Risk factors for low bone mass in patients with ulcerative colitis following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

OBJECTIVES: Bone mineral density (BMD) can be adversely affected by the chronic nature of inflammatory bowel disease. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the surgical treatment of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who require proctocolectomy. There are few data on BMD in UC patients with IPAA. The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence and risk factors associated with low BMD in UC patients after IPAA. METHODS: A total of 327 eligible patients with UC and IPAA from the Pouchitis Clinic were enrolled. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was performed. Patients were classified as having normal or low BMD, based on the criteria by the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. A total of 39 demographic and clinical variables were evaluated with logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of 327 patients with a median of 4 years after IPAA, 105 (32.1%) had low BMD. Fragility fracture was documented in 11 patients (10.5%) in the low BMD group and in 13 of 222 patients (5.9%) in the normal BMD group (P=0.14). In the multivariable analysis, covariate-adjusted factors associated with a low BMD were advanced age (odds ratio (OR) =1.64 per 5 years; 95% CI, 1.44-1.87), low body mass index (OR=0.43 per 5 kg/m(2); 95% CI, 0.30-0.62), and non-use of daily calcium supplement (OR=0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.96). Pouch-associated factors were not found to be significantly associated with the bone loss. CONCLUSIONS: Low BMD was common in patients with UC, even after colectomy and IPAA. Low BMD in this patient population was associated with certain risk factors, some of which may be modifiable.

Combined ciprofloxacin and tinidazole therapy in the treatment of chronic refractory pouchitis.

PURPOSE: Management of chronic refractory pouchitis, a common cause for pouch failure with pouch resection or diversion, is often challenging. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a combination therapy of ciprofloxacin and tinidazole in patients with chronic refractory pouchitis compared with mesalamine therapy. METHODS: Sixteen consecutive ulcerative colitis patients with chronic refractory pouchitis (disease>4 weeks and failure to respond to>4 weeks of single-antibiotic therapy) were treated with a four-week course of ciprofloxacin 1 g/day and tinidazole 15 mg/kg/day. A historic cohort of ten consecutive patients with chronic refractory pouchitis treated with oral (4 g/day), enema (8 g/day), or suppository (1 g/day) mesalamine served as controls. The Pouchitis Disease Activity Index, clinical remission, clinical response, the Cleveland Global Quality of Life, the Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Quality of Life, and the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaires scores were calculated before and after therapy and compared between the two treatment groups. RESULTS: Patients taking ciprofloxacin and tinidazole had a significant reduction in the total Pouchitis Disease Activity Index scores and subscores and a significant improvement in quality-of-life scores (P < 0.002). For patients in the mesalamine group, there was a significant reduction in the total Pouchitis Disease Activity Index scores only. Patients in the antibiotic group had a greater reduction in the total Pouchitis Disease Activity Index scores and a greater improvement in the quality-of-life scores than those in the mesalamine group (P