Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS One ; 16(2): e0245163, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33556053

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The simultaneous or intermittent use of alternative treatments and prescription medications for hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus can have adverse health effects. OBJECTIVES: To identify beliefs and practices associated with the use of alternative treatments for hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus among patients. METHODS: A mixed-methods study including an investigator-administered survey and focus group discussion sessions using convenience sampling was conducted among patients aged ≥18 years during May to August 2018. Descriptive statistics were used to describe and compare demographic characteristics among groups of survey participants using JMP Pro 14.0. Thematic analysis was conducted to analyze the qualitative data using NVivo. RESULTS: Most study participants (87-90%) were on prescription medication for their condition. Of survey participants, 69% reported taking their medication as prescribed and 70% felt that prescription medicine was controlling their condition. Almost all participants (98%) reported using alternative treatments, mainly herbal medications, and 73-80% felt that herbal medicines controlled their conditions. One-third believed that herbal medicines are the most effective form of treatment and should always be used instead of prescription medication. However, most participants (85%) did not believe that prescription and herbal treatments should be used simultaneously. Most (76-90%) did not discuss herbal treatments with their healthcare providers. Four themes emerged from the focus group sessions: 1) Simultaneous use of herbal and prescription medicine was perceived to be harmful, 2) Patients did not divulge their use of herbal medicine to healthcare providers, 3) Alternative medicines were perceived to be highly effective, and 4) Religiosity and family elders played key roles in herbal use. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides useful insights into perceptions and use of alternative treatments by patients that can be used by healthcare providers in developing appropriate interventions to encourage proper use of prescription medicines and alternative medicines resulting in improved management of these chronic diseases.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud/etnología , Hipertensión/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapias Complementarias/métodos , Terapias Complementarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Medicina de Hierbas/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina de Hierbas/tendencias , Humanos , Jamaica/epidemiología , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fitoterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Plantas Medicinales , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/uso terapéutico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Complement Ther Med ; 57: 102666, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33460742

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of healthcare professionals (HCPs) regarding CAM use for Hypertension (HTN) and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) among patients in western Jamaica, and to determine HCPs' perceptions of the need for training on CAM. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted from May to August 2019. SETTING: HCPs serving patients with HTN and T2DM in chronic disease clinics in western Jamaica completed a self-administered questionnaire that provided data on their sociodemographic characteristics, training, and KAP of CAM. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The data identified factors associated with discussion and recommendation of CAM to patients and personal use of CAM by HCPs. RESULTS: Type of profession (physicians vs nurses OR = 2.17; 95 % CI = 1.07-4.42 and pharmacists vs nurses OR = 8.67; 95 % CI = 2.83-26.57) was significantly associated with discussion of CAM. Training on CAM was significantly associated with discussion (OR = 2.36; 95 % CI = 1.26-4.42), recommendation (OR = 2.72; 95 % CI = 1.36-5.42), and personal use of CAM (OR = 2.90; 95 % CI = 1.69-4.97). Dieticians and nutritionists had 4.56 higher odds of personal use of CAM (95 % CI = 1.16-17.86), and personal use of CAM was significantly associated with discussion (OR = 8.94; 95 % CI = 4.76-16.80) and recommendation (OR = 7.17; 95 % CI = 3.54-14.51) of CAM. The majority of HCPs (70-89 %) agreed that there is a need to include CAM in professional training programs. CONCLUSION: The results of this study can be used to guide development of programs for training HCPs on knowledge and safe use of CAM so that they can better serve their patients.


Asunto(s)
Terapias Complementarias , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Hipertensión , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Estudios Transversales , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Hipertensión/terapia , Jamaica , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
BMC Complement Med Ther ; 20(1): 314, 2020 Oct 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33069215

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study examined the prevalence and predictors of complementary and alternative medicine use among clinic patients with hypertension and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus in western Jamaica. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using an investigator-administered questionnaire was conducted from May to August 2017. Data on sociodemographic factors, complementary and alternative medicine use, and knowledge and perceptions of complementary and alternative medicine were collected from the patients. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine associations between patient characteristics and knowledge and perceptions of complementary and alternative medicine and complementary and alternative medicine use. RESULTS: A total of 362 patients were invited to participate and 345 (95.3%) completed the questionnaire; 311 (90.1%) had hypertension, 130 (37.7%) had type 2 diabetes mellitus and 96 (27.8%) had both diseases. Seventy-nine percent of the participants with hypertension and 65% with type 2 diabetes mellitus reported current use of complementary and alternative medicine. Self-reported knowledge of complementary and alternative medicine (none/poor vs average/good/excellent) was significantly associated with complementary and alternative medicine use for hypertension (AOR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.13-0.87) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (AOR = 0.06, 95% CI = 0.01-0.37). Believing that complementary and alternative medicine is a natural method for treating hypertension was significantly associated with complementary and alternative medicine use among patients with hypertension (AOR = 3.9, 95% CI = 1.26-12.00), and belief that it is acceptable to use prescription medication and complementary and alternative medicine simultaneously was significantly associated with complementary and alternative medicine use among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (AOR =7.19, CI = 1.34-38.52). CONCLUSIONS: Participants' perceptions of their knowledge and beliefs regarding complementary and alternative medicine strongly influence their use of complementary and alternative medicine. These findings can be used in designing educational interventions to promote the proper use, and mitigate detrimental effects, of complementary and alternative medicine in this population.


Asunto(s)
Terapias Complementarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Hipertensión/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Jamaica , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33537410

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy complications are preventable with appropriate antenatal care (ANC). However, ANC attendance recommendations vary. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated ANC practices and predictors of ANC visits among pregnant women in western Jamaica during 2010. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 356 pregnant women. ANC visits were categorized as not meeting recommendations (<4 ANC visits), meeting WHO and the Jamaican Ministry of Health recommendations of a minimum of 4 ANC visits (4-6 ANC visits) or meeting previously standard recommendation of ≥7 visits. Differences in demographic factors, health status, ANC services received and ANC knowledge by ANC attendance were assessed and a multinomial forward-selection stepwise logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of ANC attendance. RESULTS: Most women had an adequate number of ANC visits with 53.4% attending ≥ 7 ANC visits and 27.2% attending 4-6 visits. Despite this, 19.4% of the women had inadequate ANC care and a large portion did not receive key ANC services such as folic acid supplementation (48%), information on breastfeeding (32%) and nutrition (13%). Employment status, number of live births, distance from clinic, history of diabetes or hypertension, possession of ANC card at delivery, receiving iron supplementation and HIV counseling and testing and antenatal care knowledge were predictors of ANC visits. CONCLUSION: Although most women met the WHO or Jamaican ANC recommendations, many women still did not receive key ANC services. Further investigation of ANC practices and a standardized ANC curriculum may improve provision of adequate ANC services.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA