The Charlotte Large Artery Occlusion Endovascular Therapy Outcome Score Predicts Poor Outcomes 1 Year After Endovascular Thrombectomy.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the ability of several outcome prognostic scales to predict poor 1-year outcomes and mortality after endovascular thrombectomy. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis from the stroke registry of a large integrated health system, consecutive patients presenting from August 2020 to September 2021 with an anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy were included. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the ability of each scale to predict the primary outcome (1-year modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score of 4-6) and the secondary outcome (1-year mortality). Area under the curve analyses were performed for each scale. RESULTS: In 237 included patients (mean age 68 [±15] years; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 16 [11-21]), poor 1-year outcomes were present in 116 patients (49%) and 1-year mortality was 34%. The CLEOS (Charlotte Large Artery Occlusion Endovascular Therapy Outcome Score), which incorporates age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, initial glucose level, and computed tomography perfusion cerebral blood volume index, had a significant association with poor 1-year outcomes (per 25-point increase; odds ratio, 1.0134; P = 0.02). CLEOS and PRE (Pittsburgh Response to Endovascular Therapy) were both significantly associated with 1-year mortality. Area under the curve values were comparable for CLEOS, PRE, Houston Intra-Arterial Therapy 2, and Totaled Health Risks in Vascular Events to predict 1-year mRS score 4-6 and mortality. Only 1 of 18 patients with CLEOS ≥690 had a 1-year mRS score of 0-3. CONCLUSIONS: CLEOS can predict poor 1-year outcomes and mortality for patients with anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion using prethrombectomy variables.

Association of Recent Use of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants With Intracranial Hemorrhage Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated With Alteplase.

Importance: Current guidelines recommend against use of intravenous alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke who are taking non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Objective: To evaluate the safety and functional outcomes of intravenous alteplase among patients who were taking NOACs prior to stroke and compare outcomes with patients who were not taking long-term anticoagulants. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study of 163 038 patients with acute ischemic stroke either taking NOACs or not taking anticoagulants prior to stroke and treated with intravenous alteplase within 4.5 hours of symptom onset at 1752 US hospitals participating in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke program between April 2015 and March 2020, with complementary data from the Addressing Real-world Anticoagulant Management Issues in Stroke registry. Exposures: Prestroke treatment with NOACs within 7 days prior to alteplase treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurring within 36 hours after intravenous alteplase administration. There were 4 secondary safety outcomes, including inpatient mortality, and 7 secondary functional outcomes assessed at hospital discharge, including the proportion of patients discharged home. Results: Of 163 038 patients treated with intravenous alteplase (median age, 70 [IQR, 59 to 81] years; 49.1% women), 2207 (1.4%) were taking NOACs and 160 831 (98.6%) were not taking anticoagulants prior to their stroke. Patients taking NOACs were older (median age, 75 [IQR, 64 to 82] years vs 70 [IQR, 58 to 81] years for those not taking anticoagulants), had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities, and experienced more severe strokes (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 10 [IQR, 5 to 17] vs 7 [IQR, 4 to 14]) (all standardized differences >10). The unadjusted rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 3.7% (95% CI, 2.9% to 4.5%) for patients taking NOACs vs 3.2% (95% CI, 3.1% to 3.3%) for patients not taking anticoagulants. After adjusting for baseline clinical factors, the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was not significantly different between groups (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.88 [95% CI, 0.70 to 1.10]; adjusted risk difference [RD], -0.51% [95% CI, -1.36% to 0.34%]). There were no significant differences in the secondary safety outcomes, including inpatient mortality (6.3% for patients taking NOACs vs 4.9% for patients not taking anticoagulants; adjusted OR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.69 to 1.01]; adjusted RD, -1.20% [95% CI, -2.39% to -0%]). Of the secondary functional outcomes, 4 of 7 showed significant differences in favor of the NOAC group after adjustment, including the proportion of patients discharged home (45.9% vs 53.6% for patients not taking anticoagulants; adjusted OR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.06 to 1.29]; adjusted RD, 3.84% [95% CI, 1.46% to 6.22%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous alteplase, use of NOACs within the preceding 7 days, compared with no use of anticoagulants, was not associated with a significantly increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage.