Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy to Treat Pseudomyxoma Peritonei of Ovarian Origin: A Retrospective French RENAPE Group Study.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian pseudomyxoma peritonei (OPMP) are rare, without well-defined therapeutic guidelines. We aimed to evaluate cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to treat OPMP. METHODS: Patients from the French National Network for Rare Peritoneal Tumors (RENAPE) database with proven OPMP treated by CRS/HIPEC and with histologically normal appendix and digestive endoscopy were retrospectively included. Clinical and follow-up data were collected. Histopathological and immunohistochemical features were reviewed. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with a median age of 56 years were included. The median Peritoneal Cancer Index was 16. Following CRS, the completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score was CC-0 for 9/15 (60%) patients, CC-1 for 5/15 (33.3%) patients, and CC-2 for 1/15 (6.7%) patients. The median tumor size was 22.5 cm. After pathological review and immunohistochemical studies, tumors were classified as Group 1 (mucinous ovarian epithelial neoplasms) in 3/15 (20%) patients; Group 2 (mucinous neoplasm in ovarian teratoma) in 4/15 (26.7%) patients; Group 3 (mucinous neoplasm probably arising in ovarian teratoma) in 5/15 (33.3%) patients; and Group 4 (non-specific group) in 3/15 (20%) patients. Peritoneal lesions were OPMP pM1a/acellular, pM1b/grade 1 (hypocellular) and pM1b/grade 3 (signet-ring cells) in 13/15 (86.7%), 1/15 (6.7%) and 1/15 (6.7%) patients, respectively. Disease-free survival analysis showed a difference (p = 0.0463) between OPMP with teratoma/likely-teratoma origin (groups 2 and 3; 100% at 1, 5, and 10 years), and other groups (groups 1 and 4; 100%, 66.6%, and 50% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively). CONCLUSION: These results suggested that a primary therapeutic strategy using complete CRS/HIPEC for patients with OPMP led to favorable long-term outcomes.

Eliminating the need for preoperative intravenous hyperhydration: Sodium thiosulfate as nephrotoxicity prevention in HIPEC-treated patients - A retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an effective treatment for peritoneal metastases. However, HIPEC with cisplatin is associated with renal toxicity. Sodium thiosulfate (ST) has been shown to prevent cisplatin-induced toxicity. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center analysis of patients treated curatively for peritoneal surface malignancy, who underwent cytoreductive surgery with cisplatin-based HIPEC between 2015 and 2020. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the management of cisplatin-induced renal toxicity: preoperative hyperhydration alone (PHH), preoperative hyperhydration with ST (PHH + ST), and ST alone. Renal function and complications, in terms of Acute (AKI) and chronic kidney injury (CKI), were monitored and analyzed during 3 postoperative months. RESULTS: This study included 220 consecutive patients. Mean serum creatinine levels were 95, 57 and 61 mmol/L, for PHH, PHH + ST and ST groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) were 96, 94 and 78 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively (p < 0.001). AKI and CKI are respectively for PHH, PHH + ST and ST groups were 21 % (n = 46), 1 % (n = 2) and 0 % vs 19 % (n = 42), 0 % and 0 % (p < 0.001), for pairwise analysis did not show any difference between PHH + ST and ST alone combination, regarding nephrological outcomes. All patients were followed 3 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: There is no need for preoperative hyperhydration when sodium-thiosulfate is used to prevent cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC. These findings have implications for improving and simplifying the management of patients with peritoneal metastases undergoing HIPEC with cisplatin.

The 2022 PSOGI International Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We report the results of an international consensus on hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) regimens for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) performed with the following goals: To define the indications for HIPEC To identify the most suitable HIPEC regimens for each indication in EOC To identify areas of future research on HIPEC To provide recommendations for some aspects of perioperative care for HIPEC METHODS: The Delphi technique was used with two rounds of voting. There were three categories of questions: evidence-based recommendations [using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system with the patient, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) method], an opinion survey, and research recommendations. RESULTS: Seventy-three (67.5%) of 108 invited experts responded in round I, and 68 (62.9%) in round II. Consensus was achieved for 34/38 (94.7%) questions. However, a strong positive consensus that would lead to inclusion in routine care was reached for only 6/38 (15.7%) questions. HIPEC in addition to interval cytoreductive surgery (CRS) received a strong positive recommendation that merits inclusion in routine care. Single-agent cisplatin was the only drug recommended for routine care, and OVHIPEC-1 was the most preferred regimen. The panel recommended performing HIPEC for a minimum of 60 min with a recommended minimum intraabdominal temperature of 41°C. Nephroprotection with sodium thiosulfate should be used for cisplatin HIPEC. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this consensus should guide clinical decisions on indications of HIPEC and the choice and various parameters of HIPEC regimens and could fill current knowledge gaps. These outcomes should be the basis for designing future clinical trials on HIPEC in EOC.

Role of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Combined with Cytoreductive Surgery as Consolidation Therapy for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer who undergo incomplete surgery followed by six cycles of chemotherapy could benefit from second-look or consolidation cytoreductive surgery (CCRS). The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing complete CCRS and the factors affecting survival. The secondary goal was to study the benefit of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in these patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 173 patients with CCRS with (n = 118) or without (n = 55) HIPEC treated at 12 French centers. Only patients having a completeness of cytoreduction (CC) 0/1 resection and a minimum of 5 years of follow-up were included. HIPEC was performed systematically for all patients except those treated at the four centers that did not perform HIPEC. RESULTS: The median Peritoneal Cancer Index was 6 (range 0-33). Closed HIPEC was performed in 59 (34.1%) patients and open HIPEC was performed in 56 (32.3%) patients. Grade 3-4 complications occurred in 64 (36.9%) patients. The median OS was 35.67 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 29.8-46.1) and was significantly longer for CCRS + HIPEC (31.4 months without HIPEC and 42.5 months with HIPEC; p = 0.022). On multivariate analysis, closed HIPEC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, 95% CI 0.29-0.73; p < 0.001) resulted in a longer OS, and age > 65 years (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.14-4.11; p = 0.018) and bowel resection (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.27-3.08; p = 0.020) led to a shorter OS. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, closed HIPEC (odds ratio 0.18; p = 0.001) was associated with a lower risk of dying at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: CCRS was performed with an acceptable morbidity and resulted in good overall survival. The role of HIPEC in addition to CCRS should be evaluated in prospective, randomized studies and the closed technique prospectively compared with the open technique.

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) vs CRS alone for treatment of endometrial cancer with peritoneal metastases: a multi-institutional study from PSOGI and BIG RENAPE groups.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the benefit of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of endometrial peritoneal carcinomatosis compared to CRS alone. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicentre study of patients from experienced centres in treating peritoneal malignancies from 2002 to 2015. Patients who underwent surgery for peritoneal evolution of endometrial cancer (EC) were included. Two groups of 30 women were matched and compared: "CRS + HIPEC" which used HIPEC after CRS, and "CRS only" which did not use HIPEC. We analysed clinical, pathologic and treatment data for patients with peritoneal metastases from EC. The outcome measures were morbidity, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: In "CRS plus HIPEC" group, 96.7% of women were treated for recurrence, while in "CRS only" 83.3 were treated for primary disease. There was no significant difference between Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index at laparotomy or Completeness of Cytoreduction score. Grade III and IV complications rates did not significantly differ between "CRS plus HIPEC" group and "CRS only" group (20.7% vs 20.7%, p = 0.739). Survival analysis showed no statistical difference between both groups. Median OS time was 19.2 months in "CRS plus HIPEC" group and 29.7 months in "CRS only" group (p = 0.606). Median PFS survival time was 10.7 months in "CRS plus HIPEC" group and 13.1 months in "CRS only" group (p = 0.511). CONCLUSION: The use of HIPEC combined to CRS did not have any significance as regard the DFS and OS over CRS alone in patients with primary or recurrent peritoneal metastasis of endometrial cancer.

HIPEC Methodology and Regimens: The Need for an Expert Consensus.

BACKGROUND: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is performed with a wide variation in methodology, drugs, and other elements vital to the procedure. Adoption of a limited number of regimens could increase the collective experience of peritoneal oncologists, make comparison between studies more meaningful, and lead to a greater acceptance of results from randomized trials. This study aimed to determine the possibility of standardizing HIPEC methodology and regimens and to identify the best method of performing such a standardization. METHODS: A critical review of preclinical and clinical studies evaluating the pharmacokinetic aspects of different HIPEC drugs and drug regimens, the impact of hyperthermia, and the efficacy of various HIPEC regimens as well as studies comparing different regimens was performed. RESULTS: The preclinical and clinical data were limited, and studies comparing different regimens were scarce. Many of the regimens were neither supported by preclinical rationale or data nor validated by a dose-escalating formal phase 1 trial. All the regimens were based on pharmacokinetic data and did not take chemosensitivity of peritoneal metastases into account. Personalized medicine approaches such as patient-derived tumor organoids could offer a solution to this problem, although clinical validation is likely to be challenging. CONCLUSIONS: Apart from randomized trials, more translational research and phases 1 and 2 studies are needed. While waiting for better preclinical and clinical evidence, the best way to minimize heterogeneity is by an expert consensus that aims to identify and define a limited number of regimens for each indication and primary site. The choice of regimen then can be tailored to the patient profile and its expected toxicity and the methodology according regional factors.

[Management of epithelial ovarian cancer. Short text drafted from the French joint recommendations of FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY and endorsed by INCa]. / Texte court rédigé à partir de la recommandation nationale de bonnes pratiques cliniques « Conduites à tenir initiales devant des patientes atteintes d'un cancer épithélial de l'ovaire ¼ élaborée par FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY et labélisée par l'INCa ¼.

Faced to an undetermined ovarian mass on ultrasound, an MRI is recommended and the ROMA score (combining CA125 and HE4) can be proposed (grade A). In case of suspected early stage ovarian or fallopian tube cancer, omentectomy (at least infracolonic), appendectomy, multiple peritoneal biopsies, peritoneal cytology (grade C) and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy are recommended (grade B) for all histological types, except for the expansive mucinous subtype where lymphadenectomy may be omitted (grade C). Minimally invasive surgery is recommended for early stage ovarian cancer, if there is no risk of tumor rupture (grade B). Adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel is recommended for all high-grade ovarian or Fallopian tube cancers, stage FIGO I-IIA (grade A). In case of ovarian, Fallopian tube or primitive peritoneal cancer of FIGO III-IV stages, thoraco-abdomino-pelvic CT scan with injection (grade B) is recommended. Laparoscopic exploration for multiple biopsies (grade A) and to evaluate carcinomatosis score (at least using the Fagotti score) (grade C) are recommended to estimate the possibility of a complete surgery (i.e. no macroscopic residue). Complete medial laparotomy surgery is recommended for advanced cancers (grade B). It is recommended in advanced cancers to perform para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in case of clinical or radiological suspicion of metastatic lymph node (grade B). In the absence of clinical or radiological lymphadenopathy and in case of complete peritoneal surgery during an initial surgery for advanced cancer, it is possible not to perform a lymphadenectomy because it does not modify the medical treatment and the overall survival (grade B). Primary surgery is recommended when no tumor residue is possible (grade B). After a complete first surgery, it is recommended to deliver 6 cycles of intravenous (grade A) or to propose intraperitoneal (grade B) chemotherapy, to be discussed with patient, according to the benefit/risk ratio. After a complete interval surgery for a FIGO III stage, the hyperthermic intra peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can be proposed in the same conditions of the OV-HIPEC trial (grade B). In case of tumor residue after surgery or FIGO stage IV, chemotherapy associated with bevacizumab is recommended (grade A).

Long-term survival in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

OBJECTIVE: Despite a high response rate to first-line therapy, prognosis of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) remains poor. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the frequency of long-term survivors and to identify the prognostic factors associated with long-term survival in a French cohort of 566 patients. METHODS: Patients treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for EOC in 13 French centers between 1991 and 2010 were included. Long-term survivors were defined as patients who survived more than 5 years after HIPEC and CRS, irrespective of relapse. RESULTS: Seventy-eight long-term survivors were analyzed. The median follow-up was 74 months. Median age at the time of first HIPEC was 55.4 years (range [22.6-77.6]. Seven patients had advanced EOC and 71 patients had recurrent EOC (37 patients had platinum-resistant EOC and 32 had platinum-sensitive disease). More than half of the long-term survivors had high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). In univariate analysis, age ≥50 years (p = .004), peritoneal cancer index (PCI) ≤ 8 (p = .049) and CA-125 < 100 (p = .02) were associated with long-term survival. There was a trend towards an association between higher CC-score and long-term survival (p = .057). CONCLUSION: Age ≥50 years, PCI ≤8 and CA125 < 100 were associated with long-term survival in univariate analysis. There was a trend towards the significance of CC-score. Platinum-status was not associated with long-term survival.

Peritoneal Carcinomatosis of Rare Ovarian Origin Treated by Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Multi-Institutional Cohort from PSOGI and BIG-RENAPE.

PURPOSE: Ovarian cancer is the most common deadly cancer of gynecologic origin. Patients often are diagnosed at advanced stage with peritoneal metastasis. There are many rare histologies of ovarian cancer; some have outcomes worse than serous ovarian cancer. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can be considered for patients with recurrence. This study was designed to assess the impact of CRS and HIPEC on survival of patient with peritoneal metastasis from rare ovarian malignancy. METHODS: A prospective, multicentric, international database was retrospectively searched to identify all patients with rare ovarian tumor (mucinous, clear cells, endometrioid, small cell hypercalcemic, and other) and peritoneal metastasis who underwent CRS and HIPEC through the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) and BIG-RENAPE working group. The postoperative complications, long-term results, and principal prognostic factors were analyzed. RESULTS: The analysis included 210 patients with a median follow-up of 43.5 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 69.3 months, and the 5-year OS was 57.7%. For mucinous tumors, median OS and DFS were not reached at 5 years. For granulosa tumors, median overall survival was not reached at 5 years, and median DFS was 34.6 months. Teratoma or germinal tumor showed median overall survival and DFS that were not reached at 5 years. Differences in OS were not statistically significant between histologies (p = 0.383), whereas differences in DFS were (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CRS and HIPEC may increases long-term survival in selected patients with peritoneal metastasis from rare ovarian tumors especially in mucinous, granulosa, or teratoma histological subtypes.

Ninety-day post-operative morbidity and mortality using the National Cancer Institute's common terminology criteria for adverse events better describe post-operative outcome after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The post-operative morbidity and mortality after CRS-HIPEC has been widely evaluated. However, there is a major discrepancy between rates reported due to different metrics and time of analysis used. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the legitimacy of 90-day morbidity and mortality based on the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v4.0 classification as criteria of quality for cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). METHODS: A prospective database of all patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis between 2004 and 2015 was queried for 90-day morbidity and mortality and survival. RESULTS: Among 881 patients, the 90-day major complication rate based on NCI-CTCAE classification and Clavien-Dindo's classification were 51% (n = 447 patients) and 25% (n = 222 patients), respectively. Among patients who presented with a 90-day complication based on the NCI-CTCAE classification, 50% (n = 225 patients) presented a medical complication not reported by Clavien-Dindo's classification. After surgery, 24 patients (2.7%) died of post-operative complications, for only 10 (42%) of them the death occurred within 30-day after surgery. Occurrence of major complication based on either NCI-CTCAE classification, Clavien-Dindo's classification or the medical complication not reported by Clavien-Dindo's classification all negatively impacts the overall survival. CONCLUSION: Among commonly reported morbidity's classification, 90-day morbidity based on NCI-CTCAE classification represents a legitimate metric of CRS-HIPEC quality. Post-operative morbidity after CRS-HIPEC should be reported using 90-day NCI-CTCAE classification.

Multi-institutional study of peritoneal sarcomatosis from uterine sarcoma treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: Uterine sarcoma (US) is a rare tumor representing 1% of female genital tract malignancies. Peritoneal sarcomatosis (PS) after US, diminishes median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) alone, with or without systemic chemotherapy is <1 year and 6 months, respectively. A multi-institutional review of PS from US was conducted to evaluate CRS and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and effects on survival outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of 36 patients from 7 specialized international centers was performed. Selection criteria included PS of uterine origin with CRS/HIPEC treatment. Clinical data were analyzed. OS and PFS were estimated with Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients underwent a total 38 HIPEC procedures performed from 2005 to 2014; 35 previous treatment and 1 primary treatment. Twenty-nine (81%) LMS patients, 3 (8%) endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS), 3 (8%) adeneosarcoma (AS), and 1 (3%) categorized as other. Median PCI was 16 (range: 2-39), 10 patients had PCI ≥20. Thirty-four patients (94%) had complete cytoreduction (CC 0-1), 19 patients recurred. CRS/HIPEC OS at 1, 3, and 5-years was 75%, 53%, and 32% respectively, with median OS of 37 months (CI 95%: 20-54). PFS in 32 patients with CC at 1, 3, and 5-years was 67%, 32% and 32%, respectively with median PFS of 18.9 months (CI 95%: 6.7-31). CONCLUSIONS: CRS/HIPEC is a promising treatment modality for patients with PS. Histological subtype may influence survival. A global prospective registry of patients to further assess the efficacy of CRS/HIPEC is needed.

Digital Glissonectomy: A Safe Perihepatic Peritonectomy.

BACKGROUND: Complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS), combining organ resection and peritonectomy, is the only treatment that could offer cure for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Initially, when the Glisson's capsule was involved without deep liver parenchyma invasion, either electroevaporation or Glisson's capsule resection was proposed. The objective of this study is to present and evaluate the safety of this standardized digital glissonectomy. METHODS: Since 2009, the peritonectomy of the Glisson's capsule, or digital glissonectomy, has been standardized at our institution. RESULTS: Among 655 patients who underwent a complete CRS between 2009 and 2014, 91 (14 %) glissonectomies were performed. Pseudomyxoma peritonei was the primary indication, and a glissonectomy was more frequently performed for patients with high peritoneal cancer index. The morbidity and mortality of CRS were not increased after glissonectomy (p = 0.069 and 0.949, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Digital glissonectomy is feasible and safe, when proposed for superficial deposits on Glisson's capsule.

What made hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy an effective curative treatment for peritoneal surface malignancy: A 25-year experience with 1,125 procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To review our 25-year experience with hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). BACKGROUND: Combining cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC as local treatments for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) was proposed 25 years ago. METHODS: A prospective database of all patients undergoing HIPEC for PC since 1989 was searched for clinicopathological data, 90-day morbidity and mortality, and survival. RESULTS: Among 1,125 HIPEC procedures, PC origin was colorectal (342; 30%), ovarian (271; 24%), pseudomyxoma peritonei (189; 17%), gastric (127; 11%), malignant mesothelioma (84; 8%), or other (112; 10%). Between 2004-2009 (n = 321) and 2010-2015 (n = 560), the median peritoneal cancer index decreased (11 vs. 8; P < 0.001), fewer patients underwent incomplete cytoreduction (CC2-3: 4% vs. 0.5%; P < 0.001), and more were included in randomized trials (5% vs. 16%; P < 0.001). Postoperative morbidity (52% vs. 50%, P = 0.672) was not different, but mortality significantly decreased (5% vs. 2%; P = 0.030). Median overall-survival was 42 months, and improved significantly for each 5-year period except for 2006-2010 vs. 2011-2015 (P = 0.097). The 10-year survival without recurrence was 53%, 14%, 4%, 10%, and 9% for pseudomyxoma, mesothelioma, ovarian, colorectal, and gastric PC, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that CRS and HIPEC provide long-term survival irrespective of PC origin, and survival improves with experience. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:796-803. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Splenectomy Increases Postoperative Complications Following Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Complete cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) is increasingly performed on patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of various origins. Splenectomy often is required in these patients to achieve complete tumor removal. Although splenectomy has been associated with increased morbidity in many major abdominal surgeries, its effect in patients undergoing CRS + HIPEC is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of splenectomy during CRS + HIPEC on postoperative outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 39 patients who underwent CRS + HIPEC with splenectomy during a 3-year study period from a prospective database. We compared them to case controls (CRS + HIPEC without splenectomy) that were matched for the complexity of the procedure. We evaluated the complication rate and outcomes of patients in each group. RESULTS: During the study period, splenectomy was performed in 32 % of patients undergoing CRS + HIPEC procedure. Patients in the splenectomy group experienced more grade 3-4 complications than patients in the control group (59 vs. 35.9 %, p = 0.041) as well as more pulmonary complications (41 vs. 7.7 %, p = 0.0006). Multivariate analysis identified splenectomy as the only predictor of overall major complications (odds ratio = 2.57, 95 % confidence interval = 1.03-6.40). Mortality was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Splenectomy increases major complication rate in patients undergoing CRS + HIPEC and efforts should be made to preserve the spleen during the surgery.

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for First Relapse of Ovarian Cancer.

BACKGROUND: To assess impact of surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients treated for a first relapse of ovarian cancer (FROC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a FROC treated with second-line chemotherapy, surgery and HIPEC were retrospectively included from 13 Institutions. Studied parameters were interval free between the end of initial treatment and the first relapse, second-line chemotherapy, peritoneal cancer index and completeness of surgery, HIPEC, mortality and morbidity, pathological results and survival. RESULTS: From 2001 to 2010, 314 patients were included. The main strategy was secondary chemotherapy followed by surgery and HIPEC (269/314-85.6%). Mortality and morbidity rates were respectively 1% and 30.9%. Median follow-up was 50 months, 5-year overall survival was 38.0%, with no difference between platinum-sensitive or -resistant patients and 5-year disease-free survival was 14%. CONCLUSION: HIPEC allows encouraging survival in the treatment of FROC, better in case of complete surgery, with acceptable mortality and morbidity rates.

Iterative procedures combining cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal recurrence: postoperative and long-term results.

OBJECTIVE: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the best treatment of several peritoneal surface malignancies. Isolated peritoneal recurrence may be treated by iterative procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate immediate postoperative and long-term results after iterative CRS-HIPEC. METHODS: From 1990 to 2010, 30 patients with isolated peritoneal recurrence underwent iterative procedures combining CRS-HIPEC. RESULTS: Origins of peritoneal carcinomatosis were ovarian, colorectal, pseudomyxoma peritonei, peritoneal mesothelioma, gastric cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, leiomyosarcoma, and primary peritoneal serous carcinoma. Median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 16.2 months from the first procedure. After the second procedure, one (3.3%) postoperative death occurred. Severe morbidity following the second procedure was 40% versus 30% after the first procedure (P = 0.37). At most recent follow up, 11 patients were disease-free, 10 were alive with recurrence, and 9 were dead with recurrence. Five-year overall survival after initial CRS with HIPEC was 65%, and overall median survival from diagnosis was 140 months. CONCLUSION: Iterative procedures combining CRS-HIPEC are feasible and allow long-term survival but may result in significant morbidity and mortality. Patients must be carefully selected, based on the following criteria: Origin of carcinomatosis, magnitude of first procedure, length of RFS, physiological age, co-morbidity, and possibility of complete cytoreduction.