Randomized controlled Phase III study comparing hepatic arterial infusion with systemic chemotherapy after curative resection for liver metastasis of colorectal carcinoma: JFMC 29-0003.

BACKGROUND: The feasibility and efficacy of adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) in preventing the development of liver metastases in patients with advanced colon carcinoma have not been validated. The aim of this randomized controlled study was to compare the feasibility of HAI and the protective effect against liver metastasis after curative resection to those of systemic chemotherapy. METHODS: Between July 2000 and June 2003, 91 patients were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) via continuous venous infusion (CVI) or intra-hepatic arterial weekly high-dose 5-FU (WHF). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In the WHF group, the cumulative failure rate of hepatic arterial catheterization was 16.7% at 6 months. The occurrence of grade 3 adverse events was comparable between the groups. The 5-year OS rates were 59.0% in the CVI group and 34.9% in the WHF group (P = 0.164). CVI tended to show a protective effect against liver metastasis regarding the 5-year liver-specific cumulative recurrence rate: CVI, 45.0% vs. WHF, 68.3%; P = 0.037). CONCLUSION: HAI therapy has a certain protective effect against liver metastasis after curative resection in patients with colorectal cancer. However, this therapy did not contribute to any marked improvement in their overall survival.

Profiling of fluorouracil-related genes by microdissection technique in hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-related metabolic enzymes, including dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), thymidylate synthase (TS), thymidylate phosphorylase (TP), and orotate phosphoribosyl transferase (OPRT) are initial, rate-limiting enzymes in the metabolism of 5-FU. The therapeutic implications of these enzymes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain poorly understood. We used a newly developed laser-captured microdissection technique combined with RNA extraction to examine the mRNA levels of 5-FU-related metabolic enzymes in HCC and adjacent liver tissue. METHODOLOGY: The study material comprised 43 paired specimens of HCC and adjacent liver tissue. The mRNA levels of 5-FU-related metabolic enzymes were quantified by real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction combined with laser-captured microdissection. RESULTS: The DPD mRNA level in HCC (4.31 +/- 4.21) was lower than that in adjacent liver (6.53 +/- 2.93) (p < 0.001). The TS mRNA level in HCC (3.55 +/- 2.54) was higher than that in adjacent liver (1.90 +/- 0.11) p < 0.001). The TP and the OPRT mRNA levels did not differ significantly between HCC and adjacent liver. The TS mRNA level of HCC with portal invasion (4.47 +/- 2.76) was higher than that of HCC without portal invasion (2.71 +/- 1.96) (p = 0.015). The DPD mRNA level of HCC with septum formation (4.89 +/- 4.82) was significantly higher than that of HCC without septum formation (2.12 +/- 0.61) (p < 0.027). The OPRT mRNA level of poorly differentiated HCC (1.18 +/- 0.49) was lower than that of moderately or well-differentiated HCC (2.42 +/- 1.82) (p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: The DPD mRNA level was lower and the TS mRNA level was higher in HCC than in adjacent liver. Our results will hopefully stimulate further investigations designed to optimize the use of 5-FU in patients with HCC.

Recurrence of colonic cancer twice at the site of stapled colorectal anastomosis.

Recurrence at the site of a stapled anastomosis is generally believed to result from the luminal implantation of viable cancer cells during stapling. We report a case in which colon cancer recurred twice at the site of a stapled anastomosis, despite povidone iodine (PVP-I) lavage consisting of an enema with 5% PVP-I solution before the operation and intraoperative lavage of the rectal remnant and the descending colon with a 10% PVP-I solution. Three months after sigmoidectomy to resect a carcinoma of the sigmoid colon, a circular anastomotic recurrence was found at the suture line after anastomosis with a stapler. However, 11 months after the subsequent resection and reanastomosis to remove the first anastomotic recurrence, another anastomotic recurrence was found. We performed abdominoperineal resection for the second recurrence at the site of the stapled anastomosis. Suture-line recurrence could not be prevented in the present case despite lavage with a PVP-I solution for prophylaxis.