Reasons for antimicrobial treatment failures and predictive value of in-vitro susceptibility testing in veterinary practice: An overview.

The choice of the most suitable antimicrobial agent for the treatment of an animal suffering from a bacterial infection is a complex issue. The results of bacteriological diagnostics and the in-vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) provide guidance of potentially suitable antimicrobials. However, harmonized AST methods, veterinary-specific interpretive criteria and quality control ranges, which are essential to conduct AST in-vitro and to evaluate the corresponding results lege artis, are not available for all antimicrobial compounds, bacterial pathogens, animal species and sites of infection of veterinary relevance. Moreover, the clinical benefit of an antimicrobial agent (defined as its in vivo efficacy) is not exclusively dependent on the in-vitro susceptibility of the target pathogen. Apart from the right choice of an antibacterial drug with suitable pharmacokinetic properties and an appropriate pharmaceutical formulation, the success of treatment depends substantially on its adequate use. Even if this is ensured and in-vitro susceptibility confirmed, an insufficient improvement of clinical signs might be caused by biofilm-forming bacteria, persisters, or specific physicochemical conditions at the site of infection, such as pH value, oxygen partial pressure and perfusion rate. This review summarizes relevant aspects that have an impact on the predictive value of in-vitro AST and points out factors, potentially leading to an ineffective outcome of antibacterial treatment in veterinary practice. Knowing the reasons of inadequate beneficial effects can help to understand possible discrepancies between in-vitro susceptibility and in vivo efficacy and aid in undertaking strategies for an avoidance of treatment failures.

[Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria isolated from animals: methods for in-vitro susceptibility testing and their suitability with regard to the generation of the most useful data for therapeutic applications]. / Empfindlichkeitsprüfung bakterieller Infektionserreger von Tieren gegenüber antimikrobiellen Wirkstoffen: Methoden zur in-vitro Empfindlichkeitsprüfung und deren Eignung in Hinblick auf die Erarbeitung therapeutisch nutzbarer Ergebnisse.

In-vitro susceptibility testing provides valuable informations for choosing the most suitable antimicrobial agent for the control of bacterial infections in animals. Different diffusion and dilution methods, as conducted according to various approved performance standards, can be used to determine the in-vitro susceptibility of bacterial pathogens. In the present article, problems are discussed which arise from the use of different methods and the difficulty to interpret such results. While most approved performance standards were designed for testing of bacteria from human sources, the NCCLS document M31-A2 exclusively focusses on susceptibility testing of bacteria isolated from animals and--in contrast to all other standards--includes veterinary specific breakpoints for a number of antimicrobial agents used in veterinary medicine. Therefore, performance of in-vitro susceptibility testing of veterinary pathogens should follow the recommendations given in the NCCLS document M31-A2. The microdilution method is recommended as the method of choice for susceptibility testing. The result of a microdilution test is given as the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). This value provides a quantitative result which precisely indicates the degree of susceptibility of the tested bacterial strain and in return gives the veterinarian a clear guidance whether therapeutic intervention with the antibiotic in question will be successful.