Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Medicinas Complementárias
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Evid Based Med ; 21(6): 214-221, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27836921

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The comparative effectiveness of non-pharmacological treatments of depression remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted an overview of systematic reviews to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy and adverse effects of non-pharmacological treatments of depression. We searched multiple electronic databases through February 2016 without language restrictions. Pairs of reviewers determined eligibility, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses were conducted when appropriate. RESULT: We included 367 RCTs enrolling ∼20 000 patients treated with 11 treatments leading to 17 unique head-to-head comparisons. Cognitive behavioural therapy, naturopathic therapy, biological interventions and physical activity interventions reduced depression severity as measured using standardised scales. However, the relative efficacy among these non-pharmacological interventions was lacking. The effect of these interventions on clinical response and remission was unclear. Adverse events were lower than antidepressants. LIMITATION: The quality of evidence was low to moderate due to inconsistency and unclear or high risk of bias, limiting our confidence in findings. CONCLUSIONS: Non-pharmacological therapies of depression reduce depression symptoms and should be considered along with antidepressant therapy for the treatment of mild-to-severe depression. A shared decision-making approach is needed to choose between non-pharmacological therapies based on values, preferences, clinical and social context.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Depresión/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Antidepresivos , Humanos , Psicoterapia
2.
Pediatrics ; 137(4)2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26962240

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: The effectiveness of many interventions aimed at reducing the risk of retinopathy has not been well established. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effectiveness of nutritional interventions, oxygen saturation targeting, blood transfusion management, and infection prevention on the incidence of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search of several databases was conducted, including Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus through March 2014. STUDY SELECTION: We included studies that evaluated nutritional interventions, management of supplemental oxygen, blood transfusions, or infection reduction and reported the incidence of ROP and mortality in neonates born at <32 weeks. DATA EXTRACTION: We extracted patient characteristics, interventions, and risk of bias indicators. Outcomes of interest were any stage ROP, severe ROP or ROP requiring treatment, and mortality. RESULTS: We identified 67 studies enrolling 21 819 infants. Lower oxygen saturation targets reduced the risk of developing any stage ROP (relative risk [RR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-0.97) and severe ROP or ROP requiring intervention (RR 0.58, 95% CI, 0.45-0.74) but increased mortality (RR 1.15, 95% CI, 1.04-1.29). Aggressive parenteral nutrition reduced the risk of any stage ROP but not severe ROP. Supplementation of vitamin A, E, or inositol and breast milk feeding were beneficial but only in observational studies. Use of transfusion guidelines, erythropoietin, and antifungal agents were not beneficial. LIMITATIONS: Results of observational studies were not replicated in randomized trials. Interventions were heterogeneous across studies. CONCLUSIONS: At the present time, there are no safe interventions supported with high quality evidence to prevent severe ROP.


Asunto(s)
Leche Humana , Oxígeno/administración & dosificación , Nutrición Parenteral , Retinopatía de la Prematuridad/prevención & control , Vitaminas/uso terapéutico , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Transfusión de Eritrocitos , Fluconazol/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Infecciones/tratamiento farmacológico , Oxígeno/sangre , Retinopatía de la Prematuridad/mortalidad
3.
Chest ; 146(2): 355-372, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24833061

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapeutic options have been used to treat cough that is not associated with a pulmonary or extrapulmonary etiology. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to summarize the evidence supporting different cough management options in adults and children with psychogenic, tic, and habit cough. Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus were searched from the earliest inception of each database to September 2013. Content experts were contacted, and we searched bibliographies of included studies to identify additional references. RESULTS: A total of 18 uncontrolled studies were identified, enrolling 223 patients (46% male subjects, 96% children and adolescents). Psychogenic cough was the most common descriptive term used (90% of the studies). Most of the patients (95%) had no cough during sleep; barking or honking quality of cough was described in only eight studies. Hypnosis (three studies), suggestion therapy (four studies), and counseling and reassurance (seven studies) were the most commonly used interventions. Hypnosis was effective in resolving cough in 78% of the patients and improving it in another 5%. Suggestion therapy resolved cough successfully in 96% of the patients. The greatest majority of improvements noted with these forms of therapy occurred in the pediatric age group. The quality of evidence is low due to the lack of control groups, the retrospective nature of all the studies, heterogeneity of definitions and diagnostic criteria, and the high likelihood of reporting bias. CONCLUSIONS: Only low-quality evidence exists to support a particular strategy to define and treat psychogenic, habit, and tic cough. Patient values, preferences, and availability of potential therapies should guide treatment choice.


Asunto(s)
Terapias Complementarias/métodos , Tos , Hábitos , Trastornos de Tic/complicaciones , Tics/psicología , Tos/diagnóstico , Tos/psicología , Tos/terapia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Tics/fisiopatología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA