RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many studies have identified racial disparities in healthcare, but few have described disparities in the use of anesthesia modalities. We examined racial disparities in the use of local versus general anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair. We hypothesized that African American and Hispanic patients would be less likely than Caucasians to receive local anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 78,766 patients aged ≥ 18 years in the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who underwent elective, unilateral, open inguinal hernia repair under general or local anesthesia from 1998-2018. We used multiple logistic regression to compare use of local versus general anesthesia and 30-day postoperative complications by race/ethnicity. RESULTS: In total, 17,892 (23%) patients received local anesthesia. Caucasian patients more frequently received local anesthesia (15,009; 24%), compared to African Americans (2353; 17%) and Hispanics (530; 19%), P < 0.05. After adjusting for covariates, we found that African Americans (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77-0.86) and Hispanics (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69-0.87) were significantly less likely to have hernia surgery under local anesthesia compared to Caucasians. Additionally, local anesthesia was associated with fewer postoperative complications for African American patients (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.27-0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Although local anesthesia was associated with enhanced recovery for African American patients, they were less likely to have inguinal hernias repaired under local than Caucasians. Addressing this disparity requires a better understanding of how surgeons, anesthesiologists, and patient-related factors may affect the choice of anesthesia modality for hernia repair.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Local/estadística & datos numéricos , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Herniorrafia/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etnología , Anciano , Femenino , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal anesthesia modality for umbilical hernia repair is unclear. We hypothesized that using local rather than general anesthesia would be associated with improved outcomes, especially for frail patients. METHODS: We utilized the 1998-2018 Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program to identify patients who underwent elective, open umbilical hernia repair under general or local anesthesia. We used the Risk Analysis Index to measure frailty. Outcomes included complications and operative time. RESULTS: There were 4958 Veterans (13%) whose hernias were repaired under local anesthesia. Compared to general anesthesia, local was associated with a 12%-24% faster operative time for all patients, and an 86% lower (OR 0.14, 95%CI 0.03-0.72) complication rate for frail patients. CONCLUSIONS: Local anesthesia may reduce the operative time for all patients and complications for frail patients having umbilical hernia repair.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Anestesia Local , Fragilidad/complicaciones , Hernia Umbilical/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Salud de los Veteranos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Femenino , Anciano Frágil , Hernia Umbilical/complicaciones , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Frailty predisposes patients to poor postoperative outcomes. We evaluated whether using local rather than general anesthesia for hernia repair could mitigate effects of frailty. METHODS: We used the Risk Analysis Index (RAI) to identify 8,038 frail patients in the 1998-2018 Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who underwent elective, open unilateral inguinal hernia repair under local or general anesthesia. Our outcome of interest was the incidence of postoperative complications. RESULTS: In total, 5,188 (65%) patients received general anesthesia and 2,850 (35%) received local. Local anesthesia was associated with a 48% reduction in complications (OR 0.52, 95%CI 0.38-0.72). Among the frailest patients (RAI≥70), predicted probability of a postoperative complication ranged from 22 to 33% with general anesthesia, compared to 13-21% with local. CONCLUSIONS: Local anesthesia was associated with a â¼50% reduction in postoperative complications in frail Veterans. Given the paucity of interventions for frail patients, there is an urgent need for a randomized trial comparing effects of anesthesia modality on postoperative complications in this vulnerable population.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia General , Anestesia Local , Anciano Frágil , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Veteranos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Anestesia General/estadística & datos numéricos , Anestesia Local/efectos adversos , Anestesia Local/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Fragilidad/complicaciones , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia repair is the most common general surgery procedure and can be performed under local or general anesthesia. We hypothesized that using local rather than general anesthesia would improve outcomes, especially for older adults. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 97,437 patients in the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program who had open inguinal hernia surgery under local or general anesthesia. Outcomes included 30-day postoperative complications, operative time, and recovery time. RESULTS: Our cohort included 22,333 (23%) Veterans who received local and 75,104 (77%) who received general anesthesia. Mean age was 62 years. Local anesthesia was associated with a 37% decrease in the odds of postoperative complications (95% CI 0.54-0.73), a 13% decrease in operative time (95% CI 17.5-7.5), and a 27% shorter recovery room stay (95% CI 27.5-25.5), regardless of age. CONCLUSIONS: Using local rather than general anesthesia is associated with a profound decrease in complications (equivalent to "de-aging" patients by 30 years) and could significantly reduce costs for this common procedure.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia General , Anestesia Local , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Anestesia General/métodos , Anestesia Local/efectos adversos , Anestesia Local/métodos , Femenino , Hospitales de Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Texas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia repair is the most common general surgery operation in the United States. Nearly 80% of inguinal hernia operations are performed under general anesthesia versus 15%-20% using local anesthesia, despite the absence of evidence for the superiority of the former. Although patients aged 65 y and older are expected to benefit from avoiding general anesthesia, this presumed benefit has not been adequately studied. We hypothesized that the benefits of local over general anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair would increase with age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 87,794 patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project who had elective inguinal hernia repair under local or general anesthesia from 2014 to 2018, and we used propensity scores to adjust for known confounding. We compared postoperative complications, 30-day readmissions, and operative time for patients aged <55 y, 55-64 y, 65-74 y, and ≥75 y. RESULTS: Using local rather than general anesthesia was associated with a 0.6% reduction in postoperative complications in patients aged 75+ y (95% CI -0.11 to -1.13) but not in younger patients. Local anesthesia was associated with faster operative time (2.5 min - 4.7 min) in patients <75 y but not in patients aged 75+ y. Readmissions did not differ by anesthesia modality in any age group. Projected national cost savings for greater use of local anesthesia ranged from $9 million to $45 million annually. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons should strongly consider using local anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair in older patients and in younger patients because it is associated with significantly reduced complications and substantial cost savings.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia General/estadística & datos numéricos , Anestesia Local/estadística & datos numéricos , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Anciano , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Femenino , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hyperparathyroidism is both underdiagnosed and undertreated, but the reasons for these deficiencies have not been described. The purpose of this study was to identify reasons for underdiagnosis and undertreatment of hyperparathyroidism that could be addressed by targeted interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 3,200 patients with hypercalcemia (serum calcium >10.5 mg/dL) who had parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels evaluated at our institution from 2011 to 2016. We randomly sampled 60 patients and divided them into three groups based on their PTH levels. Two independent reviewers examined clinical notes and diagnostic data to identify reasons for delayed diagnosis or referral for treatment. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 61 ± 16.5 years, 68% were women, and 55% were white. Fifty percent of patients had ≥1 elevated calcium that was missed by their primary care provider. Hypercalcemia was frequently attributed to causes other than hyperparathyroidism, including diuretics (12%), calcium supplements (12%), dehydration (5%), and renal dysfunction (3%). Even when calcium and PTH were both elevated, the diagnosis was missed or delayed in 40% of patients. For 7% of patients, a nonsurgeon stated that surgery offered no benefit; 22% of patients were offered medical treatment or observation, and 8% opted not to see a surgeon. Only 20% of patients were referred for surgical evaluation, and they waited a median of 16 months before seeing a surgeon. CONCLUSION: To address common causes for delayed diagnosis and treatment of hyperparathyroidism, we must improve systems for recognizing hypercalcemia and better educate patients and providers about the consequences of untreated disease. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study identified reasons why patients experience delays in workup, diagnosis, and treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism. These data provide valuable information for developing interventions that increase rates of diagnosis and referral.