RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A 12-month follow-up study showed that middle ear pressure treatment with a transtympanic membrane massage (TMM) device had a similar effect to a Meniett device. OBJECTIVES: The effects of pressure treatment with a TMM device were retrospectively compared to the effects of treatment with a Meniett device in patients with Meniere's disease (MD) and delayed endolymphatic hydrops (DEH) who were followed for a minimum of 24 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients were treated with the TMM device and 14 patients were treated with a Meniett device. The insertion of a transtympanic ventilation tube was necessary for the Meniett device but not for the TMM device. RESULTS: In patients treated with the TMM and Meniett devices, the frequency of vertigo significantly improved at 19-24 months after treatment. The distribution of vertigo at 19-24 months after treatment did not differ between the patients treated with the two types of devices. Pressure treatment for 8 months or more was suitable to achieve remission. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Middle ear pressure treatment for 8 months or more with a TMM or Meniett device was equally effective and provided minimally invasive treatment options for intractable MD and DEH.
Asunto(s)
Hidropesía Endolinfática/terapia , Enfermedad de Meniere/terapia , Tratamiento de Micropresión Transtimpánica/instrumentación , Adulto , Hidropesía Endolinfática/cirugía , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Audición , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ventilación del Oído Medio , Presión , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vértigo/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The retrospective study showed that the effect of the middle ear pressure treatment by the tramstympanic membrane massage (TMM) device was similar to that of the Meniett device. OBJECTIVES: The new TMM device named EFET device was prospectively evaluated in patients with Meniere's disease (MD) and delayed endolymphatic hydrops (DEH) and we compared the effects to the Meniett device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 23 ears of 19 patients were treated with an EFET device, and 17 ears of 15 patients were treated with the Meniett device. All patients suffering from intractable MD and DEH were treated for 4 months. The insertion of a transtympanic ventilation tube was necessary for the Meniett device, but not the EFET device. RESULTS: In patients treated by the EFET and Meniett devices, the frequency of vertigo significantly improved after treatment. The distribution of vertigo outcomes at 4 months after treatment did not differ between patients treated with the both devices. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Middle ear pressure treatment by the EFET device is effective and provides minimally invasive options for intractable MD and DEH like the Meniett device.
Asunto(s)
Hidropesía Endolinfática/terapia , Enfermedad de Meniere/terapia , Otolaringología/instrumentación , Tratamiento de Micropresión Transtimpánica , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nistagmo Patológico/etiología , Nistagmo Patológico/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Vértigo/etiología , Vértigo/terapiaRESUMEN
CONCLUSION: Middle ear pressure treatment by the tympanic membrane massage (TMM) device as well as the Meniett device is effective and provides minimally invasive options for intractable vertigo in patients with Meniere's disease (MD) and delayed endolymphatic hydrops (DEH). OBJECTIVE: The effects of the TMM device were evaluated according to the criteria of the Japan Society for Equilibrium Research (1995) in patients with MD and DEH and compared to those in patients treated with the Meniett device. METHODS: Twelve ears of 10 patients (MD 8; DEH 2) were treated with the TMM device, while 16 ears of 15 patients (MD 11; DEH 4) were treated with the Meniett device. All the patients had failed to respond to medical treatment including diuretics before each pressure treatment, and were followed up for more than 12 months after treatment. Tympanotomy is necessary before treatment for the Meniett device, not but for the TMM device. RESULTS: With both devices, the frequency of vertigo after treatment was significantly lower than before treatment (p < 0.05). The time course of vestibular symptoms with the TMM device was not significantly different from that with the Meniett device (p > 0.05). No complications were directly attributable to treatment with the TMM device.