Electrogram-only guided approach to His bundle pacing with minimal fluoroscopy: A single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: His bundle pacing (HBP) is the most physiological pacing. The standard technique based on fluoroscopic approach might be challenging and fluoro consuming. Targeting the His guided exclusively by the electrical signals could enable a precise lead implant, thus reducing fluoroscopy time (FT) and X-ray dose, desirable both for patients and operators. The aim of the study is to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety both acutely and at 30 days of the electrogram (EGM)-guided HBP with minimal or no fluoroscopy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between October and December 2018, 41 consecutive patients underwent EGM-guided HBP. Successful HBP was obtained in 39 (95%) patients, (30 males, 78 ± 10 years). Selective HBP (S-HBP) was achieved in 23 (59%), nonselective HBP (NS-HBP) in 16 (41%) patients. The final HBP lead position was reached in 31 (79.4%) patients without fluoroscopy, only guided by electrical signals. In eight patients a minimal fluoroscopy (mean, 8 seconds) has been required. The sheath's cutting and the slack of the lead were routinely performed under fluoroscopy. No difference was observed in FT for HBP lead placement in S-HBP and NS-HBP (mean, 8.1 ± 25 vs 7.5 ± 20 seconds, P = .8; median value 0 vs 0 seconds). No differences were observed in FT for the entire procedure, total dose area product and total procedural time in S-HBP and NS-HBP. Lead dislodgement occurred in one (2.6%) patient 1 day after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: HBP could be performed safely and efficiently using the EGMs, with minimal or no fluoroscopy. Fluoroscopy was required during sheath removal and atrial lead placement.

The risk of atrial fibrillation during right ventricular pacing.

AIMS: Right ventricular pacing adversely affects left atrial (LA) structure and function that may trigger atrial fibrillation (AF). This study compares the occurrence of persistent/permanent AF during long-term Hisian area (HA), right ventricular septal (RVS), and right ventricular apex (RVA) pacing in patients with complete/advanced atrioventricular block (AVB). METHODS AND RESULTS: We collected retrospective data from 477 consecutive patients who underwent pacemaker implantation for complete/advanced AVB. Ventricular pacing leads were located in the HA, RVS, and RVA in 148, 140, and 189 patients, respectively. The occurrence of persistent/permanent AF was observed in 114 (23.9%) patients (follow-up 58.5 ± 26.5 months). Hisian area groups presented a lower rate of AF occurrence (16.9%) compared with RVS and RVA groups (25.7 and 28.0%, respectively), P = 0.049. Cox's proportional hazard model was used to estimate HR. The risk of persistent/permanent AF was significantly lower in the patients paced from HA compared with those paced from RVA, HR = 0.28 (95% CI 0.16-0.48, P = 0.0001). The RVS and RVA pacing groups showed a similar AF risk: HR 1.04 (95% CI 0.66-1.64, P = 0.856). Other independent predictors of persistent/permanent AF occurrence included previous (before device implantation) paroxysmal AF (HR = 4.08; 95% CI 3.15-7.31, P = 0.0001), LA diameter, and age, whereas baseline bundle-branch block was associated with a lower risk of AF occurrence (HR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.35-0.81, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: HA pacing compared with RVA or RVS pacing seems to be associated with a lower risk of persistent/permanent AF occurrence. The risk of persistent/permanent AF was similar in the RVA vs. RVS groups.

Multipoint pacing by a left ventricular quadripolar lead improves the acute hemodynamic response to CRT compared with conventional biventricular pacing at any site.

BACKGROUND: Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains challenging. Pacing from multiple sites of the left ventricle (LV) has shown promising results. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to systematically compare the acute hemodynamic effects of multipoint pacing (MPP) by means of a quadripolar lead with conventional biventricular (BiV) pacing. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients (23 men; mean age 72 ± 12 years; LV ejection fraction 29% ± 7%; 15 with ischemic cardiomyopathy, 17 with left bundle branch block; mean QRS 183 ± 23 ms) underwent CRT implantation. Per patient, 3.2 ± 1.2 different veins and 6.3 ± 2.4 pacing sites were tested. LV electrical delay (Q-LV) was measured at each location, along with the increase in LV dP/dtmax (maximum rate of rise of LV pressure) obtained by BiV and MPP. The effect of MPP, by means of simultaneous pacing from distal and proximal dipoles, was investigated at all available sites. RESULTS: Overall, 3.2 ± 1.2 different MPP measurements were collected per patient. When all sites were considered, LV dP/dtmax increased from 951 ± 193 mm Hg/s at baseline to 1144 ± 255 and 1178 ± 259 mm Hg/s on BiV and MPP, respectively. When the best site was considered, LV dP/dtmax increased from a baseline value of 942 ± 202 mm Hg/s to 1200 ± 267 mm Hg/s (BiV) and 1231 ± 267 mm Hg/s (MPP). The mean QRS duration at any site during MPP and conventional CRT was 171 ± 18 and 175 ± 16 ms (P = .003), respectively. CONCLUSION: Compared with BiV pacing at any LV site, MPP yielded a small but consistent increase in hemodynamic response. A correlation between the increase in hemodynamics and Q-LV on MPP was observed for all measurements, including those taken at the best and worst sites. The MPP-induced improvement in contractility was associated with significantly greater narrowing of the QRS complex than conventional BiV pacing.

A new integrated approach to improve left ventricular electromechanical activation during right ventricular septal pacing.

AIMS: The deleterious effects of apical right ventricular pacing has fostered the utilization of alternative pacing sites. Although right ventricular septal (RVS) sites are commonly used, the results have been controversial because of poor standardization of lead position by fluoroscopy. This study investigated the utility of a new RVS pacing technique based on the combination of fluoroscopy (F), and electrophysiological mapping (F + EP). Left ventricular (LV) electromechanical activation was determined in patients undergoing RVS pacing and the results of the F + EP approach were compared with those derived from standard F alone. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between December 2008 and November 2010 we enrolled 156 consecutive patients undergoing permanent RVS pacing. The standard F approach was used in 93 patients and the F + EP technique was applied to 63 patients. Electromechanical activation was assessed by: (i) electromechanical latency (EML) interval measured from the QRS onset to the mechanical activation of the basal LV and (ii) intra-LV dyssynchrony measured as the interval from the earliest to the latest LV basal motion. Intra-LV dyssynchrony was found in 46.2% patients in the F group compared with 15.9% in the group F + EP (P < 0.001). The F group demonstrated a significantly higher degree of intra-LV dyssynchrony than F + EP group (43.9 ± 24.3 vs. 26.5 ± 15.4 ms; P < 0.001). The F group exhibited a significantly higher EML duration compared with the F + EP group (215.8 ± 25.3 vs. 195.1 ± 17.4 ms; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: During RVS pacing, the F + EP approach provides a more physiological LV activation than the standard F technique. The prognostic significance of these short-term findings needs to be correlated with long-term data.