise, in peripheral vascular trauma it is an excellent option, especially in anatomical sites that are difficult to access and with complex lesions such as pseudoaneurysms, arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) or the combination of both, with numerous advantages. Aim: To evaluate the results of endovascular treatment in trauma Penetrating vascular injury and iatrogenesis. Materials and Method: Retrospective review of all patients with peripheral vascular trauma undergoing endovascular therapy. Results: Between April 2011 and May 2020, 30 patients were treated, 28 men and 2 women. With fluctuating ages between 17 and 84 years. The cause of the trauma was 20 penetrating and 10 iatrogenic. The affected vessels were superficial femoral artery 6, deep femoral 2, subclavian 9, axillary 1, popliteal 4, iliac 1, peroneal 1, anterior tibial 5, brachiocephalic venous trunk 1. Seventeen patients were treated with endoprosthesis, 9 with embolization and 4 with percutaneous closure in relation to arterial catheters in the subclavian. There was no mortality but two patients required open repair: a giant popliteal pseudoaneurysm and an anterior tibial pseudoaneurysm in which both sections of both arteries were found to be complete. Clinical follow-up was between 30 days and 3 years. Conclusión: In this serie, endovascular therapy in peripheral vascular trauma lesions offers excellent results with low morbidity and mortality and acceptable patency in the short and medium term.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arteries/injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy , Wounds, Penetrating/therapy , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnosis , Wounds, Penetrating/diagnosis , Blood Vessel Prosthesis/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies
6.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(18): e25667, 2021 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33950945

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Blunt chest trauma (BCT) accounts for up to 65% of polytrauma patients. In patients with 0 to 2 rib fractures, treatment interventions are typically limited to oral analgesics and breathing exercises. Patients suffering from BCT experience symptoms of severe pain, poor sleep, and inability to perform simple daily life activities for an extended period of time thereafter. In this trial, we aim to investigate the efficacy of acupuncture as a functional and reliable treatment option for blunt chest trauma patients. METHODS: The study is designed as a double-blind randomized control trial. We will include 72 patients divided into 2 groups; the acupuncture group (Acu) and placebo group (Con). The acupuncture group will receive true acupuncture using a uniquely designed press tack needle. The control group will receive placebo acupuncture treatment through the use of a similarly designed press tack needle without the needle element. The acupoints selected for both groups are GB 34, GB 36, LI 4, LU 7, ST 36, and TH 5. Both groups will receive 1 treatment only following the initial visit to the medical facility and upon diagnosis of BCT. Patient outcome measurements include: Numerical Rating Scale, Face Rating Scale, respiratory function flowmeter, Verran Snyder-Halpern sleep scale, and the total amount of allopathic medication used. Follow-up time will be scheduled at 4 days, 2 weeks, and lastly 3 months. EXPECTED OUTCOME: The results of this study can potentially provide a simple and cost-effective analgesic solution to blunt chest trauma patients. This novel study design can serve as supporting evidence for future double-blind studies within the field of acupuncture. OTHER INFORMATION: The study will be conducted in the thoracic surgical department and acupuncture department in China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan. The study will be conducted on blunt chest trauma patients and is anticipated to have minimum risk of adverse events. Enrollment of the patients and data collection will start from March 2020. Study completion time is expected in March 2022. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: (CMUH109-REC1-002), (NCT04318496).


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy/methods , Multiple Trauma/therapy , Pain Management/methods , Pain/diagnosis , Thoracic Injuries/therapy , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy , Acupuncture Therapy/adverse effects , Acupuncture Therapy/instrumentation , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Trauma/complications , Multiple Trauma/diagnosis , Needles , Pain/etiology , Pain Management/adverse effects , Pain Management/instrumentation , Pain Measurement/statistics & numerical data , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Thoracic Injuries/complications , Thoracic Injuries/diagnosis , Treatment Outcome , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complications , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnosis , Young Adult
7.
Injury ; 49(6): 1008-1023, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29655592

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Blunt chest injuries (BCI) are associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. There are many interventions for BCI which may be able to be combined as a care bundle for improved and more consistent outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To review and integrate the BCI management interventions to inform the development of a BCI care bundle. METHODS: A structured search of the literature was conducted to identify studies evaluating interventions for patients with BCI. Databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, PubMed and Scopus were searched from 1990-April 2017. A two-step data extraction process was conducted using pre-defined data fields, including research quality indicators. Each study was appraised using a quality assessment tool, scored for level of evidence, then data collated into categories. Interventions were also assessed using the APEASE criteria then integrated to develop a BCI care bundle. RESULTS: Eighty-one articles were included in the final analysis. Interventions that improved BCI outcomes were grouped into three categories; respiratory intervention, analgesia and surgical intervention. Respiratory interventions included continuous positive airway pressure and high flow nasal oxygen. Analgesia interventions included regular multi-modal analgesia and paravertebral or epidural analgesia. Surgical fixation was supported for use in moderate to severe rib fractures/BCI. Interventions supported by evidence and that met APEASE criteria were combined into a BCI care bundle with four components: respiratory adjuncts, analgesia, complication prevention, and surgical fixation. CONCLUSIONS: The key components of a BCI care bundle are respiratory support, analgesia, complication prevention including chest physiotherapy and surgical fixation.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Patient Care Bundles , Rib Fractures/therapy , Thoracic Injuries/therapy , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Pain Management
8.
Am Surg ; 84(10): 1691-1695, 2018 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30747696

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to compare end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) during resuscitation of open-chest cardiac massage (OCCM) with aortic cross-clamp (ACC) versus receiving resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) with closed-chest compressions (CCCs). Patients who received REBOA were compared with patients receiving OCCM for traumatic arrest using continuous vital sign monitoring and videography. Thirty-three patients were enrolled in the REBOA group and 18 patients were enrolled in the OCCM group. Of the total patients, 86.3 per cent were male with a mean age of 36.2 ± 13.9 years. Ninety-four percent of patients suffered penetrating trauma in the OCCM group compared with 30.3 per cent of the REBOA group (P = <0.001). Before aortic occlusion (AO), there was no difference in initial EtCO2 values, but mean, median, peak, and final EtCO2 values were lower in OCCM (P < 0.005). During CPR after AO, the initial, mean, and median values were higher with REBOA (P = 0.015, 0.036, and 0.038). The rate of return of spontaneous circulation was higher in REBOA versus OCCM (20/33 [60.1%] vs 5/18 [33.3%]; P = 0.04), and REBOA patients survived to operative intervention more frequently (P = 0.038). REBOA patients had greater total cardiac compression fraction (CCF) before AO than OCCM (85.3 ± 12.7% vs 35.2 ± 18.6%, P < 0.0001) and after AO (88.3 ± 7.8% vs 71.9 ± 24.4%, P = 0.0052). REBOA patients have higher EtCO2 and cardiac compression fraction before and after AO compared with patients who receive OCCM.


Subject(s)
Aorta/injuries , Balloon Occlusion/methods , Carbon Dioxide/blood , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Adult , Capnography/methods , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/instrumentation , Constriction , Embolization, Therapeutic/instrumentation , Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Female , Heart Arrest/therapy , Heart Massage/methods , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Thoracic Injuries/complications , Thoracic Injuries/therapy , Thoracotomy/methods , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complications , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy , Wounds, Penetrating/complications , Wounds, Penetrating/therapy
9.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 51(9): 796-804, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28644311

ABSTRACT

GOAL AND BACKGROUND: A literature review to improve practitioners' knowledge and performance concerning the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of hemobilia. STUDY: A search of Pubmed, Google Scholar, and Medline was conducted using the keyword hemobilia and relevant articles were reviewed and analyzed. The findings pertaining to hemobilia etiology, investigation, and management techniques were considered and organized by clinicians practiced in hemobilia. RESULTS: The majority of current hemobilia cases have an iatrogenic cause from either bile duct or liver manipulation. Blunt trauma is also a significant cause of hemobilia. The classic triad presentation of right upper quadrant pain, jaundice, and upper gastrointestinal bleeding is rarely seen. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are the preferred diagnostic modalities, and the preferred therapeutic management includes interventional radiology and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Surgery is rarely a therapeutic option. CONCLUSIONS: With advances in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging technology, diagnosis with these less invasive investigations are the favored option. However, traditional catheter angiography is still the gold standard. The management of significant hemobilia is still centered on arterial embolization, but arterial and biliary stents have become accepted alternative therapies.


Subject(s)
Bile Ducts/injuries , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Hemobilia/epidemiology , Iatrogenic Disease , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/epidemiology , Bile Ducts/diagnostic imaging , Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/instrumentation , Embolization, Therapeutic , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnostic imaging , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/therapy , Hemobilia/diagnostic imaging , Hemobilia/therapy , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Radiography, Interventional , Risk Factors , Stents , Treatment Outcome , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy
10.
J Pediatr Surg ; 52(5): 826-831, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28188036

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: An accelerated clinical care pathway for solid organ abdominal injuries was implemented at a level one pediatric trauma center. The impact on resource utilization and demonstration of protocol safety was assessed. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively on patients admitted with blunt abdominal solid organ injuries from 2012 to 2015. Patients were subdivided into pre- and post-protocol groups. Length of hospital stay (LOS) and failure of non-operative treatment were the primary outcomes of interest. RESULTS: 138 patients with solid organ injury were studied: 73 pre- (2012-2014) and 65 post-protocol (2014-2015). There were no significant differences in age, gender, injury severity score (ISS), injury grade, or mechanism (p>0.05). LOS was shorter post-protocol (mean 5.6 vs. 3.4days; median 5 .0 vs. 3.0days; p=0.0002), resulting in average savings of $5966 per patient. Patients in the protocol group mobilized faster (p<0.0001) and experienced fewer blood draws (p=0.02). On multivariate analysis, protocol group (p<0.001) and ISS (p<0.001) were independently associated with LOS. There were no differences between groups in the need for operation, embolization, or transfusion. CONCLUSION: An accelerated care pathway is safe and effective in the management of pediatric solid organ injuries with early mobilization, less blood draws, and decreased LOS without significant morbidity and mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, cost effectiveness, level III.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries/therapy , Critical Pathways , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy , Abdominal Injuries/diagnosis , Abdominal Injuries/economics , Adolescent , Alberta , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Critical Pathways/economics , Female , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Injury Severity Score , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Multivariate Analysis , National Health Programs/economics , Patient Safety/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Centers , Treatment Outcome , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnosis , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/economics
11.
B-ENT ; Suppl 26(2): 87-102, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29558579

ABSTRACT

Tracheal damage. Blunt/penetrating trauma and inhalation injuries to the trachea can result in acute airway compromise, with life-threatening implications. Early assessment, identification, and prompt and appropriate management are of paramount importance in order to reduce patient morbidity and mortality. Signs and symptoms of these injuries are specific and sometimes subtle, and their seriousness may be obscured by other injuries. Diagnosis can therefore be challenging, requiring a high index of suspicion. Indeed, diagnosis and treatment are often delayed, resulting in attempted surgical repair months or even years after injury. Laryngoscopy, flexible and/or rigid bronchoscopy and computed tomography of the chest are the procedures of choice for a definitive diagnosis. Airway control and appropriate ventilation represent the key aspects of emergency management. Definitive treatment depends on the site and the extent of injury. Surgery, involving primary repair with direct suture or resection and end-to-end anastomosis, is the treatment of choice for patients suffering from tracheal injuries. A conservative approach must be considered for the paediatric population and selected patients with mainly iatrogenic damage. We present a review of the incidence, mechanisms of injury, clinical presentations, diagnosis, initial airway management, anaesthetic considerations and definitive treatment in the case of tracheal damage from blunt/penetrating trauma and inhalation injuries.


Subject(s)
Trachea/injuries , Airway Management , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Burns, Inhalation/complications , Burns, Inhalation/diagnosis , Burns, Inhalation/therapy , Emergency Medical Services , Emergency Service, Hospital , Endoscopy , Expectorants/therapeutic use , Humans , Hyperbaric Oxygenation , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Respiration, Artificial , Trachea/diagnostic imaging , Trachea/surgery , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complications , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy , Wounds, Penetrating/complications , Wounds, Penetrating/therapy
12.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 75(3): 421-5, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23928740

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Management of splenic injury has shifted from operative to nonoperative management in both children and adults with reports of high success rates. Benefits of splenic conservation include decreased hospital stay, blood transfusion, and mortality, as well as avoidance of infectious complications. Angiography with embolization is an innovative adjunct to nonoperative management and has resulted in increased splenic salvage in adults; however, data in the pediatric population are scant. METHODS: A retrospective comparative study of a single-hospital trauma registry reviewed from 1999 to 2009. Patients 18 years and younger admitted with injury to the spleen were included. Children with penetrating injury were excluded. Children were divided into three categories by initial treatment: observation, embolization, or splenectomy. Data recorded include age, radiographic grade of injury, and Injury Severity Score (ISS). Groups were analyzed for success of initial treatment, requirement for transfusion of packed red blood cells, splenic salvage, and mortality. RESULTS: Registry review identified 259 children with blunt splenic injury. Initial treatment was observation in 227, embolization in 15, and splenectomy in 17. In the observation group, 9 (4%) of 227 children failed initial treatment; 8 of these underwent embolization, while 1 unerwent splenectomy. In the embolization group, 1 (7%) of 15 failed initial treatment and underwent splenectomy. Blood transfusion was required by 38 (17%) of 227 in the observation group, 6 (40%) of 15 (p = 0.02) in the embolization group, and 15 (88%) of 17 (p < 0.01) in the splenectomy group. Overall splenic salvage rate was 237 (92%) of 259. Three children died in the observation group, and four children died in the splenectomy group. There was no death in the embolization group. CONCLUSION: Splenic artery embolization for blunt trauma in children is associated with a higher blood transfusion rate compared with observation but offers a safe, intermediate alternative to splenectomy when observation fails. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.


Subject(s)
Embolization, Therapeutic , Spleen/injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy , Adolescent , Blood Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Length of Stay , Male , Radiography , Retrospective Studies , Spleen/blood supply , Splenectomy , Splenic Artery/diagnostic imaging , Splenic Artery/injuries , Treatment Outcome , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/surgery
13.
J Vasc Surg ; 56(3): 728-36, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22795520

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the anatomic distribution and associated mortality of combat-related vascular injuries comparing them to a contemporary civilian standard. DESIGN: The Joint Trauma Theater Registry (JTTR) was queried to identify patients with major compressible arterial injury (CAI) and noncompressible arterial injury (NCAI) sites, and their outcomes, among casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan from 2003 to 2006. The National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) was then queried over the same time frame to identify civilian trauma patients with similar arterial injuries. Propensity score-based matching was used to create matched patient cohorts from both populations for analysis. RESULTS: Registry queries identified 380 patients from the JTTR and 7020 patients from the NTDB who met inclusion criteria. Propensity score matching for age, elevated Injury Severity Score (ISS; >15), and hypotension on arrival (systolic blood pressure [SBP] <90) resulted in 167 matched patients from each registry. The predominating mechanism of injury among matched JTTR patients was explosive events (73.1%), whereas penetrating injury was more common in the NTDB group (61.7%). In the matched cohorts, the incidence of NCAI did not differ (22.2% JTTR vs 26.6% NTDB; P = .372), but the NTDB patients had a higher incidence of CAI (73.7% vs 59.3%; P = .005). The JTTR cohort was also found to have a higher incidence of associated venous injury (57.5% vs 23.4%; P < .001). Overall, the matched JTTR cohort had a lower mortality than NTDB counterparts (4.2% vs 12.6%; P = .006), a finding that was also noted among patients with NCAI (10.8% vs 36.4%; P = .008). There was no difference in mortality between matched JTTR and NTDB patients with CAI overall (2.0% vs 4.1%; P = .465), or among those presenting with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) <8 (28.6% vs 40.0%; P = 1.00) or shock (SBP <90; 10.5% vs 7.7%; P = 1.00). The JTTR mortality rate among patients with CAI was, however, lower among patients with ISS >15 compared with civilian matched counterparts (10.7% vs 42.4%; P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality of injured service personnel who reach a medical treatment facility after major arterial injury compares favorably to a matched civilian standard. Acceptable mortality rates within the military cohort are related to key aspects of an organized Joint Trauma System, including prehospital tactical combat casualty care, rapid medical evacuation to forward surgical capability, and implementation of clinical practice guidelines. Aspects of this comprehensive combat casualty care strategy may translate and be of value to management of arterial injury in the civilian sector.


Subject(s)
Afghan Campaign 2001- , Arteries/injuries , Blast Injuries/mortality , Iraq War, 2003-2011 , Military Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Vascular System Injuries/mortality , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/mortality , Wounds, Penetrating/mortality , Adult , Benchmarking , Blast Injuries/diagnosis , Blast Injuries/therapy , Cause of Death , Chi-Square Distribution , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Female , Glasgow Coma Scale , Humans , Incidence , Injury Severity Score , Male , Military Medicine/standards , Odds Ratio , Prognosis , Propensity Score , Registries , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , United States , Vascular System Injuries/diagnosis , Vascular System Injuries/therapy , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnosis , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy , Wounds, Penetrating/diagnosis , Wounds, Penetrating/therapy , Young Adult
14.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 106(5): 573-80, 2011.
Article in Romanian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22165054

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Since its inception, the man suffered injuries through falls, fire, drowning and interpersonal conflict. While the mechanism and frequency of different specific injuries has changed passing of millennia, trauma remains an important cause of mortality and morbidity in modern society. Although the war is presented as one of the four knights of the Apocalypse, we must emphasize the important developments of surgical experience during war. The purpose of this study is to highlight the lessons learned during the history and how they changed the modern trauma care. METHOD: Systematic review of English language literature using computer searching of Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health International MEDLINE database using PubMed Entre interface. RESULTS: The first historical record of a trauma medical care is 3605 years ago. Over the past decades, one of the most important changes in trauma patient care is the selective nonoperative management (SNOM) of significant abdominal visceral injuries. SNOM was first described in 1968, for splenic trauma, by Upadhyay and Simpson. It was accepted much later for liver injuries. Beginning from 1960 - 1970, SNOM was introduced for abdominal stab wounds. Exploratory laparotomy remains the standard approach for abdominal gunshot wounds until 1990, when centers from United States and South Africa first reported cases successfully managed nonoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The trauma surgery has evolved continuously over the centuries, according to more and more severe modem injuries.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries/history , Trauma Centers/history , Wounds and Injuries/history , Abdominal Injuries/therapy , Emergency Medical Services/history , Europe , History, 15th Century , History, 16th Century , History, 17th Century , History, 18th Century , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , History, Ancient , History, Medieval , Humans , Laparotomy/history , South Africa , United States , Warfare , Wounds and Injuries/surgery , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Wounds, Gunshot/history , Wounds, Gunshot/therapy , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/history , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy , Wounds, Stab/history , Wounds, Stab/therapy
17.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol ; 23(1): 41-6, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19901829

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The article reviews the epidemiology of airway injuries, airway anatomy, techniques for airway management, helpful pharmacologic adjuncts and finally alternatives to airway manipulation. RECENT FINDINGS: Principles of airway management including the maintenance of spontaneous ventilation and careful and adequate preparation for an alternative plan will always be important. Advances in pharmacologic agents provide a safer, more controlled environment through which the patient's compromised airway can be controlled. Recent publications add to the evidence that alternative methods of oxygenation and ventilation such as cardiopulmonary bypass can be used successfully to treat patients with catastrophic airway injuries. SUMMARY: Trauma to the airway, either blunt or penetrating or iatrogenic, can result in significant patient morbidity and mortality. Although, relatively rare, if we practice long enough, each of us will encounter such a patient. The anesthesiologist must be familiar with airway anatomy and the location of injury for successful treatment. Along with airway injuries, associated injuries are common and often complicate definitive airway treatment. Modern anesthetic medications such as dexmedetomidine and proven techniques such as awake fiberoptic intubation can be used to safely treat these difficult patients. Alternative therapies such as cricothyroidotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass should be available if first-line therapies fail to secure an injured airway.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Intravenous/methods , Bronchoscopy/methods , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Trachea/injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy , Wounds, Penetrating/therapy , Anesthesia, Intravenous/instrumentation , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Fiber Optic Technology , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/instrumentation , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Trachea/anatomy & histology , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complications , Wounds, Penetrating/complications
19.
Am J Emerg Med ; 27(3): 280-4, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19328370

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a pilot study to assess the efficacy of acupuncture as an analgesic intervention for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) after minor acute trauma to the extremities. In addition, we sought to assess the feasibility of performing acupuncture in this setting. METHODS: Acupuncture was used as primary analgesia for a convenience sample of ED patients with acute, nonpenetrating extremity injury. Efficacy was measured using a visual analog scale before treatment, immediately after acupuncture (time 0), and every 30 minutes thereafter. A telephone call was made to patients within 72 hours to ascertain pain levels using a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale. Markers of feasibility included average time patients spent in the fast track area of the ED vs average time in the department (TID) for all fast track patients with similar injury. RESULTS: Of 47 patients approached, 20 (43%) consented to participate. The mean age of those who consented was 33 years, and 70% (n = 14) were male. Median change in visual analog scale score for pre-acupuncture vs time 0 was 16 mm, with range of 0 to 60 mm. Median numerical rating scale score at time of discharge and at follow-up was 3. Median TID was 135 minutes, with a range of 55 to 255 minutes. Patients with extremity injury who did not receive acupuncture had a median TID of 90 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that acupuncture can be an effective analgesic intervention for patients with acute injury to the extremities. Acupuncture did not increase patients' TID. Minor complications were reported.


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy/methods , Extremities/injuries , Musculoskeletal System/injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy , Adult , Emergency Service, Hospital , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Pain Measurement , Pilot Projects , Statistics, Nonparametric , Treatment Outcome
20.
Singapore Med J ; 49(1): 54-6, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18204770

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of trans-anal rectal injuries is usually delayed because of the patient's denial. Some of these injuries are self-inflicted or caused by criminal assault, leading to delayed presentation. We aimed to study the causes, clinical presentation, management and clinical outcome of transanal rectal injuries. METHODS: The records of 12 patients (nine males) with a median age of 36.5 (range 20-64) years, had trans-anal rectal injury and were treated between 1993 and 2006 at Al-Ain Hospital, were reviewed. RESULTS: Injury was caused by a fall on a sharp object in five patients, by a rectal foreign body in two patients, by a compressed air hose in two patients, by sexual assault in two patients, and by rectal cleansing enema in one patient. Seven patients presented two hours after the injury, four patients within 8-24 hours, and one sexually-assaulted patient presented after seven days. Injuries were in the anterior rectal wall in seven, in the rectosigmoid junction in three, and in the anorectal region in two patients. Ten patients presented with peritonitis, four were in shock, seven had bleeding per rectum, and two had a weak sphincter. The complication rate was significantly higher in the colostomy patients compared with primary repair (5/6 compared with 0/6, p-value is less than 0.02, Fisher's exact test). All patients survived. The median (range) hospital stay was ten (9-72) days. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of trans-anal rectal injuries is usually delayed because of late presentation. Sexual assault should be suspected following rectal injuries. Colostomy is not always mandatory.


Subject(s)
Anal Canal/injuries , Rectum/injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnosis , Wounds, Penetrating/diagnosis , Accidental Falls , Adult , Colostomy/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sex Offenses , Treatment Outcome , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy , Wounds, Penetrating/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL