Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
2.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 103(8-9): 460-8, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21074125

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Compliance with guidelines for the management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) may be difficult in hard-to-access areas. AIMS: to analyse the characteristics, management and outcome of STEMIs occurring at altitude in the French Alps and managed by mobile medical emergency units. METHODS: From January 2006 to December 2008, from the prospective RESURCOR registry, 114 patients with a STEMI of less than 12 hours' duration, occurring in a ski resort or at high altitude and managed by the RESURCOR care system, were identified. Baseline characteristics, treatments and in-hospital outcomes were analysed. RESULTS: Ninety-three per cent of patients were men; the mean age was 57 years. STEMIs occurred during or less than 1 hour after physical activity in 76.3% of cases (mainly during or after alpine/cross-country skiing). Killip class greater or equal to 2 and cardiac arrest were observed in 35% and 7.9% of cases, respectively. Fifty-two (45.6%) patients underwent thrombolysis and 62 (54.4%) had percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Median delays were: first call to treatment, 82 min (17-230 min); symptoms to treatment, 165 min (52-770 min). All delays were significantly longer for PCI than for thrombolysis. First call to treatment delay was less than 120 min in 98.1% of patients who underwent thrombolysis and in 51.6% who had PCI (P<0.0001). In-hospital survival was 96.5%. CONCLUSION: Altitude STEMIs happen mainly during sporting activities. Clinical presentation is often severe, but an emergency coronary care network allows rapid reperfusion. These findings emphasize the need for an efficient network for STEMI management in geographically difficult-to-access areas.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Esquí , Terapia Trombolítica , Anciano , Altitud , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Francia , Adhesión a Directriz , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Esfuerzo Físico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Estaciones del Año , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Transporte de Pacientes , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 103(5): 285-92, 2010 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20619238

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Compared with administration in the catheterization laboratory, early treatment with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors provides benefits to patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who undergo primary percutaneous intervention. Whether this benefit is maintained on top of a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel is unknown. METHODS: In a multicentre, controlled, randomized study, 320 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention received a high-dose bolus of tirofiban given either in the ambulance (prehospital group) or in the catheterization laboratory. The primary endpoint was a TIMI flow grade 2-3 of the infarct-related vessel at initial angiography. Secondary endpoints included ST-segment resolution 1h after percutaneous coronary intervention and peak serum troponin I concentration. RESULTS: Tirofiban was administered 48 (95% confidence interval 21.4-75.0) min earlier in the prehospital group. At initial angiography, the combined incidence of TIMI 2-3 flow was 39.7% in the catheterization-laboratory group and 44.2% in the prehospital group (p=0.45). No difference was found on postpercutaneous intervention angiography or peak troponin concentration. Complete ST-segment resolution 60 min after the start of intervention was 55.4% in the catheterization-laboratory group and 52.6% in the prehospital group (p=0.32). CONCLUSION: Prehospital initiation of high-dose bolus tirofiban did not improve significantly initial TIMI 2 or 3 flow of the infarct-related artery or complete ST-segment resolution after coronary intervention compared with initiation of tirofiban in the catheterization laboratory (NCT00538317).


Asunto(s)
Ambulancias , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Tirosina/análogos & derivados , Biomarcadores/sangre , Clopidogrel , Angiografía Coronaria , Circulación Coronaria , Creatina Quinasa/sangre , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio/sangre , Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Infarto del Miocardio/fisiopatología , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Ticlopidina/administración & dosificación , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Factores de Tiempo , Tirofibán , Resultado del Tratamiento , Troponina I/sangre , Tirosina/administración & dosificación , Tirosina/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA