Effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions delivered via technology versus therapist among patients on peritoneal dialysis at an outpatient clinic in Singapore.

AIMS: This study aimed to (i) evaluate the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions in improving self-efficacy, reducing stress and anxiety among peritoneal dialysis patients, and (ii) compare the most effective method of mindfulness based interventions. METHODS: This randomized three-arm controlled trial recruited first-time peritoneal dialysis patients from the peritoneal dialysis outpatient clinic in Singapore. Patients were randomly allocated to either video-assisted mindfulness training, therapist-assisted mindfulness training or treatment-as-usual. All groups received 4.5 days of structured peritoneal dialysis training at the peritoneal dialysis centre, while video-assisted mindfulness training and therapist-assisted mindfulness training groups were taught additional mindfulness-based techniques. The perceived stress scale, self-efficacy, and anxiety (State and Trait Anxiety Inventory) were measured at baseline, 4- and 12 weeks post-randomization, using reliable and valid instruments. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were recruited (13 in each group). All the therapies showed a significant time trend in anxiety. Only therapist- and video-assisted mindfulness training showed a significant trend in perceived stress scale scores but not treatment-as-usual. All Intervention X Time interactions were not significant. Patients in therapist- and video-assisted mindfulness training groups had reduced perceived stress scale scores compared to treatment-as-usual at week 12. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the potential of mindfulness-based interventions in reducing stress among first-time PD patients.

Virtual reality interventions and the outcome measures of adult patients in acute care settings undergoing surgical procedures: An integrative review.

AIMS: To evaluate the different types of virtual reality (VR) therapy received by adult patients undergoing surgical procedures in acute care settings and the outcome measures, as well as to highlight the acceptability and feasibility of VR approaches among patients and healthcare workers. DESIGN: Whittemore and Knafl's integrative review method guided the analysis. DATA SOURCES: Searches were conducted in ScienceDirect, ProQuest, Wiley Online Library, Medline, PsycINFO and PubMed and Google Scholar from 2000 to June 2021. REVIEW METHODS: A systematic search on articles published in English was carried out with electronic databases and hand search references. Keywords searched included primary qualitative and quantitative studies that utilized VR therapy in surgical care settings. RESULTS: Eighteen articles were reviewed, which reported the use of two main strategies: guided and interactive imagery therapy. The findings identified: (i) patient-clinical outcome measures including the use of analgesics, vital signs, functional capacity and length of hospital stay; and (ii) patient-reported experience measures including pain, anxiety and satisfaction level. Comfort, age, knowledge and attitude were key factors influencing the acceptability of VR among the patients, whereas cost-effectiveness and infection control were two main factors affecting the feasibility of use among the health care workers. CONCLUSION: VR therapy demonstrated potential improvements in both the patient-clinical outcomes and patient-reported experiences of those undergoing surgical procedures. However, the findings were inconsistent, which required further research to explore and establish the effectiveness of using VR in the context of acute care settings. IMPACT: VR distraction has been increasingly used as a non-pharmacological method in managing pain, easing anxiety and optimizing other associated outcomes in patients undergoing surgical procedures. It is essential to examine the effectiveness of VR therapy on the adult patients' outcomes in acute care settings with surgical procedures, as well as its acceptability and feasibility of use.

An integrative review on screening for frailty in acute care: Accuracy, barriers to implementation and adoption strategies.

Frailty is a multifactorial clinical syndrome associated with increased vulnerability to negative health-related outcomes including disease and disability. Many frailty screening tools are established for use in community settings with few for acute care. An integrative review methodology by Whittemore and Knafl, was adopted to summarise the reliability and validity of different frailty screening tools, barriers to implementation and adoption strategies in acute care settings. Thirteen relevant papers met the inclusion criteria. Validity and reliability of 14 screening tools were reported in 10 studies, whereas barriers identified in implementing frailty screening and potential adoption strategies were reported in 5 studies. Accuracy of screening tools require further improvement before use in hospitalized elderly. Strategies including the improvement of hospital guidelines and practices, promoting early involvement of stakeholders, and choosing a reliable and quick to administer screening tool can be implemented to help improve and facilitate early frailty screening in acute care.