RESUMEN
In the last few years, substantial progress has been made in the treatment of ovarian cancer, with increased knowledge about the biology of the disease. Ovarian cancer is a neoplasm strongly linked to defects in DNA repair mechanisms, where deficiency in the homologous recombination (HR) system results in a better response of ovarian cancers to therapy, whether platinum-based chemotherapy, anthracyclines, or poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. More recently, it has been demonstrated that different ovarian cancer histotypes may have different immunogenicity. Interestingly, defects in HR systems are associated more frequently with higher tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, providing a rationale for developing combination therapy with immune-modulating agents and PARP inhibitors. Again, locoregional therapies combining heat shock and chemotherapy delivery have been shown to induce an anticancer immune response in vitro. Thus, the potential for locoregional therapeutic approaches that may impact the immune system, perhaps in combination with immune-modulating agents or PARP inhibitors, needs to be further explored. With this premise, we reviewed the main biological and clinical data demonstrating a strict interplay between the immune system, DNA repair mechanisms, and intraperitoneal therapies in ovarian cancer, with a focus on potential future therapeutic implications.
Asunto(s)
Reparación del ADN , Inmunidad , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Animales , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Reparación del ADN/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Inmunidad/efectos de los fármacos , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Inflamación/genética , Inflamación/inmunología , Inflamación/patología , Inflamación/terapia , Neoplasias Ováricas/inmunología , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Ovario/inmunología , Ovario/patología , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/farmacología , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Reparación del ADN por Recombinación/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
Ovarian cancer (OC) remains relatively rare, although it is among the top 4 causes of cancer death for women younger than 50. The aggressive nature of the disease and its often late diagnosis with peritoneal involvement have an impact on prognosis. The current scientific literature presents ambiguous or uncertain indications for management of peritoneal carcinosis (PC) from OC, both owing to the lack of sufficient scientific data and their heterogeneity or lack of consistency. Therefore, the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology (SICO), the Italian Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, the Italian Association of Hospital Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, and the Italian Association of Medical Oncology conducted a multidisciplinary consensus conference (CC) on management of advanced OC presenting with PC during the SICO annual meeting in Naples, Italy, on September 10-11, 2015. An expert committee developed questions on diagnosis and staging work-up, indications, and procedural aspects for peritonectomy, systemic chemotherapy, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for PC from OC. These questions were provided to 6 invited speakers who answered with an evidence-based report. Each report was submitted to a jury panel, representative of Italian experts in the fields of surgical oncology, gynecology, and medical oncology. The jury panel revised the reports before and after the open discussion during the CC. This article is the final document containing the clinical evidence reports and statements, revised and approved by all the authors before submission.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/diagnósticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Although standard treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) consists of surgical debulking and intravenous platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy, favorable oncological outcomes have been recently reported with the use of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The aim of the study was to analyze feasibility and results of CRS and HIPEC in patients with advanced EOC. MATERIALS/METHODS: This is an open, prospective phase 2 study including patients with primary or recurrent peritoneal carcinomatosis due to EOC. Thirty-nine patients with a mean (SD) age of 57.3 (9.7) years (range, 34-74 years) were included between September 2005 and December 2009. Thirty patients (77%) had recurrent EOC and 9 (23%) had primary EOC. RESULTS: For HIPEC, cisplatin and paclitaxel were used for 11 patients (28%), cisplatin and doxorubicin for 26 patients (66%), paclitaxel and doxorubicin for 1 patient (3%), and doxorubicin alone for 1 patient (3%). The median intra-abdominal outflow temperature was 41.5°C. The mean peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 11.1 (range, 1-28); and according to the intraoperative tumor extent, the tumor volume was classified as low (PCI <15) or high (PCI ≥15) in 27 patients (69%) and 12 patients (31%), respectively. Microscopically complete cytoreduction was achieved for 35 patients (90%), macroscopic cytoreduction was achieved for 3 patients (7%), and a gross tumor debulking was performed for 1 patient (3%). Mean hospital stay was 23.8 days. Postoperative complications occurred in 7 patients (18%), and reoperations in 3 patients (8%). There was one postoperative death. Recurrence was seen in 23 patients (59%) with a mean recurrence time of 14.4 months (range, 1-49 months). CONCLUSIONS: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy after extensive CRS for advanced EOC is feasible with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Complete cytoreduction may improve survival in highly selected patients. Additional follow-up and further studies are needed to determine the effects of HIPEC on survival.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Endometriales/mortalidad , Hipertermia Inducida , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/patología , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Terapia Combinada , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/mortalidad , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/patología , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/terapia , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Neoplasias Endometriales/terapia , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inyecciones Intraperitoneales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of soy isoflavones and melatonin in relieving menopausal symptoms. METHODS: Double-blind, multicenter, randomized trial performed according to a 2 x 2 factorial design. Treatment groups: (1) soy isoflavones+melatonin; (2) soy isoflavones alone; (3) melatonin alone; (4) placebo. 80 mg of soy isoflavones, 3 mg of pure melatonin or placebo were supplemented to participants for 3 months. Severity of menopausal symptoms was recorded at baseline and after 3 months using the Greene Climacteric Scale. RESULTS: 388 consecutive women were screened: not eligible 98, refused informed consent 28. Randomized 262 and analyzed 232; twelve women withdrew because of adverse events. Median percent differences between basal and final scores were 39% in the isoflavones + melatonin group, 38% in the isoflavones alone group, 26% in the melatonin alone group and 38% in the placebo group. Placebo response was much higher than planned, making it meaningless to perform any statistical test. With regard to somatic and vasomotor symptoms, outcome was similar among the four groups, whereas improvement of psychological symptoms was higher in the isoflavones+melatonin group than in the other three. CONCLUSIONS: Present data do not show any advantage of isoflavones or melatonin over placebo for the relief of menopausal symptoms. However, the effect in psychological symptoms in the isoflavones + melatonin group should be further investigated.