Donor simvastatin treatment abolishes rat cardiac allograft ischemia/reperfusion injury and chronic rejection through microvascular protection.

BACKGROUND: Ischemia/reperfusion injury may have deleterious short- and long-term consequences for cardiac allografts. The underlying mechanisms involve microvascular dysfunction that may culminate in primary graft failure or untreatable chronic rejection. METHODS AND RESULTS: Here, we report that rat cardiac allograft ischemia/reperfusion injury resulted in profound microvascular dysfunction that was prevented by donor treatment with peroral single-dose simvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase and Rho GTPase inhibitor, 2 hours before graft procurement. During allograft preservation, donor simvastatin treatment inhibited microvascular endothelial cell and pericyte RhoA/Rho-associated protein kinase activation and endothelial cell-endothelial cell gap formation; decreased intragraft mRNA levels of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, inducible nitric oxide synthase, and endothelin-1; and increased heme oxygenase-1. Donor, but not recipient, simvastatin treatment prevented ischemia/reperfusion injury-induced vascular leakage, leukocyte infiltration, the no-reflow phenomenon, and myocardial injury. The beneficial effects of simvastatin on vascular stability and the no-reflow phenomenon were abolished by concomitant nitric oxide synthase inhibition with N-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester and RhoA activation by geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate supplementation, respectively. In the chronic rejection model, donor simvastatin treatment inhibited cardiac allograft inflammation, transforming growth factor-ß1 signaling, and myocardial fibrosis. In vitro, simvastatin inhibited transforming growth factor-ß1-induced microvascular endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that donor simvastatin treatment prevents microvascular endothelial cell and pericyte dysfunction, ischemia/reperfusion injury, and chronic rejection and suggest a novel, clinically feasible strategy to protect cardiac allografts.

Decompressive craniectomy for intracerebral hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) has a high mortality rate and leaves most survivors disabled. The dismal outcome is mostly due to the mass effect of hematoma plus edema. Major clinical trials show no benefit from surgical or medical treatment. Decompressive craniectomy has, however, proven beneficial for large ischemic brain infarction with massive swelling. We hypothesized that craniectomy can improve ICH outcome as well. METHODS: We used the model of autologous blood injection into the basal ganglia in rats. After induction of ICH and then magnetic resonance imaging, animals were randomly allocated to groups representing no craniectomy (n = 10) or to craniectomy at 1, 6, or 24 hours. A fifth group without ICH underwent craniectomy only. Neurological and behavioral outcomes were assessed on days 1, 3, and 7 after ICH induction. Furthermore, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling-positive cells were counted. RESULTS: After 7 days, compared with the ICH + no craniectomy group, all craniectomy groups had strikingly lower mortality (P < 0.01), much better neurological outcome (P < 0.001), and more favorable behavioral outcome. A trend occurred in the ICH + no craniectomy group toward more robust apoptosis. CONCLUSION: Decompressive craniectomy performed up to 24 hours improved outcome after experimental ICH, with earlier intervention of greater benefit.