Efficacy of Topical Botanical Treatment of Children With Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis

Objective: The study was conducted to determine the efficacy of the botanical combination incorporated in Kamedis Eczema Therapy Cream (the test product) for children with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis. Design: The study was designed as an interventional, multi-center, double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Setting: Children subjects were a sub-population of the 108 combined population of adults and children evenly randomly divided into three treatment groups: test product, vehicle, and comparator. The vehicle used was the identical test product without the botanical combination while the comparator was a leading OTC brand in the US market. All three groups used the same Kamedis body wash followed by one of the three randomized treatment creams for the affected areas. Participants: Thirty-nine (39) children subjects with uncomplicated, stable, mild to moderate atopic dermatitis were recruited and qualified for the study, 24 female and 15 male, ages varying between 3 and 18. Measurements: Investigators assessed the severity of each subject using the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), affected Body Surface Area (BSA) extent evaluated parameters at each of the visit days 0, 7, 14, and 28. Subjective symptoms of pruritus and insomnia were evaluated by the patient or their legal guardian. The SCORAD and EASI indexes were calculated based on the collected parameters. Results: The test product demonstrated an improvement in all evaluated and calculated clinical parameters over the vehicle at the end of the treatment duration, proving the validation that the test product is much more effective and beneficial than the vehicle. The test product reached 40% of 'clear' IGA subjects out of the enrolled subjects and 60% out of the 'clear' and 'almost clear' IGA subjects comparing to 8% and 38%, respectively, with the vehicle, presenting a clear advantage over the vehicle. The BSA improvement comparison analysis of the test product over the vehicle yielded P value of less than 0.05, which is statistically significant. The SCORAD and EASI indexes also showed an advantage of the test product versus the vehicle at week 4. Conclusion: The study results validate that the botanical combination is the key factor for the efficacy and improvement of the AD symptoms within this population of children. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(10):1038-1045.

Validation of Botanical Treatment Efficiency for Adults and Children Suffering from Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis

Objective: The study was conducted to determine the efficiency of the botanicals combination incorporated in the Kamedis Eczema Therapy Cream (the tested product) for adults and children suffering from mild to moderate Atopic Dermatitis. Design: The study designed as an interventional, multi-center, double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Setting: Subjects were evenly randomly divided into three treatment groups: tested product, vehicle, and comparator. The vehicle used was the identical tested product without the botanical combination while the comparator was a leading OTC brand in the US market. All three above groups used a similar Kamedis wash for the body and face following by one of the three randomized treatment creams for the affected areas on the face and body. Participants: One hundred and eight (108) subjects with uncomplicated, stable, mild to moderate atopic dermatitis recruited and qualified for the study; 71 females and 37 males, age 3 to 73. Measurements: The investigator assessed the severity of each subject using the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) and affected body surface area (BSA) at each of the visit days 0, 7, 14, and 28. Results: The tested product demonstrated an improvement in IGA and BSA over the vehicle at every visit across treatment time, proving the validation that the botanical product is much more effective and beneficial than the same product without the botanicals. The tested product as well as the comparator reached exactly the same percentage, 34%, of 'clear' IGA subjects of the enrolled subjects, presenting advantage over the vehicle. The BSA improvement comparison analysis of the tested product over the vehicle yielded statistically significant P value of 0.0369. Conclusion: The study results approve and validate that the botanical combination is the key factor for the efficacy and improvement of the AD symptoms within this study population. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(6):557-561.

Scalp Seborrheic Dermatitis and Dandruff Therapy Using a Herbal and Zinc Pyrithione-based Therapy of Shampoo and Scalp Lotion.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an herbal and zinc pyrithione shampoo and a scalp lotion (Kamedis Derma-Scalp Dandruff Therapy, Kamedis Ltd., Tel Aviv, Israel) for the treatment of scalp seborrheic dermatitis and dandruff. Design: This was an interventional, open-label, safety and efficacy study. Setting: This open-label study was conducted at Consumer Product Testing Company Inc. in Fairfield, New Jersey. At the baseline visit (Day 0), an examination of the scalp was conducted by a board-certified dermatologist. The entire scalp was evaluated for evidence of seborrheic dermatitis using the Adherent Scalp Flaking Score with a 10-point scale. Only subjects with evidence of moderate-to-greater seborrheic dermatitis or moderate-to-greater dandruff were deemed qualified for inclusion in the study. Participants: Fifty subjects were recruited and included in the study. Measurements: Study subjects were evaluated by the same dermatologist for erythema and flaking at Days 0, 14, 28, and 42 using a five-point scale for each parameter. At each time point, a total severity score was calculated based on the findings of the evaluations. Following the scalp evaluation, each subject had a standardized digital photograph taken of his or her scalp. Each subject was also asked to answer a satisfaction questionnaire regarding the product treatment enhancement and characteristics. Results: A reduction in both parameters evaluated was seen at all time points. Statistical significance was achieved at each time point when compared with the baseline visit. In addition, the subjects expressed a high degree of satisfaction with the treatment. No adverse events were reported during this study. Conclusion: The study showed that the herbal zinc pyrithione shampoo and scalp lotion provided improvement in the main symptoms of seborrheic dermatitis.

A Randomized Controlled Study of a Novel Botanical Acne Spot Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: The study evaluated the tolerability and efficacy of a new presented treatment for acne. The product is an OTC topical gel consisting of 2% SA, which is also enriched in botanicals that have been shown to have anti-inflammatory properties.

DESIGN: The study was designed as a single-site, randomized, investigator-blinded, split-face 10-day study.

SETTING: Subjects enrolled with a minimum of 2 inflammatory papular acne lesions and 2 non-inflammatory open or closed comedones on both sides of the face in symmetrical locations, to the greatest degree possible. One side of each subject's face was randomly selected to receive the study treatment product.

PARTICIPANTS: 25 subjects, 15 female and 10 males, ages 12 to 43 years, suffering from mild to moderate acne.

Measurements: Study duration was 10 days, with study visits occurring at baseline (day 0), day 1, day 2, day 3, day 7, and day 10. Subjects underwent investigator facial evaluation and lesion assessment by dermatologist at each of the visit days. For the inflammatory lesions, the assessed parameters were erythema, elevation, induration, and overall impression. The assessed non-inflammatory parameters were elevation and overall impression.

Results: The observed difference between the treatment and the control group increased between day 1 and day 2 and reached an average of 15% to 20% with small varieties between the parameters and stayed similar across the remaining visits. Statistically significance (P less than 0.005) was achieved for all inflammatory and non-inflammatory tested parameters.

Conclusion: This study was performed to determine the safety, efficacy, and ease of use of a botanical acne treatment gel in providing a reduction in inflammatory acne lesion erythema, elevation, and induration. Erythema and elevation were the most influential parameters in inflammatory lesion with improvement noted after 2 days of application.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16(6):599-603.

Treatment of Seborrheic Dermatitis Using a Novel Herbal-based Cream.

Objective: Seborrheic dermatitis is a common relapsing inflammatory skin condition occurring in approximately 3 to 5 percent of the general population. Current available therapies control, but do not cure seborrhea. The study's objective was to determine the safety and efficacy of a barrier-based, nonsteroidal cream incorporating herbal extracts as a treatment for facial seborrheic dermatitis. Design: Interventional, open label, safety/efficacy study. Setting: At the baseline visit, the investigator selected a target area on the face. The target area was evaluated for Investigator Static Global Assessment, desquamation (scaling), induration (inflammation), and erythema (redness) as well as self-assessed pruritus. Participants: Thirty-two subjects with seborrheic dermatitis were enrolled in the study. Measurements: Subjects were instructed to use the study medication twice a day, morning and evening, for a consecutive period of 42 days. In addition to the baseline visit (Day 0), subjects visited the clinic for two follow-up visits at Days 14 and 28 and for a final visit at Day 42. At each visit, all parameters were evaluated. Results: A reduction in all parameters evaluated was seen at almost all timepoints, improving more from one timepoint to the next during the study period. In addition, the patients expressed a high degree of satisfaction with the treatment. No adverse events were reported during this study. Conclusion: The study showed that after six weeks of treatment, the face cream provided improvement in Investigator Static Global Assessment, pruritus, desquamation, induration, and erythema. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02656368 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/sh ow/NCT02656368?term=Kamedis&rank=2).