Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Front Immunol ; 10: 2090, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31552038

RESUMEN

Honey bees can be found all around the world and fulfill key pollination roles within their natural ecosystems, as well as in agriculture. Most species are typically docile, and most interactions between humans and bees are unproblematic, despite their ability to inject a complex venom into their victims as a defensive mechanism. Nevertheless, incidences of bee stings have been on the rise since the accidental release of Africanized bees to Brazil in 1956 and their subsequent spread across the Americas. These bee hybrids are more aggressive and are prone to attack, presenting a significant healthcare burden to the countries they have colonized. To date, treatment of such stings typically focuses on controlling potential allergic reactions, as no specific antivenoms against bee venom currently exist. Researchers have investigated the possibility of developing bee antivenoms, but this has been complicated by the very low immunogenicity of the key bee toxins, which fail to induce a strong antibody response in the immunized animals. However, with current cutting-edge technologies, such as phage display, alongside the rise of monoclonal antibody therapeutics, the development of a recombinant bee antivenom is achievable, and promising results towards this goal have been reported in recent years. Here, current knowledge on the venom biology of Africanized bees and current treatment options against bee envenoming are reviewed. Additionally, recent developments within next-generation bee antivenoms are presented and discussed.


Asunto(s)
Venenos de Abeja , Abejas , Mordeduras y Picaduras de Insectos/inmunología , Mordeduras y Picaduras de Insectos/terapia , Américas/epidemiología , Animales , Abejas/clasificación , Abejas/fisiología , Conducta Animal , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Hipersensibilidad/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad/terapia , Mordeduras y Picaduras de Insectos/epidemiología , Mordeduras y Picaduras de Insectos/historia , Vigilancia en Salud Pública
2.
Toxicon ; 112: 59-67, 2016 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26829652

RESUMEN

Africanized Apis mellifera bees, also known as killer bees, have an exceptional defensive instinct, characterized by mass attacks that may cause envenomation or death. From the years 2000-2013, 77,066 bee accidents occurred in Brazil. Bee venom comprises several substances, including melittin and phospholipase A2 (PLA2). Due to the lack of antivenom for bee envenomation, this study aimed to produce human monoclonal antibody fragments (single chain fragment variable; scFv), by using phage display technology. These fragments targeted melittin and PLA2, the two major components of bee venom, to minimize their toxic effects in cases of mass envenomation. Two phage antibody selections were performed using purified melittin. As the commercial melittin is contaminated with PLA2, phages specific to PLA2 were also obtained during one of the selections. Specific clones for melittin and PLA2 were selected for the production of soluble scFvs, named here Afribumabs: prefix: afrib- (from Africanized bee); stem/suffix: -umab (fully human antibody). Afribumabs 1 and 2 were tested in in vitro and in vivo assays to assess their ability to inhibit the toxic actions of purified melittin, PLA2, and crude bee venom. Afribumabs reduced hemolysis caused by purified melittin and PLA2 and by crude venom in vitro and reduced edema formation in the paws of mice and prolonged the survival of venom-injected animals in vivo. These results demonstrate that Afribumabs may contribute to the production of the first non-heterologous antivenom treatment against bee envenomation. Such a treatment may overcome some of the difficulties associated with conventional immunotherapy techniques.


Asunto(s)
Antivenenos/uso terapéutico , Venenos de Abeja/antagonistas & inhibidores , Diseño de Fármacos , Mordeduras y Picaduras de Insectos/tratamiento farmacológico , Proteínas de Insectos/antagonistas & inhibidores , Meliteno/antagonistas & inhibidores , Anticuerpos de Cadena Única/uso terapéutico , Animales , Antivenenos/genética , Antivenenos/metabolismo , Antivenenos/farmacología , Venenos de Abeja/química , Venenos de Abeja/enzimología , Venenos de Abeja/toxicidad , Técnicas de Visualización de Superficie Celular , Células Clonales , Quimioterapia Combinada , Edema/etiología , Edema/prevención & control , Hemólisis/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Mordeduras y Picaduras de Insectos/fisiopatología , Proteínas de Insectos/análisis , Proteínas de Insectos/toxicidad , Masculino , Meliteno/análisis , Meliteno/toxicidad , Ratones , Inhibidores de Fosfolipasa A2/farmacología , Inhibidores de Fosfolipasa A2/uso terapéutico , Fosfolipasas A2 Secretoras/antagonistas & inhibidores , Fosfolipasas A2 Secretoras/toxicidad , Proteínas Recombinantes/aislamiento & purificación , Proteínas Recombinantes/metabolismo , Proteínas Recombinantes/farmacología , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos de Cadena Única/genética , Anticuerpos de Cadena Única/metabolismo , Anticuerpos de Cadena Única/farmacología , Tejido Subcutáneo/efectos de los fármacos , Análisis de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA