Manual stimulation, but not acute electrical stimulation prior to reconstructive surgery, improves functional recovery after facial nerve injury in rats.

UNLABELLED: The outcome of peripheral nerve injuries requiring surgical repair is poor. Recent work suggested that electrical stimulation (ES) of the proximal nerve stump to produce repeated discharges of the parent motoneurons for one hour could be a beneficial therapy if delivered immediately prior to reconstructive surgery of mixed peripheral nerves. PURPOSE: We tested whether ES has a positive influence on functional recovery after repair of a purely motor nerve, the facial nerve. METHODS: Electrical stimulation (20 Hz) was delivered to the proximal nerve stump of the transected facial nerve for 1 hour prior to nerve reconstruction by end-to-end suture (facial-facial anastomosis, FFA). For manual stimulation (MS), animals received daily rhythmic stroking of the whisker pads. Restoration of vibrissal motor performance following ES or MS was evaluated using video-based motion analysis. We also assessed the degree of collateral axonal branching at the lesion site, by counting motoneuronal perikarya after triple retrograde labeling, and estimated the quality of motor end-plate reinnervation in the target musculature. Outcomes at 4 months were compared to animals receiving sham stimulation (SS) or MS. RESULTS: Neither protocol reduced the degree of collateral sprouting. ES did not improve functional outcome and failed to reduce the proportion of polyinnervated motor end-plates. By contrast, MS restored normal whisking function and reduced polyinnervation. CONCLUSION: Whereas acute ES is not beneficial for facial nerve repair, MS provides long-term benefits.

Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation does not improve quality of muscle reinnervation or recovery of motor function after facial nerve transection in rats.

Recently, we devised and validated a novel strategy in rats to improve the outcome of facial nerve reconstruction by daily manual stimulation of the target muscles. The treatment resulted in full recovery of facial movements (whisking), which was achieved by reducing the proportion of pathologically polyinnervated motor endplates. Here, we posed whether manual stimulation could also be beneficial after a surgical procedure potentially useful for treatment of large peripheral nerve defects, i.e., entubulation of the transected facial nerve in a conduit filled with suspension of isogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) in collagen. Compared to control treatment with collagen only, entubulation with BM-MSCs failed to decrease the extent of collateral axonal branching at the lesion site and did not improve functional recovery. Post-operative manual stimulation of vibrissal muscles also failed to promote a better recovery following entubulation with BM-MSCs. We suggest that BM-MSCs promote excessive trophic support for regenerating axons which, in turn, results in excessive collateral branching at the lesion site and extensive polyinnervation of the motor endplates. Furthermore, such deleterious effects cannot be overridden by manual stimulation. We conclude that entubulation with BM-MSCs is not beneficial for facial nerve repair.

Manual stimulation of facial muscles improves functional recovery after hypoglossal-facial anastomosis and interpositional nerve grafting of the facial nerve in adult rats.

The facial nerve in humans is often prone to injuries requiring surgical intervention. In the best case, nerve reconstruction is achieved by a facial-facial anastomosis (FFA), i.e. suture of the proximal and distal stumps of the severed facial nerve. Although a method of choice, FFA rarely leads to a satisfactory functional recovery. We have recently devised and validated, in an established experimental paradigm in rats, a novel strategy to improve the outcome of FFA by daily manual stimulation (MS) of facial muscles. This treatment results in full recovery of facial movements (whisking) and is achieved by reducing the proportion of functionally detrimental poly-innervated motor end-plates. Here we asked whether MS could also be beneficial after two other commonly used surgical methods of clinical facial nerve reconstruction namely hypoglossal-facial anastomosis (HFA) and interpositional nerve grafting (IPNG) which, however, seem to have a poorer outcome compared to FFA. Compared to FFA, daily MS for 2 months after HFA and IPGN did not completely restore function but, nevertheless, significantly improved the amplitude of whisker movements by 50% compared with untreated animals. Functional improvement was associated with a reduction in the proportion of polyinnervated end-plates. MS did not reduce the extent of axonal branching at the lesion site nor the subsequent misdirected axonal regrowth to inappropriate targets. Our data show that a simple approach leading to improved quality of muscle fiber reinnervation is functionally beneficial after different types of clinically relevant surgical interventions.