High-Dose Epinephrine Enhances Platelet Aggregation at the Expense of Procoagulant Activity.

Platelet activation is characterized by shape change, granule secretion, activation of fibrinogen receptor (glycoprotein IIb/IIIa) sustaining platelet aggregation, and externalization of negatively charged aminophospholipids contributing to platelet procoagulant activity. Epinephrine (EPI) alone is a weak platelet activator. However, it is able to potentiate platelet activation initiated by other agonists. In this work, we investigated the role of EPI in the generation of procoagulant platelets. Human platelets were activated with convulxin (CVX), thrombin (THR) or protease-activated receptor (PAR) agonists, EPI, and combination thereof. Platelet aggregation was assessed by light transmission aggregometry or with PAC-1 binding by flow cytometry. Procoagulant collagen-and-THR (COAT) platelets, induced by combined activation with CVX-and-THR, were visualized by flow cytometry as Annexin-V-positive and PAC-1-negative platelets. Cytosolic calcium fluxes were monitored by flow cytometry using Fluo-3 indicator. EPI increased platelet aggregation induced by all agonist combinations tested. On the other hand, EPI dose-dependently reduced the formation of procoagulant COAT platelets generated by combined CVX-and-THR activation. We observed a decreased Annexin-V-positivity and increased binding of PAC-1 with the triple activation (CVX + THR + EPI) compared with CVX + THR. Calcium mobilization with triple activation was decreased with the higher EPI dose (1,000 µM) compared with CVX + THR calcium kinetics. In conclusion, when platelets are activated with CVX-and-THR, the addition of increasing concentrations of EPI (triple stimulation) modulates platelet response reducing cytosolic calcium mobilization, decreasing procoagulant activity, and enhancing platelet aggregation.

[Proteins influencing the blood coagulation]. / Proteine mit Einfluss auf die Blutgerinnung.

This review describes some natural proteins, which can be employed, either as factor concentrates derived from human plasma or as recombinant drug, to modulate the coagulation system. I will address some biochemical characteristics and the physiological role of von Willebrand factor, the coagulation factors of the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways, and the physiological anticoagulant protein C. In addition, I will detail the pharmacological compounds, which are available for influencing or substituting the coagulation proteins: desmopressin (DDAVP), single coagulation factor concentrates, prothrombin complex concentrates, and protein C concentrate. In particular, I will address some treatment topics of general medical interest, such as the treatment of massive bleeding, the correction of the coagulopathy induced by vitamin K-antagonists in patients with cerebral haemorrhage, and of the coagulopathy of meningococcemia. Finally, I will describe some properties and practical clinical applications of the recombinant anticoagulans lepirudin and bivalirudin, which are derived from hirudin, the natural anticoagulant of the medical leech.

Citrate- vs. acetate-based dialysate in bicarbonate haemodialysis: consequences on haemodynamics, coagulation, acid-base status, and electrolytes.

BACKGROUND: A concentrate for bicarbonate haemodialysis acidified with citrate instead of acetate has been marketed in recent years. The small amount of citrate used (one-fifth of the concentration adopted in regional anticoagulation) protects against intradialyser clotting while minimally affecting the calcium concentration. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of citrate- and acetate-based dialysates on systemic haemodynamics, coagulation, acid-base status, calcium balance and dialysis efficiency. METHODS: In 25 patients who underwent a total of 375 dialysis sessions, an acetate dialysate (A) was compared with a citrate dialysate with (C+) or without (C) calcium supplementation (0.25 mmol/L) in a randomised single-blind cross-over study. Systemic haemodynamics were evaluated using pulse-wave analysis. Coagulation, acid-base status, calcium balance and dialysis efficiency were assessed using standard biochemical markers. RESULTS: Patients receiving the citrate dialysate had significantly lower systolic blood pressure (BP) (-4.3 mmHg, p < 0.01) and peripheral resistances (PR) (-51 dyne.sec.cm-5, p < 0.001) while stroke volume was not increased. In hypertensive patients there was a substantial reduction in BP (-7.8 mmHg, p < 0.01). With the C+ dialysate the BP gap was less pronounced but the reduction in PR was even greater (-226 dyne.sec.cm-5, p < 0.001). Analyses of the fluctuations in PR and of subjective tolerance suggested improved haemodynamic stability with the citrate dialysate. Furthermore, an increase in pre-dialysis bicarbonate and a decrease in pre-dialysis BUN, post-dialysis phosphate and ionised calcium were noted. Systemic coagulation activation was not influenced by citrate. CONCLUSION: The positive impact on dialysis efficiency, acid-base status and haemodynamics, as well as the subjective tolerance, together indicate that citrate dialysate can significantly contribute to improving haemodialysis in selected patients.