An Alternative Abdominal Closure Technique After Pediatric Liver Transplant: Bogota Bag Technique.

OBJECTIVES: In conditions such as large-for-size syndrome, postreperfusion hepatic edema, and intestinal edema, primary closure of the abdominal wall can cause respiratory complications and thrombosis of vascular structures. Here, we compared results of primary abdominal closure versus a temporary patch closure technique (the Bogota bag technique) in pediatric liver transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed primary abdominal closure in 295 recipients. In 39 pediatric liver transplant recipients, the Bogota bag technique was used as the abdominal closure technique because of suspected intraoperative tense abdominal closure. In patients who had the Bogota bag technique, we sutured the sterilized saline bag to the skin at the edge of the defect by shaping the defect so as not to cause abdominal hypertension. Primary abdominal closure was achieved in patients after control laparotomies at 48-hour intervals. RESULTS: The mean age of the primary abdominal closure group was 8.38 years, whereas the mean age of the Bogota bag group was 2 years. The average weight of patients in the primary abdominal closure group was 26.38 kg, and the average weight of patients in the Bogota bag group was 7.93 kg. Biliary atresia was the most common indication in both groups. Mean length of hospital stay was 21 days in the primary abdominal closure group and 24 days in Bogota bag group. Six patients in the Bogota bag group died from sepsis or bleeding in the early postoperative period. In the Bogota bag group, wound closure was achieved within 2 weeks in 25 patients and within 3 weeks in 8 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Temporary patch closure techniques can be used safely in low-weight and young children, children with large-for-size grafts, and those who display increased intra-abdominal pressure.

Effect of Subcutaneous Topical Ozone Therapy on Second-Degree Burn Wounds in Rats: An Experimental Study.

Burns are one of the most severe traumas, causing coagulative destruction of the skin. The use of various products that accelerate wound healing in patients with burns may affect rates of patient survival and reduce complications. We studied the effects of subcutaneous ozone injection on second-degree burn wounds in an animal model. For this study, 72 Sprague-Dawley male rats were divided randomly into the following three groups: control group, silver sulfadiazine group, and ozone group; each group was then divided randomly into two subgroups (day 7 or day 14 examination and euthanized). Superficial partial-thickness burns were created on the lower back. In the control group, subcutaneous 0.9% serum saline was injected daily into the burn area. In the silver sulfadiazine group, burns were dressed daily with silver sulfadiazine. In the ozone group, subcutaneous ozone was injected daily into the burn area. We performed tissue hydroxyproline level measurements and histopathological evaluations. When groups were compared in terms of weight change, no significant difference was found between day 7 and day 14. With regard to tissue hydroxyproline levels, the ozone group had significantly higher levels on both days 7 and 14 (P < .001). In histopathological evaluations, we determined that wound healing in the ozone group was significantly higher than in the other groups. We found that subcutaneous ozone therapy was more effective than silver sulfadiazine in the healing process of second-degree burn wounds and could be safely used in the treatment of burn wounds.

Efficacy of cell saver use in living-donor liver transplant.

OBJECTIVES: Liver transplant currently is the best treatment option for end-stage liver disease. During liver transplant, there is major blood loss due to surgery and primary disease. By using a cell saver, the need for blood transfusion is markedly reduced. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of cell saver use on morbidity and mortality in living-donor liver transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 178 living-donor liver transplants, performed from 2005 to 2013 in our center. Child-Turcotte-Pugh A patients, deceased-donor liver transplants, and liver transplants performed for fulminant hepatic failure were not included in this study. Intraoperative blood transfusion was done in all patients to keep hemoglobin level between 10 and 12 g/dL. Cell saver was used in all liver transplants except in patients with malignancy, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C. RESULTS: We included 126 patients in the study. Cell saver was used in 84 liver transplants (66%). In 42 patients (34%), liver transplant was performed without a cell saver. In living-donor liver transplant with cell saver use, 10 mL/kg blood (range, 2-50 mL/kg blood) was transfused from the cell saver; in addition, 5 to 10 mL/kg allogeneic blood was transfused. In living-donor liver transplant without cell saver, 20 to 25 mL/kg allogeneic blood was transfused. CONCLUSIONS: During liver transplant, major blood transfusion is needed because of surgery and primary disease. Cell saver use markedly decreases the need for allogeneic blood transfusion and avoids adverse events of massive transfusion.