Association of CT-based diagnosis of sarcopenia with prognosis and treatment response in patients at risk of malnutrition - A secondary analysis of the Effect of early nutritional support on Frailty, Functional Outcomes, and Recovery of malnourished medical inpatients Trial (EFFORT) trial.

BACKGROUND & AIM: CT-derived measures of muscle mass may help to identify patients with sarcopenia. We investigated the prognostic significance of CT-derived sarcopenia and muscle attenuation with nutritional markers, clinical outcomes and response to nutritional support in medical in-patients at nutritional risk. METHOD: Within this secondary analysis of the randomized-controlled Effect of early nutritional support on Frailty, Functional Outcomes, and Recovery of malnourished medical inpatients Trial (EFFORT) comparing individualized nutritional support with usual care nutrition in medical inpatients, we investigated associations of CT-based sarcopenia and muscle attenuation at the level L3 with different nutritional and clinical outcomes, and the response to the nutritional intervention. The primary composite endpoint was adverse clinical outcome within 30 days of hospital admission. RESULTS: We included 573 of 2028 EFFORT patients with available CT scans, of which 68.4% met the CT-based definition of sarcopenia and 72.9% had low muscle attenuation. In multivariate analysis, low skeletal muscle index was associated with higher nutritional risk (coefficient per NRS class -0.94 (95%CI -1.87 to -0.01) p = 0.049) and higher risk for adverse clinical outcomes (adjusted odds ratio 1.59 (95% CI 1.06 to 2.38), p = 0.024). Low muscle attenuation was also associated with adverse clinical outcome (adjusted odds ratio 1.67 (95%CI 1.08 to 2.58), p = 0.02). Nutritional support tended to be more effective in reducing mortality in non-sarcopenic patients compared to patients with CT-based sarcopenia (p for interaction 0.058). CONCLUSIONS: Within a population of medical patients at nutritional risk, CT-based sarcopenia and muscle attenuation were associated with several nutritional parameters and predicted adverse clinical outcomes. Information from CT scans, thus may help to better characterize these patients, and may be helpful in guiding therapeutic interventions.

Value of handgrip strength to predict clinical outcomes and therapeutic response in malnourished medical inpatients: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Disease-related malnutrition is associated with loss of muscle mass and impaired functional status. Handgrip strength (HGS) has been proposed as an easy-to-use tool to assess muscle strength in clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the prognostic implications of HGS in patients at nutritional risk with regard to clinical outcomes and response to nutritional support. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the randomized controlled, multicenter, Effect of Early Nutritional Support on Frailty, Functional Outcome, and Recovery of Malnourished Medical Inpatients Trial, which compared the effects of individualized nutritional support with usual hospital food in medical inpatients at nutritional risk. Our primary endpoint was 30-d all-cause mortality. The association between sex-specific HGS and clinical outcomes was investigated using multivariable regression analyses, adjusted for randomization, age, weight, height, nutritional risk, admission diagnosis, comorbidities, interaction terms, and study center. We used interaction terms to investigate possible effect modification regarding the nutritional support intervention. RESULTS: Mean ± SD HGS in the 1809 patients with available handgrip measurement was 17.0 ± 7.1 kg for females and 28.9 ± 11.3 kg for males. Each decrease of 10 kg in HGS was associated with increased risk of 30-d mortality (female: adjusted OR: 2.11; 95% CI: 1.23, 3.62, P = 0.007; male: adjusted OR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.93, P = 0.015) and 180-d mortality (female: adjusted OR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.0, 2.10, P = 0.048; male: adjusted OR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.28, 1.89, P < 0.001). Individualized nutritional support was most effective in reducing mortality in patients with low HGS (adjusted OR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.82 in patients in the ≤10th percentile compared with OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.66, 1.48 in patients in the >10th percentile; P for interaction = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: In medical inpatients at nutritional risk, HGS provided significant prognostic information about expected mortality and complication risks and helps to identify which patients benefit most from nutritional support. HGS may thus improve individualization of nutritional therapy.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02517476.

"Evidence-based medical nutrition - A difficult journey, but worth the effort!"

Evidence-based medicine is the art of combining "best external evidence", "clinical judgement" and "patient values" for improved daily clinical decision making and is the ultimate goal in modern medicine. Historically, in the field of medical nutrition, there had been a lack of strong evidence from large and high-quality trials resulting in often weak guideline recommendations and therefore insufficient implementation in clinical practice. Particularly in the field of malnutrition, the medical community has long struggled to find evidence-based approaches for effective management by means of screening, assessment and treatment of patients. With recent trials showing that individual medical nutrition therapy has strong effects on clinical outcomes, we should now aim to practice "evidence-based medical nutrition" (EBMN) by combining clinical judgement (e.g., thorough clinical assessment of the malnourished patient), patient preferences (e.g., integration of perspectives of patients and relatives, consideration of comorbidities to define specific energy/protein goals and appropriate route of medical nutrition therapy) and the most current scientific evidence (e.g., trial-supported use of nutritional interventions for individual patients). Such an approach may certainly be helpful to improve clinical outcomes of the vulnerable population of malnourished medical inpatients.

Association of Nutritional Support With Clinical Outcomes Among Medical Inpatients Who Are Malnourished or at Nutritional Risk: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Importance: Malnutrition affects a considerable proportion of the medical inpatient population. There is uncertainty regarding whether use of nutritional support during hospitalization in these patients positively alters their clinical outcomes. Objective: To assess the association of nutritional support with clinical outcomes in medical inpatients who are malnourished or at nutritional risk. Data Sources: For this updated systematic review and meta-analysis, a search of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Embase was conducted from January 1, 2015, to April 30, 2019; the included studies were published between 1982 and 2019. Study Selection: A prespecified Cochrane protocol was followed to identify trials comparing oral and enteral nutritional support interventions with usual care and the association of these treatments with clinical outcomes in non-critically ill medical inpatients who were malnourished. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias; data were pooled using a random-effects model. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was mortality. The secondary outcomes included nonelective hospital readmissions, length of hospital stay, infections, functional outcome, daily caloric and protein intake, and weight change. Results: A total of 27 trials (n = 6803 patients) were included, of which 5 (n = 3067 patients) were published between 2015 and 2019. Patients receiving nutritional support compared with patients in the control group had significantly lower rates of mortality (230 of 2758 [8.3%] vs 307 of 2787 [11.0%]; odds ratio [OR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.97). A sensitivity analysis suggested a more pronounced reduction in the risk of mortality in recent trials (2015 or later) (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.28-0.79) compared with that in older studies (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.72-1.22), in patients with established malnutrition (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.34-0.80) compared with that in patients at nutritional risk (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.62-1.18), and in trials with high protocol adherence (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54-0.84) compared with that in trials with low protocol adherence (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.44-1.76). Nutritional support was also associated with a reduction in nonelective hospital readmissions (14.7% vs 18.0%; risk ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.60-0.96), higher energy intake (mean difference, 365 kcal; 95% CI, 272-458 kcal) and protein intake (mean difference, 17.7 g; 95% CI, 12.1-23.3 g), and weight increase (0.73 kg; 95% CI, 0.32-1.13 kg). No significant differences were observed in rates of infections (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.64-1.16), functional outcome (mean difference, 0.32; 95% CI, -0.51 to 1.15), and length of hospital stay (mean difference, -0.24; 95% CI, -0.58 to 0.09). Conclusions and Relevance: This study's findings suggest that despite heterogeneity and varying methodological quality among trials, nutritional support was associated with improved survival and nonelective hospital readmission rates among medical inpatients who were malnourished and should therefore be considered when treating this population.