Characteristics of patients receiving extended treatment after incident venous thromboembolism.

Given high recurrence risk after venous thromboembolism (VTE), guidelines recommend extended dose rivaroxaban (10 mg OD) or apixaban (2.5 mg BID) to be considered after 6 months of initial treatment. This study aimed to provide insight into clinical practice regarding the use of extended preventive treatment and to describe duration of the initial treatment. Linkage of nationwide health registers identified all in- and outpatients with VTE from April 2017 through 2018. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated adjusting for other VTE-related factors. The study included 6030 patients with VTE. Among rivaroxaban users, 2.2% (n = 113) received the extended 10-mg dose after mean 9.4 (SD 3.1) months of standard treatment. For apixaban, 4.7% (n = 40) received extended 2.5-mg dose after mean 8.0 months (SD 3.9). After adjustments, incident pulmonary embolism (HR 1.81 95% CI 1.12;2.91) and trauma/fracture (HR 1.42 95% CI 0.46;4.43) were associated with switching to extended dose, whereas patients with unprovoked VTE were less likely to receive the extended dose (HR 0.68 95% CI 0.30;1.55). Less than 3% of patients with incident VTE received extended treatment after initial standard treatment. Even though international guidelines suggest that the risk-benefit balance is in favour of extended VTE treatment, this was yet to be translated into clinical practice as of 2018. Studies using contemporary data are warranted to investigate routine clinical practice of extended treatment for VTE recurrence.

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism and the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: a review of clinical outcomes and patient perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism remains an important but challenging aspect in the treatment of patients with cancer. Recently, alternatives to injection of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) have been introduced, the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which could potentially alleviate patients from burdensome daily injections. AREAS COVERED: This review discusses the available evidence exploring the role of NOACs in the treatment and secondary prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism, from randomized trials, observational data, contemporary guideline recommendations, and patient perspectives. EXPERT OPINION: Edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban have proven attractive alternatives to LMWH for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. Contemporary guidelines have promptly endorsed the use of NOACs in patients with most cancer types. Nonetheless, issues remain regarding bleeding risk, interactions with medical cancer treatment, and the effectiveness and safety for extended treatment periods. There are head-to-head comparisons of the NOACs, and therefore no data favoring the use of one NOAC over the others. Patient's preferences are highly diverse and should be part of routine considerations when weighing risks and benefits associated with various available anticoagulant drugs.