RESUMEN
ß oscillations in the basal ganglia have been associated with interval timing. We recorded the putaminal local field potentials (LFPs) from monkeys performing a synchronization-continuation task (SCT) and a serial reaction-time task (RTT), where the animals produced regularly and irregularly paced tapping sequences, respectively. We compared the activation profile of ß oscillations between tasks and found transient bursts of ß activity in both the RTT and SCT. During the RTT, ß power was higher at the beginning of the task, especially when LFPs were aligned to the stimuli. During the SCT, ß was higher during the internally driven continuation phase, especially for tap-aligned LFPs. Interestingly, a set of LFPs showed an initial burst of ß at the beginning of the SCT, similar to the RTT, followed by a decrease in ß oscillations during the synchronization phase, to finally rebound during the continuation phase. The rebound during the continuation phase of the SCT suggests that the corticostriatal circuit is involved in the control of internally driven motor sequences. In turn, the transient bursts of ß activity at the beginning of both tasks suggest that the basal ganglia produce a general initiation signal that engages the motor system in different sequential behaviors.
Asunto(s)
Ritmo beta/fisiología , Movimiento/fisiología , Desempeño Psicomotor/fisiología , Tiempo de Reacción/fisiología , Estimulación Acústica/métodos , Animales , Haplorrinos , Macaca mulatta , Masculino , Estimulación Luminosa/métodos , Distribución AleatoriaRESUMEN
This article investigated both the ability of naive human subjects to learn interval production, as well as the properties of learning generalization across modalities and interval durations that varied systematically from the over-trained interval. Human subjects trained on a 450-, 650-, or 850-ms single-interval production task, using auditory stimuli to define the intervals, showed a significant decrease in performance variability with intensive training. This learning generalized to the visual modality and to non-trained durations following a Gaussian transfer pattern. However, the learning carryover followed different rules, depending on the duration of the trained interval as follows: (1) the dispersion of the generalization curve increased as a function of the trained interval, (2) the generalization pattern was tilted to the right in the visual condition, and (3) the transfer magnitude for 650 ms was less prominent than for the other two intervals. These findings suggest the existence of neural circuits that are tuned to specific time lengths and that show different temporal processing properties depending on their preferred interval duration.