Behavioral therapies in headache: focus on mindfulness and cognitive behavioral therapy in children and adolescents.

Introduction: A wide proportion of children and adolescents with headache tends not to respond to various pharmacological treatments in use. The failure to respond to symptomatic treatment and prophylaxis is often due to the presence of a comorbid psychopathology undiagnosed or not properly treated. For these reasons and for the negative impact of headache on the quality of life of the patients and on the costs for the public health system, the adoption of an integrated multi-disciplinary perspective in the diagnosis and treatment of headache is needed.Areas covered: Several researchers have shown that behavioral treatment is effective as pharmacological treatment, not only for headache management but also to maintain a lifetime response to the headache treatment. In particular, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Mindfulness have proven to be very resolutive both in the management of pain and in the management of stressful situations that can trigger the headache in children and adolescents with headache.Expert opinion: Although studies on behavioral treatments on children and adolescents with primary headaches are still few but a combined approach seems to be very useful in improving the quality of life of these subjects, especially in those who have internalizing disorders in comorbidities.

Intense imagery movements: a common and distinct paediatric subgroup of motor stereotypies.

AIM: The aim of this article is to describe a subgroup of children who presented with stereotyped movements in the context of episodes of intense imagery. This is of relevance to current discussions regarding the clinical usefulness of diagnosing motor stereotypies during development. METHOD: The sample consisted of 10 children (nine males, one female; mean age 8y 6mo [SD 2y 5mo], range 6-15y). Referrals were from acute paediatricians, neurologists, and tertiary epilepsy services. Children were assessed by multidisciplinary teams with expertise in paediatric movement disorders. RESULTS: Stereotypies presented as paroxysmal complex movements involving upper and lower limbs. Imagery themes typically included computer games (60%), cartoons/films (40%), and fantasy scenes (30%). Comorbid developmental difficulties were reported for 80% of children. Brain imaging and electrophysiological investigations had been conducted for 50% of the children before referral to the clinic. INTERPRETATION: The descriptive term 'intense imagery movements' (IIM) was applied if (after interview) the children reported engaging in acts of imagery while performing stereotyped movements. We believe these children may form a common and discrete stereotypy subgroup, with the concept of IIM being clinically useful to ensure the accurate diagnosis and clinical management of this paediatric movement disorder.