Efficacy and safety of a blood conservation program including low-dose aprotinin in routine myocardial revascularization.

OBJECTIVES: We attempted to analyze the efficacy and safety of an extensive blood saving program applied in a large cohort of patients. MEASURES: Blood saving included reinfusion of intraoperative predonated blood, aprotinin (2 million KIU) in the prime solution, reinfusion of any residual volume, postoperative acceptance of normovolemic anemia (hematocrit > or = 25%) and autotransfusion of shed blood. SETTING, EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND PATIENTS: In our general hospital with a heart surgery service (1150 cases/year), we studied the records of 527 non-selected consecutive patients, who were prospectively treated with this program being applied in primary myocardial revascularization between. RESULTS: We avoided the use of donor blood in 86.9% of the patients requiring a mean of 0.2+/-0.01 unit of donor blood per patient. No repeat thoracotomy for bleeding was needed in any patient. Univariate analysis revealed that female gender, a low level of hematocrit, high age, a small stature, weight, body surface area, and red cell volume prebypass significantly (p<0.001) were correlated to treatment with donor blood. Multiple regression showed that a small red cell volume and a low prebypass hematocrit were the most (p<0.0001) significant predictors for the use of donor blood. Observing a low incidence of morbidity (myocardial infarction, gastrointestinal, neurological thromboembolic, renal and wound complications), the safety of this program seems to be emphasized. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive blood saving including low-dose aprotinin reduced effectively and safely the need for donor blood in a large cohort of patients.

Low-dose aprotinin in internal mammary artery bypass operations contributes to important blood saving.

The effect on postoperative blood loss and blood use of blood-saving treatment with or without 280 mg of low-dose aprotinin (2 million kallikrein inactivator units) was studied in 200 consecutive patients undergoing either unilateral or bilateral internal mammary artery bypass grafting. Postoperative blood loss and total units of homologous blood products were similar in patients having either bypass procedure without aprotinin treatment. In patients given aprotinin, postoperative blood loss and use of homologous blood products were significantly lower (p < 0.05). The use of any donor blood product was prevented in 78% of the patients given aprotinin versus only 45% of patients treated without aprotinin. None of the aprotinin-treated patients underwent repeat thoracotomy for excessive bleeding; repeat thoracotomy was indicated in 8% of the patients having bilateral internal mammary artery grafting without aprotinin treatment. These results demonstrate that low-dose aprotinin reduces blood loss and blood use significantly and prevents excessive bleeding.

The effect of postoperative normovolaemic anaemia and autotransfusion on blood saving after internal mammary artery bypass surgery.

The efficacy of two blood conservation techniques in decreasing and in preventing the use of homologous blood products was retrospectively studied in 150 patients undergoing internal mammary artery bypass surgery. Patients were matched according to prebypass blood haemoglobin (Hb) content and body surface area and were allocated to one of three groups: in the patients of group 1 (n = 50), normovolaemic anaemia (NA) was accepted postoperatively (haematocrit [Hct] was accepted to a minimum level of 25%); the patients of group 2 (n = 50) were treated with postoperative autotransfusion (AT) of mediastinal shed blood and acceptance of NA. Group 3 (n = 50) contained control patients, not treated with NA or with AT (Hct was accepted to a minimum level of 30%). Patients of group 1 required 3.0 +/- 0.3 units of homologous blood products, but the patients of groups 2 and 3 received significantly more (p less than 0.01) units: 3.9 +/- 0.2 and 4.5 +/- 0.3 units. No donor blood products were needed in 36%, 9% and 5% of the patients in groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively. The net postoperative blood loss was similar in the groups: 1229 +/- 92 ml in group 1, 1098 +/- 74 ml in group 2 and 1243 +/- 72 ml in group 3. However, total blood loss (1982 +/- 135 ml), including the retransfused part (954 +/- 89 ml), was significantly larger (p less than 0.01) in group 2, than in groups 1 and 3.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)