Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 34(7): e305-e311, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35379523

RESUMEN

AIMS: Various factors can influence the learning curve of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Initiating CRS and HIPEC programmes in low- and middle-income countries is challenging due to resource constraints and limited availability of expertise. We present our experience of CRS and HIPEC from a learning curve perspective among a cohort 155 peritoneal surface malignancy patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC between May 2015 and February 2019 were included in the study. Patients were divided into two consecutive cohorts: the first 73 cases comprised the learning phase, group 1; the subsequent cohort of 82 patients were considered as the implementation phase, group 2. A comparative analysis of clinical and surgical outcome parameters was carried out between the two groups. RESULTS: The clinical spectrum was comparable among group 1/group 2. Most were ovarian (56.8%), colorectal (13.5%) and appendiceal (11.0%) malignancies. Group 2 had a higher number of moderate to high peritoneal cancer index patients (34.1% versus 19.1%), total peritonectomies (48.8% versus 45.2%), multi-visceral resections (colonic 41.5% versus 27.4%, small bowel 25.6% versus 19.1%, diaphragmatic 8.5% versus 6.5% and hepatic resections 8.5% versus 2.7%) and completeness of cytoreduction 0/1 rates (97.6% versus 93.1%). A lower incidence of intraoperative urological injuries (2.6% versus 12.3%) was noticed in group 2 (P = 0.007). Non-significant improvements seen in group 2 included surgery duration (6.0 ± 1.3 h versus 6.4 ± 1.7 h), intensive care unit stay (1.3 ± 1.1 days versus 1.8 ± 1.5 days), overall hospital stay (8.1 ± 0.9 days versus 8.8 ± 1.4 days) and reduction in Clavien-Dindo grade 3-4 complications (25.4% versus 36.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study indicate that by implementing standard protocols and mentoring by an experienced team, a learning curve of CRS and HIPEC can be achieved in fewer than 75 cases. The baseline expertise of the treating team can also influence the learning curve.


Asunto(s)
Hipertermia Inducida , Neoplasias Peritoneales , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica , Curva de Aprendizaje , Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Atención Terciaria de Salud , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA