RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Alopecia areata (AA) is a challenging disease with variable treatment outcomes. Hair follicles express vitamin D receptors. Therefore, vitamin D3 may be promising for AA treatment through immunomodulatory mechanisms. The efficacy of bimatoprost in scalp AA treatment was reported by few studies. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of microneedling (MN) with topical vitamin D3 versus MN with bimatoprost in comparison with MN alone in the treatment of localized AA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-five patients with localized AA were divided into three groups. The first group: 25 patients were treated with MN alone. The second group: 25 patients treated with MN combined with topical vitamin D3. The third group: 25 patients treated with MN combined with bimatoprost solution. The response was evaluated clinically and dermoscopically. RESULTS: At the end of the study, all groups showed a statistically significant decrease in the SALT score compared to the baseline. The clinical response (regrowth scale): vitamin D and bimatoprost groups showed a statistically significant higher regrowth scale compared to MN alone group (p-value = 0.000). After treatment, hair regrowth was significantly higher in MN combined with bimatoprost than in MN combined with topical vitamin D3. However, after 3 months of follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference between both groups. Side effects were mild and transient in all groups. CONCLUSION: Topical vitamin D3 and bimatoprost combined with MN are safe and effective therapeutic options for localized AA.
Asunto(s)
Alopecia Areata , Bimatoprost , Colecalciferol , Fármacos Dermatológicos , Punción Seca , Humanos , Alopecia Areata/tratamiento farmacológico , Alopecia Areata/terapia , Bimatoprost/administración & dosificación , Bimatoprost/efectos adversos , Colecalciferol/administración & dosificación , Colecalciferol/efectos adversos , Cabello/efectos de los fármacos , Cabello/crecimiento & desarrollo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Punción Seca/métodos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Administración TópicaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation and comparison of the efficacy and safety of 3 different modalities of treatment for dark circles that function via different modes of action. METHODS: In total, 45 female patients with periorbital hyperpigmentation were randomly selected to participate from those attending the outpatient dermatology clinic of Al-Zahraa University Hospital within a 6-month period. Patients were divided into 3 groups, and the groups were subjected to different types of therapy: group A, carboxy therapy; group B, chemical peel; and group C, vitamin C mesotherapy. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were detected in improvements in pigmentation or the degree of patient satisfaction between any of the groups. However, the mesotherapy group reported more of a burning sensation following treatment than the other 2 groups but also showed a significant improvement in pigmentation and patient satisfaction compared with the carboxy group. CONCLUSION: All 3 treatment modalities were effective in the reduction in periorbital pigmentation. However, mesotherapy showed a significant improvement in pigmentation and a higher level of patient satisfaction compared with the other types of treatment.
Asunto(s)
Dióxido de Carbono/administración & dosificación , Quimioexfoliación , Gases/administración & dosificación , Hiperpigmentación/terapia , Mesoterapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Antioxidantes/administración & dosificación , Ácido Ascórbico/administración & dosificación , Cáusticos/uso terapéutico , Ojo , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intradérmicas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ácido Tricloroacético/uso terapéutico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Multiple treatment options are introduced in treatment of vitiligo but the response is unsatisfactory. OBJECTIVE: In this prospective, randomized, comparative trial, we studied the effect of combined treatment with fractional carbon dioxide (CO2 ) laser, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection, and narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) for stable nonsegmental vitiligo regarding repigmentation grade, patient's satisfaction, and side effects. METHODS: Eighty adult patients with localized nonsegmental vitiligo were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly categorized to receive 4 lines of treatment; fractional CO2 laser, PRP, combined fractional CO2 laser and PRP, and combined fractional CO2 laser and NB-UVB. The treatment period was 2 months. Patients were clinically evaluated 3 months after the last treatment. Outcome was evaluated by 5-point scale for repigmentation, 10-point visual analog scale for patient's satisfaction, and side effects. RESULTS: Laser and PRP group achieved the best results regarding repigmentation and patient's satisfaction. Sixty percent of the patients developed repigmentation >50% and 40% of patients developed repigmentation >75%. In laser and NB-UVB group, 5% developed repigmentation >75% and 25% developed repigmentation >50%. Only 10% of patients developed repigmentation >75% in laser group and only 20% of patients developed repigmentation >75% in PRP group. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of fractional CO2 laser with PRP injection is a promising treatment for vitiligo, followed by combination of fractional CO2 laser with NB-UVB phototherapy. Both fractional CO2 laser and PRP injection gave poor results if they received alone.