RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Functional non-retentive fecal incontinence (FNRFI) is a psychologically upsetting and embarrassing issue and affects children's quality of life negatively. AIM OF THIS STUDY: Evaluation of the short and long-term effect of Bilateral transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (BTPTNS) in the treatment of FNRFI in children and its impact on the quality of life (QoL). Methodology: The current randomized controlled study included 94 Children with FNRFI who were randomly allocated into two equal groups. Group A received BTPTNS and Group B Received Sham BTPTNS. Follow-up was planned for 24 months for manometric findings, incontinence score, Incontinence episodes, and the QoL. RESULTS: The incontinence score was significantly decreases in Group A more than what was reported in Group B at 6, 12, 24 months follow up . In group A 53.2% of the included children who received BTPTNS showed a decrease in the incontinence episodes more than 75% and among them, 23.4% were fully continent. All the QoL domains were significantly improved in Group A after 6, 12, and 24 months when compared with Group B. CONCLUSION: BTPTNS can be a good modality in the treatment of FNRFI with favorable long-term maintenance of its effect together with a remarkable positive impact on all domains of QoL.
Asunto(s)
Incontinencia Fecal , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio , Niño , Humanos , Incontinencia Fecal/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento , Nervio Tibial/fisiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Biofeedback and transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (TPTNS) can be used in treatment of Functional non-retentive fecal incontinence (FNRFI). Aim of this study was to evaluate the early effect of Biofeedback versus (TPTNS) and treatment by Kegal exercises and dietetic regulations in management of (FNRFI) in children. METHODOLOGY: The current prospective randomized controlled study included 93 children with FNRFI who were randomly allocated into the 3 groups. Group A (nâ¯=â¯28) were treated by dietetic regulation and Kegal exercises. Group B (nâ¯=â¯34) received biofeedback while group C (nâ¯=â¯31) received (TPTNS) for 3â¯months. Follow up using St' Mark's incontinence score and high resolution manometry was done at 3 and 6â¯months and compared to the initial records. RESULTS: There was statistically significant decrease in the incontinence score in Group B and C compared to Group A at 3 and 6â¯months (p Ë 0.001). Resting and squeeze pressures showed significant increase group B and C (p Ë 0.001). Patients in Group B and C showed significant decrease volume of balloon required for 1st sensation (p Ë 0.001 and 0.034) respectively. CONCLUSION: Biofeedback is more effective than TPTNS, Kegal exercises and dietetic regulations in treatment of FNRFI in children for short term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I. TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment Study.