RESUMEN
Although biofield therapy is unexplained by scientific evidence, it has been practised for many years in numerous cultures for a variety of medical conditions. This study aimed to determine whether one session of biofield therapy with an experienced practitioner could treat warts on the hands and feet in adults. A single-blind, assessor-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial was performed between April 2016 and November 2018. The enrolled participants had at least one wart on the hand or foot that had been present for at least 90 days and they were not using any other therapy for the wart. The primary outcome of this trial was the disappearance of the original wart 3 weeks after session of proximal nontouch biofield therapy vs. a sham session. No original wart had disappeared 3 weeks after intervention (0/64), which made the study impossible to conclude on the primary objective. There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning wart disappearance 3 weeks (P = 0.49) or 6 weeks (P = 0.40) after the intervention. Reduction in wart size at Week 3 tended towards a better result for biofield therapy but this was not significant (P = 0.27). No related adverse effects were observed. The major limitation of this trial was the short follow-up time for measurement of clinical outcome, which did not allow verification of the hypothesis. However, this study shows that 3 weeks after a session of proximal nontouch biofield therapy is an insufficient length of time to assess biofield therapy in comparison with a sham session. Based on this study, biofield therapy cannot be recommended to treat warts within 3 weeks.
Asunto(s)
Tacto Terapéutico/efectos adversos , Tacto Terapéutico/estadística & datos numéricos , Verrugas/terapia , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Pie/patología , Mano/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Efecto Placebo , Método Simple Ciego , Tacto Terapéutico/métodos , Verrugas/diagnósticoRESUMEN
On the basis of 18 cases of recurrent parotiditis in the child, the authors offer the current review of this condition: clinical features, radiological features, bacteriological features, course. They emphasize the importance of precise technique during sialography, which must include straight and lateral films. The progress of this condition is characterised by recurrences. These may be avoided by prolonged and appropriate antibiotic therapy. The improvement which takes place at puberty is of etiopathogenic significance. Bucco-dental septis, constantly present, is one of the causes favourising infectious parotiditis in child.