Evolution of Nutritional Status after Early Nutritional Management in COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients.

Background & Aims: SARS-CoV2 infection is associated with an increased risk of malnutrition. Although there are numerous screening and nutritional management protocols for malnutrition, only few studies have reported nutritional evolution after COVID-19. The objectives of this study were to describe the evolution of nutritional parameters between admission and 30 days after hospital discharge, and to determine predictive factors of poor nutritional outcome after recovery in adult COVID-19 patients. Methods: In this observational longitudinal study, we report findings after discharge in 91 out of 114 patients initially admitted for COVID-19 who received early nutritional management. Nutritional status was defined using GLIM criteria and compared between admission and day 30 after discharge. Baseline predictors of nutritional status at day 30 were assessed using logistic regression. Results: Thirty days after discharge, 28.6% of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 were malnourished, compared to 42.3% at admission. Half of malnourished patients (53%) at admission recovered a normal nutritional status after discharge. Weight trajectories were heterogeneous and differed if patients had been transferred to an intensive care unit (ICU) during hospitalization (p = 0.025). High oxygen requirement during hospitalization (invasive ventilation p = 0.016 (OR 8.3 [1.6-61.2]) and/or oxygen therapy over 5 L/min p = 0.021 (OR 3.2 [1.2-8.9]) were strong predictors of malnutrition one month after discharge. Conclusions: With early nutritional management, most patients hospitalized for COVID-19 improved nutritional parameters after discharge. These findings emphasize the importance of nutritional care in COVID-19 patients hospitalized in medicine departments, especially in those transferred from ICU.

[Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD), an inflammatory myeloid neoplasia]. / La maladie d'Erdheim-Chester, une néoplasie myéloïde inflammatoire.

In a compatible clinico-radiological setting, the diagnosis of Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) involves the analysis of histiocytes in tissue biopsies: they are typically foamy and CD68+ CD1a, whereas in Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) they are CD68+ CD1a+. Overlap forms of histiocytoses are frequent. Technetium bone scintigraphy showing nearly constant tracer uptake by the long bones is highly suggestive of ECD and a 'hairy kidney' appearance on abdominal CT scan is observed in more than half ECD cases. CNS involvement is a strong prognostic factor and an independent predictor of death in cases of ECD. Optimal initial therapy for ECD appears to be administration of IFN-α (and/or pegylated IFN-α) and prolonged treatment significantly improves survival; however, tolerance may be poor. Best alternative therapies are anakinra, mainly effective for mild forms of the disease, infliximab, and sirolimus. Cases of ECD present with strong systemic immune activation, involving IFN-α, IL-1/IL1-RA, IL-6, IL-12, and MCP-1, consistent with the systemic immune Th-1-oriented disturbance associated with the disease. Between 57 and 75 % of ECD patients carry the BRAFV600E mutation, an activating mutation of the proto-oncogene BRAF. More than 50 cases harboring BRAF mutation and with severe multisystemic and refractory ECD (sometimes associated with LCH) have been treated worldwide with vemurafenib, a BRAF inhibitor that proved to be very beneficial. Other recurrent mutations of the MAPK (NRAS, MAP2K1) and PIK3 pathways (PIK3CA) have been found among ECD patients. As recurrent mutations in the MAPK pathway are found in ECD and LCH on a background of chronic inflammation, we believe that both conditions should be redefined as an inflammatory myeloid neoplasia.

Joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of adult and paediatric lupus nephritis.

OBJECTIVES: To develop recommendations for the management of adult and paediatric lupus nephritis (LN). METHODS: The available evidence was systematically reviewed using the PubMed database. A modified Delphi method was used to compile questions, elicit expert opinions and reach consensus. RESULTS: Immunosuppressive treatment should be guided by renal biopsy, and aiming for complete renal response (proteinuria <0.5 g/24 h with normal or near-normal renal function). Hydroxychloroquine is recommended for all patients with LN. Because of a more favourable efficacy/toxicity ratio, as initial treatment for patients with class III-IV(A) or (A/C) (±V) LN according to the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society 2003 classification, mycophenolic acid (MPA) or low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (CY) in combination with glucocorticoids is recommended. In patients with adverse clinical or histological features, CY can be prescribed at higher doses, while azathioprine is an alternative for milder cases. For pure class V LN with nephrotic-range proteinuria, MPA in combination with oral glucocorticoids is recommended as initial treatment. In patients improving after initial treatment, subsequent immunosuppression with MPA or azathioprine is recommended for at least 3 years; in such cases, initial treatment with MPA should be followed by MPA. For MPA or CY failures, switching to the other agent, or to rituximab, is the suggested course of action. In anticipation of pregnancy, patients should be switched to appropriate medications without reducing the intensity of treatment. There is no evidence to suggest that management of LN should differ in children versus adults. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations for the management of LN were developed using an evidence-based approach followed by expert consensus.

Potentiation of fluindione or warfarin by dexamethasone in multiple myeloma and AL amyloidosis.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with primary systemic (AL) amyloidosis or multiple myeloma are frequently treated with cyclic dexamethasone (DXM) courses and often require oral anticoagulants. We previously reported a strong potentiation of oral anticoagulants with intravenous methylprednisolone and observed a similar potentiation with DXM in 3 patients, which led us to prospectively investigate the interaction between DXM and oral anticoagulants. METHODS: Nine patients with multiple myeloma (n=6) or AL amyloidosis (n=3), including 6 prospective patients, taking fluindione (n=8) or warfarin (n=1), were studied for a total of 10 cycles. DXM (40 mg/day for 4 days every 28 days) was administered alone (n=4) or with melphalan (n=5). One patient was studied for 2 consecutive cycles after a moderate increase in the international normalized ratio (INR) during the first course of DXM. International normalized ratio (INR) was measured serially during DXM administration. Plasma oral anticoagulant concentrations were measured for 5 cycles. RESULTS: The mean INR increased from 2.75 (range: 1.80-3.6) at baseline to 5.22 (3.09-7.07) after DXM. Oral anticoagulants were transiently stopped during 8 cycles and 1 mg oral vitamin K was given during 2. No serious bleeding was observed. Plasma oral anticoagulant concentrations increased after DXM administration. In controls receiving DXM without oral anticoagulants, DXM alone did not increase prothrombin time. CONCLUSION: High dose DXM can potentiate oral anticoagulants and elevate INR substantially. INR should therefore be monitored repeatedly during concomitant administration of these 2 drugs to allow individual adaptation of oral anticoagulant doses.