Asunto(s)
Vitamina K , Humanos , Administración Intravenosa , Infusiones Intravenosas , Administración OralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Essential to the coagulation pathway, vitamin K (phytonadione) is used to correct clotting factor deficiencies and for reversal of warfarin-induced bleeding. In practice, high-dose intravenous (IV) vitamin K is often used, despite limited evidence supporting repeated dosing. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to characterize differences in responders and nonresponders to high-dose vitamin K to guide dosing strategies. METHODS: This was a case-control study of hospitalized adults who received vitamin K 10 mg IV daily for 3 days. Cases were represented by patients who responded to the first dose of IV vitamin K and controls were nonresponders. The primary outcome was change in international normalized ratio (INR) over time with subsequent vitamin K doses. Secondary outcomes included factors associated with response to vitamin K and incidence of safety events. The Cleveland Clinic Institutional Review Board approved this study. RESULTS: There were 497 patients included, and 182 were responders. Most patients had underlying cirrhosis (91.5%). In responders, the INR decreased from 1.89 at baseline (95% CI = [1.74-2.04]) to 1.40 on day 3 (95% CI = [1.30-1.50]). In nonresponders, the INR decreased from 1.97 (95% CI = [1.83-2.13]) to 1.85 ([1.72-1.99]). Factors associated with response included lower body weight, absence of cirrhosis, and lower bilirubin. There was a low incidence of safety events observed. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of mainly patients with cirrhosis, the overall adjusted decrease in INR over 3 days was 0.3, which may have minimal clinical impact. Additional studies are needed to identify populations who may benefit from repeated daily doses of high-dose IV vitamin K.
Asunto(s)
Vitamina K , Warfarina , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Vitamina K 1/uso terapéutico , Vitamina K 1/farmacología , Coagulación Sanguínea , Relación Normalizada Internacional , Cirrosis Hepática/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Treatment of suspected infections in critically ill patients requires the timely initiation of appropriate antimicrobials and rapid de-escalation of unnecessary broad-spectrum coverage. New advances in rapid diagnostic tests can now offer earlier detection of pathogen and potential resistance mechanisms within hours of initial culture growth. These technologies, combined with pharmacist antimicrobial stewardship efforts, may result in shorten time to adequate coverage or earlier de-escalation of unnecessary broad spectrum antimicrobials, which could improve patient outcomes and lower overall treatment cost. Furthermore, de-escalation of antimicrobials may lead to decreased emergence of resistant organisms and adverse events associated with antimicrobials. Clinical pharmacists should be aware of new rapid diagnostic tests, including their application, clinical evidence, and limitations, in order to implement the most appropriate clinical treatment strategy when patients have positive cultures. This review will focus on commercially available rapid diagnostic tests for infections that are routinely encountered by critically ill patients, including gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial blood stream infections, Candida, and Clostridioides difficile.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmisibles/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Transmisibles/tratamiento farmacológico , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/métodos , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/normas , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/normas , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Crítica , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad MicrobianaRESUMEN
The increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) nosocomial infections accounts for increased morbidity and mortality of such infections. Infections with MDR Gram-negative isolates are frequently treated with colistin. Based on recent pharmacokinetic studies, current colistin dosing regimens may result in a prolonged time to therapeutic concentrations, leading to suboptimal and delayed effective treatment. In addition, studies have demonstrated an association between an increased colistin dose and improved clinical outcomes. However, the specific dose at which these outcomes are observed is unknown and warrants further investigation. This retrospective study utilized classification and regression tree (CART) analysis to determine the dose of colistin most predictive of global cure at day 7 of therapy. Patients were assigned to high- and low-dose cohorts based on the CART-established breakpoint. The secondary outcomes included microbiologic outcomes, clinical cure, global cure, lengths of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays, and 7- and 28-day mortalities. Additionally, safety outcomes focused on the incidence of nephrotoxicity associated with high-dose colistin therapy. The CART-established breakpoint for high-dose colistin was determined to be >4.4 mg/kg of body weight/day, based on ideal body weight. This study evaluated 127 patients; 45 (35%) received high-dose colistin, and 82 (65%) received low-dose colistin. High-dose colistin was associated with day 7 global cure (40% versus 19.5%; P = 0.013) in bivariate and multivariate analyses (odds ratio [OR] = 3.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37 to 8.45; P = 0.008). High-dose colistin therapy was also associated with day 7 clinical cure, microbiologic success, and mortality but not with the development of acute kidney injury. We concluded that high-dose colistin (>4.4 mg/kg/day) is independently associated with day 7 global cure.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Resistencia betalactámica , Lesión Renal Aguda/prevención & control , Anciano , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Bacteriemia/patología , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Esquema de Medicación , Cálculo de Dosificación de Drogas , Femenino , Bacterias Gramnegativas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Bacterias Gramnegativas/patogenicidad , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/mortalidad , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/patología , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
There are limited treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections. Currently, there are suggestions in the literature that combination therapy should be used, which frequently includes antibiotics to which the causative pathogen demonstrates in vitro resistance. This case-control study evaluated risk factors associated with all-cause mortality rates for critically ill patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia. Adult patients who were admitted to an intensive care unit with sepsis and a blood culture positive for Gram-negative bacteria resistant to a carbapenem were included. Patients with polymicrobial, recurrent, or breakthrough infections were excluded. Included patients were classified as survivors (controls) or nonsurvivors (cases) at 30 days after the positive blood culture. Of 302 patients screened, 168 patients were included, of whom 90 patients died (53.6% [cases]) and 78 survived (46.4% [controls]) at 30 days. More survivors received appropriate antibiotics (antibiotics with in vitro activity) than did nonsurvivors (93.6% versus 53.3%; P < 0.01). Combination therapy, defined as multiple appropriate agents given for 48 h or more, was more common among survivors than nonsurvivors (32.1% versus 7.8%; P < 0.01); however, there was no difference in multiple-agent use when in vitro activity was not considered (including combinations with carbapenems) (87.2% versus 80%; P = 0.21). After adjustment for baseline factors with multivariable logistic regression, combination therapy was independently associated with decreased risk of death (odds ratio, 0.19 [95% confidence interval, 0.06 to 0.56]; P < 0.01). These data suggest that combination therapy with multiple agents with in vitro activity is associated with improved survival rates for critically ill patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia. However, that association is lost if in vitro activity is not considered.