Vitamin A Deficiency, COVID-19, and Rhino-Orbital Mucormycosis (Black Fungus): An Analytical Perspective.

Mucormycosis is a rare but serious opportunistic fungal disease characterized by rhino-orbito-cerebral and pulmonary involvement. It is mainly seen in people with secondary immunosuppression, isolated vitamin A deficiency, measles, and AIDS patients. It showed a rise during the second wave of the COVID-19 epidemic in the spring of 2021 in India, especially in diabetic COVID-19 patients. Vitamin A deficiency is known to cause nutritional immunodeficiency and hence leading the way to increased opportunistic fungal, bacterial, and viral infections. In the eye, it causes keratitis, night blindness, xerophthalmia, conjunctivitis, Bitot spots, keratomalacia, and retinopathy. It also causes decreased tear secretion and deterioration of the anatomical/physiological defense barrier of the eye. The negative impact of vitamin A deficiency has been previously demonstrated in measles, AIDS, and COVID-19. We think that mucormycosis in COVID-19 might be rendered by vitamin A deficiency and that vitamin A supplementation may have preventive and therapeutic values against mucormycosis and other ocular symptoms associated with COVID-19. However, any vitamin A treatment regimen needs to be based on laboratory and clinical data and supervised by medical professionals.

Approach of Turkish ophthalmologists to micronutrition in age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the knowledge and behaviors of ophthalmologists in Turkey concerning micronutrition support in patients with age related macular degeneration (ARMD). METHODS: This study involved 1,845 ophthalmologists. A scientific poll was sent to all participants by email. The survey covered the following: demographic features, subspecialty knowledge about micronutrition preference for prescribing micronutrition to age related macular degeneration patients, and the reason for this preference. If a participant indicated that he or she prescribed micronutrition, the participant was also asked to indicate the source of the treatment and supplemental treatments. RESULTS: Of 1,845 ophthalmologists, 249 responded to the survey. Of the respondents, 9% (22) never, 43% (107) sometimes, 37% (92) frequently, and 11% (27) always used micronutrition. The most frequent prescribing subgroup was general ophthalmology (22%), followed by the retina-uvea subspecialty (13.9%). The micronutrition prescribing ratio was 54.8% in retina-uvea specialists when the "frequent" and "always" responses were combined. There was no statistically significant difference between subgroups with respect to prescribing micronutrition. Among the ophthalmologists prescribing micronutrition, 57.1% of them did not use the Age-Related Eye Disease Study-1 (AREDS) criteria, and only 31.3% prescribe micronutrition according to AREDS criteria. The results for the general ophthalmologist and retina-uvea specialist subgroups were similar, 56.3% vs 20.2%, and 54.1% vs 36.1%, respectively. Micronutrition was not recommended for the following reasons: expensive (55.4%), low patient expectancy (40%), no effect (30%), and low patient drug compliance (25.4%). Moreover, 55.2% of the clinicians recommended physical activities, dietary changes, and smoking cessation; 7.3% did not recommend these behavioral changes. CONCLUSION: This survey demonstrated that micronutrition preference in age related macular degeneration was low in ophthalmologists in Turkey. Additionally, retina specialists have a lower rate of prescribing micronutrition. Micronutrition support and behavior such as smoking cessation, dietary changes, etc. should be recommended more often to patients with age related macular degeneration.

Approach of Turkish ophthalmologists to micronutrition in age-related macular degeneration / Abordagem dos oftalmologistas turcos em relação a micronutrição na degeneração macular relacionada à idade

Purpose: To evaluate the knowledge and behaviors of ophthalmologists in Turkey concerning micronutrition support in patients with age related macular degeneration (ARMD). Methods: This study involved 1,845 ophthalmologists. A scientific poll was sent to all participants by email. The survey covered the following: demographic features, subspecialty knowledge about micronutrition preference for prescribing micronutrition to age related macular degeneration patients, and the reason for this preference. If a participant indicated that he or she prescribed micronutrition, the participant was also asked to indicate the source of the treatment and supplemental treatments. Results: Of 1,845 ophthalmologists, 249 responded to the survey. Of the respondents, 9% (22) never, 43% (107) sometimes, 37% (92) frequently, and 11% (27) always used micronutrition. The most frequent prescribing subgroup was general ophthalmology (22%), followed by the retina-uvea subspecialty (13.9%). The micronutrition prescribing ratio was 54.8% in retina-uvea specialists when the "frequent" and "always" responses were combined. There was no statistically significant difference between subgroups with respect to prescribing micronutrition. Among the ophthalmologists prescribing micronutrition, 57.1% of them did not use the Age-Related Eye Disease Study-1 (AREDS) criteria, and only 31.3% prescribe micronutrition according to AREDS criteria. The results for the general ophthalmologist and retina-uvea specialist subgroups were similar, 56.3% vs 20.2%, and 54.1% vs 36.1%, respectively. Micronutrition was not recommended for the following reasons: expensive (55.4%), low patient expectancy (40%), no effect (30%), and low patient drug compliance (25.4%). Moreover, 55.2% of the clinicians recommended physical activities, dietary changes, and smoking cessation; 7.3% did not recommend these behavioral changes. Conclusion: This survey demonstrated that micronutrition preference in ...

Objetivo: Avaliar o conhecimento e comportamento dos oftalmologistas na Turquia sobre o suporte micronutricional em pacientes com degeneração macular relacionada à idade (DMRI). Métodos: Este estudo continha 1.845 oftalmologistas, e uma pesquisa científica foi enviado a todos os participantes por e-mail. O levantamento abrangeu as seguintes informações: características demográficas, conhecimento na subespecialidade sobre a preferência micronutricional para a prescrição micronutrientes a pacientes com degeneração macular relacionada à idade, e a razão por trás dessa preferência. Se um participante respondeu que prescreveu micronutrientes, foi solicitado que indicasse a origem do tratamento, bem como tratamentos suplementares. Resultados: Duzentos e quarenta e nove de 1.845 oftalmologistas responderam à pesquisa. Destes oftalmologistas 9% (22) nunca haviam usado micronutrição, 43% (107), utilizava eventualmente, 37% (92) usavam com frequência, e 11% (27) sempre usou. O subgrupo de prescrição mais frequente era composto por oftalmologistas gerais (22%), seguido por subespecialistas em retina e/ou úvea (13,9%). A frequência de prescrição de micronutrientes foi de 54,8% dentre os subespecialistas em retina e/ou úvea quando resultados de resposta foram combinados em "frequente" e "sempre." Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os subgrupos com relação à prescrição de micronutrientes. Entre os oftalmologistas que prescreviam micronutrição, 57,1% deles não usavam os critérios The Age-Related Eye Disease Study-1 (AREDS) e 31,3% deles prescreviam de acordo com critérios AREDS. A utilização dos critérios teve distribuição semelhante entre os oftalmologistas gerais e os especialistas, 56,3% vs 20,2%, e 54,1% vs 36,1%, respectivamente. A micronutrição não era recomendada pelas seguintes razões: preço (55,4%), baixa expectativa de paciente (40%), nenhum efeito (30%), e baixa aderência do paciente à droga (25,4%). Além disso, 55,2% ...