Osteogenic cell cultures cannot utilize exogenous sources of synthetic polyphosphate for mineralization.

Phosphate is critical for mineralization and deficiencies in the regulation of free phosphate lead to disease. Inorganic polyphosphates (polyPs) may represent a physiological source of phosphate because they can be hydrolyzed by biological phosphatases. To investigate whether exogenous polyP could be utilized for mineral formation, mineralization was evaluated in two osteogenic cell lines, Saos-2 and MC3T3, expressing different levels of tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase (tnALP). The role of tnALP was further explored by lentiviral-mediated overexpression in MC3T3 cells. When cells were cultured in the presence of three different phosphate sources, there was a strong mineralization response with ß-glycerophosphate (ßGP) and orthophosphate (Pi) but none of the cultures sustained mineralization in the presence of polyP (neither chain length 17-Pi nor 42-Pi). Even in the presence of mineralizing levels of phosphate, low concentrations of polyP (50 µM) were sufficient to inhibit mineral formation. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy confirmed the presence of apatite-like mineral deposits in MC3T3 cultures supplemented with ßGP, but not in those with polyP. While von Kossa staining was consistent with the presence or absence of mineral, an unusual Alizarin staining was obtained in polyP-treated MC3T3 cultures. This staining pattern combined with low Ca:P ratios suggests the persistence of Ca-polyP complexes, even with high residual ALP activity. In conclusion, under standard culture conditions, exogenous polyP does not promote mineral deposition. This is not due to a lack of active ALP, and unless conditions that favor significant processing of polyP are achieved, its mineral inhibitory capacity predominates.

A review of phosphate mineral nucleation in biology and geobiology.

Relationships between geological phosphorite deposition and biological apatite nucleation have often been overlooked. However, similarities in biological apatite and phosphorite mineralogy suggest that their chemical formation mechanisms may be similar. This review serves to draw parallels between two newly described phosphorite mineralization processes, and proposes a similar novel mechanism for biologically controlled apatite mineral nucleation. This mechanism integrates polyphosphate biochemistry with crystal nucleation theory. Recently, the roles of polyphosphates in the nucleation of marine phosphorites were discovered. Marine bacteria and diatoms have been shown to store and concentrate inorganic phosphate (Pi) as amorphous, polyphosphate granules. Subsequent release of these P reserves into the local marine environment as Pi results in biologically induced phosphorite nucleation. Pi storage and release through an intracellular polyphosphate intermediate may also occur in mineralizing oral bacteria. Polyphosphates may be associated with biologically controlled apatite nucleation within vertebrates and invertebrates. Historically, biological apatite nucleation has been attributed to either a biochemical increase in local Pi concentration or matrix-mediated apatite nucleation control. This review proposes a mechanism that integrates both theories. Intracellular and extracellular amorphous granules, rich in both calcium and phosphorus, have been observed in apatite-biomineralizing vertebrates, protists, and atremate brachiopods. These granules may represent stores of calcium-polyphosphate. Not unlike phosphorite nucleation by bacteria and diatoms, polyphosphate depolymerization to Pi would be controlled by phosphatase activity. Enzymatic polyphosphate depolymerization would increase apatite saturation to the level required for mineral nucleation, while matrix proteins would simultaneously control the progression of new biological apatite formation.