Six-Year Evaluation of Same-Day Discharge following Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether same-day discharge increased the incidence of 30-day readmission (30dR) after conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at a single institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 253 patients with HCC underwent 521 transarterial chemoembolization procedures between 2013 and 2020. TACE was performed with 50-mg doxorubicin/10-mg mitomycin C/5-10-mL ethiodized oil/particles. Patients not requiring intravenous pain medications were discharged after a 3-hour observation, and 30dR was tracked. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of 30dR in same-day discharge patients versus patients admitted for observation using the chi-square test. Secondary objectives assessed factors associated with overnight admission and factors predictive of 30dR using generalized estimated equation calculations and logistic regression. RESULTS: In the cohort, 24 readmissions occurred within 30 days (4.6%). Same-day discharge was completed after 331 TACE procedures with sixteen 30dRs (4.8%). Patients admitted overnight were readmitted 8 times after 190 TACE procedures (4.2%). This difference was not statistically significant (P = .4). Factors predicting overnight admission included female sex (58/190 [30.5%] vs 58/331 [17.5%], P < .001) and tumor size of ≥3.8 cm (104/190 [55%] vs 85/190 [45%]). Factors predicting 30dR included female sex (10/116 [8.6%] vs 14/405 [0.2%]) and younger age (median [interquartile range], 63 years [55-65 years] vs 65 years [59-71 years]). At regression, factors predictive of 30dR were Child-Pugh Class B/C (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; P = .04) and female sex (OR, 2.9; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Same-day discharge after conventional TACE is a safe and effective strategy with 30dR rate of <5%, similar to overnight observation.

Outpatient Transarterial Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Review of a Same-Day Discharge Strategy.

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that same-day discharge of selected transarterial chemoembolization patients would not increase 30-day readmission rate compared with overnight observation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With institutional review board approval, 193 hepatocellular carcinoma patients who underwent transarterial chemoembolization from July 2013 to June 2016 were reviewed. Treatment was conventional/lipiodol transarterial chemoembolization with 50 mg doxorubicin/10 mg mitomycin-c/particles or drug-eluting embolics transarterial chemoembolization with 50-75 mg doxorubicin/vial. At 3 hours, patients tolerating oral intake and not requiring intravenous analgesics were considered for discharge. The primary outcome measure was 30-day readmission for observation versus discharge using chi-squared (χ2) analysis. The secondary aim was to identify baseline or treatment variables independently associated with readmission, including Child-Pugh class, medically managed encephalopathy or ascites, patient age (<65 vs ≥65), tumor number (1 or >1), and level of embolization (segmental vs lobar). RESULTS: Patients underwent 261 transarterial chemoembolization procedures. The 30-day readmission rate was not significantly different between observed patients (n = 179, 9.0%) and discharged patients (n = 82, 13.8%; P = .33). Readmission was not related to the selected agent (conventional/lipiodol-transarterial chemoembolization, 11.0% vs drug-eluting embolics transarterial chemoembolization, 7.5%; P = .36). Baseline variables associated with readmission were Child-Pugh B/C (χ2 = 7.9, P < .01), history of encephalopathy (χ2 = 15.4, P < 0.01), and ascites (χ2 = 4.4, P < .05). Patient age (<65 vs ≥65), tumor number (1 vs >1), and level of embolization (segmental vs lobar) were not predictive of readmission (all P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Same-day discharge after transarterial chemoembolization does not increase the risk of 30-day readmission. Child-Pugh B/C patients, as well as those with ascites or encephalopathy, have the highest risk of readmission.

Procedural Impact of a Dedicated Interventional Oncology Service Line in a National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center.

PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that establishing a dedicated interventional oncology (IO) clinical service line would increase clinic visits and procedural volumes at a single quaternary care academic medical center. METHODS: Two time periods were defined: July 2012 to June 2013 (pre-IO clinic) and July 2013 to June 2014 (first year of dedicated IO service). Staff was recruited, and clinic space was provided in the institution's comprehensive cancer center. Clinic visits and procedure numbers were documented using the institution's electronic medical record and billing forms. IO procedures included were transarterial chemoembolization, Y-90 radioembolization, perfusion mapping for Y-90, portal vein embolization, and bland embolization. We compared changes in clinic visit and procedure numbers using paired t tests. Changes after IO initiation were compared to 1-year changes in the Medicare 5% Limited Data Set by cross-referencing Current Procedure Terminology and International Classification of Diseases codes in 2012 and 2013. RESULTS: Clinic visits increased from 9 to 204 (P = .003, t = 8.89, df = 3). Procedures increased from 60 to 239 (P = .018, t = 3.85, df = 4). Procedural volumes increased at least 150% for each subtype. The volumes in the 5% Limited Data Set did not change significantly over the 2-year period (443 to 385, P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of a dedicated IO service significantly increased clinic visits and procedural volumes. National trends were unchanged, suggesting that the impact of our program was not part of a sudden increase of IO procedures.