Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography.

PURPOSE: To assess magnetic resonance (MR) colonography as a method for detection of colorectal masses, with conventional colonoscopy as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR colonography was performed in 132 patients referred for colonoscopy because of the possible presence of a mass. After rectal filling with a gadopentetate dimeglumine and water enema, T1-weighted three-dimensional gradient-echo MR studies were acquired with the patient in the prone and supine positions. Water-sensitive single-shot fast spin-echo MR images were also obtained. Surface-rendered virtual endoscopic endoluminal views, orthogonal sections in three planes, and water-sensitive MR images were interactively assessed for presence of colorectal masses by two radiologists. RESULTS: MR colonography was well tolerated without sedation or analgesia. MR image quality was sufficient for diagnosis in 127 (96%) patients. Most small (10-mm) lesions were correctly identified. For these large masses, MR colonography had a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 99%, positive predictive value of 92%, and negative predictive value of 98% for detection of masses. CONCLUSION: MR colonography is a promising modality for help in detecting colorectal mass lesions larger than 10 mm in diameter.

Contrast optimization for assessment of the colonic wall and lumen in MR colonography.

This report focuses on the optimization of magnetic resonance colonography for combined virtual endoluminal and T2-weighted wall analysis of the colon and demonstrates the potential of the single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) sequence for identifying colorectal pathologies. A 45 degrees flip angle in the three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo sequence and a TE of 60 msec in the SSFSE sequence in conjunction with a 10 mM gadolinium concentration in the enema results in maximal contrast for the delineation of the colonic lumen in T1-weighted imaging and the colonic wall in T2-weighted imaging. The SSFSE sequence reveals hyperintense signal for inflammatory disease and most polyps exceeding 10 mm in size. It supplements the virtual endoluminal assessment by aiding in the differentiation between mass lesions and fecal matter or residual air.

Virtual colonography.

Cross-sectional imaging techniques are increasingly being considered as alternative imaging modalities for colorectal screening. While CT-colonography uses air to insufflate the colon, an enema containing small amounts of paramagnetic contrast represents the basis for MR-colonography. Both techniques provide large three-dimensional data sets of the abdomen, containing the entire colon. Using sophisticated post-processing, the colon can be assessed in any desirable plane from various viewpoints. Thus even virtual endoscopic views can be rendered to assess the inside of the colon. This chapter briefly describes the technical aspects underlying both CT- and MR-colonography. Advantages and disadvantages of the two techniques are critically discussed, comparing them with one another as well as with conventional colonoscopy and barium enema.

Detection of mass lesions with MR colonography: preliminary report.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of magnetic resonance (MR) colonography in the detection of colorectal mass lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients underwent MR colonography preceding colonoscopy. The colon was filled with a gadolinium-water mixture (1:100) with MR imaging guidance, and the patient was imaged prone and supine with a breath-hold three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled sequence. In addition, two-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled images were acquired before and after intravenous administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Images were interactively analyzed on the basis of multiplanar reconstruction by two radiologists. For regions that were not conclusively assessable with multiplanar reconstruction, virtual intraluminal endoscopic images of the colon were reconstructed. MR findings were correlated with colonoscopic results. RESULTS: Two patients were excluded from the analysis. Findings in eight of 11 patients were correctly assessed as normal and in six of 10 as mass-positive. In the four patients with false-negative findings, one had two 8-mm polyps and the other three had polyps smaller than 5 mm. All nine mass lesions larger than 10 mm, as well as four of the 10 polyps ranging between 5 and 10 mm, were detected, but all polyps smaller than 5 mm were missed. In contrast to the polyps less than 5 mm, the four missed polyps (5-10 mm) could be identified retrospectively on virtual intraluminal endoscopic images. Contrast enhancement was documented in 13 polyps. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional MR colonography provided virtual colonoscopic viewing and helped detection of colonic polyps.

Preliminary assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for various colonic disorders.

BACKGROUND: Improvements in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology have enabled the acquisition of three-dimensional MRI datasets in a single breath hold. We adopted this technique to make a three dimensional intraluminal and extraluminal assessment of the colon in three patients with various colonic disorders. METHODS: One patient was studied after having a double-contrast barium enema. Two patients had MRI scans after colonoscopy, which showed three colonic tumours in one and multiple polyps in the ascending colon of the other. The process of rectal filling with 1.5-2.0 L water mixed with 15-20 mL 0.5 mol/L gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) was monitored with MR fluoroscopic sequence. Three-dimensional datasets of the contrast-filled colon were taken with patients in prone (before and after intravenous administration of 0.1 mmol/kg bodyweight Gd-DTPA) and supine positions. 64 sections with a voxel-resolution of 2.0 x 2.0 x 1.25 mm3-were taken during a 28 s breath hold. Three-dimensional maximum intensity projection, multiplanar reconstruction, and virtual colonoscopic images of the colon were created from these. FINDINGS: Analysis of the coronal source images in conjunction with multiplanar reconstructions revealed all relevant abnormalities, including diverticula, carcinomas, and polyps. Three dimensional maximum-intensity projections gave a morphological overview of the whole colon. Targeted projections, made up of a limited number of coronal source images, showed diverticula and smaller polyps more clearly. After patients were given intravenous contrast all colonic mass lesions were enhanced. Datasets obtained in prone patients gave the best intraluminal views of the colon. Virtual magnetic resonance colonoscopy showed colonic haustra as well as the ileocaecal valve, but did not show clearly the diverticula. All intraluminal mass lesions, on the other hand, were easy to see. INTERPRETATION: The potential of three-dimensional colonic MRI to provide accurate, minimally invasive, cost-effective polyp screening, as well as comprehensive colonic tumour staging, warrants further investigation.

[Collagen colitis--a clinical entity of relevance]. / Die Kollagenkolitis--eine klinische Entität von Relevanz.

Collagenous colitis is a clinical and pathological entity characterized by chronic watery diarrhea and deposition of collagen beneath the surface epithelium of the large intestine. By colonoscopy and barium enema the colon appears normal. The laboratory tests give usually normal results. 75% of the patients are middle-aged women with a mean age around 50 years. The etiology of the disease is still unknown. An association with various autoimmune diseases has been suggested, but was never proven. Up to now, it is not clear whether the collagenous colitis is a distinct entity or only an epi-phenomenon of another disease which leads to thickening of the collagen layer. Collagenous colitis is diagnosed if all other diseases with chronic watery diarrhea are excluded. A specific treatment is not known. Symptomatic treatment with bulk and antidiarrheal drugs improves the symptoms of most of the patients.