A Randomized Phase II Study of Leucovorin/5-Fluorouracil with or without Oxaliplatin (LV5FU2 vs. FOLFOX) for Curatively-Resected, Node-Positive Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The optimal perioperative treatment for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains controversial. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (LV5FU2) and LV5FU2 plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) combination chemotherapies administered adjuvantly for curatively-resected, node-positive ESCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with pathologically node-positive esophageal cancer after curative R0 resection were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive LV5FU2 or FOLFOX biweekly for up to eight cycles. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2015, 62 patients were randomized into the two treatment groups (32 in the LV5FU2 arm and 30 in the FOLFOX arm). The median age was 60 years and both groups had similar pathologic characteristics in tumor, nodal status, and location. Treatment completion rates were similarly high in both groups. The DFS rate at 12 months was 67% in the LV5FU2 group and 63% in the FOLFOX group with a hazard ratio of 1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 2.62). After a median follow-up period of 27 months, the median DFS was 29.6 months (95% CI, 4.9 to 54.2) in the LV5FU2 arm and 16.8 months (95% CI, 7.5 to 26.1) in the FOLFOX arm (p=0.428), respectively, while the median overall survival was not reached in either arm. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more frequent in patients in the FOLFOX arm than the LV5FU2 arm (20.0% vs. 3.1%). CONCLUSION: The addition of oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) did not lead to better efficacy compared to LV5FU2 chemotherapy in an adjuvant setting in node-positive ESCC patients.

Clinical recommendations for defining platinum unsuitable head and neck cancer patient populations on chemoradiotherapy: A literature review.

Toxicities resulting from platinum based chemotherapy in head and neck cancer is a cause for much concern. There is a lack of clinical criteria for defining these patient populations, which has posed serious problems associated with increased morbidity and consequently an adverse effect on patients' quality of life. In addition, there is a lack of consensus on clinical criteria for defining such patient populations, who may be unsuitable for concurrent chemoradiotherapy. A group of experts in the field of head and neck cancer from the Asia Pacific Region convened in August 2014 in Korea to discuss the development of a set of clinical criteria in order to fill the knowledge gap and provide a reference tool for head and neck oncologists. This paper reports the final output from this meeting and the accompanying literature review, with the aim of aiding clinical decision making with the help of some clinical criteria to identify platinum unsuitable patient populations in head and neck cancer management. Some alternative treatment options are also discussed in this paper.

The optimal duration of vitamin supplementation prior to the first dose of pemetrexed in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Although folic acid and vitamin B12 supplements are recommended during pemetrexed therapy, the optimal duration for supplementation prior to the first dose of pemetrexed has not been defined. We analyzed adverse events during the first cycle of pemetrexed therapy in 350 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had received pemetrexed monotherapy. Patients were divided into two groups: group A and group B included patients who started vitamin supplements 5-14 days versus within 4 days before the first dose of pemetrexed, respectively. Groups A and B included 294 (84.0%) and 56 (16.0%) patients, respectively. The median number of cycles of pemetrexed was three in both groups. Patients in group A and B showed similar rates of leukopenia (6.1% vs. 5.4%, respectively, P = 1.00), neutropenia (5.1% vs. 3.6%, P = 1.00), thrombocytopenia (3.1% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.14), neutropenic fever (0.7% vs. 0%, P = 1.00), fatigue (20.1% vs. 19.6%, P = 0.94), and anorexia (15.0% vs. 21.4%, P = 0.23) during the first cycle of pemetrexed therapy. There were no significant differences in terms of hospitalization (4.4% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.73) or unscheduled visits due to pemetrexed-related adverse events (8.2% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.31) between groups A and B, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that an age of ≥ 65 years (odds ratio, 3.49; 95% CI 1.12-10.86) and poor performance status (odds ratio, 3.96; 95% CI 1.12-14.03) were statistically significant predictive factors for grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity. The duration of vitamin supplementation before the first dose of pemetrexed did not affect the development of pemetrexed-related toxicities, suggesting that the initiation of pemetrexed-based chemotherapy does not have to be delayed to accommodate a vitamin supplementation schedule.

Multiplexed gene expression and fusion transcript analysis to detect ALK fusions in lung cancer.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene (ALK) fusions have been identified in approximately 5% of non-small-cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs) and define a distinct subpopulation of patients with lung cancer who are highly responsive to ALK kinase inhibitors, such as crizotinib. Because of this profound therapeutic implication, the latest National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology recommend upfront ALK screening for all patients with NSCLC. The Food and Drug Administration-approved companion diagnostic test (ie, fluorescence in situ hybridization) for identification of ALK-positive patients, however, is complex and has considerable limitations in terms of cost and throughput, making it difficult to screen many patients. To explore alternative screening modalities for detecting ALK fusions, we designed a combination of two transcript-based assays to detect for presence or absence of ALK fusions using NanoString's nCounter technology. By using this combined gene expression and ALK fusion detection strategy, we developed a multiplexed assay with a quantitative scoring modality that is highly sensitive, reproducible, and capable of detecting low-abundant ALK fusion transcripts, even in samples with a low tumor cell content. In 66 archival NSCLC samples, our results were highly concordant to prior results obtained by fluorescence in situ hybridization and IHC. Our assay offers a cost-effective, easy-to-perform, high-throughput, and FFPE-compatible screening alternative for detection of ALK fusions.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of intrathecal administration of pemetrexed in rats.

PURPOSE: Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis is a devastating complication of malignant disease. In this study, we evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of intrathecally administered pemetrexed in rats. METHODS: Three levels of pemetrexed (0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg) were administered to 15 rats per level (45 rats in total) twice a week for 2 weeks through specifically designed indwelling subarachnoid catheters. Presence of clinical and pathological neurotoxicity was evaluated. To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed, independent cohorts of 30 rats were treated with 1 mg/kg of pemetrexed and its concentration in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood was measured using UPLC/MS/MS. RESULTS: There were no cases of clinical or pathologic neurotoxicity after intrathecal administrations of pemetrexed at levels of 0.3 and 1 mg/kg; however, 5 of 15 (33%) rats died after administration of 3 mg/kg pemetrexed. The distribution/elimination of pemetrexed in CSF was best described by a two-compartment model, with initial and terminal half-lives of 0.43 and 1.43 h, respectively. The predicted maximal concentration in CSF was 588 µM, and high levels of pemetrexed appeared to be maintained for a long time. Area under the curve and volume of distribution at steady state were 560 µM h and 1.14 ml, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The no observed adverse effect level of intrathecal administration of pemetrexed was 1 mg/kg in rats. At this level, therapeutically high and durable pemetrexed concentrations could be achieved. Based on these results, further research on intrathecal pemetrexed in humans or non-human primates should be considered.

Adenocarcinoma has an excellent outcome with pemetrexed treatment in Korean patients: a prospective, multicenter trial.

OBJECTIVE: This prospective multicenter study conducted by the Korean Cancer Study Group evaluated the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed in Korean patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had prior chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC in whom prior chemotherapy failed received pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks with folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation until disease progression or the development of intolerable toxicity. Eighty-one patients were enrolled. RESULTS: The overall response rate for 78 evaluable patients was 5.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-12.6; partial response 4/78, no complete response]. The disease control rate including complete, partial response and stable disease was 46.2% (36/78, 95% CI 34.8-57.8). With a median 8.7 months follow-up, the median time to progression was 3.1 months (95% CI 1.17-5.03) and the median overall survival (OS) was 7.8 months (95% CI 5.19-10.35). The median OS for patients with adenocarcinoma histology was 18.7 months compared to 6.1 months for non-adenocarcinoma. In a multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 [hazards ratio (HR)=0.331, 95% CI 0.135-0.814] and adenocarcinoma (HR=0.504, 95% CI 0.283-0.899) were independent factors for prolongation of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed monotherapy has promising efficacy in patients with advanced NSCLC as a second-line therapy with less hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity, especially in those with adenocarcinoma histology.