Tranexamic Acid Was Not Associated With a Reduction in Bleeding Complications Related to Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes in males given perioperative tranexamic acid (TXA) during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) to a historical cohort that did not receive TXA. METHODS: Our cohort included HoLEP patients (N = 1037) from August 2018 through November 2022. Exclusion criteria included history of stroke, transient ischemic attack, or coronary stent placed within 18 months. The primary predictor was TXA during HoLEP. The primary outcome variable was a return to the operating room (RTOR) for bleeding. Secondary outcomes included catheter reinsertion, transfusion, and clotting complications. Multivariable models evaluating associations of TXA with outcomes were adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: In our cohort, 214/1035 had one or more complications with 81 having a Clavien-Dindo Grade of 3a or higher, 114/1037 with catheter reinsertion, 36/1037 RTOR for bleeding, and 15/1035 had a transfusion. TXA use was not associated with 30-day RTOR. 3.7% of those without TXA had a RTOR, and 3.1% of those with TXA had a RTOR (adjusted odds ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.28-1.38, P = .25). Transfusion rates were higher for those without TXA (2.0%) compared to with (0.5%). This was statistically significant after adjustment (adjusted odds ratio 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.69, P = .016) and after correction for multiple testing (corrected P = .048). TXA use was not associated with catheter reinsertion or clotting complications. CONCLUSION: Routine perioperative intravenous TXA in HoLEP patients was not associated with a reduction of RTOR for bleeding, catheter reinsertion, or clotting complications. TXA was associated with decreased transfusions with a low overall event rate of 1.4%.

Early apical release versus En-bloc no touch technique for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a high-volume single-surgeon cohort study.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the early apical release (EAR) technique for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP) is associated with improved perioperative outcomes compared to the En-bloc no touch (EBNT) technique. METHODS: Consecutive men treated with HOLEP by a single surgeon from August 2018 to March 2021 were identified. Beginning in June 2021 all procedures were performed using the EAR technique, and these were compared to the preceding cases done with the EBNT technique. Intraoperative outcomes included operative time, need for open conversion, enucleation efficiency (tissue removed per minute of OR time), and enucleation ratio (tissue removed relative to preoperative gland size on imaging). Postoperative outcomes included catheter reinsertion, blood transfusion, and complications classified by the Clavien-Dindo scale. RESULTS: We identified 801 men, including 571 (71%) treated with EBNT and 230 (29%) with EAR. Median preoperative characteristics were similar between groups. The EAR approach was associated with significantly longer mean operating room time, 100.5 min versus 91.9 min, p = 0.003. However, EAR patients had a much lower rate of conversion to open cystotomy (0.43% versus 3.0%). There were no significant differences in rate of catheter reinsertion or perioperative complications between groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: EAR technique by an experienced HoLEP surgeon resulted in longer operative times, potentially reflecting an initial learning curve, but essentially eliminated the need for open cystotomy. Perioperative results including catheter reinsertion rate and bleeding complications were similar between the two cohorts. These data support continued use of the EAR technique for HOLEP to minimize risk of open conversion.

Analysis of Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate Fixed Operating Room Times.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate factors influencing fixed operating room time during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed for all holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) cases performed by a single surgeon over a 24-month period. Operating room (OR) time was divided into fixed and variable time. The variable time was defined as cut-to-close time. Fixed time included in room time to anesthesia release time (IRAT), anesthesia release time to cut time (ARCT), and close time to wheels out (CTWO). The effects of time of day and anesthesia personnel (AP) changes on fixed operating room time were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 406 HoLEPs were analyzed. There was no statistically significant difference in nonprocedural OR times between morning and afternoon surgeries (IRAT, P = .38, ARCT P = .10, CTWO P = .77). Median nonprocedural OR times accounted for 27% (IQR: 22%-31%) of the total procedure time in the AM group and 29% (IQR: 24%-33%) in the PM group (P = .005). Of the HoLEPs,78.1% (178/228) experienced one or more AP changes during the procedure. The median fixed OR time was not significantly different between procedures with 1 AP and procedures with ≥2 APs (IRAT, P = .53; ARCT, P = .71; CTWO, P = .98). CONCLUSION: Fixed operating room time makes up a significant portion of HoLEP procedures and should be considered when evaluating OR efficiency. The time of day and number of anesthesia personnel involved did not affect the fixed OR times.

Women's reasons and perceptions around planning a homebirth with a registered midwife in Western Australia.

BACKGROUND: Qualitative evidence has provided rich descriptions around reasons for planning a homebirth with a midwife. Reasons and the importance, confidence and support around this option have not been examined by parity with a larger cohort. AIM: Examine women's characteristics, reasons and perceptions of the importance, confidence and support around choosing homebirth based upon parity. METHODS: A mixed method approach was undertaken within a prospective cohort study in Western Australia where women planning a homebirth have the option of a publicly funded model or care from privately practising midwives. At recruitment a questionnaire collected demographic data, perceived importance, confidence and support plus reasons for choosing homebirth. A qualitative component included an open ended question that encouraged sharing of opinions providing textual data explored by content analysis. FINDINGS: Reasons noted by 211 pregnant women for choosing homebirth were: avoidance of unnecessary intervention (58.8%), comfort and familiarity of home (34.1%), freedom of making own choices (25.6%), and having more continuity of care (24.2%). Reasons for planning homebirth were similar by parity, except for comfort of home being more important (44.0% vs 28.7%, p=0.025) and continuity of care (13.3% vs 30.1%, p=0.006) being less important to primigravid women. Themes revealed common beliefs around childbirth, appreciation for access to homebirth and a desire for greater awareness and less negativity around homebirth. CONCLUSION: Regardless of parity, homebirth was believed to be safe and supported by partners. Reasons identified from qualitative research to avoid intervention, the comfort of home, choice and continuity of care were supported.

Comparative Effectiveness of Behavioral Interventions on Quality of Life for Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Recommendations to engage in behavioral strategies to combat clinically significant cognitive and behavioral symptoms are routinely given to persons with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The comparative effectiveness of these behavioral interventions is not well understood. Objective: To compare the incremental effects of combinations of 5 behavioral interventions on outcomes of highest importance to patients with MCI. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this multisite, cluster randomized, multicomponent comparative effectiveness trial, 272 patients from 4 academic medical outpatient centers (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida; and University of Washington, Seattle) were recruited from September 1, 2014, to August 31, 2016, with last follow-up March 31, 2019. All participants met the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association criteria for MCI. Interventions: The intervention program was modeled on the Mayo Clinic Healthy Action to Benefit Independence and Thinking (HABIT) program, a 50-hour group intervention conducted during 2 weeks, including memory compensation training, computerized cognitive training, yoga, patient and partner support groups, and wellness education. In our study, 1 of 5 interventions was randomly selected to be withheld for each intervention group. Participants and their partners had 1-day booster sessions at 6 and 12 months after intervention. Main Outcomes and Measures: Quality-of-life measurement of participants with MCI at 12 months was the primary outcome, selected based on the preference rankings of previous program participants. Mood, self-efficacy, and memory-based activities of daily living were also highly ranked. Results: A total of 272 participants (mean [SD] age, 75 [8] years; 160 [58.8%] male and 112 [41.2%] female) were enrolled in this study, with 56 randomized to the no yoga group, 54 to no computerized cognitive training, 52 to no wellness, 53 to no support, and 57 to no memory support system. The greatest effect size for quality of life was between the no computerized cognitive training and no wellness education groups at 0.34 (95% CI, 0.05-0.64). In secondary analyses, wellness education had a greater effect on mood than computerized cognitive training (effect size, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.21-0.86), and yoga had a greater effect on memory-related activities of daily living than support groups (effect size, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.13-0.72). Conclusions and Relevance: These results provide further support for behavioral interventions for persons with MCI. Different outcomes were optimized by different combinations of interventions. These findings provide an initial exploration of the effect of behavioral interventions on patient-advocated outcomes in persons with MCI. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02265757.

Under scrutiny: Midwives' experience of intrapartum transfer from home to hospital within the context of a planned homebirth in Western Australia.

BACKGROUND: Women's experience of homebirth has been a focus of research, with limited international research and no Australian evidence of the experiences of midwives in relation to their experience of intrapartum transfers within the context of a planned homebirth. OBJECTIVE: To explore the experience of Western Australian midwives involved in an intrapartum transfer from home to hospital. METHODS: A descriptive phenomenological study was conducted. Women who elect to have a homebirth in Western Australia have the choice of care from privately practising midwives or a publicly funded program. Midwives who were currently practising or had practised within the past three years and experienced an intrapartum transfer were invited to participate. In-depth interviews were conducted with 13 midwives and data analysed using the Stevick-Colaizzi-Keen method. RESULTS: Analysis revealed an overarching theme "under scrutiny" which captured four themes: "decision to transfer: getting the timing right"; "reception at the hospital: welcoming or not"; "maintaining continuity of carer" and "reflections: coming to terms with the experience". CONCLUSION: The decision to transfer to hospital represents a profound shift in expectations for the woman and midwife that is often not recognised by hospital staff. Intrapartum transfer is a challenging clinical decision for all parties; midwives, women, partners and health services. Increased effort by maternity health professionals to improve communication and collaboration must be a priority to better support women and their partners who make an informed decision to have a planned homebirth.