Composite lipid emulsion use and essential fatty acid deficiency in pediatric patients with intestinal failure with high parenteral nutrition dependence: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Reports of essential fatty acid deficiency (EFAD) in patients receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) and a composite lipid (mixed oil intravenous lipid emulsion [MO ILE]) are predominantly when managed by lipid restriction. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of EFAD in patients with intestinal failure (IF) who are PN dependent without lipid restriction. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients, ages 0-17 years, followed by our intestinal rehabilitation program between November 2020 and June 2021 with PN dependency index (PNDI) of >80% on a MO ILE. Demographic data, PN composition, PN days, growth, and plasma fatty acid profile were collected. A plasma triene-tetraene (T:T) ratio >0.2 indicated EFAD. Summary statistics and Wilcoxon rank sum test evaluated to compare between PNDI category and ILE administration (grams/kilograms/day). P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (median age, 4.1 years [interquartile range (IQR) = 2.4-9.6]) were included. The median duration of PN was 1367 days (IQR = 824-3195). Sixteen patients had a PNDI of 80%-120% (61.5%). Fat intake for the group was 1.7 g/kg/day (IQR = 1.3-2.0). The median T:T ratio was 0.1 (IQR = 0.1-0.2) with no values >0.2. Linoleic and arachidonic acid were low in 85% and 19% of patients, respectively; however, Mead acid was normal in all patients. CONCLUSION: This report is the largest to date on the EFA status of patients with IF on PN. These results suggest that, in the absence of lipid restriction, EFAD is not a concern when using MO ILEs in children receiving PN for IF.

Reduction of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections and Line Occlusions in Pediatric Intestinal Failure Patients Receiving Long-Term Parenteral Nutrition Using an Alternative Locking Solution, 4% Tetrasodium Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid.

BACKGROUND: Patients with intestinal failure (IF) are dependent on parenteral nutrition (PN), however, they are at risk of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and line complications. Four-percent tetrasodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution is an effective nonantibiotic, antimicrobial, antibiofilm, and anticoagulant agent. Our objective was to determine 4% tetrasodium EDTA efficacy in preventing CLABSIs and reducing line occlusions in pediatric IF patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients managed at 2 tertiary Canadian pediatric centers between April 2016 and December 2018 who received 4% tetrasodium EDTA solution under the brand name Kitelock. Data were collected for 12 months pre and post-Kitelock. CLABSIs and alteplase administration were compared using a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. Data were reported as medians and frequencies. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included (10 boys; median age, 83 months [range, 8-232 months]). The rate of CLABSIs before 4% tetrasodium EDTA was 2.7+4 per 1000 catheter days. Patients received 4% tetrasodium EDTA for a median of 365 (278-365) days, with no infections in the 12 months post-therapy (P = .002). Median rates of occlusive episodes for the entire cohort before 4% tetrasodium EDTA were 0 (0-5.0) and 0 (0-2.0) after starting therapy (P = .018). In patients with previous occlusions (n = 9), the median episodes of alteplase use previously was 5.5 (2.7-19.2) compared with 2.7 (0-2.7) (P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary findings suggest 4% tetrasodium EDTA solution is effective in reducing CLABSIs and catheter occlusions in pediatric patients with long-term central-access.

An Observational Study of Smoflipid vs Intralipid on the Evolution of Intestinal Failure-Associated Liver Disease in Infants With Intestinal Failure.

BACKGROUND: SMOFlipid has a more diverse lipid profile than traditional Intralipid and has become the standard lipid for patients in our intestinal rehabilitation program. Our objective was to compare outcomes in neonates with intestinal failure (IF) who received SMOFlipid against those receiving Intralipid. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of infants with IF with a minimum follow-up of 12 months in 2008-2016. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: group 1 received SMOFlipid; group 2 was a historical cohort who received Intralipid. The primary outcome was liver function evaluated using conjugated bilirubin (CB) levels. Statistical analysis included the Mann-Whitney U and χ2 tests, with an α value < 0.05 considered significant. Approval was obtained from our institutional review board. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were evaluated (17 = SMOFlipid, 20 = Intralipid). SMOFlipid patients were less likely to reach CB of 34 (24% vs 55%, P = 0.05), 50 µmol/L (11.8% vs 45%; P = 0.028), and did not require Omegaven (0% vs 30%; P = 0.014). CB level at 3 months after initiation of parenteral nutrition (PN) was lower in patients receiving SMOFlipid (0 vs 36 µmol/L; P = 0.01). Weight z-scores were improved for patients receiving SMOFlipid at 3 months (-0.932 vs -2.092; P = 0.028) and 6 months (-0.633 vs -1.614; P = 0.018). There were no differences in PN-supported patients or demographics between the groups. CONCLUSION: Use of SMOFlipid resulted in decreased development of IF-associated liver disease in patients with IF when assessed using biochemical tests.

Persistence of hepatic fibrosis in pediatric intestinal failure patients treated with intravenous fish oil lipid emulsion.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric intestinal failure (PIF) is a life-altering chronic condition with significant morbidity and mortality. Omegaven® therapy has been used to treat children with advanced intestinal failure associated liver disease. Our objective was to determine the evolution of hepatic fibrosis in PIF patients who received Omegaven® and describe their clinical outcome. METHODS: A retrospective review in PIF patients who received Omegaven® was performed. Patients were included if they had liver biopsies completed before Omegaven® therapy and after resolution of hyperbilirubinemia. Biopsy results were evaluated to determine the degree of fibrosis, inflammation, and cholestasis. Clinical and biochemical data was collected. RESULTS: Six patients were identified. Assessment of fibrosis at last follow-up demonstrated improvement in 2 patients and progression or stable fibrosis in 4/6. All patients demonstrated reduction in cholestasis and inflammation. One patient received a liver/intestine transplant and a second is listed, both of them with progressive fibrosis. One patient achieved full enteral nutrition, while the rest remain partially parenteral nutrition dependent. CONCLUSION: Use of Omegaven® is associated with reduced cholestasis and inflammation, but with persistence or worsening of fibrosis in some patients. A subset of patients with progressive fibrosis may develop portal hypertension and progressive liver disease.